GHSA-HM6C-RC5H-32M9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-03 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-03 09:31
VLAI?
Details

A flaw in curl’s cookie parsing logic allows a malicious HTTP server to set 'super cookies' that bypass the Public Suffix List check. This enables an attacker-controlled origin to inject cookies that curl subsequently scopes and transmits to unrelated third-party domains.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-8924"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-03T07:16:24Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "A flaw in curl\u2019s cookie parsing logic allows a malicious HTTP server to set\n\u0027super cookies\u0027 that bypass the Public Suffix List check. This enables an\nattacker-controlled origin to inject cookies that curl subsequently scopes and\ntransmits to unrelated third-party domains.",
  "id": "GHSA-hm6c-rc5h-32m9",
  "modified": "2026-07-03T09:31:26Z",
  "published": "2026-07-03T09:31:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-8924"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3733905"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-8924.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-8924.json"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…