PYSEC-2026-562

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-06-29 11:50 - Updated: 2026-07-01 20:23
VLAI?
Details

In the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna, the vanna.ask function is vulnerable to remote code execution due to prompt injection. The root cause is the lack of a sandbox when executing LLM-generated code, allowing an attacker to manipulate the code executed by the exec function in src/vanna/base/base.py. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker to achieve remote code execution on the app backend server, potentially gaining full control of the server.

Impacted products
Name purl
vanna pkg:pypi/vanna

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "vanna",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/vanna"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "0.6.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.0.1",
        "0.0.10",
        "0.0.11",
        "0.0.12",
        "0.0.13",
        "0.0.14",
        "0.0.15",
        "0.0.16",
        "0.0.17",
        "0.0.18",
        "0.0.19",
        "0.0.2",
        "0.0.20",
        "0.0.21",
        "0.0.22",
        "0.0.23",
        "0.0.24",
        "0.0.25",
        "0.0.26",
        "0.0.27",
        "0.0.28",
        "0.0.29",
        "0.0.3",
        "0.0.30",
        "0.0.31",
        "0.0.32",
        "0.0.33",
        "0.0.34",
        "0.0.35",
        "0.0.36",
        "0.0.37",
        "0.0.38",
        "0.0.4",
        "0.0.5",
        "0.0.6",
        "0.0.7",
        "0.0.8",
        "0.0.9",
        "0.1.0",
        "0.1.1",
        "0.2.0",
        "0.2.1",
        "0.3.0",
        "0.3.1",
        "0.3.2",
        "0.3.3",
        "0.3.4",
        "0.4.0",
        "0.4.1",
        "0.4.2",
        "0.4.3",
        "0.5.0",
        "0.5.1",
        "0.5.2",
        "0.5.3",
        "0.5.4",
        "0.5.5",
        "0.6.0",
        "0.6.1",
        "0.6.2"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-5826",
    "GHSA-rrqq-fv6m-692m"
  ],
  "details": "In the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna, the `vanna.ask` function is vulnerable to remote code execution due to prompt injection. The root cause is the lack of a sandbox when executing LLM-generated code, allowing an attacker to manipulate the code executed by the `exec` function in `src/vanna/base/base.py`. This vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker to achieve remote code execution on the app backend server, potentially gaining full control of the server.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-562",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T20:23:10.996611Z",
  "published": "2026-06-29T11:50:42.052160Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5826"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/vanna-ai/vanna"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/90620087-44ac-4e43-b659-3c5d30889369"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/vanna"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rrqq-fv6m-692m"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "vanna vulnerable to remote code execution caused by prompt injection"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…