GHSA-MM7C-RHG6-QR4R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 23:41 – Updated: 2026-06-16 23:41
VLAI?
Summary
Gitea: Authorization Bypass via "Allow edits from maintainers" allows unauthorized commits to any readable repo
Details
Summary
Any authenticated low-privilege user with read access to a repository can push arbitrary commits directly to that repository, bypassing all write-access checks.
Vulnerability
Gitea's "Allow edits from maintainers" PR option can be abused via reverse-fork PRs:
- The web UI PR-create endpoint binds
allow_maintainer_edit=truewithout verifying that the submitter has write access to the HEAD repository. - Gitea allows creating a PR where BASE = attacker's fork and HEAD = upstream target. The attacker is "maintainer" of the BASE (their own fork), so the flag is set against the upstream HEAD.
- On
git pushover HTTP/SSH, Gitea relaxes the required access mode toReadwhenSupportProcReceiveis enabled (routers/web/repo/githttp.go,routers/private/serv.go) and defers enforcement to the pre-receive hook. - The pre-receive hook calls
CanMaintainerWriteToBranch(models/issues/pull_list.go), which finds the malicious PR, seesAllowMaintainerEdit=true, and checks whether the pusher has write access to the BASE repo. Since BASE is the attacker's own fork, the check passes and the push is authorized against the upstream.
Exploitation
- Attacker forks the target repository.
- Attacker visits the web compare endpoint and creates a PR with
BASE = their_fork,HEAD = upstream, and "Allow edits from maintainers" checked. - Attacker clones their fork, makes a commit, and runs
git push <upstream_url> <branch>— the push is accepted.
Reproduction
python3 poc.py --repo http://gitea:3000/victim/repo --user attacker --password attacker_pass
Expected output:
[+] target: victim/my_repo default branch: main
[*] forking -> attacker/my_repo_pocfork (202)
[+] fork ready
[+] malicious PR created (BASE=attacker fork, HEAD=upstream)
remote: . Processing 1 references
remote: Processed 1 references in total
To http://192.168.101.20:3000/victim/my_repo.git
e5c07b3..9a0b884 main -> main
[+] latest commit on victim/my_repo@main: 'PoC: unauthorized commit via maintainer-edit bypass'
[+] CONFIRMED: unauthorized push to upstream succeeded.
A PWNED.txt file will appear on the target repo's default branch, committed by the attacker who has no write access.
Impact
Full repository compromise. Any logged-in user can backdoor any repository they can read, including all public repositories on the instance.
Suggested Fix
Two independent checks are missing; both should be added for defense in depth:
- At PR creation: before setting
AllowMaintainerEdit = true, verify the submitter has write access to the HEAD repository. - In
CanMaintainerWriteToBranch: verify that the PR's HEAD repo matches the repository being pushed to, and that the PR was opened by a legitimate owner/writer of the HEAD repository. Do not trustAllowMaintainerEditsolely based on BASE write access.
Severity ?
8.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.26.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "code.gitea.io/gitea"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.26.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-26231"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-16T23:41:01Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nAny authenticated low-privilege user with read access to a repository can push arbitrary commits directly to that repository, bypassing all write-access checks.\n\n## Vulnerability\n\nGitea\u0027s \"Allow edits from maintainers\" PR option can be abused via reverse-fork PRs:\n\n1. The web UI PR-create endpoint binds `allow_maintainer_edit=true` **without** verifying that the submitter has write access to the HEAD repository.\n2. Gitea allows creating a PR where **BASE = attacker\u0027s fork** and **HEAD = upstream target**. The attacker is \"maintainer\" of the BASE (their own fork), so the flag is set against the upstream HEAD.\n3. On `git push` over HTTP/SSH, Gitea relaxes the required access mode to `Read` when `SupportProcReceive` is enabled ([`routers/web/repo/githttp.go`](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/v1.25.5/routers/web/repo/githttp.go#L189), [`routers/private/serv.go`](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/v1.25.5/routers/private/serv.go#L337)) and defers enforcement to the pre-receive hook.\n4. The pre-receive hook calls [`CanMaintainerWriteToBranch`](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/v1.25.5/models/issues/pull_list.go#L72) (`models/issues/pull_list.go`), which finds the malicious PR, sees `AllowMaintainerEdit=true`, and checks whether the pusher has write access to the **BASE** repo. Since BASE is the attacker\u0027s own fork, the check passes and the push is authorized against the upstream.\n\n## Exploitation\n\n1. Attacker forks the target repository.\n2. Attacker visits the web compare endpoint and creates a PR with `BASE = their_fork`, `HEAD = upstream`, and \"Allow edits from maintainers\" checked.\n3. Attacker clones their fork, makes a commit, and runs `git push \u003cupstream_url\u003e \u003cbranch\u003e` \u2014 the push is accepted.\n\n## Reproduction\n\n```bash\npython3 poc.py --repo http://gitea:3000/victim/repo --user attacker --password attacker_pass\n```\n[poc.py](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/26641541/poc.py)\n\nExpected output:\n```\n[+] target: victim/my_repo default branch: main\n[*] forking -\u003e attacker/my_repo_pocfork (202)\n[+] fork ready\n[+] malicious PR created (BASE=attacker fork, HEAD=upstream)\n\nremote: . Processing 1 references\nremote: Processed 1 references in total\nTo http://192.168.101.20:3000/victim/my_repo.git\n e5c07b3..9a0b884 main -\u003e main\n\n[+] latest commit on victim/my_repo@main: \u0027PoC: unauthorized commit via maintainer-edit bypass\u0027\n[+] CONFIRMED: unauthorized push to upstream succeeded.\n```\n\nA `PWNED.txt` file will appear on the target repo\u0027s default branch, committed by the attacker who has no write access.\n\n\n## Impact\n\nFull repository compromise. Any logged-in user can backdoor any repository they can read, including all public repositories on the instance.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nTwo independent checks are missing; both should be added for defense in depth:\n\n1. **At PR creation:** before setting `AllowMaintainerEdit = true`, verify the submitter has write access to the **HEAD** repository.\n2. **In `CanMaintainerWriteToBranch`:** verify that the PR\u0027s HEAD repo matches the repository being pushed to, and that the PR was opened by a legitimate owner/writer of the HEAD repository. Do not trust `AllowMaintainerEdit` solely based on BASE write access.",
"id": "GHSA-mm7c-rhg6-qr4r",
"modified": "2026-06-16T23:41:01Z",
"published": "2026-06-16T23:41:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-mm7c-rhg6-qr4r"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Gitea: Authorization Bypass via \"Allow edits from maintainers\" allows unauthorized commits to any readable repo"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…