CVE-2026-44128 (GCVE-0-2026-44128)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-08 13:13 – Updated: 2026-05-18 16:13
VLAI?
Title
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution
Summary
SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.2.1 allows unauthenticated remote code execution in the new GINA UI because an endpoint passes attacker-controlled input from a parameter to Perl's eval.
Severity ?
9.3 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CWE
  • CWE-95 - Improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code ('eval injection')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
SEPPmail AG Secure Email Gateway Affected: 0 , < 15.0.2.1 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Dario Weiss of InfoGuard Labs
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44128",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-08T14:18:10.630743Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T21:27:48.160Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Secure Email Gateway",
          "vendor": "SEPPmail AG",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "15.0.2.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Dario Weiss of InfoGuard Labs"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.2.1 allows unauthenticated remote code execution in the new GINA UI because an\u0026nbsp;endpoint passes attacker-controlled input from a\u0026nbsp;parameter to Perl\u0027s\u0026nbsp;\u003ccode\u003eeval\u003c/code\u003e."
            }
          ],
          "value": "SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.2.1 allows unauthenticated remote code execution in the new GINA UI because an\u00a0endpoint passes attacker-controlled input from a\u00a0parameter to Perl\u0027s\u00a0eval."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-242",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 9.3,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-95",
              "description": "CWE-95 Improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code (\u0027eval injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-18T16:13:51.596Z",
        "orgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
        "shortName": "NCSC.ch"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://downloads.seppmail.com/extrelnotes/150/ERN15.0.html#security"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://labs.infoguard.ch/posts/seppmail_secure_e-mail_gateway_rce_vulnerabilities_cve-2026-2743_cve-2026-7864_cve-2026-44127_cve-2026-44128/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "455daabc-a392-441d-aa46-37d35189897c",
    "assignerShortName": "NCSC.ch",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-44128",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-08T13:13:46.034Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-05T12:56:43.132Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-18T16:13:51.596Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.