rustsec-2026-0131
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-05-02 12:00
Modified
2026-05-13 12:38
Summary
Double-free in `Chomp::inner()`
Details
Chomp::inner() uses std::ptr::read_unaligned to move out the value from a
raw pointer. If the original value is an owned type (e.g. Box), calling
inner() moves out the ownership, but the original variable will still be
dropped at the end of its scope. This causes the same heap memory to be freed
twice, resulting in a double-free and undefined behavior.
This can be triggered through safe public APIs — Chomp::new() and
Chomp::inner() — with no unsafe required from the caller.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"categories": [
"memory-corruption"
],
"cvss": null,
"informational": "unsound"
},
"ecosystem_specific": {
"affected_functions": null,
"affects": {
"arch": [],
"functions": [],
"os": []
}
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "bitchomp",
"purl": "pkg:cargo/bitchomp"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.0-0"
}
],
"type": "SEMVER"
}
],
"versions": []
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"license": "CC0-1.0"
},
"details": "`Chomp::inner()` uses `std::ptr::read_unaligned` to move out the value from a\nraw pointer. If the original value is an owned type (e.g. `Box`), calling\n`inner()` moves out the ownership, but the original variable will still be\ndropped at the end of its scope. This causes the same heap memory to be freed\ntwice, resulting in a double-free and undefined behavior.\n\nThis can be triggered through safe public APIs \u2014 `Chomp::new()` and\n`Chomp::inner()` \u2014 with no `unsafe` required from the caller.",
"id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0131",
"modified": "2026-05-13T12:38:12Z",
"published": "2026-05-02T12:00:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://crates.io/crates/bitchomp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0131.html"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://github.com/KingPEPSALT/bitchomp/issues/5"
}
],
"related": [],
"severity": [],
"summary": "Double-free in `Chomp::inner()`"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…